Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Transfer Rumor: Bolton On Verge of First Signings

Roadmap to the tournament

Disclaimer: This is not a prediction post. I would love to say I think the Cougars are good enough to make the field of 64... err, I mean 65 [bracket creep rears its ugly head! We should cancel the tournament and settle this competition the only way real men do: in a series of 34 Bowl games, of which only one has any sort of impact on the national championship picture].

Unfortunately, I'm not at a point where I feel confident in predicting the Cougars as March Madness participants. I'm not saying necessarily the Cougars can't make the tournament. They can. It just happens to be up to them, and them alone, and not a matter of my own prognostication skills. Essentially, what I'm providing tonight is a glance at what WSU must do - at a minimum - to find themselves dancing in March.

First, we have to answer the time-honored question: what gets us in? Right now, we sit at 10-2 heading into conference play. No marquee wins, but no bad losses either. We've lost to the only two top 100 teams we've played (per the kenpom rankings), and defeated all the others on the bad side of 100. I wish I could say definitively that 10 or 11 wins in conference play gets us into the tournament, but unfortunately a lot of our future is decided by how well our nonconference opponents play the rest of the way. K-State and Gonzaga could very well finish in the Top 25; that helps our cause. LSU needs to stay afloat in a surprisingly competent Southeastern Conference. If a few of our other opponents can sneak into the dance - for example, Idaho getting their act together - then even better.

However, the Pac-10 itself needs to ride the coattails of a strong Christmas Break and keep proving to people it's not the horrifically awful conference some think it is. And, really, it isn't. Right now, the Pac-10 is ranked sixth by kenpom, the worst since 2005. But did you know: the Conference of Champions was rated as low as ninth back in 2004? Yep. That was the same year Dick Bennett took a ragtag, talent-starved group of Cougars to a 7-11 conference record and a tie for seventh place. Probably not a coincidence. So the Pac-10 has been worse, but the expectations have also changed. That's thanks in large part to the conference having a first place ranking last year (not surprising), and a second place standing the year before that. The Pac-10's ascension to premier basketball conference has flown under the radar (ask a former coach of ours who still thinks the ACC walks on water), but now that we've come back to Earth things look far worse than they actually are.

Right or wrong, perception rules the day, and perception right now says the Pac-10 is a three or four bid conference at maximum. That means the Cougars need to finish in the top four. Precisely, to be safe, I'd imagine the Cougars need to put together 11 conference wins. That would also take the pressure off for the conference tournament, where they need only win one game to solidify a spot, rather than two, or the whole enchilada. [Side note: this is also a great year for the conference tournament - which could be wide open, and allow the conference to sneak a team into the dance that might otherwise not belong. It could even be a young team with one of the conference's premier players, a first-year head coach and gray alternate jerseys] Such a conference record - assuming they go one and done in the Pac-10 tourney - puts the Cougs at 22-10. I have a hard time seeing the selection committee denying a team in a power conference with that kind of resume. Of course, if they were to do it to someone, it would be us. That's a story for a different day.

Now, what's the easiest path to get there? Kenpom - which I'm sure you're aware is completely infallible and 100% accurate - has us finishing at 8-10 in conference. To get to eleven wins we need to win the games we're projected to win, and pick up three more along the way. Here's how I see it happening:

Week 1: Sweep the Oregons at home. This is a big weekend for us, and the Cougs must get off to a strong start. 12-2 (2-0).

Week 2: Split on the road at Arizona. Doesn't matter which one we get. There's the weakened, susceptible Arizona team, or the Arizona State team that is much better but features a 2-3 zone that Klay Thompson eats for dinner. 13-3 (3-1).

Week 3: Split with the Bay Area teams in Friel. In other words, beat Stanford and lose to Cal. 14-4 (4-2).

Week 4: Split in SoCal. Oddly enough, UCLA seems to be the more likely candidate for a win, despite the fact we're 2 and 3849834285 in trips to Pauley Pavillion. 15-5 (5-3).

Week 5: Lose to the Huskies at Hec Ed. No shame in that, at least this season. 15-6 (5-4).

Week 6: Split the Arizonas at home. Again, ASU is formidable so I wouldn't necessarily pencil us in for a win. 16-7 (6-5).

Week 7: Split in the Bay Area. It is important we sweep the Tree, given our past record of misfortune against the Golden Bears. It's also important that we don't fall apart in this tough week 4 through week 7 stretch. 17-8 (7-6).

Week 8: Sweep USCLA at home. Who'd have ever thought we might be favored in both games against the Bruins this season? Regardless, we need them. This will be a huger than huge weekend for the Cougs if they are still in it. Let's hope the youth comes together. 19-8 (9-6).

Week 9: BEAT THE DAWGS. On Nik Nite in Beasley, of course. 20-8 (10-6).

Week 10: Split in Oregon. Lest I remind you how tough this road trip has been for us historically, even when Oregon State was at its worst. The Cougs would be red hot at this point if they've done what I've projected, so it's only natural there might be a letdown in one of these road games. It'd be great to have the breathing room, though, if they could pull off both. 21-9 (11-7).

Conference Tourney: Win the first game over the #5 seed (my prediction: Southern Cal), then fall to the #1 seed (prediction: Cal) in a hard-fought semifinal that endears us to the selection committee. 22-10 (12-8).

So there we are. Is it doable? Surprisingly, yes. The bad news is that there is very little room for error. The Cougars need to be consistent, avoid the dreaded three-game losing streak, and get hot in February when the schedule gifts us five home games.

Still, it is possible. Plus, it's going to be a heck of a lot of fun to see if these young Cougars can pull it off.

Comment 8 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Why are we using Kenpom as a guidline?

When the NCAA uses RPI. Yes maybe people like Kenpom a little more, but if we are truly trying to predict we should use RPI as that is what the comity uses.

by MattPD on Dec 28, 2009 10:20 PM PST reply actions  

Increasingly, the committee is using other things

And in reality, no one really knows what goes on in that room. Hence all the “live looks in the room” over the past few years are visual and no audio. No one knows what goes on with the NCAA selection committee.

by 02Coug on Dec 28, 2009 10:50 PM PST up reply actions  

RPI is taking less and less of a role in that room

For example, you’ll notice RPI isn’t mentioned even once in this piece. Kenpom is the most reliable indicator we have at the moment of the strength of a team, so I think for the purposes of this discussion, it fits. As we get closer to the end of the season, looking at RPI becomes a little more relevant. (Even though RPI is stupid and irrevocably flawed.) It becomes a little less bad with larger sample sizes.

by Jeff Nusser on Dec 29, 2009 9:31 AM PST up reply actions  

I like kenpom in theory,

the only thing I don’t agree with is the there is no bonus for winning. Take the following scenario for example (and I know this is a little out there):

Two teams that play the exact same set of teams (the oppenents are all equal), and team A goes 5-5 but loses by 2 points in the 5 losses and wins by 10 or so in the 5 games they won. Team B goes 10-0 but wins each game by only a point or two. Using kenpom, team A would probably still be ranked above team B because overall their scoring efficiency was better than Team B against the same teams. I know I am dumbing down his formula a little but it is to point out that wins are not factored enough.

For example, he has 2 teams in the top 10 with 4 losses. Cal and Old Dominion are combined 1-7 against top 50 teams. However, they get rewarded big time by losing close to good teams. I’m not saying we should not reward playing well against good teams, but this is a little crazy. Meanwhile villanova is 2-1 vs. top 50 teams and 11-1 overall, ranked 30?

by spencer peaty on Dec 29, 2009 11:03 PM PST up reply actions  

That's why you have to keep in mind what this ranking system actually is trying to say

Per Pomeroy:

The first thing you should know about this system is that it is designed to be purely predictive. If you’re looking for a system that rates teams on how "good" their season has been, you’ve come to the wrong place. There are enough systems out there that rank teams based on what is "good" by just about any definition you can think of. So I’d encourage you to google college basketball ratings or even try the opinion polls for something that is more your style.

