Cougs win ugly over Beavs
Seven Oregon State points in the final 13:38 of regulation. Fifteen Washington State turnovers. 35% shooting by the Beavers. A nine-point OSU lead thrown away down the stretch. An 11 shot disadvantage for the Cougars. No points by either team in the final 1:42.
In a game this ugly, was it really any surprise WSU came out on top?
Aron Baynes has 17 points and 11 rebounds to lead Washington State past Oregon State, 61-57. The Cougs, once down 43-34, climbed back into the game late, tying on a Taylor Rochestie three-pointer with 3:47 left. Lathen Wallace made a three for the Beavers to regain the lead 50-47, but was immediately countered by Daven Harmeling's three to tie it up again at 50, with 1:42 left.
It was the last score of regulation. Taylor Rochestie had a chance at a game winner - a runner similar to the one he made last weekend against Stanford - but was too far out and threw up an airball over the rim. Oregon State's ensuing desperation halfcourt shot was short and the game headed into overtime.
There, the Cougs took over, outscoring OSU 8-3 to start the extra period. WSU finally sealed the deal through two Caleb Forrest free throws with nine seconds remaining.
Player of the Game - Baynes Baynes Baynes. 17 and 11, on 6 of 7 shooting and 5 of 5 free throws. Please just give him the rock. I can't emphasize this enough.
Play of the Game - Daven Harmeling's three to tie the game at 50 with 1:42 remaining. It was Daven's first made basket in Pac-10 play, and five games overall. I'm not joking. Welcome back, buddy.
Where did Casto go?
Making his first career start, DeAngelo Casto ended up with only six minutes. What happened? Two quick first half fouls sidelined Casto in the first half - not all that shocking. When WSU started the second half, DeAngelo was back, but quickly pulled after some defensive lapses. Again, not surprising for a freshman. What was surprising was that he never came back. Casto and fellow freshman Abe Lodwick were never heard from down the stretch.
Defensively, there was no reason to put DeAngelo back in, as the upperclassman-heavy lineup of Rochestie-Thompson-Harmeling-Forrest-Baynes carried much of the load down the stretch and in overtime. But Casto should have been in there to help alleviate the considerable offensive rebound advantage OSU had - 25.6% to 20%, and 8 to 5 overall. He also could've provided a spark for a still-struggling Cougar offense. WSU still managed only 16 points in the last 13:38, in what had to be the slowest nine-point comeback in the history of college basketball.
A reversal of fortune
Shooting certainly wasn't an issue for the Cougs tonight. WSU hit 70% of their shots in the first half and finished with an eFG% of 56.2%. Also present for the Cougs was an excellent free throw rate of 55% - converting on 16 of 22 chances from the charity stripe.
What was missing from the WSU offense was any sort of ball protection - a turnover rate of 25.4% leading to eleven more Beaver shots. Also troubling was a first half defense that surrendered 33 points. 33 points to an Oregon State team that scored 38 total points against Arizona State one week ago.
From freshmen back to upperclassmen
The freshman revival we thought was coming after the Stanford win? Well, it took a step back tonight. Days after winning with a three-freshman lineup (Thompson, Casto, Lodwick), the Cougars went to the seniors in this one. Baynes, Rochestie, Forrest and Harmeling were all key down the stretch. They're not ready to fade away just yet. The key will be finding ways to integrate the younger and older members of the squad successfully. Also key will be getting enough playing time for the freshmen that we can have depth as the season goes on.
Great call by Tony though to bring in Charlie Enquist in the first half. With Baynes and Casto in foul trouble, Tony got eight strong minutes out of the freshman, with one rebound and one block to show for it. No major defensive breakdowns for the kid, either. At least none that I saw live.
Gassed Rochestie for Saturday?
Credit member BigWood (great handle, by the way) for being the first to point out that Taylor played 45 minutes tonight. That means he now has two days to rest up before the faster paced Ducks. He'll almost certainly be playing over 80 minutes this road trip. Can he still push through it and have a good game against Oregon?
0 recs |
14 comments
|
Comments
Rotchestie played 77 minutes at home last week
I think they are going to need to steal some minutes for him in the first half against Oregon. The good news is that the Beaver’s didn’t play too fast and for some short stretches Rotchestie didn’t bring up the ball. The bad news is the Duck’s will of course try to play fast. At some point Rotchestie is going to wear down a bit this weekend. For sure over the rest of the year. That’s why I was praying to get Garrett Sim when he opened up his recruitment last spring. Oh well.
