Scouting Report: St. Mary's
Courtesy of kenpom.com:
Category Offense Defense D-I Avg
Adj. Efficiency:
110.1 [56]
96.2 [75]
101.1
Adj. Tempo:
66.4 [166]
66.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%:
49.8 [137]
46.3 [54]
49.1
Turnover %:
18.7 [68]
18.2 [300]
20.4
Off. Reb. %:
39.2 [18]
29.7 [45]
32.9
FTA/FGA:
40.7 [59]
30.3 [45]
36.5
Miscellaneous Components
3P%:
33.6 [189]
34.2 [167]
34.2
2P%:
49.5 [110]
44.6 [49]
47.9
FT%:
69.3 [160]
68.9 [176]
68.9
Block%:
7.7 [92]
11.4 [51]
8.8
Steal%:
8.3 [37]
10.1 [144]
9.9
Style Components
3PA/FGA:
34.4 [131]
26.1 [7]
33.1
A/FGM:
52.8 [205]
42.5 [3]
54.0
Defensive Fingerprint:
Mostly Man
Point Distribution (% of total points)
3-Pointers:
27.1 [177]
23.5 [301]
27.6
2-Pointers:
50.8 [214]
58.1 [12]
52.0
Free Throws:
22.1 [83]
18.4 [264]
20.4
Strength of Schedule
Components:
102.5 [133]
100.2 [139]
101.1
Overall:
0.5658 [126]
.5000
Non-conference:
0.6284 [67]
.5000
Personnel
Bench Minutes:
33.6% [107]
30.7%
Experience:
2.16 yrs [37]
1.66
Effective Height:
+2.2 [49]
0.0
Average Height:
77.2" [71]
76.5"
A couple of noteworthy things when reading this chart. One, if a number is in brackets, it is a national rank. Two: green equals good, red equals bad.
There's only one thing in the Four Factors that St. Mary's is bad at, and as luck would have it it's one of the things we're bad at too: forcing turnovers. That should be a huge aid to our offense. This team simply cannot afford turnovers. Because we surrender the offensive rebound for our transition defense, we need to make our possessions count. All of them. Secondly, we are not a come-from-behind team, as evidenced by UCLA and countless other runs that have put us down this season. Maybe not so much against UCLA, but in most games where we've been run off the floor this season, turnovers have played a huge role.
The good news, at least I like to think it's good, is that St. Mary's only does one thing remarkably well. That's offensive rebounding, and the fact of the matter is when you have superior talent in a conference like the WCC, you absolutely should dominate the offensive glass (although Gonzaga doesn't, which is either an anomaly or a result of their brutal nonconference schedule).
Which brings me to my key matchup of the game: Aron Baynes versus Diamon Simpson. We need Baynes to be prolific with defensive rebounding, and we need him to steer clear of foul trouble, which he's been so good at this year. Simpson is ranked 11th nationally in free throw rate, so watch out. If Baynes gets in trouble, hope Casto is a suitable replacement. If DeAngelo gets in trouble too, we are basically out of luck. Might not matter what Patty Mills does if our big men get two quick fouls called on them. Simpson is also a beast at defensive rebounding, rated 35th nationally in DR%. Again, as I look at these numbers, I hope it has something to do with the fact that St. Mary's opposition just wasn't as strong as ours.
So, my three burning questions for the game are:
- Is Patty Mills back to form? His injury basically sunk a Top 25 team.
- Can Baynes outperform Simpson under the basket?
- Can we keep St. Mary's off the free throw line?
If I could tell you the answers to those, I would probably have some kind of super power. I can't. We'll find out for sure tomorrow
The scariest thing as I glance at the scouting report above it looks remarkably similar to one University of Washington basketball team. Dominant in offensive rebounding, excellent at getting to the free throw line. Don't get down about that - UW is much better, and we held our own against the Huskies even with Klay Thompson and Marcus Capers in foul trouble. Nevertheless, St. Mary's is a solid team that has every right to have a chip on their shoulders about failing to make the Big Dance.
Make no mistake - I want this game. One, to give WSU and the Pac-10 a marquee win in the NIT. Secondly, the WCC has been going all out in its effort to recruit Australia's finest. They even worked with ESPN (imagine that!) to get a number of their conference games televised down under. I would love to show a nationwide audience in the U.S., and possibly Australia, that Baynes is the best Aussie on the court, and that Australian players should be looking to suit up in Crimson and Gray.
This game, oddly enough, could have some serious impact on recruiting in the future. At least we have Brock Motum already locked up for next fall.
0 recs |
14 comments
|
Comments
Dang!
All these stats look confusing as hell and when they’re explained to me, I find out we don’t match up with SMC all that well. Double Dang!
