PLAYER PROFILE: DeAngelo Casto
"He's screaming his own name!"
Those words, spoken by some other fan in my section of the ZZU CRU, told me one thing: DeAngelo Casto had arrived.
And sure enough, Casto was the catalyst for the Cougars' first Pac-10 conference win last winter. To refresh your memory: Stanford came into Pullman somewhat highly touted last January, boasting an 11-2 record that was among the best in the Pac-10 (albeit against a cupcake schedule). The Cougs, meanwhile, had a rough start to the Pac-10 slate, getting bombed by 20 against Washington in an underattended Winter Break rivalry game, then falling to perennial nemesis Patrick Christopher and California. WSU needed a win in the worst way to avoid starting 0-3.
After a rough first half, Tony Bennett decided to go young late in the game. Baynes and Rochestie were unavoidable selections, as they always were last season. But for the other three, Bennett went with Klay Thompson (obvious), Abe Lodwick (less obvious), and a relatively untested DeAngelo Casto. The three were key to the Cougars' second half comeback that erased a deficit that was as large as eleven in the first half. Sure, there was this:
...but as you may also remember, it was Casto that saved the game. After Taylor Rochestie's runner-off-the-glass to give WSU the lead with 17 seconds left, Stanford had plenty of time for their last chance. The always dangerous Anthony Goods drove the lane and went straight to the basket.
Stuffed.
Casto had grabbed his own rebound and snuffed out Stanford's best shot at a win. Sure, he missed the two ensuing free throws and gave Stanford another long shot at a win, but Casto had arrived on the big stage. I'm not really sure he was screaming his own name - it could've been something else - but based on the fact the crowd was doing it, and going crazy in the process, I'm pretty sure he was. Cool moment.
As for the remainder of the year:
For someone that made such a defensive impact last year, Casto didn't see the floor as much as you'd have thought. In those 16.1 minutes per game, though, he was prominent in a few statistical categories, and anemic in others. We know he's a great shot blocker: Casto was ranked 41st nationally with an 8.9 block%. We also know he's a powerful offensive rebounder: in a Bennett system that de-emphasizes crashing the offensive glass in favor of tranisition, 1.3 of Casto's 4.0 boards per game were of the offensive variety. But he's also an underrated defensive rebounder - ranked 125th nationally in DR%. And while he struggled mightily from the free throw line early on, he gradually improved into 2009, finishing with a decent if not world-beating 64.4%. A far cry from his 0-for-2 in the final moments against Stanford.
A lot of people are mystified by Ken Bone's comments that Casto is a "poor man's Jon Brockman". Count me among them. Sure, the rebounding prowess is comparable, but Brockman finished last season as a far more powerful scorer, while being much better at protecting the ball than Casto. It's not that I think Casto can't someday arrive at Brockman's level offensively - he certainly can - but Brockman has nothing on Casto defensively, and Casto has nothing on Brockman at the other end. Brockman couldn't block shots, and won't ever be the low post defender that we believe Casto will be. Casto goes long stretches without scoring, and needs to be more aggressive getting to the hoop and drawing fouls. Comparing the two isn't an extreme stretch, but it's still a stretch.
Best Case Scenario: DeAngelo Casto: defensive powerhouse and electric low-post scorer. We lose a ton of point production from last season in Taylor Rochestie and Aron Baynes. Casto picks up a huge chunk of the interior scoring - five to ten points per game - and provides a huge boost to our chances in 2010. Casto becomes a top 25 shot-blocker nationally, dominates the boards, and gives the Cougars 30 minutes or so of strength under the basket. He also becomes the Cougars' most consistent threat for a SportsCenter Top 10 play.
Worst Case Scenario: Casto is limited early on coming back from his knee injury, and then later on by a rough transition to Bone's system. He puts up numbers comparable to last year, and despite getting more minutes and points, his field goal percentage suffers, and he isn't powerful enough on the boards to keep the Cougs from getting demolished by bigger opponents.
Likely Scenario: Casto is still the great defensive player he has been, and becomes more polished on defense. He fills some of the void left behind by Aron Baynes, but still needs help from James Watson and Brock Motum. People start to take Casto seriously as a rebounding threat, he makes the all-conference defensive team and has an outside shot at second team All Pac-10.
Poll time now. Option #4 is for Husky fans.
0 recs |
15 comments
|
Comments
Spokompton? How rude.