If not Capers how about getting Harthun some time at the point? Something is going on there because Bennett has to know Rotchestie cannot keep this pace up all season. What about John Allen?
Great game from Baynes! I like seeing Thompson get more and more agressive. At some point he will start making a lot of shots. He should have 14+ against the quacks.
by BornCoug on Jan 15, 2009 11:26 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Rochestie...
Okay, I hate to say it, but maybe Tony is going to rest TR after the games get out of hand against UCLA and ASU. Realistically, at least with UCLA we shouldn’t be closer than 10 most of the game. Not that miracles can’t happen, but I think maybe we’ll get to play some other guys during those games.
7 in a row, baby!
by johnnycougar on Jan 16, 2009 12:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm still not concinced UCLA is that good
They’ve got a lot of shooters, and they shot the lights out against a zone last night, but one hot shooting night won’t make me a believer.
by Jeff Nusser on Jan 16, 2009 12:50 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Hate to throw Ken Pomeroy at you...
But UCLA is ranked 10th by Ken, 5th in adjusted O and 34th in adjusted D. Their shooting, like you mentioned, is 4th (EFG), but they also have excellent offensive rebounding (25th) and oustanding defense (11th at forcing turnovers). In short, I’m worried about them. Plus they’ve had our number for the last few years.
Side note: Did you know that every Pac 10 team not from the state of Oregon is ranked in the top 60? The Pac 10 is now up to second as a conference, only behind the ACC.
7 in a row, baby!
by johnnycougar on Jan 16, 2009 3:27 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I didn't say I wasn't worried about them
I just said I’m not that convinced that they’re that great. They’ve played a tremendously easy nonconference schedule, and played Oregon and OSU. They might really be good, but I remain skeptical.
And, yes, I did know that about the Pac-10. No surprise to me, although it will surprise all those people who keep calling this a “four-bid conference.” They just don’t know what they’re talking about.
by Jeff Nusser on Jan 16, 2009 4:04 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Harthun
I would like to see Harthun get in the mix Saturday as well. He will probably be pumped up back in his home state and may be able to give us a few good minutes. I believe Allen was hurt and I think he is redshirting.
by selahcoug on Jan 16, 2009 7:52 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, my understanding is he had a bad back at some point
But they don’t exactly talk a lot about the injuries of walk ons. He’s suiting up for the games, if that says anything.
by Jeff Nusser on Jan 16, 2009 8:53 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Play of the Game
Deane’s dunk was the key play. It brought us back to life. This team showed it’s character, decided to respond, and the rest is history.
by SW WA Coug on Jan 16, 2009 12:35 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Maybe I should have called it the turning point instead
But it was a key moment in this game. They thought we were going to lay down and die.
by SW WA Coug on Jan 16, 2009 12:37 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
*I* thought we were going to lay down and die
For what it’s worth.
by Jeff Nusser on Jan 16, 2009 12:50 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed.
I really thought we were going to lose at one point in the 2nd half because earlier in the year, that was when we stopped playing our game and would lose by 20. I guess that Stanford win really gave these guys confidence down the stretch—something we’ll surely need throughout the year.
by james_WSU on Jan 16, 2009 1:01 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It was Calvin Haynes
that tried that silly dunk on us, not Deane. He got the assist. Thanks to both for lighting that fire.
by SW WA Coug on Jan 16, 2009 2:27 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
and he got by Rochestie
OSU plays mostly a halfcourt set, but Taylor got quite a workout, Claitt, Wallace and Haynes all took turns taking him to the rack last night….
by BigWood on Jan 16, 2009 7:11 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
one contention on the enquist experiment
enquist individually didn’t play awfully, but if i ever have to see a lineup of taylor, nik, klay, daven and enquist again, i’m turning the tv off. the hole in the key was wide enough to drive a truck through and led to the guard dujour at the top of the key shaking taylor and getting an easy layup. it’s what made the last 3 minutes of the 1st half so painful.
by BigWood on Jan 16, 2009 7:14 PM PST reply actions 0 recs

by 











