Monday hodgepodge: Recruiting, injuries and more
Bye weeks are always a little weird and awkward for blogs, since -- like the team -- we get into a certain week-in, week-out routine with games every Saturday. For the first time in a month and a half, there is no game to look forward to this weekend (assuming you do, in fact, look forward to them).
Of course, this isn't a bad thing, as this team needs a week off to heal in the worst way. Every team says they look forward to a bye because of the injury factor, but this team is a special kind of hurt. We all thought it couldn't get any worse than last year, but it has. Boy, it sure seems like a long time ago that we were talking about this team being healthy out of camp.
So, the bye will not just allow for an extra week for some of the guys who have been out to get healthy, but it will allow those who have been playing banged up to get right. That's a big deal moving forward.
Why? Because if this were last year, I honestly wouldn't care about this team getting healthy. They were in so far over their heads on a weekly basis, that it honestly didn't matter who was on the field. But this team has shown signs of life -- the kind of life that leads you to wonder what they might be able to do with a few more bullets in the chamber, specifically on the offensive line.
Looks like we'll probably get a chance to find out against Cal. Guards Zack Williams and B.J. Guerra and guard/tackle Steven Ayers all have a shot at being back in the lineup. Assuming both Kenny Alfred and Micah Hannam are healthy for Cal -- both were banged up by the end of the ASU game -- we actually could have our entire starting five back on the offensive line (assuming Paul Wulff wants to put Ayers back in the starting lineup for Tyson Pencer).
One player who almost certainly won't be ready for Cal is Brian Danaher, the backup guard who returned from a concussion on Saturday. Wulff seemed concerned about Danaher all week, even refusing to re-insert him into the starting lineup. Well, it turns out his concern was well founded, as it's believed Danaher suffered yet another concussion.
Danaher now has a disturbing history of brain trauma, and while I'm sure the coaches, trainers and Danaher don't need my advice, I'm going to give it to them anyway: Shut him down. Maybe forever ... but at least for this year. Knowing what we now know about these brain injuries -- and given that there is so much more to learn -- there is no reason to put his future at risk. None whatsoever.
Another player who won't be back for Cal is corner back Daniel Simmons, who suffered a broken leg and is done for the year. Major bummer for him, as he had fought his way into the starting lineup this year. However, he's still just a redshirt freshman, so still lots of promise to look forward too.
Tough to say exactly what Wulff and defensive coordinator Chris Ball will do in this spot. If Eric Block is healthy -- he's been struggling with his digestive issue again, and didn't play on Saturday -- you could see a move of Chima Nwachukwu back to corner. That could also happen if they're comfortable with Jay Matthews, who played but didn't record a tackle.
I don't think they'll do that, though. my guess would be that they would elect to put either Terrance Heyward or Aire Justin (remember him?) over there. Why? Because Cal is a team that's obviously going to focus on running the ball, and it's going to be more important to have sound tackling from the safety position, and the dropoff in that respect is significant after Nwachukwu. If LeAndre Daniels or Tyree Toomer were still back there, it would be a different story. But they're not.
The good news is that the Cougs should get some help up front in trying to stop Jahvid Best and Shane Vereen in the form of defensive tackle Bernard Wolfgramm, who appears as if he should return from his hip injury. That's beyond huge, because we all remember what Best did to Matt Eichelberger and Ai Ahmu last year ...
There's absolutely no doubt that with Wolfgramm, this starting four up front is light years ahead of those guys. Even against USC's vaunted line, there weren't any holes like that. (At least, not after the first drive.) Additionally, middle linebacker Alex Hoffman-Ellis should return from his staph infection. While Greg Trent was as hard-nosed a player as you'd find, he wasn't the most fleet of foot. Hoffman-Ellis gives the Cougs a chance with his athleticism.
There also appears to be more help on the way for next year. Somebody asked recently about defensive end Brandon Rankin. I couldn't find any info out there, but the intrepid Vince Grippi did some looking and dropped this little nugget in his pregame report from Saturday:
Two players who signed with WSU last February but couldn’t make it into school, Brandon Rankin and Quayshawne Buckley, seem to be on track to get into school in the spring semester. Buckley is waiting to hear his test results – that was kept him from qualifying – and is confident he did well. Rankin is on track to finish his classes. In case you don’t know, Rankin is 6-foot-5, 260-pound junior college defensive end who has earned a four-star rating from Scout.com and will have two years left. Buckley, a 6-4, 270-pound defensive lineman, earned three stars as a high school senior last year.
