Baynes doesn't have to do much to be a better rebounder
It's pretty lean these days in terms of Cougar basketball news, but I ran across this interesting nugget buried in a Cougfan.com story that was picked up by CougHoops.com:
Aron Baynes said his No. 1 personal goal this year is to be a better rebounder.
"I’ve never been happy with what I’ve done on the boards. I know I can do more," he told CF.C this summer while in Seattle helping out at June Daugherty’s Hope Heart Institute basketball camps. "That’s something I’m really focusing on."
I find this noteworthy for one reason alone -- Baynes already is an excellent rebounder.
Now, those that look at raw stats might disagree with me. After all, six rebounds a game (his average last year) just doesn't look all that impressive and might cause someone to argue that there is definitely room for improvement. "I mean, for goodness sake, Tyler Hansbrough averaged 10.2 rebounds -- now there's a great rebounder!"
But if you followed me over here from WSU HOOPS, you know I hate raw stats, because they never tell the whole story.
The truth is, in terms of rebounding ability, Baynes was one of the best rebounders in the Pac-10 last season. According to Kenpom.com, he cleaned up 22.5 percent of the Cougs' defensive rebound opportunities (No. 6 in the conference) and 10.8 percent of the Cougs' offensive rebound opportunities (No. 9 in the conference). That first figure was better than Jordan Hill, Brook Lopez, Jeff Pendergraph and Taj Gibson. (Oh, and just for good measure, please note that Baynes' defensive rebounding prowess exceeded Hansbrough's last year -- 19.8 percent.)
So, if he's so good, why only six rebounds a game?
The first answer is that the Cougs' slow-down style only translates to just 55-60 possessions a game. Fewer possessions means fewer shots, which means fewer opportunities for rebounds. If Baynes played for North Carolina and played the same 60 percent of his team's minutes but with 75 possessions per game, we can reasonably conclude that he'd have posted 7.5-8 rebounds a game last year.
The rub, however, is in that "60 percent" figure. We all know Baynes has had a lot of issues with fouls. While that 60 percent represents a significant improvement over the previous two years, it's nowhere near as high as it should be -- or needs to be this year.
If Baynes truly wants to improve his rebounding numbers, he only has to do one thing, and one thing only:
STAY ON THE FLOOR.
People can talk all they want about Baynes' new and improved body -- which is reportedly "260 rock-solid pounds" -- but the truth is the only way that's really going to help him be a better rebounder is if he's just a little more agile minus those 10 pounds and avoids one silly foul a game because of it. Don't kid yourself into thinking that Baynes has to do a lot different with technique or anything like that to improve as a rebounder this year. He's already exceptional at using his wide body to box out opponenets; if he simply ups that minute percentage figure to 75 percent or so, that will do wonders -- and put him right around seven rebounds a game if he just grabs boards at the same rate he did last year.
That said, I'm glad this is on Baynes' mind, as I'm all for him trying harder to be a better rebounder. With just Caleb Forrest and Daven Harmeling playing next to him -- don't even bring up Casto or Boeke or Lodwick, because we have absolutely no idea what they're going to bring -- this team is desperately going to need him to rebound like a madman. A good goal showing reasonable improvement would probably be 25 percent on defensive rebounding opportunities and 12 percent on offensive opportunities.
(Put it into plain English, Nusser!)
OK, here you go: Assuming the Cougs have roughly the same amount of rebounding chances as last year, if he can produce those rate numbers mentioned above -- 25 DR%, 12 percent OR% and 75 percent of minutes played -- he should grab roughly 8 rebounds a game, 2.5 of the offensive variety. It might not seem like much, but those two extra rebounds a game this year would represent a HUGE improvement. If he can exceed 8? Well, then we can start talking about Baynes as one of the great rebounders in program history.
I just hope he doesn't try too hard to get those rebounds and finds himself right back on the bench.
7 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Awesome
Just the thought of Cougar basketball puts a smile on my face and makes me forget for just one second how awful our football team is. But seriously, I’ve always thought that 6 rebounds a game was way underachieving for Baynes. The different stats definitely paint a whole new picture, so thanks for the insight. Is anyone else really pumped for Cougar basketball or is it just me (plus Nuss and Grady of course)? I almost don’t care if we aren’t that great this year as long as we see the freshmen grow over the course of the season and begin to play with each other well (that’s what she said).
My expectations are high
I still expect this to be a good team. How good hinges on two things: Can Rochestie and Baynes improve enough as offensive forces for them to offset the freshman learning curve and make it through that brutal nonconference schedule without taking too many lumps?
I have a hunch that Taylor is going to surprise a lot of people with his offense this year, now that he won’t have to constantly figure out ways to get the ball into Low and Weaver’s hands.
You’ve covered this pretty well back in the day at WSU Hoops – Baynes is simply our best rebounder. However, even if he improves this year I think Casto and Boeke will grab a few boards themselves. I don’t think we’ll have the problems we did last year on the boards, as even if Aron gets into foul trouble we’ll have bigger backup. Asking Robbie to play Center was too much, though he did play his heart out every game of course! This year we should be bigger at every position (Rochestie even looks like he put on some extra muscle).
Now, whether all of that size translates into anything other than extra rebounds, I don’t know. There will definitely be a learning curve but I feel with Bennett’s system we should be okay on defense, which will always keep us in the game even when we struggle on O. As Taylor stepping up, I can’t recall us running plays for anyone other than Low (and Robbie’s alley-oop play), and he showed us even just within the motion offense how dynamic he can be. I think he will truly be the leader of this team and I am excited to watch him (hopefully!) take over games. Baynes should also have a little more elbow room this year with quite a few big men leaving for the draft. I’m so pumped!
by johnnycougar on Sep 18, 2008 5:48 PM PDT up reply actions
ESPN
I found this article on ESPN and wanted to share it with you guys. Enjoy!
Washington State coach Tony Bennett heaped praise on his highly-touted freshman Klay Thompson after the first week of workouts. The son of former NBA forward Mychal Thompson, the 6-7 Thompson is expected to have a major impact on the Cougars. “He’s a complete player, well-schooled and really gifted,” Bennett said. “He has length and athleticism. He’s also hungry defensively.”
Bennett will drill into Thompson the importance of defense early and often in advance of practice officially starting on Oct. 17. But already Bennett sees how much more athletic his freshmen class is with Thompson, James Watson, DeAngelo Casto, Marcus Capers, Nick Witherill and Mike Harthun. The Cougars are trying to replace Derrick Low, Kyle Weaver, Robbie Cowgill and Daven Hamerling. The return of guard Taylor Rochestie and center Aron Baynes and reserve Daven Harmeling gives the Cougars three experienced part-time starters to go along with the infusion of newcomers.
“Three of those freshmen are going to have to contribute,” Bennett said. “I can’t wait to watch them five-on-five. But we’ll have to grind it up defensively.”
Great find
Although of the three seniors he mentions only Harmeling will be a “part-time” starter.
It’s looking more and more like we’ll have Klay Thompson in the starting lineup from day one… exciting stuff.
Beyond him being a starter from day one
is that it sounds like he’s going to be able to be a contributing starter from day one. That’s a huge difference, and it’s awesome. The fact that Tony’s giving praise tells you all you need to know — this isn’t a guy who’s typically given to hyperbole. If anything, we can assume he might even be a little bit better than Tony is saying …
Agreed
As long as he is starting because he has earned it, rather than nobody from last year stepped up, we’re in store for good things from him. Supposedly he has the tools to be as good as Weaver!!! Hopefully we will see the maturity and passion as well.
by johnnycougar on Sep 18, 2008 5:41 PM PDT up reply actions

by 
















