Gonzaga 74, Washington State 69
There's a reason I (usually) only use the final score as the title on my game recaps. Not because I'm boring, or can't think of a catchy title that would summarize the game in a few snappy words.
It's because it is what it is.
All that really matters in the end is the final score. It didn't matter if the Zags went on their run in the first five minutes or the last five. We knew they were too good a team not to have a stretch with momentum on their side. It was a matter of how we responded. Tonight, we didn't. In that event, it doesn't matter what the score was 10, 20 or even 30 minutes in. All that matters is the result.
What you saw tonight was a young team falling apart on the road against a veteran team. Of course the Zags are young at a couple spots, but we're young at every spot, minus Nikola Koprivica.
Ultimately, I think what really hurts about this loss is the brief glimpse of what this team could become. With Reggie Moore on the bench in foul trouble, and Klay not up to living up to his usual scoring prowess, this team dominated Gonzaga in the first half. Thames, Koprivica and Harthun played well off the bench. Casto and Lodwick controlled the interior. Scoring was balanced. Shots were in rhythm. The defense was taking away the three-point shot, for the most part.
But then we saw the ugly head of what this team really is, or at least has been up to this point. Horrific three-point defense. Rebounding issues. A lack of a reliable scorer outside of Klay and Reggie Moore. We also saw our inconsistencies: free throw shooting, turnovers and forced shots all in the final ten minutes. An inability to match the Zags' aggressiveness and ability to get to the foul line. 8 turnovers on 10 possessions is unacceptable; one of many lessons to be learned from this game. This was no longer a team hungry for an upset; it was a team trying to hang on. We did against Eastern because we were the better team; we didn't against Gonzaga because we aren't.
Still, try to see this for the whole picture, not the end of the second half. This was a five point loss to a great team, who is nearly unbeatable on their home floor (I know we debunked the Kennel myth a little bit earlier, but the fact is their dominance is due to the fact that so often they ARE the better team). And the Zags don't easily get upset. It hurts now, but next year when this team closes out a game just like this you can be thankful they had this kind of experience.
It is what it is. K-State next.
Player of the Game: DeAngelo Casto. 10 points, 10 boards, on 50% shooting with 3 blocks and 3 steals.
[I should also give some well-deserved respect to the Zags' Steven Gray, who did a phenomenal job defensively on Klay Thompson, especially late in the game.]
Unsung Hero: Xavier Thames. Did most of his damage in the first half, but still had 11 points on 3/5 shooting (including 3/3 from three-point range), 3 rebounds and an assist.
Play of the Game: I have to go with the Casto block that brought Robert Sacre back to the floor. Takes us back to the first half. Simpler, happier times.
It was over when... the Cougs failed to score on a field goal for an almost ten minute stretch late in the second half. Thanks to free throws we were able to score six more points in that stretch, but that obviously was not going to be enough. Ugh. I thought the scoring droughts were supposed to move to Virginia along with Tony.
Stat of the Game: I've already mentioned the scoring drought, so let's go with the Cougars missing 8 out of 20 free throw attempts - the secret killer for WSU in this game. Make just half of those misses and, well...
0 recs |
16 comments
|
Comments
Well, what did we learn?
Klay had an off night but our bench put up points in the first half. X can score and has a pretty sweet shot. Abe is a practice and shootaround All-American which, as we’ve seen, means nothing. We’re young and couldn’t finish in a hostile environment. Charlie Enquist is not a Pac-10 player. Reggie Moore is gonna be fun to watch. We couldn’t stop Bouldin outside, and Harris inside, which killed us. We could stop Sacre, Goodson, and Gray, though! We can hang with the big boys and, if we learn how to play 40 minutes, might beat them.
The Pac-10 went 0-fer tonight, too. Awesome.
by cougfan on Dec 2, 2009 11:58 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I forgot
Please practice defending the high screen against a kid who can light it up from deep. Thanks in advance.
by cougfan on Dec 3, 2009 12:00 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Good points
I wonder if Bone tries to sign a jc player for the 4-5 spot for next year. It seems like that might be the achilles heel this year or hopefully, the bigs on the roster improve enough to be serviceable.
by Coug1990 on Dec 3, 2009 7:57 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i think we're banking on motum gaining 20 pounds
by BigWood on Dec 3, 2009 10:04 AM PST via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
I didn't see the game.
But I’m guessing from your comment they were going under the screens and not over them.
CougCenter WSU's second main blog
by Dancing Football on Dec 3, 2009 10:06 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yep
And even going over screens wasn’t going to help. They really needed to switch when he, and only he, was handling. You just can’t go under a screen without help against a guy who is red hot from deep. Either switch them or try to go over, but either way find some way to close out on him.
by cougfan on Dec 3, 2009 10:34 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I miss the Baynes hedge.
CougCenter WSU's second main blog
by Dancing Football on Dec 3, 2009 10:41 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Couldn't have said it better myself
Spot on all around.
by Jeff Nusser on Dec 3, 2009 6:04 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Lack of Bigs
Was the biggest reason (no pun intended) for our eventual demise last night. they really started pounding it inside late and we just couldnt match up with them. They got too many easy buckets to get back into the game. That being said, Klay’s off night (especially from the stripe!!) was a killer, but that will happen sometimes.
All in all, I’m very impressed with this team, their first real test of the season should be viewed with a passing grade for such a YOUNG team. But what they lack in experience, they made up for with effort and hustle. It looked like we had 5 caleb forrests out there! They really get after it and play hard! It’s a great start to the season and should help us in the conference. Go Cougs!
by LoganC on Dec 3, 2009 9:26 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
Cougs were a big man short last night. Casto was a beast but he couldn’t do it all.
by MattGSeattle on Dec 3, 2009 9:31 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
lack of bigs threw us into a 2-3
And bouldin shot right over the top of it.
by BigWood on Dec 3, 2009 10:11 AM PST via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
We should be okay in conference with the bigs we have
Come tournament time, whichever tournament we make, it will be a bigger issue.
by johnnycougar on Dec 3, 2009 12:07 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not so sure.
We shut down Sacre in the first half. They adjusted and went small. They got back in because of those high screens with Bouldin getting hot, combined with the screener sliding down towards the basket and getting WIDE OPEN (no Cougs within 10 ft) looks.
Combine that with young players feeling pressed when they starting coming back, (leading to) poor shooting, free throw shooting and turning the ball over. Those were the biggest reasons why we lost.
by TiltingRight on Dec 3, 2009 5:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Couldn't figure out how to defend high screens
We’d try to hedge and the screener would slip it. We wouldn’t hedge and the man on ball would go under and get shot over. They just couldn’t get it at all and it lit us up. We just looked lost defending the high screen.
by cougfan on Dec 4, 2009 12:00 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The great news about that?
It’s completely and totally correctable. They’ll learn from it.
by Jeff Nusser on Dec 4, 2009 9:57 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs

by 







