Arizona State 27, Washington State 14
A few steps forward. A few steps back.
In the end, this game played out the way most of us expected. Two anemic offenses and one stellar defense giving us an ugly game, but also a closer game than we're used to seeing. As one would expect, the stellar defense won out. ASU was too much to handle, with Vontaze Burfict, Mike Nixon, and co. dominating this game from the opening snap. The Cougs faced one of the best rushing defenses in the country, and boy did it show - between numerous tackles for losses, broken plays and sacks, the Cougars ended up with negative 54 yards rushing. Negative 54.
The Cougars had their opportunities in the first half, but failed to capitalize. Reid Forrest's fake punt conversion for a first down brought some life to the offense, but no points following a Jeff Tuel interception. ASU had three turnovers in the first 30 minutes, but the Cougars couldn't convert even one of those into a score. Tuel struggled under pressure: the Devils had six sacks in the first half, and forced their fair share of hurries and bad decisions which led to Tuel's two picks. Marshall Lobbestael brought some brief stability to the Cougar offense in relief, but a fumble by Daniel Blackledge - on a catch that should have resulted in a first down deep in ASU territory - ended the threat. ASU sealed the half by running their two-minute offense to perfection. The result was a 13-0 halftime deficit that had to make the Cougars feel like banging their heads against a wall.
The second half saw improvement, but not immediately. ASU made a huge gain on a reverse to set up a nine yard touchdown run that left WSU back against the ropes. It took some turnovers - the Cougs forced six total - and the re-emergence of Jeff Tuel to get the Cougs back into it. Andy Mattingly's interception deep in ASU territory was the big break Wazzu needed. It set up Tuel's first TD, which wasn't exactly a thing of beauty. Intended for Daniel Blackledge - who was, at least in this writer's opinion, being interfered with - the ball came up short and into the opportunistic hands of Jared Karstetter, who made a beautiful adjustment for the six. That fired up both sides of the ball, and the Cougars were back in business down 19-7.
Then, the blunder. For most of the game, Reid Forrest had been rolling out to make rugby style kicks, like he used to do at the start of his career. Earlier in the game, though, he found a seam and was able to convert a first down that gave the Cougars some much-needed momentum. Yet again, in the second half, it looked for a moment like Forrest had a seam to the outside. But Arizona State wasn't going to make the same mistake twice. They stayed at home, and Forrest booted the ball out of desperation past the line of scrimmage. The result was a penalty that gave ASU exceptional field position. Field position that was converted into a Cameron Marshall TD run and a way-too-easy two-point conversion. 27-7.
Still, the Cougs weren't done. Although for a moment it looked like things were getting worse. A kickoff was fumbled out of bounds at the five, followed up immediately by a near-safety (and another play for a loss). That's when Wulff made a bold play call that would re-write the WSU record books. Jeff Tuel stepped back in his own end zone, and fired off a bullet to Johnny Forzani in single coverage. Forzani broke free, and the rest, literally, was history. 99 yards later Tuel had converted his first huge play as a Cougar. 27-14 after the PAT from Grasu.
But the ASU defense didn't bend from there, stuffing the Cougar offense on their remaining drives in the game. ASU's running game awoke to run out the clock, and that was it.
The Cougs had forced six turnovers, but committed four of their own. They made big plays on defense, but failed to prevent the struggling ASU quarterbacks from reaching the end zone. The Cougar offense was horrible: 181 total yards, numerous losses and penalties, but also 99 on one play and two passing touchdowns from our QB of the future. It was a game with a lot of positives, but a lot of negatives as well.
The best thing I can say is that this game definitely gives us something to build on. The defense made key plays, tackled well and only let one big play - the reverse - burn them. The offense struggled in the first half but Jeff Tuel's benching woke him up to the tune of two passing touchdowns and a play that cements his place in the WSU record book (as well as the NCAA, since you can't have a longer pass play than 99 yards).
Player of the Game: Louis Bland. It's tempting to go with Tuel, or Karstetter, but the only fireworks from the offense came in the second half. The Cougar defense came to play the whole game, and with Bland's eight tackles, one interception, one tackle for loss, one sack, and one forced fumble, he was the anchor of a revitalized squad. I understand the ASU offense is bad, but you don't force six turnovers by accident. Bland, Mattingly, Long and the defensive backfield kept both the run and pass in check for the majority of this game, with only receiver Kyle Williams burning us for big numbers. I saw numerous plays today that would have been big gains or touchdowns last year. Now, the defense is covering their gaps, running down ball carriers, and keeping things in front of them. It's a noticeable improvement, and credit Bland as the centerpiece today.
