LeGarrette Blount reinstated

Thoughts?

3 months ago Dancing Football 8 comments 0 recs |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

You already know mine

http://www.cougcenter.com/2009/10/2/1067020/on-blounts-reinstatement-i-get-it

CougCenter

by Nuss on Nov 9, 2009 10:02 AM PST reply actions 0 recs

What a surprise this happened after they lost

by spokanecougar on Nov 9, 2009 11:51 AM PST reply actions 0 recs

Its not like he could play defense

They ran the ball and threw the ball with ease. They just couldn’t stop Stanford, so I doubt thats the reason.

He shouldn’t have been suspended for the whole season anyway, but good luck justifying taking carries away from LaMichael James

by MattPD on Nov 9, 2009 12:03 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs

Thunder and lightning

CougCenter

by Nuss on Nov 9, 2009 2:02 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs

Took long enough

by johnnycougar on Nov 9, 2009 3:19 PM PST reply actions 0 recs

No Surprise

I expected Blount to be reinstated after the OR loss on Saturday.

by PDXCoug on Nov 9, 2009 6:40 PM PST reply actions 0 recs

Dear University of Oregon Athletic Department:

Please give the Pac-10 & National populace another reason to hate you.

11/09/09 @9:55am. Blount is reinstated.

Thank you.

by HugeBoobs on Nov 9, 2009 6:58 PM PST reply actions 0 recs

Not sure why everyone says because they lost they reinstated

It was crappy timing, but has been the plan all along. They said he’d be eligible after the USC game. They aren’t going to reinstate him and immediately throw him at a road game, therefor this was the game it was going to happen.

This wasn’t a snap decision after the loss. If they felt they needed him to compete, they would’ve brought him back before the Stanford game or, if they didn’t set an after USC game time frame, before the USC game.

by cougfan on Nov 9, 2009 9:34 PM PST reply actions 0 recs