Could the Cougs possibly have looked like a Pac 10 caliber offense?
Last Saturday's performance by the Coug offense was its best all season. Led by Jeff Tuel's breakout day, WSU was able to move the ball into Cal territory with regularity. The final number of points was not impressive, but that is also a product of the Cougs going for it deep in Cal territory in the 4th quarter, rather than kicking field goals and making the score look prettier.
Cal fans, who we have learned are similar to Coug fans in their expectations, have made sure to point out that their defense is not great and we should temper our enthusiasm a bit. They are right, we should temper our enthusiasm, it was just one game and we know all too well what happens when we look too much into the statistics from a single contest. They are also right that the Golden Bear defense is far from stout. They are at best, average. Hovering right around the middle in yards per play, giving up 5.4.
But before we let the Bear fans bring us down too much, let's take a look at how other team's offenses have done against the Cal defense:
| Team | Season Yards Per Play | Yards Per Play vs. Cal |
| Maryland | 4.8 | 4.3 |
| Eastern Washington | 6.1 | 3.6 |
| Minnesota | 5.1 | 4.9 |
| Oregon | 5.5 | 6.2 |
| USC | 7.0 | 5.9 |
| UCLA | 4.7 | 6.6 |
| WSU | 4.3 | 6.2 |
Stats courtesy of cfbstats.com, goeags.com, and calbears.com.
Out of conference play, Cal was able to make some bad offenses look even worse. In conference play, it has been a different story. Oregon, UCLA, and WSU all exceeded their season yards per play averages. Interestingly enough, it appears that Cal's defense had its best performance against a dominant USC offense.
So what can we take from these stats? The Cougs performed as well as or better than any other team Cal has faced. Some may argue that Cal was coasting and that allowed WSU to make some easy plays against a prevent defense. That's not entirely accurate. First, the WSU offense did much of its damage in the first half. Second, that 68-yard bomb from Tuel to Forzani is exactly the type of play that a team is trying to stop when up big. Athletes may let up when the score is lopsided, but they still hate giving up more points. It's not as if Cal's players were simply letting WSU's receivers run around unabated.
This was step in the right direction. For the first time in conference play, this group looked like a competent Pac 10 offense. The offensive line was its healthiest in a while, Jeff Tuel showed maturity and pocket presence, and Johnny Forzani burned the Cal defense for a big play when they were dropping eight men back in coverage. For this game, the Cougs showed that there is talent on the roster capable of competing. Whether or not that will carry over for the rest of the season remains to be seen. At least for now we know that the possibility is there.
24 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I'll be writing more about this later
But the great news is that Notre Dame’s defense isn’t really any better than Cal’s. The possibility of another good offensive performance is very real.
Nice writeup
The key point is definitely that we played our best in the first half – I think that’s a first time all year for us!
I am starting to get excited for next year! Hopefully an improved and healthy offensive line, with Tuel throwing deep to Forzani or to Simone on precision routes. While the results this year haven’t been much improvement over last year, it is just swell to have the big play threat back again.
One other thing
Imagine how much better even this attack is going to get if/when it ever runs the ball effectively again …
On a more serious note lol,
After looking at some of the plays on video from Saturday, our offense actually looked pretty decent: receivers actually looked like they were hitting correct routes, Tuel made some nice throws, and everything just looked more crisp in those white uniforms lol. I just wish there was a video on Winston’s 57yd run! I’m only wondering why Tardy isn’t getting any carries…
I love the "whoa" from the Cal fan.
CougCenter WSU's second main blog
by Craig Powers on Oct 27, 2009 12:19 PM PDT up reply actions
If you click on the channel there are a lot of nice plays from the Cougs.
Gotta love the guys at Cal Golden Blogs!
CougCenter WSU's second main blog
by Craig Powers on Oct 27, 2009 12:23 PM PDT up reply actions
He was separating from the LBs.
The DB that made the tackle had a line on him, so can’t tell if he would have outran them, but at least there’s some speed there.
by TiltingRight on Oct 27, 2009 1:32 PM PDT up reply actions
Tardy is probably not getting any carries because we are always down big and not running the ball much.
Also, we just don’t gain many yards when he has the ball in his hands. It’s not entirely his fault, but Winston is now at 4.7 YPC compared to Dwight’s 3.3.
CougCenter WSU's second main blog
by Craig Powers on Oct 27, 2009 12:18 PM PDT up reply actions
Don't quite understand what you mean there.
Tardy is averaging roughly 8 carries/game, Mitz around 5.5, and Winston around 7. Tardy only carried once on Saturday, threw the ball once, and was used in kick returns.
It appears that the coaching staff just wants to try something new with the younger guys. Looking at the numbers, that is hard to argue with.
CougCenter WSU's second main blog
by Craig Powers on Oct 27, 2009 12:33 PM PDT up reply actions
I meant that Mitz had 8 carries in the Cal games--same as Winston
yet Mitz is averaging less ypc than Tardy
Mitz is the kind of guy who needs a little push from the offensive line
He’s not going to make many people miss, but if he gets a head of steam … look out. He’ll punish someone. I can see him having a larger role as the offensive line gets pieced back together.
Nice offense + no defense = ....
Well the Cal Bears, pac-10 wise. Gotta have a defense to compete in this conference.
That said our offense has really improved lately, at least yardage wise. They have got to find more ways to get in the end zone while in the red zone, though. All this yardage with no points doesn’t mean squat. It’ll come though, and it’s improving each weak.
ND Game
i hope i am wrong … but with an ineffective running game and w/ ND’s passing attack… this could be another “bloodbath” for the cougs. i would be happy if we are competitive and keep the score close.
Notre Dame's defense is worse than Cal's
But their offense is probably in line to do similar things to us — their passing attack is very, very good. If the defense can shore up some of the correctable things from Saturday, and if the offense can keep growing, and if the line is healthier … I like our chances to be a heck of a lot closer than 30 points.
louis bland out for the season
cougfan.com just reported that louis bland is gone for the season… we can not seem to get a break !
Grippi speculated that was the case a few days ago.
We lost a guy for the season on the bye week. Any guesses on the next insane injury story?
CougCenter WSU's second main blog
by Craig Powers on Oct 27, 2009 6:21 PM PDT up reply actions
Well...
We could go the USC route and have a weightlifting accident but that wouldn’t be original. I’m going to go with either: a freak bowling accident in bowling class or a projector falling on a position players leg during film study.
Those sound about right.
Nothing is out of the realm of possibility!
“Every single worthwhile player on the WSU football team today was devoured by Giant Palouse Earthworm.”
CougCenter WSU's second main blog
by Craig Powers on Oct 27, 2009 8:59 PM PDT up reply actions
Aren't those endangered.
No, wait, that would be a healthy Wazzu starter that is endangered. Arg!!!
Go Cougs! Beat ND.

by 






