Unsung hero: Jared Karstetter. The adjustment he made to catch the third quarter touchdown was huge. Furthermore, he continues to be the security blanket for the quarterbacks that Jeshua Anderson couldn't be. Tonight, he grabbed four balls for forty-five yards and made himself an available target for Jeff Tuel throughout the game. Now if only Tuel had the pass protection to get it to him.
Play of the Game: The longest pass play in school history, Jeff Tuel to Johnny Forzani for 99 yards and a TD. I always feel better about the Paul Wulff era when I remember that it's mostly his recruits making the big plays and giving us some hope for the future.
B.S. Call of the Game: Oh, there were many. Mostly against us, but a couple against ASU too. There were many penalties in general, deserved or not. But the offensive pass interference call on Daniel Blackledge was completely nonsensical. Not to mention a momentum killer.
It was over when... Cameron Marshall ran 10 yards for an ASU touchdown with 12:25 to play; following the botched fake punt.
Stat of the Game: WSU forced six turnovers. And we still lost. Probably because of the four turnovers of our own, making for ten (!) total. Although, that -54 rushing yards stat still makes me cringe.
If you haven't voted in Nuss' poll below yet, do it. My vote is that it was a positive step in the right direction, but I'm interested to know what the rest of Coug Nation thinks. Of course you're always welcome to expand on your thoughts in the comments.
Enjoy the bye week - only six days until Midnight Mayhem.
0 recs |
76 comments
|
Comments
Consider this a late UW/Ariz gamethread as well
The Huskies have those weird square-shaped sweat stains on their jerseys too, so I guess at least Nike is fair to everyone.
Go Wildcats.
by Grady. on Oct 10, 2009 9:56 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Soooooo UWs weakness...
Bubble screen/ WR screen. This is hilarious…
by cougfan on Oct 10, 2009 10:12 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dawgs D is making Foles look like a heisman contender
by cougfan on Oct 10, 2009 10:13 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm scared of Aguilar (sp?) for the Apple Cup
The Huskies didn’t have any receivers I worried about last year
by Grady. on Oct 10, 2009 10:24 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
So, Locker for Heisman?
I love how all the Facebook status’ went from “WE’RE WINNING AT THE HALF!” to “…..”
by playerkyle14 on Oct 10, 2009 10:24 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Have I mentioned I hate the siren?
Either it’s a celebration, or every time the Huskies score an elderly person suffers a heart attack.
by Grady. on Oct 10, 2009 10:27 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I also hate it.
Especially when they played it when they scored the last second TD against LSU.
by Dancing Football on Oct 10, 2009 10:28 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I hate the huskies, but the siren is great.
Noise, energy, attention, all the things you want in a TD score. Maybe some just hate it by association, which is understandable.
Vote for Butch!
by spencer peaty on Oct 10, 2009 10:45 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Speaking of noise at a TD...
I Really miss the cannon! Why did they have to get rid of that thing? I asked some students about it at the game, and nobody even knew what I was talking about. With the start of the CUB renovation, they got rid of it, and our football team has gone downhill ever since. Maybe that’s our real problem, haha.
by brlogan on Oct 11, 2009 3:32 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I had heard it was a hazard to the CUB
something about shaking the foundations or something. I could be wrong.
by displacedcoug on Oct 11, 2009 10:10 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Couldn't they put it somewhere else?
I’ve never seen it, so I don’t know how big it is or anything.
by james_WSU on Oct 12, 2009 12:18 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's a military cannon
So it’s fairly good size. Scared the pants off my wife the first time she went to a game.
by Nuss on Oct 12, 2009 8:46 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Perhaps they could.
I don’t even know where it is now. I’m going to do some research.
by brlogan on Oct 13, 2009 5:41 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Stoops is the worst coach ever
Throw on first and ten with a five point lead and 2:30 left? WHY WOULD THAT BE A BAD IDEA?
by Grady. on Oct 10, 2009 10:29 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Pretty crazy bounce.
UW got one of those last week too on the Trufant TD.
by Dancing Football on Oct 10, 2009 10:30 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Remember the Abdullah fumble recovery a few years back?
