What Went Right Part I: A change of offensive strategy in the second half
Much has already been commented on what we all witnessed the other night. I think it is safe to say that everyone noticed that something was different. I decided to do an extensive breakdown of the film from the other night's game to try to put into words exactly what it was that we saw. While all of us have obviously noticed the change in personnel, I am going to try to stay away from that as much as possible and just talk X's and O's (I will have an individual player grades and commentary on both the frontcourt and backcourt coming later), but the personnel issues do play a part.
To start with, I think it safe to say that the Cougar offense has been absolute garbage for quite a few weeks running. Comments have flooded CougCenter about the effectiveness of Taylor Rochestie, lack of a perimeter shooter, lack of free throw attempts (which is a direct result of the lack of ability to penetrate), and of course which combinations of players give this team the best opportunity to be successful on the offensive side of the ball. It has been my (unpopular) opinion that coach Bennett has put way too much of a straight jacket on this group of players to this point in the season, and that while the offense has been increasingly unproductive, Bennett has refused to waiver from his discipline. Until halftime Saturday night.
Watching this team all season, you can see that these guys have all of the talent and ability to have an effective offense. But they continually look hesitant, unsure, lacking confidence and down right afraid to take the shot. At first it was hard to notice, and I remembered watching Dick coach this team when Harmeling was a freshman. I remember thinking that this year's team was similar in their look of confusion. But it really came home to me when Grady posted this video (go ahead and watch it, you'll see what I mean). We all look at that and think "damn, I miss Low and Weaver." But there is more there than that. That is a team that took advantage of opportunities when they had the chance.
Perhaps that is what Rochestie has been doing with his untimely pull-up jumpers with 20 seconds on the shot clock. But you can see it in this current group; they never push the ball when they get the chance. Now I know that we have all come to love the slow, half-court efficiency of Bennett ball over the years, but part of being efficient is taking the easy, high-percentage shots that are there for the taking. And fast break opportunities are some of the highest percentage shots you can get. And the Klay Thompson dunk served as proof positive of that. But was Klay acting alone? Who does this kid think he is? Nobody has pushed the ball like that all year. Surely coach Bennett wouldn't approve!
Well, before that destiny-changing dunk occurred, I found something on the film that showed me coach Bennett had finally taken the leash of these kids. No, it wasn't the sweet post move that DeAngelo Casto had to get them going, it actually occurred at the start of the Cougars second possession of the half. It started with a beautiful help side block by Casto, Thompson retrieving the ball in the corner and charging hard up the floor. The Cougars were running? The possession eventually ended with Rochestie missing a layup, but what I saw was very subtle. I missed it when I was watching the game live, but noticed on the replay. Casto blocks the shot, and starts to pursue the loose ball. Thompson picks up the ball and as he starts to move up court Casto weaves in front of him and motions with his hand, as if to say "LET'S GO! LET'S PUSH IT!" It was evident that this was by design in the fact that all of the Cougs were screaming down the court (even the Baynes Train was sprinting). And it wasn't the only time we saw it either, it happened several times through the course of the second half.
The good Lord knows that I would have loved to be in that locker room at halftime, but since I wasn't I can only speculate. Thus, having to guess by the evidence seen in the second half I believe that Tony finally came to the conclusion that enough was enough, and that this team isn't going to win without scoring some points and it's just not coming in the half court. Now that's not to say that they are going to be running up and down the floor like Louisville, but that video from years past shows that the Cougar teams that have made the Tournament haven't been afraid to push the ball when the opportunity presents itself. If nothing else, a new approach was entered into the fray Saturday night, and at the minimum it produced "The Dunk."
I know this team is young. And I know that it takes time and that the Bennetts, though they offer freshman minutes, don't often let freshman have much freedom. That was certainly the case under Dick. But for as great as that class was, four years ago, this year's freshman class is even better. You can see it in their facial expressions, they have been frustrated. I believe that, to this point, the Bennett handcuffs that were meant to serve as a teaching tool while the upperclassmen carried the team have served to terrorize the confidence of the freshman. And when it became obvious that we couldn't count on Harmeling, Koprivica, and to some extent Rochestie to carry the scoring punch for this team, the wheels came off the wagon.
Coach needs to let these kids play a bit. I think it makes the upperclassmen more effective and that is what a team is all about. This is Tony's first go as a head coach bringing in a huge class full of talent. And I think maybe he has held them back just a little bit. But I think that the second half against Stanford showed that there are at least two freshman on this team that have ability to play fulltime minutes, along with the freedom to make some plays happen.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of CougCenter's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of CougCenter's writers or editors.
Comments
Nice and X and O talk
I love it. However, I we ultimately have to go back to personnel. DC plays with a energy that is contagious. He loves being on the court and it shows. Also, go back and watch the screens for TR where he pops out rather than cutting through. Wide open set shots, which he is deadly with.
Also, I think DC changes the game offensively for us with how active he is. He is raw, but I like his ability to body in the lane and get up a shot. Got a # of fouls called.
by ptowncoug3012 on
Jan 12, 2009 7:39 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Buddy you are ahead of the curve.
I’ve got so much coming in the next few days. After the player grades we’ll talk personnel from an X’s and O’s stand point. It’ll be fun.
by Jo-Jo on
Jan 12, 2009 7:51 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Thanks for writing exactly what I was going to write
You saved me like two hours of writing last night. I actually had thought of those first Bennett teams, where the players just looked absolutely lost on offense — not because they didn’t know what they were doing, but because they were hesitant to make a decision. Of course, the motivation then was totally different; they knew if they made a bad decision they were going to find their butt firmly planted next to Dick with a chewing to follow. So, those guys became like our Washington state politicians — rather than make a bad decision, they would make no decision at all. And, as we also see from our politicians, that gets you nowhere.
by Nuss on
Jan 13, 2009 9:10 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
The thing is
DB was doing something right with the scare them s—less mentality. I remember just watching our team pass the ball around the outside until 5 secs remained on the shot clock. Yikes!
