SMPG: Panic. Tony doesn't get it.
EDITOR'S NOTE (3/30/09): Yes, I am aware of how ridiculous this post sounds now. But for what it's worth, at the time I wrote it, I believed it.
Count me among the many out there who are dumbfounded by Kentucky's firing of Billy Gillespie.
Maybe I was naive, but I thought NCAA programs had gotten past this sort of thing. I was wrong, once again. For yet another year, the old superpowers of College football and basketball unite to throw the coaching world into an endless carousel, all in the name of higher expectations.
I'm at a loss to understand why Kentucky thinks this is a good move. Or why they thought it was a good move to lose Tubby Smith in the first place (who, I might add, is now having great success in Minnesota). Now, who in their right mind is going to take a job where getting along with the administration is going to be equally important, and as difficult, as getting along with recruits?
Universities seem to get drunk on championships. This is one problem we've never had to deal with as Coug fans, and that's actually a good thing. The closest I've come to witnessing this phenomenon has to do with Nebraska football, where it happens that a few of my relatives bleed a slightly different shade of crimson blood.
Let me bring you up to date on what's happened with the Huskers, as it is a perfect example of a powerhouse desperate for success. Since the glory days of the 90s, football in Lincoln hasn't been the same. Realizing that Frank Solich was no longer going to cut it, the players and some fans of Nebraska lobbied for an up-and-coming defensive coordinator by the name of Bo Pelini to take over the program. The AD disagreed. Nebraska wanted the "sexy hire". So, they went with recently fired Raiders head coach Bill Callahan. After all, Callahan made it to the Super Bowl in his first NFL season, so he had to be awesome. Right?
Nope. Callahan brought a textbook-thick playbook and the West Coast offense to Nebraska, a school that thrived for years on utilizing corn-fed lineman to fuel a potent rushing attack. Long story short: it didn't work. And when Nebraska wanted to reclaim their identity, who did they turn to? A successful LSU defensive coordinator named Bo Pelini. The same guy they should've hired years earlier.
The best hiring of the young offseason won't be whoever Kentucky hires, or whoever Arizona hires, but who Alabama already hired. That would be VCU coach Anthony Grant, the very definition of bright young coach. Grant would've been the head coach at Florida had Billy Donovan bolted for the Magic. Even more shocking, Grant didn't leave VCU at the first opportunity - he waited for what he felt would be the right opening, despite numerous job openings on the East coast before that.
The point is this: I was mystified when Oregon State first hired Craig Robinson. Now I'm not. It's much better to find the right person to lead your program, not the biggest name. On rare occasions, you get both, which is exactly what happened when Jim Sterk lured Dick Bennett out of retirement.
Still, patience needs to be more of a requirement on both ends. Dan Monson bolted from Gonzaga in favor of Minnesota - only to be fired and watch his successor, Mark Few, rise to the top of the collegiate coaching ranks. Notre Dame has been the poster child of coaching indecisiveness, hiring Ty Willingham, firing Ty Willingham, and then giving a ten-year extension to Charlie Weis after one modestly successful season. It's all a mess - and if Kentucky doesn't figure out how to have a little patience, they will go the way of the Irish.
Tony had the perfect response on his radio show when a caller asked about the interest he's had from other schools. "You're just their flavor of the month," said the younger Bennett. That's proof he understands the carousel more than most of his colleagues. Want to make a million plus coaching college basketball? Want to jump ship for a big-name program? Just have one surprising season with a mid major or lower-tier power conference team. Teams were clamoring for Tony's services after the Sweet Sixteen last year. Funny how few teams will try to break down the door to claim Tony now, after a 17-16 NIT season.
Let me ask you this: is Tony any less qualified to lead a major program this year than he was after last year? Of course not. The difference is that programs like Indiana overvalued his abilities after his phenomenal first two seasons. Just like programs will undervalue Bennett after this season. It's all part of the ridiculousness of coaching in this day and age.
Tony understands it all, but I fear for the next victim. Will it be Mark Few leaving the job security and wins behind at Gonzaga for the intensified pressure of Arizona? Will it be John Calipari doing the same and ditching Memphis for Lexington? Who will be the next firing of a power-hungry University seeking to reclaim its lost glory?