Also Stoops fault for not just taking a knee and running the ball.
by Grady. on Oct 10, 2009 10:31 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
"They go up by three if they get this"
Thanks Captain Obvious!
by Grady. on Oct 10, 2009 10:32 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Actually nothing compares to the U of I radio announcers
Unbelievably bad. You and I would call a way better game, and we have no training whatsoever.
by Grady. on Oct 10, 2009 10:36 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The geyser fumble.
that was a TD too, the refs just effed up the call on the field.
by Dancing Football on Oct 10, 2009 10:32 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I remember that
I don’t miss the days before instant replay.
Fortunately we had Swogger for the win.
by Grady. on Oct 10, 2009 10:34 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
C'mon Zona
I would love to see UW lose this
by Grady. on Oct 10, 2009 10:34 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
UA was in complete control.
Crazy turnaround.
by Dancing Football on Oct 10, 2009 10:36 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That is not intentional grounding
Out of the pocket. Near a receiver.
by Grady. on Oct 10, 2009 10:37 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Nick Holt is on steroids
Please, someone, test that man.
by Grady. on Oct 10, 2009 10:38 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Mentink sez:
“First USC and now this?!”
Because a win over a Top 5 team = a lucky bounce against a 3-1 team that had you beat
by Grady. on Oct 10, 2009 10:49 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
emphasis on Idaho
who, by the way, would be 6-0 otherwise
by Grady. on Oct 10, 2009 10:55 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Karma's way of paying us back the fleecing of a W in South Bend.
Damn, my eyeball tastes good.
by Gekko Mojo on Oct 10, 2009 11:10 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I cry a little every time
I see the name ‘Trufant’ on purple.
by displacedcoug on Oct 10, 2009 10:51 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
So much crying ahead of you.
Soon you will be able to make some nice Kleenex box shoes.
by Dancing Football on Oct 10, 2009 10:56 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
More tears. . .
I swear, in lieu of getting stadium renovation funds, the Huskies must have inherited some sort of crazy luck in Husky Stadium. Stupid foot-bounce interception! Looking to the future ASU and UCLA are winnable games, and they got us and Cal at home. It is realistic to think UW is going bowling. That makes me cry inside.
by JimtheCoug on Oct 10, 2009 11:03 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
It should encourage you that turnarounds can happen very fast ...
…if you have the right coaching.
UW had the nation’s longest losing streak one game into this season. To even be thinking of going bowling with half the season passed is evidence of what is possible.
Damn, my eyeball tastes good.
by Gekko Mojo on Oct 10, 2009 11:09 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
What is this 'coaching' you speak of?
Never heard of such a thing
by Grady. on Oct 11, 2009 4:57 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great
All I get to hear about all week is the miracle at Montlake.
Curious how I received 0 texts while UW was getting taken to the woodshed, but all my friends that are “fans” bombarded my phone after that fluke ass play. Guess they saw the highlights because I know they didn’t stick with the game
by cougfan on Oct 10, 2009 11:17 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
not to defend the huskies, but...
what do you text when you are down?
by displacedcoug on Oct 10, 2009 11:23 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I actually use plenty
For example….
Not again
I know how this ends….
We’re still covering…
by cougfan on Oct 11, 2009 12:40 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
when were they "taken to the woodshed"? UW was leading at the half...
… and was never down by more than two possessions. For a team that was just handed an ungodly number of turnovers (at home) and still lost by 14, I’d say that cougfan has a curious definition of that particular phrase.
Damn, my eyeball tastes good.
by Gekko Mojo on Oct 10, 2009 11:47 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
3rd quarter, champ
You’re off if you believe you dominated that game. U of A marched down the field over and over and over. Bubble screen right, jailbreak left, WR quick screen right. Look firmilar. Even your own fans were questioning Holt and that staff. The Huskies were getting worked over by an Arizona offense that isn’t that great.
I never said we didn’t get the same treatment but I don’t think you can say that UW deserved to win that game or that they dominated that game.
by cougfan on Oct 11, 2009 12:45 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh yeah - I watched the game
… and I never said UW dominated, I just didn’t see us getting taken to the woodshed. We pulled it out by a) hitting the deep ball a few times, b) having a playmaker QB, c) eliminating the threat of the UA running game by stacking the box with a safety (thus UA’s liberal use of the bubble screens), d) holding them to FG’s when they got to the red zone.
