SECOND QUARTER GRADES: Running Backs
With the season now half over, we're resuming our quarter grades series, figuring that breaking the season into nice, even chunks is a great way to evaluate progress. The grades are a reflection of performance in that quarter, not cumulative over the season.
FIRST QUARTER GRADE: A
SECOND QUARTER GRADE: INC
STATS
COMMENTS: You know, I'd love to give these guys a real grade. But how exactly do you do that? Did Tardy suddenly become a worse runner against USC, Oregon and ASU? Of course not. Unless you're Barry Sanders, there's only so much a guy can do when there are no holes to run through, and that's exactly the situation these guys found themselves in for the past three games.
The two major developments over the last three games have been the absence of the team's best running back, James Montgomery, and the emergence of Winston, a true freshman. Winston -- whom I call Jacquizz Light -- is a smaller, shiftier back who has shown a burst that Tardy and Mitz lack. That's not a knock on those guys; that's just to say that Winston brings something different to the table. He's cut into Mitz's carries, which is a shame in the sense that we've seen what Mitz can do, but with such little holes to run through, giving the ball to a smaller guy who can hopefully squeeze through smaller creases and make a guy or two miss makes a lot of sense. Mitz is at his best running downhill behind a bruising line that can get a push, and that's just not what he was running behind the past three games.
I suppose I could have just given them another A, this time for effort -- especially for the tough yards gained against USC. Coaches also would include things like how well they did in pass protection, but my eye is fairly untrained to that sort of thing -- about the only time I notice is when a guy whiffs. In my mind, there just isn't enough information out there to evaluate these guys. They didn't do anything to hurt us, but they didn't really have the opportunity to help either.
HOW TO IMPROVE THE GRADE: I suppose I should rename this "How to Get a Grade." They need to have a fighting chance to gain some yards, something they should get starting this week against Cal -- assuming Zack Williams and B.J. Guerra return as scheduled. Both are critical to the success of the running game, and Cal has proven vulnerable against the rush, giving up better than 4.0 yards per carry to each of their past three opponents (including a whopping 5.27 this past weekend at UCLA). Notre Dame will provide a stiffer challenge, having started to sell out against the run to stop the pass, but Arizona is pretty average.
In other words, assuming reasonable health on the offensive line, we should get a better read on these guys over the third quarter of the season, as there should be yards to be had.
EDIT, 1:15 p.m.: Forgot to attach the poll. Vote if you so desire.
0 recs |
15 comments
|
Comments
I think the worst part about it
is DeMaundray Woolridge has 12 rushing TDs through 7 games with Idaho.
:(
by playerkyle14 on Oct 19, 2009 12:18 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Think of it this way
If he had stayed at WSU, his eligibility would have been used up last year. Besides, what do you think Tardy or Mitz would do against Idaho’s competition?
by Jeff Nusser on Oct 19, 2009 12:46 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Remember when Woolridge and Harrison had over 100 yards each against Nevada?
That was the ultimate speed/power combo.
by displacedcoug on Oct 19, 2009 2:03 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're right
but I always felt he was going to be really special here, so when he flamed out, it hurt me more than most.
also, idaho beat hawaii who manhandled us, and its a sad, sad day when you stop to think that the vandals would beat us if we played them this year.
by playerkyle14 on Oct 19, 2009 3:50 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well...
didn’t Idaho beat us twice when Price did the whole redshirt-rebuild thing? I’m all for Idaho beating us if it means 3 top 10 finishes haha
by james_WSU on Oct 19, 2009 4:46 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Once
And I called for Price to be fired after that game. I believe my exact words were, “I’ll put up with a lot of things, but we should never — NEVER — LOSE TO (BLEEPING) IDAHO!!!!”
Guess I was wrong on that one. :-)
by Jeff Nusser on Oct 19, 2009 6:33 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Twice!
CougCenter WSU's second main blog
by Dancing Football on Oct 19, 2009 6:58 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
DAMMIT!
How did I forget that? Must’ve struck it from the memory banks. Maybe what I said was, “I’ll put up with losing to Idaho once, but we should never — NEVER — LOSE TO IDAHO IN BACK TO BACK (BLEEPING) YEARS!!!”
Or something like that. I’m old.
by Jeff Nusser on Oct 19, 2009 8:29 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Different stories
Look at Idaho’s competition. Look at his line vs. that competition. Now look at ours. Woolridge wouldn’t be putting up those numbers for us. And as mentioned, he’d likely be graduated already.
As for Hawaii, they’re a shadow of the team they were when they beat us. And how easy it is to forget the freakishly redonkulous number of turnovers we had that game.
by TiltingRight on Oct 19, 2009 11:22 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
What happened with him?
I cant remember why he transferred??
by Wazzucrazed on Oct 19, 2009 12:46 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Its kinda hard to give the running backs a pass...
…with -54 yards. I understand the line was the bigger problem, but at some point don’t you just have to sit back and look at that number. -54. That has to be some kind of record or something.
by displacedcoug on Oct 19, 2009 2:02 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
That -54 was because of 12 sacks
In the college game, sacks count against your rushing total. In the NFL, they take it off the team passing stats, which is the better way to do it. That’s why, when I did the offensive line grades, I isolated the sacks and the running backs’ yards per rush — if you just look at the team overall yards per rush, it’s skewed because of the sacks.
by Jeff Nusser on Oct 19, 2009 2:31 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Barely beat me to it!
CougCenter WSU's second main blog
by Dancing Football on Oct 19, 2009 2:32 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sacks count as negative rushing yards.
I don’t think you can put that on the running backs at all.
CougCenter WSU's second main blog
by Dancing Football on Oct 19, 2009 2:31 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 








