CougCenter: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: Dolphins vs Patriots: The Biggest Game in Years for Miami Bar-right-arrows



Well, that was fun ...

First of all, let me start out by saying this: The final score did not surprise me one bit. I pretty much expected the Cougs to get drubbed. The manner in which it happened, however? Totally didn't see that coming.

I know I'll be diving deeper into some of these issues this week (and I imagine Grady will, too), but I wanted to get my initial thoughts down for discussion. It's important to keep in mind these are just my observations from the third level of Qwest Field, since I neglected to set the DVR before leaving yesterday, so some of this might be more perception than anything else.

So, with that, here we go with a look at each unit:

Star-divide

OFFENSE

Truly mixed results here. The offense looked about as bad as an offense can look for the first half, looked excellent in the third quarter, and so-so in the fourth quarter.

I was struck by how vanilla the playcalling was -- for this being a multiple-look/spread attack, it sure looked like most any other offense in the country, save for the no-huddle approach. Lots of snaps from under center, lots of straight hand-offs, very little read and react. I suppose that will open up as the season goes along, but I was surprised at the lack of creativity in terms of getting the ball to playmakers in space.

The patchwork offensive line looked great at times in the running game, terrible at other times in the passing game. The line seemed most effective on running plays that involved lots of pulling and movement -- not a huge shock considering none of Saturday's starters exceed 300 pounds. But that also is a detriment on passing downs, where the line often got shoved into the backfield. Perhaps more shotgun is the answer here?

The receivers were an unmitigated disappointment in my book. I wrote last week how I thought the guys not named Gibson would be the key to the offense's success. Well, the receivers had eight total catches, and six of them were by Brandon Gibson (who was not exempt from my ire with those early drops). Jared Karstetter only had the ball thrown his way a couple of times, with a drop and no catches. Those two catches -- one by Blackledge and one by Willis -- went for just eight yards. EIGHT. If Gibson is the only guy who can get open, we are in for a lot of problems until Jeshua Anderson comes back.

One thing I definitely want to explore this week was the effectiveness of Tardy and Ivory. Both looked excellent. And Gary Rogers? I thought he looked insanely nervous. People are going to be pleasantly surprised by his play against Cal next week, I think, given the way he settled in during the second half.

DEFENSE

This was easily the highlight of the day for me. Before the game, I was telling anyone who would listen that the over/under on rushing yards for Oklahoma State was about 275. Considering the lopsided time of possession and consistent terrible field position the defense was put in, I'd say this unit deserves a heck of a lot of credit for keeping the score as close as it was.

The defensive line more or less held its own, which was something I did not expect to happen. That allowed the linebackers, the strength of this defense, to fly around and make plays. The ends were very good as well, as Matt Mullenix played big and Kevin Kooyman flashed some of the speed we all will be looking for this year by picking up a tackle for loss and two QB hurries.

The secondary has taken a bit of a beating for the plays it gave up to Dez Bryant, but I think they're getting a little bit of a bad rap. I mean, how are they supposed to compete with a guy taller and more athletic than them? Bryant might be the most gifted receiver they face all year. Let's look at what else they did. They gave up just 193 yards total passing, just 103 to receivers other than Bryant. Yes, this unit might struggle a bit against the really athletic receivers, but there's potential here, too.

And while we're at it, can I say that Chima Nwachukwu is becoming one of my favorite players? That guy is just sound -- he's always in the right place at the right time, and he'll be an all-Pac-10 player and play in the NFL if for no other reason than that.

SPECIAL TEAMS

Now, for the lowlight.

That was quite possibly the worst display of special teams I’ve seen out of any team, at any level. Special teams are all about discipline, intensity and execution, and for a team coached by a coach that has been preaching those three things incessantly since he was hired to fail so spectacularly in that regard is shocking to me.

Terrible punts, short and non-directional? Check. Missed PAT? Check. Average to below-average returns? Check. Short kickoffs? Check. Inability to stay in lanes on a kickoff? Check. We failed in every facet of special teams to some degree yesterday.

It's hard to even pinpoint what can be done to fix it. The punter problems are lack of talent, and the kicking game just might be. I suppose we could do a better job of maintaining lane assignments and not let a kick returner run behind an unimpeded wedge -- I seriously have never, ever seen that happen before, where not even one guy runs into the wedge -- but these are guys who have been forced into action that probably don't belong on a field right now.

This could be something that's a major-league struggle for us all year.

0 recs | Comment 4 comments

Read Related

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

errr....

yes, quite a stumbling opening. I mostly agree with your observations, especially the horrible special teams display. I watched it on tv, and my friends and I actually wished that we would just kick it out of bounds every time, kickoffs and punts. Seriously.