UW scored four TDs compared to their three and pulled it out. Did it take a remarkably fortunate play … yes. But we were in a position to take the lead with that play. That is what good coaching will get you: players who keep playing and a game plan that covers your weaknesses as much as possible.
UW is not going to fool anyone with that defense this year … but the coaches game plan to keep the game as close as it can be. Every game we win from here on out is going to be our O outscoring the opponent.
I would also point out that we put up the same stat differential in the LSU game (in our favor) and came out of that with a “L”. Consider this cosmic justice.
Damn, my eyeball tastes good.
by Gekko Mojo on Oct 11, 2009 1:08 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
oh - and of course we deserved to win that game.
… why wouldn’t we deserve it? UA didn’t give it to us. our offense scored four TDs, theirs only three. Our coaches are doing the best they can with what they have from an 0-12 team and they put us in a position to make a play and win the game at the end. With the exception of Stanford, all UW games have been that way this year.
Damn, my eyeball tastes good.
by Gekko Mojo on Oct 11, 2009 1:10 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
BTW - I find it interesting that Grady has now made several references to his comfort in the fact that it is Wulff recruits "making the plays"...
… on those rare occurrences where a play is made. It would seem that this is the case because those are the players who actually play. You could also view this as a negative if you were to take the position that Wulff might have been better off is he had maintained a more balanced roster and tried to actually coach up the more senior players that he inherited. I’m just saying that it might be worth a little bit of a debate.
Damn, my eyeball tastes good.
by Gekko Mojo on Oct 10, 2009 11:51 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Or, you could take the position that Doba more or less left the roster devoid of talent
Which is the position most of us take.
by Nuss on Oct 11, 2009 6:18 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
wau admin
wsu admin was asleep at the wheel when the football program went into the tank. whenever i post this comment they say look at womens soccr , vollyball, etc. the problem is those sports do not pay the bill. it is no different for the oversite say at GM.utual, etc - where was the boart oversite?
by willarose on Oct 11, 2009 8:05 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I hear you on the "coaching up" comment
But really, last year we almost exclusively played the inherited players since Wulff knew that for the good of the program we needed the talented freshmen to redshirt. I believe he wanted to do that this year as well but had to burn multiple redshirts due to injuries and incompetence.
The other thing is that the true / redshirt freshmen and sophomores are actually bigger / faster / stronger than the guys who have been here multiple years in many cases. There’s only so much you can do – it’s not like Weiss taking over Notre Dame, with its years of good recruiting but inept coaching.
by johnnycougar on Oct 11, 2009 2:54 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That is a valid point
There are times where upperclassmen shine on the field like Bland, Tardy, Mattingly etc. But they just don’t have the potenital players like Simone, Tuel and Long have. The upperclassmen have developed into decent players, while the freshmen are already decent players that could grow into great players.
by Grady. on Oct 11, 2009 5:02 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Idaho got a vote for the Ap top 25!
by a guy named Scott Wolf who apparently thinks that Idaho is better than Oklahoma St. and Penn State!!!!! You may think he is just really high on WAC teams. You’d be wrong because he has Boise St. at 11, the lowest of any pollster. This is what is wrong with college football. People like this have the power to make a difference.
Vote for Butch!
by spencer peaty on Oct 11, 2009 1:55 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
If we are talking about Scott Wolf of USC coverage fame ...
… he’s pretty qualified. If you think Idaho did not deserve a single vote, who got robbed? that’s funny.
Damn, my eyeball tastes good.
by Gekko Mojo on Oct 11, 2009 3:38 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Do you think they are the 25th best team in the country?
Is Penn State the 26th? OKST 27th? That make sense to you? That’s horrible.
Vote for Butch!
by spencer peaty on Oct 11, 2009 6:41 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
it's one vote and the Vandals have the same record as Houston. If Houston "deserves" it,
… then what is so unbelievable about Idaho getting one measly vote? this is the system that is in place until we either a) get rid of pre-season polling or b) implement a playoff system.
Damn, my eyeball tastes good.
by Gekko Mojo on Oct 11, 2009 10:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with A and B
but that does not mean I should not care about this guy’s horrible voting.