On top of that, "If it says Libbeys, Libbeys, Libbeys on the label, label, label you will like it, like it, like it on your table, table, table. I don’t think so! Triple Dang!
Go Cougs!!!
by SW WA Coug on Mar 17, 2009 12:24 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
If I'm reading it right?...
St. Mary’s is pretty bad across the board on offensive 3 pt. field goals stats. I see this as a huge positive considering how our pack-style defense lacks quite a bit in that category. It seems the teams that drop the 3 on us are the ones who seem to break our defense apart (Cal, UCLA, Gonzaga, Arizona – to name a few). I know UW doesn’t utilize the 3 very often, but in the blow-out game in Pullman they were hitting it early and often. I don’t see anyway of this getting away from us like two of the UCLA games, the Pullman UW game, and Gonzaga game. If Capers and Rochestie can cut off penetration from Mills, then we are gold.
by LeaveItToWeaver on Mar 17, 2009 1:28 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
The major weakness of the pack defense is the propensity to give up open 3-pointers because you’re defending the lane so vigorously. This is a team that’s pretty average in terms of shooting, 3-pointers taken and percentage of offense from 3-pointers. This works in our favor.
by Jeff Nusser on Mar 17, 2009 8:18 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
And honestly, no offense to the WCC
But if your 3 point shooting is that mediocre in a conference that isn’t as strong, what’s it going to be like against the #6 overall defense in the country? I know our pack defense allows a lot of 3s but also think of the teams we’ve gone up against – all four that LeaveItToWeaver mentioned are in the top 20 in 3pt %, and we’ve played eight games against them. I think our 3pt defense isn’t quite as bad as it looks, especially since we’re good at closing out on the shooters and at least contesting the shots. This could show up in a big way against St Mary’s.
Tony Bennett for Heisman!
by johnnycougar on Mar 17, 2009 10:32 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Quote from the SMC board:
“If Patty is at least 90% healthy he’ll be a really tough guy for them to defend, he’ll just be too quick for there defense no matter how good there supposed to be, I
dont think theres anyone equivalent in the Pac 10 to compare to Patty.”\
No one equivalent in Pac 10 play? ROFL!!!!
This is where per game statistics go to die.
CougCenter
by Dancing Football on Mar 17, 2009 7:23 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm pretty sure Darren Collison disagrees
by Jeff Nusser on Mar 17, 2009 8:19 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jerome Randle, Tajaun Porter, Nic Wise, and Isaiah Thomas may also want to interject.
This is where per game statistics go to die.
CougCenter
by Dancing Football on Mar 17, 2009 9:44 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I only said Collison because they possess similar size and skill sets
by Jeff Nusser on Mar 17, 2009 10:17 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
True
I was going for quick PGs in general
This is where per game statistics go to die.
CougCenter
by Dancing Football on Mar 17, 2009 12:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Looking over his stats
I’m seeing a lot of 6-18 type shooting nights, really what makes him most dangerous is his free throw rate. But even that is still well below players like Randle and Thomas. He only shoots 34% on 3s, and his true shooting % (which takes free throws into account) is below Klay’s.
Probably underrated aspects to his game are his assists (though not that great of of a A/T ratio) and that he gets a lot of steals. We’ll need to play patiently and we can definitely neutralize this guy.
Forget the Randle and Collison comparisons, let’s just look at him compared to Rochestie (here):
The only category in which he is significantly better than Taylor is in steals. He’s slightly better offensively overall but has worse eFG or TS%, rebounding, assisting, A/T ratio, and even free throw rate.
Tony Bennett for Heisman!
by johnnycougar on Mar 17, 2009 10:46 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The guy will be a better pro than Rochestie, no doubt
But for tonight, I like Rochestie, who also is much better at keeping opposing guards in front of him than he gets credit for. Where the Cougs have problems is with mobile big men who can screen and roll and force the Cougs to switch. I don’t know if any of the Gaels big men present that kind of problem. Perhaps Simpson?
by Jeff Nusser on Mar 17, 2009 10:55 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm pretty sure we will be able to dictate the flow of the game
That’s our most effective weapon, for my money. Each possession is valuable. I don’t think Saint Mary’s can get away from playing at our pace. There shouldn’t be a lot of open court looks for them, where Mills is most effective.
If we shoot respectably, get Aron involved and he’s having a decent night, and limit unforced errors and fouls, it should be a good game for us.
by SW WA Coug on Mar 17, 2009 12:48 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Will playing in a small HS type gym cause anyone to regress?
I sure hope not. Looking at their seating chart it sure feels like the HS regionals. LOL.
Putting it that way, perhaps Capers will start lighting it up, what did he average in HS? Ditto for Casto and Thompson.
Go Cougs!
by DCinSEA on Mar 17, 2009 2:36 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 