Rogers definitely looked nervous, but man a couple of those early drops were critical. Gibson’s first one (about a 20 yard gain had he held on) was clearly pass interference on the replay, the CB tangled arms well before the ball got there. If the receivers had held on a little better, Rogers might have gotten into a better rhythm. With the running game clicking, the threat of deep passes would have opened up the box a bit.

To me, the most aggravating thing was the play-calling in the first half. Hmmm, third and long, let’s just run a draw up the middle. At least TRY a couple times, especially after it looked like the game was getting away from us. And it’s not like Rogers doesn’t have a good arm, at least chuck it up the field a few times. OK State supposedly had a porous secondary, and we hardly even tested them. As we painfully learned from the Seahawks a few years ago, if the receivers keep dropping the ball, the best way to fix it is to keep throwing it to them, keep their confidence up. Overall, 1st half strategy was awful.

The defense was exceptional, at least until they started throwing to Bryant every time. That’s when you have to double team and risk giving up big runs, or you deal with the passes. I guess we decided not to double, and it sure made things easy on the Cowboys. However, despite the final score, I will maintain that had the special teams and offense at least given us a decent field position battle, our D would have kept things close until the 4th quarter. It’s not too hard to score touchdowns when you start every drive inside opposition territory.

Overall, I dunno, I guess I’m pleased with some things. I think we’ll surprise a couple Pac 10 teams at home, but if our offense doesn’t open up over the course of the season, we have no chance of a bowl game and a good chance of last in the PX.

by johnnycougar on Aug 31, 2008 7:02 PM PDT   0 recs

I guess that's why I'm encouraged

Our defense was not overwhelmed, and that’s the thing that would have been the most indicative of a really long season. Don’t kid yourself — that was a very game effort against an exceptionally experienced offensive line. That makes me feel really good.

I expect that our offense will catch up eventually, and when it does, we should be able to expect better things. Look for how big of a jump our offense makes this week. Week one and week two are important.

by Nuss on Aug 31, 2008 7:53 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Yeah, and our opponent next week looks to be a good matchup for us, relatively speaking. Judging from Cal’s game the other day, they have the usual offensive flair but their D is suspect, so our surprising D will be in for a challenge but perhaps our O can get the ball moving a bit. I’m hoping that home field advantage more or less cancels out a sure-to-be-awful special teams performance on Saturday, and maybe we’ll have a chance for the upset.

Also, how great was it to see two end-arounds with Gibson!?!? The run was a great call, and the pass play was a good call but a poor throw. Reminiscent of Mike Price play-calling…

Also, I feel WAY better now that I have read up on post-game stuff from the UW-Oregon game. At least our future is bright… What a whooping down in Eugene. Not that we’ll fare much better against Oregon, but I now think we’ ve got a good chance to win the Apple Cup!

by johnnycougar on Aug 31, 2008 9:14 PM PDT   0 recs

It was all mental

I don’t disagree with the glimer of hope that you see Nuss, but the thing that gets me is the fact that all the problems in that game the other day were mental. This team was not ready to play football. This is how it works with new coaches; either they come in and get the players excited about the new system, or they utterly confuse them and strip them of their hope and passion.

I see this especially in the play of Gary Rogers and Brandon Gibson. Rogers sat behind a guy like Alex Brink for all those years and never had the chance to develope the overwelming talent that he possessed coming in as a recruit. This is a tough break for a guy like him whose spent four years learning one system and preparing for his day in the sun, only to be given a new language to learn and execute in a few months. Bummer. And as for Gibson, I bet he wishes he was landing on an NFL practice squad right about now.

It’s sad, because there is a bit of talent on this team. But the talent of the upperclassmen will become sacrificial to the new leadership, and eventually replaced with the kind of recruits Wulff wants.

This is a rebuild in full throttle, and step one looked really ugly.

by Jo-Jo on Sep 1, 2008 10:18 AM PDT   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to CougCenter, a blog dedicated to Washington State University athletics

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Wsuspaceneedleflag_small
Player Grades vs. Farleigh Dickinson
Pumpkin_small
Nike subliminally promotes the Ducks
Broberg_small
What a Joke
Arizona_small
A Sad day for Sports Blogs
Small
Great news if/when we make the tourney
Pumpkin_small
A friendly reminder for the AD
Small
08-09 BEST CASE/WORST CASE for WSU
Loper_sports_small
College Basketball Prospectus Anyone? (And a Video!)
Phattnuss-128_small
Wanna see the top QB in 2010 live?
4101355231-aic_road_trip_-_photo_1_small
[Now with Summary]: carp's Pac-12 proposal

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini

Go Cougs


Mr. Managers

Phattnuss-128_small Nuss

Pumpkin_small Grady.

ad

Site Meter