Try Spokanistan instead.
by jj_fekl on Nov 1, 2009 5:41 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
big smile on my face
when i hoped on here and realized these guys are 2 weeks from getting things started.
by donkeyjon12 on Nov 1, 2009 6:40 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I have more hope for a big jump in production for Casto than the other sophomores
by johnnycougar on Nov 1, 2009 8:50 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I'm more worried about his ability to stay on the floor for 30 minutes
He had 4.1 fouls called per 40 minutes last year, and I gotta be honest — it felt like more than that. He’s going to have to play under more control on defense, because he by far our best honest-to-goodness big man. This also means not trying to block everything in sight and leaving the guy he was supposed to be boxing out wide open for an offensive rebound and put back.
I’ll consider it a wild success if …
1) His minute percentage is over 70
2) Both his rebounding percentages go up
If his block percentage goes up or stays the same, great. But even if it goes down, as long as those two other things happen, I’ll be incredibly happy.
by Jeff Nusser on Nov 2, 2009 8:01 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I think as you're counted on to play more minutes you typically become more cautious.
It might take him a few games to figure it out but I’m not too worried about it.
by Bamer_ on Nov 2, 2009 10:43 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Wasn't too fond of Bone's comment either
I guess I can see what he meant in terms of being able to dominate the boards but not being the scorer, but it totally dismisses Casto’s strong point. I really hope Bone gets over his comparing everything to Washington phase soon. I know that is his only Pac-10 experience, but it is not going to help anyone.
I can see Casto achieving your best case scenario. He should be able to score 5-10 points a game as he should have a lot more minutes to do it. I just hope the shot blocking doesn’t go to his head too much and he tries to block shots on every attempt and get into foul trouble. I do think he is going to have some problems in staying out of foul trouble, especially early on in the season.
http://wsufoundation.wsu.edu/giving/enteramount.asp?Fund=Martin%20Stadium%20Project
by selahcoug on Nov 2, 2009 8:16 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I don't get the "comparing everything to washington" comment.
It would seem that he is trying to implement a system that he helped to define at Washington (and the other places that he has coached) that focuses on rebounding and getting the ball out fast. It would seem to me that Bone was just commenting on Casto’s potential. I’m not sure why that should be interpreted as a dis.
Brock led the pac 10 in rebounding three years in a row (only Walton and Alcindor have ever done that), led the nation in active career double doubles (60), finished in the top 12 in scoring three years in a row, was only the fourth player in Pac 10 history to record 1800 pts and 1200 rebounds, and he was a two-time first team Pac 10 player. Even if Casto is a destitute man’s version of a poor man’s Jon Brockman, its a complement.
Damn, my eyeball tastes good.
by Gekko Mojo on Nov 2, 2009 8:33 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree as well
I don’t mind him comparing our players to great uw players that he has coached right now. If he is continually doing that a year or two from now, that might be a different story.
by Coug1990 on Nov 2, 2009 9:24 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with you, I would love if Casto had anything close to the impact Brockman did.
I just think the problem most people have with the comment is that they really aren’t very similar players, aside from the position they play.
CougCenter WSU's second main blog
by Dancing Football on Nov 2, 2009 11:32 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I see.
…well, they have almost the exact same dimensions – 6’8 about 260lbs. Casto has longer limbs. I guess the point must have been that if you can get him rebounding more instead of going for blocked shots all the time, he could be a real factor in triggering the offense.
Damn, my eyeball tastes good.
by Gekko Mojo on Nov 2, 2009 12:19 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Casto is a lot lighter than Brockman
Scout.com says Brockman came into UW at 245, but Casto only runs around 230. Brockman, as a senior, was 255. Brockman also was listed at 6-7, but I think that might have been giving him an inch or so, while I think Casto is a legit 6-8.
If Casto weighs 255 by the time he’s a senior … OH MY GOODNESS.
But I think your point is right on — seems like Bone was talking more about the ability to get after it on the glass and to get garbage points. Additionally, I think one quality that’s being overlooked here is Casto’s hustle, which I think is also very similar to Brockman. Those are all qualities to be admired, and if Casto has a final three years that even resemble Brockman’s, wow that would be a huge success.
by Jeff Nusser on Nov 2, 2009 3:04 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That wasn't his only comment
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/huskymensbasketballblog/index.html
http://wsufoundation.wsu.edu/giving/enteramount.asp?Fund=Martin%20Stadium%20Project
by selahcoug on Nov 2, 2009 3:48 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs

by 