TB admitted that once he took the reigns he called more set plays, I think with the belief that he needed to encourage guys to shoot. However, I agree something happened this year. I don’t know if it hesitation from being scared or just not knowing ones role on the team. Fastbreak opportunities to allow players to play and not think, which is nice, but not ultimately the answer for us. I think we are still that 3 spot away and I keep hammering on that. The starting 3 should be taking 7-9 shots a game and that is simply not happening granted Nik was a bit more assertive this last game and got tagged for 2 charges and 3 missed 3 pointers.
by ptowncoug3012 on
Jan 13, 2009 9:52 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
I totally agree with you
But there hesitation has been seen all year in tha half-court as well. I believe that Tony told those young guys not to shoot unless there is nobody between you and the basket, and I believe that he felt he would get more of a contribution out of Daven and Nik, and a more effecient contribution out of Taylor. It just hasn’t happened and the young guys have been waiting around for the upperclassmen to make something happen and it just hasn’t developed. In the mean time the young guy have forgotten the more simple parts of the game. When it comes to offense I am a strategist and a tactician as much as anybody, but at the end of the day, you’ve got to put the ball in the basket. They’ve been so fucused on the process, that they can’t see the forrest through the trees.
by Jo-Jo on
Jan 13, 2009 10:51 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Amen
The bottom line is putting the ball in the basket. I did an interview with Dick about 5 years ago, and he said he’d love to have his teams run, but you’ve got to have the personnel to do it. He rarely did, and certainly didn’t at the time I talked to him. Hence, the motion offense designed to wear a defense into a breakdown. But if the defense has a breakdown earlier in the shot clock, and a good scoring opportunity presents itself, you’ve got to take it.
by Nuss on
Jan 13, 2009 11:04 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
And that is what they haven't been doing all year.
That is why my frustration with the offense has been so evident. Passing up quality shots for a contested shot with under 10 seconds on the clock is not efficient.
by Jo-Jo on
Jan 13, 2009 11:13 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
They need to relax
They have played pretty tight over the last month. It has seemed like they are trying to will shots in rather than just relaxing and shooting the shots they can make. I don’t think they are taking too many poor shots. They just need to settle down and step up and make them.
Have some fun. Hoops is a fun game and I think they finally seemed to settle down against Stanford. I hope it continues.
by BornCoug on
Jan 13, 2009 5:33 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Tony's growing as a Coach
Somewhat long time reader, first time Poster.
My thoughts over the past few weeks, besides wanting to see more of Casto and find someone to make an outside shot, was that Tony is really still a young coach. I think many WSU fans have forgotten this, between winning National COTY awards and having interest from major programs, as a fanbase we forgot that there are situations he has not truly faced as a head coach.
Tony inheritted a program from his Dad, and while it is entirely likely that Tony’s perspective took those teams to a new level, he was not the big three’s head coach from day one. This freshmen class, the Casto, Thompson, et. al. group, is a chance for Tony to learn as he goes. My hope has been that as TB goes through the next few years, he grows as a coach and truly develops his own style. I love the slowed down game, manage your possession Bennet ball and think it is the best way for WSU to be competetive. But getting over the hump to the next level will require even better players and better athletes then Derrick, Robbie and Kyle (maybe not Kyle, but definately Robbie). And those players, the Klays and Casto’s, will want to have at least a little freedom with their structure. We don’t ever want to be a run and gun, fire quick team, but you also can’t scare your new talent into not making decisions that fit their game style.
by 02Coug on
Jan 13, 2009 8:16 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
"but you also can’t scare your new talent into not making decisions that fit their game style"
Yes sir, and that is exactly what I believe has happened. But didn’t that second half give you a glimmer of hope? It did for me. (feeling giddy)
by Jo-Jo on
Jan 13, 2009 8:26 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Oh Yeah it did
Hope not only for this season…but hope that the program as a whole is being led by a truly capable coach. If Tony can adjust and recognize problems in his system, and times that he needs to make some adjustments, we really are in great hands.
by 02Coug on
Jan 13, 2009 8:35 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Amazing what one game can do
Remember all week when everyone was ripping Taylor and second guessing Tony Bennett? REDEMPTION. I’m glad we are all in love with Tony again, it was getting awkward around here.
by Dancing Football on
Jan 13, 2009 8:46 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Not to be a debbie downer
but I would add, amazing what a one point win can do. I understand that we played better in the 2nd half and actually showed a glimmer of hope, but personally I am going to watch these next two games pretty closely to see if this is for real. Maybe I have just been a Coug too long…
7 in a row, baby!
by johnnycougar on
Jan 14, 2009 12:09 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Nope
I’m right with you buddy. You can be Debbie Downer, and I’ll be my usual Negative Nancy.
I fear that Tony made those half-time adjustments out of necessity in that game. But will revert back to his starting rotation, and schemes. That, will piss me right off.
by Jo-Jo on
Jan 14, 2009 12:34 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Gosh I hope Casto starts tomorrow...
But yeah, your fear is certainly justified. Casto probably won’t start.
by cfred on
Jan 14, 2009 3:06 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yes once you are a Coug success is never comfortable
There is always some terrible thing coming around the corner that will put you back in your place. I’ve been having really bad feelings about this trip to Oregon this week. Things have rarely gone well there.
by Dancing Football on
Jan 14, 2009 5:12 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs










