Injuries, injuries, injuries
Coming into the season, here is what the two-deep looked like on the offensive line:
| Left Tackle | Left Guard | Center | Right Guard | Right Tackle |
| Steven Ayers (#So.) | Zack Williams (#Jr.) | Kenny Alfred (#Sr.) | B.J. Guerra (#So.) | Micah Hannam (#Jr.) |
| Tyson Pencer (#Fr.) | Brian Danaher (#Jr.) | Andrew Roxas (Jr.) | Brian Danaher (#Jr.) | Joe Eppele (#Jr.) |
Here's what it looks like now:
| Left Tackle | Left Guard | Center | Right Guard | Right Tackle |
| Tyson Pencer (#Fr.) | Alex Reitnouer (Fr.) | Kenny Alfred (#Sr.) | Joe Eppele (#Jr.) | Micah Hannam (#Jr.) |
| Joe Eppele (#Jr.) | Reed Lesuma (#Sr.) | Chris Prummer (#So.) | Reed Lesuma (#Sr.) | Joe Eppele (#Jr.) |
Obvious things I'll go ahead and point out:
- Only two starters are left from the projected starting five -- the same two guys who made it through all of last year.
- Of the 10 players on the original two-deep, only four are healthy enough to play this weekend.
- There are three players on this week's two-deep who didn't even appear on the original two-deep. One of them will be starting.
- That one player is a true freshman, who will teaming with a redshirt freshman to make up the left side of the line. That's Jeff Tuel's blindside, in case you were wondering.
- There are nine different players on the original two-deep; there are only seven different players on the current two-deep. Meaning, if this line suffers more than two injuries at any point in the game, Paul Wulff will be turning to either true freshman Tim Hodgdon (whom they still hope to redshirt) or redshirt freshman Michael Pfeiff.
And we thought the injuries last year were bad.
What does all this mean for Saturday? It means we're going to have an awfully, awfully tough time scoring points. It seems like it's been beaten to death, but the fact that Cal -- with its awesome offensive line and Jahvid Best carrying the ball -- could only score three points against this unit doesn't bode well for the Cougs.
I honestly thought the Cougs had a chance to keep this game closer than most people thought, figuring the Ducks will be suffering the inevitable let down. But that was when Danaher was starting at left guard. While the change of one guy might not seem like much, when you go from a guy who made eight starts last season to a guy who was still in high school and rated a two-star recruit last season -- at a position where physical maturity is at a premium ... that's a big, big difference. That's not even taking into account that communication is going to be doubly difficult in the Autzen atmosphere.
Truly, I'm afraid what we're going to see offensively on Saturday is going to resemble last year in a lot of ways. Want to know the biggest reason why our passing game was so horrific last year? Because the offensive line could not block five-on-four, at least one tight end and one running back were kept in to block on almost all obvious passing plays. (Which, of course, was most of the plays.) That meant we were sending just two or three receivers out into patterns against seven defenders. It becomes a vicious cycle where you can't pass if you can't protect the quarterback, but you also can't pass if you protect the quarterback too much.
And you wonder why Brandon Gibson had 10 fewer receptions and 500 fewer yards than he did the year before. It wasn't Gibson.
There's a chance that Paul Wulff and Todd Sturdy don't do that as much on Saturday, since Tuel obviously isn't the stationary target that Marshall Lobbestael is and Kevin Lopina became as his injuries mounted last year. You'll likely see just a running back protector in early in a hope to give Tuel a chance to throw the ball to a guy who's actually open, but if he's successful, expect Oregon to ramp up the pressure by bringing extra guys. And unless Tuel can elude the rush and make them pay with a big gain or two, the Ducks will be relentless.
While I want, want, WANT to believe that this game can be closer than expected, I'm coming around to the idea that it's probably going to be ugly, simply because of the matchup factor.
I still think the defense will turn in a yeoman's effort, but I'm extremely concerned about the big plays -- especially against a spread offense predicated on misdirection and confusion. If the offense struggles like I think it's probably going to, the defense is probably going to feel the need to make something happen. That's death against an offense that requires assignment-sound defense to stop it.
Unless things such as poor decision making, poor discipline or unforced turnovers rear their heads tomorrow, if it turns out to be a blowout, don't lose faith.
If you'd like to hear Paul Wulff talk about the injuries at length, listen to his Thursday press conference via the player below. It's distributed via our podcast; you can find subscription options at our podcast page.
6 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
My hope is...
I more hope they leave a back in to chip pass rushers and then use the back as a safety valve for Tuel. Some delayed routes may keep the defense honest and could burn blitzing LBs. Now, Oregon does have a talented D-Line so how much they will bring backers is questionable. With a banged up O-Line, we’re going to need quick routes and receivers that are open in a short amount of time. We saw it last week, our QBs couldn’t even hit their back foot on a five step drop before someone was in their face.
Finally, MOVE THE POCKET! Roll the kid out, move it different directions, and change it up. A standard dropback pocket with this O-Line isn’t going to work. If you move him around and make him a moving target, it’ll at least give him a chance to throw the ball and buy him a little bit of extra time.
Thanks, and a little more on scheme
The offense now has all the pieces, except for O-Line, they need to succeed. The mobile QB Wulff has wanted, a group of WRs that will work, and 3 running backs with some different looks (Tardy, Mitz, Winston). This, being the rest of the season, is where you’ll see what the offensive game plan is made of.
As for this week, I wouldn’t be surprised to see some spread option out of us. Tuel ran it in high school and it would seem to play into our banged up line. Oregon showed last week they can shut down a running back in a standard running game (turn and hand off). They also have a TON of speed on that side of the ball. I would really hope we try to use it against them. Try to get them to overpursue, use double moves out wide, etc in a effort to at least get the offense moving. I guess what I’m saying is now that we can open the offense up and use it as designed, we may see some results going forward. I sure hope so.
The only reason I think they might not do that
Is that they can’t afford to get Tuel killed — he’s just not physically mature enough to carry the ball 10 times and take 10 hits.
What I find unbelievable is that Eppele who has experience at tackle
isn’t going to play at LT despite the obvious inexperience of Pencer. Oh how I long for the days of Yarno when I felt that he had the ability of creating interchangeable parts.
According to Wulff Pencer is quick on his feet and real athletic
However is going for athleticism over expierence at this point our best bet? Im not the head coach and he must have seen something I did not. However it does seem odd he would protect Tuels blindside with a less expierienced blocker who allowed sacks against USC multiple times last game

by 
