The purpose of this system is to show how strong a team would be if it played tonight, independent of injuries or emotional factors. Since nobody can see every team play all (or even most) of their games, this system is designed to give you a snapshot of a team’s current level of play.

by Jeff Nusser on Dec 30, 2009 7:47 AM PST up reply actions  

I wanted to do this exact thing

Do the week by week breakdown of what we need/could do in the Pac 10.

I can’t add much, but I will add this. We really, really need to start out 2-0, and ideally 4-0. I think both of those are possible, but I also thinlk both can be hurt by a let down that a young team entering conference play might have.

My biggest fear is this weekend. Students won’t be back, and we’ll probably be playing in front of relatively small and quiet crowds. Oregon always gives us trouble, and I hope that we can knock them out early.

by 02Coug on Dec 28, 2009 10:57 PM PST reply actions  

Let me introduce all of you to three teams from a power conference last year

Auburn: 22-11 overall, 10-6 conference
South Carolina: 21-9 overall, 10-6 conference
Florida: 23-10 overall, 9-7 conference

None of them made the NCAA tournament. Auburn had wins over Tennessee and LSU — both tournament teams — and it wasn’t enough. All three of these showed the problem with playing in a weak conference — there just isn’t the opportunity to pick up a quality win.

We don’t have a quality nonconference win to fall back on, and most years that’s not a problem. It’s a problem this year. The committee looks at whether you can play with tournament teams — in other words, are you likely to comport yourselves well if they pick you to play in the tournament. I think for us to have any kind of a chance, we have to, at minimum, split with Cal and Washington.

by Jeff Nusser on Dec 29, 2009 9:42 AM PST reply actions  

Exactly

That’s why I am not convinced that we will get in even with 11 conference wins. I can see us making it without beating UW if we sweep the next teams below us in conference, establishing a clear tier of top 3 or top 4 teams. But we really need to finish in the top 4 and probably 3, which won’t likely happen with only 11 wins. Get 13 and I’ll feel snubbed if we don’t make it.

by johnnycougar on Dec 29, 2009 2:42 PM PST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to CougCenter, a website dedicated to WSU football, basketball and other athletics.

Community Guidelines

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Brianheadshot_small
OT: Teaching Football Signals
Small
Per Cougfan.. Walden is out
Worldtraveler_small
OTFP: Greatest Player You've Ever Seen?
Cougar_01t_small
Bone-in or Bone-out?
Small
Vote for ESPN College Game Day to come to Pullman!
Jeff_mug_h2_small
Live In Spokane? Possess A DVD Recorder? Or Even A VCR? I Need Your Help
Small
OTFP: Best/Worst Trophy
Small
Just noticed this about The Crimson and Grey Game
Small
Washington State Basketball Recruiting Chart
Blazers_small
Quick Saturday Scrimmage Recap PLUS Stadium Renovation Update

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

Interview with Drew Bledsoe
Klay Thompson 6th In ROY voting
Tell us: Between Mike Leach and Craig James, who gets your vote?
Wulff lands job with 49ers
New 'Friday Night Lights' Movie: Leaked* Script Reveals Mike Leach Storyline
What if Larry Scott Never Came and Tom Hansen was Still in Charge?
Jessamyn McIntyre article from CFC
New Pac-12 Network Announcers Announced
Interview With Former Cougar Ace, Adam Conley
Jody Sears named interim head coach for Weber St.

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Go Cougs


Attractive, intelligent managing editors

Jeff_mug_h2_small Jeff Nusser

62817_716885768283_27206155_40333453_7664553_n_small Grady Clapp

Arizona_small Craig Powers

Brianheadshot_small Brian Floyd

Header_small Mark Sandritter

Attractive, intelligent editors

Worldtraveler_small Kyle Rancourt