Rankin is the kind of kid who could have an immediate impact. Imagine a defensive end rotation with Travis Long, Kevin Kooyman -- who looks more and more like he's headed for a medical redshirt -- and Rankin. How cool would that be?
That about covers it for today. We'll be back along either tonight or tomorrow with a lengthy post looking at the defense. You'll also start seeing the second quarter grades (can you believe the season is half over?), and we'll have Paul Wulff's press conference for you to listen to tomorrow. And since basketball kicks off its season this weekend with Midnight Mayhem, we'll probably be sprinkling in a little hoops content this week, too. I can guarantee it will be part of what we talk about on the podcast, so you've got that to look forward to as well.
In other words, while the football team will be on a bye ... we won't.
0 recs |
15 comments
|
Comments
That Vid was disgusting..
Thanks for the updates Nuss. Appreciate what you guys bring to this forum, Its like having 2-3 cougar fan and blog sites combined into one, from all the souces of info. Sounds like we got alot of reason to hope especially with Rankin and Buckely for next year. I have good reason to believe we will be competing for a bowl game next year. Alot of these freshman will be way mroe mature football players than a majority of the nations sophomoes out there with all the game expierence they are getting. And, do you think theres any chance Haladay will supplant Tuel next season, from what it sounds liek he is a legit QB.
by Wazzucrazed on Oct 12, 2009 3:43 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
A bowl next year?
I can be as blindly optimistic as anyone else, but we have to get a pac-10 win before we start talking about a bowl (an 0-12 husky team doesn’t count as pac-10). As for Halladay, it is way too early for that debate. He is still in high school, which means the numbers he is putting up now don’t count for anything. Tuel looks good to me, and Halladay will get what Tuel didn’t: a redshirt.
I would also like to say thanks. You guys put up so much about the Cougs. Its really nice to be able to go to one site for all of the news and analysis you three bring. I actually have this site as my home page…
by displacedcoug on Oct 12, 2009 5:18 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not so sure about a bowl either.
We have SO far to go. Let’s be competitive first.
As far as Halladay, it is way too early to tell. Tuel looks like he can be very good and if Halladay really is special, it would be nice to actually redshirt him and get three years in the starter’s role.
Thanks for the kind words, they are greatly appreciated.
by Dancing Football on Oct 12, 2009 5:23 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
my math might be bad ...
.. but if he redshirts next year and Tuel stays healthy his whole career, then I’m guessing he get’s two years as starter after watching Tuel’s junior and senior years. Did I miss something.
Damn, my eyeball tastes good.
by Gekko Mojo on Oct 12, 2009 7:43 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're right.
I don’t know where I got three years. I’m blaming the fever I have right now. :-)
by Dancing Football on Oct 12, 2009 8:13 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
This comment is purely to make the comment arc symmetric
by johnnycougar on Oct 13, 2009 5:30 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The goal should be a bowl in 2011
And I wouldn’t even think about Halliday supplanting Tuel.
by Jeff Nusser on Oct 12, 2009 6:04 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I easily forget how young this team is.
Think about how many impact seniors we will be losing this year. Alfred, Hicks and Mattingly are big loses. Tardy is a notable loss but if Montgomery can play next year he, Mitz, and the other young guys will be fine without him. You lose a few other seniors like Thompson and Stripling, but those are not big loses. We are adding via recruits and improving across the board far more than we will be losing for sure.
Vote for Butch!
by spencer peaty on Oct 13, 2009 8:32 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Go back and look at the starting lineups from ASU
Holy cow. Four freshmen just on offense.
by Jeff Nusser on Oct 13, 2009 8:38 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
its a pretty good bet that Monty is probably not going to play football again, I would think.
Damn, my eyeball tastes good.
by Gekko Mojo on Oct 15, 2009 3:18 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rankin and Buckley
Good to see that news on both those guys. I had been wondering if we would ever see Rankin play for the Cougs. Hopefully both those guys will be playing next year!
by Yakicoug on Oct 14, 2009 9:08 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 