Vote for Butch!
by spencer peaty on Oct 12, 2009 8:21 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
In order for Idaho to get a poin
Someone had to rank them No. 25. In no way, shape, or form do I think you can make a claim that Idaho is the 25th best team in the country. However, this vote is brought to you by the same collection of guys who had five guys vote UW in their top 15 after USC, then had every single one of them drop UW from their ballot the following week.
Polls are neat! (Or stupid. Your choice.)
by Nuss on Oct 12, 2009 8:49 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
By the way
One of the dirty little secrets of these polls is that guys will often vote someone at No. 25 that they want to recognize or do a favor for. They take the same attitude Gekko does — what’s it hurt to give little old Idaho a point if it makes a coach/player/friend feel good?
I think it’s ridiculous, but whatever. College football gets what it deserves by feeding the poll monster.
Oh, and if you want to see a truly terrible ballot, how about this one?
by Nuss on Oct 12, 2009 8:55 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly
The outrage is not that Idaho got a point. But that a person thinks they are the 25th best team in the country.
Vote for Butch!
by spencer peaty on Oct 12, 2009 10:50 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with you on the poll question ..
… we shouldn’t allow any polls to be published until week 4 of the season.
That said, pollsters have a real problem: how to recognize high performing mid-conference teams who are playing “weak” schedules but who have, collectively speaking, time and again shown that they can play with the BCS teams without requiring them to string together five or six straight strong seasons (ala BSU).
I’m a believer that the margin of difference between a Michigan (2009 version) and an Idaho is closer than most people might want to recognize. If this is the case, why shouldn’t an Idaho with two legit pro prospects (one a first or second rounder) on the o-line and a borderline pro prospect at QB have to potential to crack the top 25 if a team like Michigan, with a true frosh QB and a young offense, can get votes?
Damn, my eyeball tastes good.
by Gekko Mojo on Oct 12, 2009 5:31 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Michigan beat Notre Dame
Idaho beat … Northern Illinois?
by Nuss on Oct 12, 2009 8:50 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
like I said:
pollsters have a real problem trying to figure out how good the mid-level teams are when they keep putting up wins against so-called inferior competition. Boise St and Utah have proven that they can beat the big boys and the little boys alike. Who’s to say that Idaho doesn’t play ND straight up if they were to play? We don’t know, but the pollsters still have to make a guess.
Damn, my eyeball tastes good.
by Gekko Mojo on Oct 13, 2009 8:00 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
UW lost to ND, UW killed Idaho
Although not completely foolproof, that seems like a reasonable measuring stick.
by Nuss on Oct 13, 2009 8:47 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
true - but...
…UW was on the road at ND (and really should have won based on how it ended) and Idaho had to play at Husky stadium. Like I said, they have as many legit pro prospects as any other mid-tier outside of BSU. Its hard to know how good they are, but a single vote is not absurd based on the current results. Heck, Florida has maintained a number one ranking despite playing Charleston So, Try and Florida Atlantic. You could argue that they’ve hardly played anyone.
Damn, my eyeball tastes good.
by Gekko Mojo on Oct 13, 2009 3:41 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Penn State vs. Idaho
I think all the points have been made about why it is crazy to give them a top 25 vote and likely the reason it was done. But to be fair to the Vandals they have won every game they have played but one, same as a lot of teams. The one obviously being against UW on the road. Now look at what Penn State has done. Nice non-conference schedule. Plus they play in the worst major conference in all the land. It is likely Penn State would beat Idaho, but other than a win against a very poor Illinois team what has Penn State done to be ranked in the top 25?
by donkeyjon12 on Oct 12, 2009 11:17 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Well,
First of all I am not a fan of the big-10 and I do hope Idaho does well for a number of reasons. Your right, both teams have not played hardly anyone. But as long as we are comparing the two, consider scoring differential.
Idaho has scored 172 points and given up 153, for a +19. Penn State has scored 187 and given up 61 for a +126. Even if you compare the Big 10 with the WAC and say their non-conference slate is equal, the way Penn State wins their game is dramatically different.
If Idaho is 9-1 heading into Boise St., then I would not be surprised at all if they get ranked.
Vote for Butch!
by spencer peaty on Oct 12, 2009 2:53 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just hear Daniel Simmons broke his fibula
and is out for the season. Just when we thought we’d rest up on the bye, and have all the starters on Defense and most on O back. This hurts, he’s a phenomenal athlete and has been making plays all year for us..
by Wazzucrazed on Oct 12, 2009 11:52 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 