For now, I like where WSU is at. Tony gets it. And that's a special thing.
0 recs |
23 comments
|
Comments
Is Sterk really that good?
Did he know exactly what he was getting in Tony when he signed up Dick? There are so many guys in Tony’s position who would have bolted by now.
This is where per game statistics go to die.
CougCenter
by Dancing Football on Mar 29, 2009 10:52 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I don't think Sterk knew what we were getting with Tony
But he was certainly right about what we got with DB.
by Grady. on Mar 29, 2009 5:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tony is the team
For several years we’ve wondered if the cougs were a one or two season thrill. Tony’s commitment and the play of our freshmen this past season indicates its an organization building for the future. We should be proud.
by oldmancoug on Mar 29, 2009 11:54 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I was watching Dick Vitale's neck veins....
bulge and his head was practically ready to explode when he was talking about the Kentucky opening the other day. The sound was muted but that was fine. I got the message. He was promoting any number of ‘qualified’ candidates for that position and I can only imagine who they were. I’m fairly sure Kentucky’s AD and fans had the sound turned up. That’s normally where the hype and rumors get started, with guys like him promoting their flavors of the month.
by SW WA Coug on Mar 29, 2009 12:54 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
He was promoting Bob Knight.
I wish I was joking.
by Jeff Nusser on Mar 29, 2009 1:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
USC football went thru the same thing....
before Mike Garrett lucked out with the Pete Carroll hiring. You see this kind of thing happening many times over the years. How do you replace a John Wooden?
We are fortunate to have Tony Bennett, no matter what his path was to be in this position. It’s irrelevant. I think the longer he’s in Pullman, the better the chance that he stays on longer. I can actually envision him staying long-term. I hope that makes sense. The way I see it, he realizes at Wazzu it’s about more than just wins and losses and how much salary he pulls down. I don’t know what it is for him, but it’s certainly more than that.
by SW WA Coug on Mar 29, 2009 1:22 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Let's not get too comfortable
I really want to believe that Coach Tony will stay in Pullman forever, but I also thought Coach Price was going to stay forever. I was never so sure of Price’s permanence in Pullman than the week before the announcement that he was going to Alabama. I was telling my brother-in-law how Price was WSU, that he was respected, valued and trusted, despite many years of futility.
We can never get comfortable. We always need to worry, to some degree. It might be that he leaves when we least expect it.
by HitKing69 on Mar 29, 2009 1:05 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I don't have any illusions that he's going to stay forever
But he also has made it clear that he wants to invest the time to build something special before he even thinks about going anywhere. I believe him. Because of that, I think we have nothing to worry about for at least two more seasons. Honestly.
by Jeff Nusser on Mar 29, 2009 1:10 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
One quick question....
Since Chadwick is the son of a long time friend of Tony’s, wouldn’t it be reasonable to think that Tony would stay to see him through his time at WSU at the very least?
I have no illusions that Tony will stay until retirement at WSU, but I believe that he’s motivated by things entirely outside of money. Sure, he could pull down over $2M/year somewhere else, but with that comes so much more pressure and intrusion on his personal life. I may be in the minority, but there is significant value in getting “only” $1M/year vs. what he could get given those tradeoffs.
by westsidecougar1 on Mar 29, 2009 1:53 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yep
And I should clarify that I don’t think Tony will stay around forever… but he will only go if he gets burned out or feels he can leave the program in a good position. And that’s certainly a positive. My hope is that we can somehow keep Ben Johnson around long enough to hand him the reigns if Tony leaves in the next five years.
I still hope Tony becomes a lifer in Pullman. But that’s a lot of wishful thinking. I still think burnout is just as likely to get him as another school.
by Grady. on Mar 29, 2009 5:20 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Grady, you make some great points...
Also I am reminded of what UCLA went through after John Wooden retired at the top of his game.
As much as I love college athletics, the big money is certainly driving schools/coaches to cheat and cut corners in order to get an edge over their competition. I’m not sure where this will end, but it is very distasteful to me.
We are very fortunate that Tony sees right through these sleazeballs at the big money programs. Sure, he could pull down over $2M/yr last season leaving WSU for “greener pastures”, but at the expensive of selling his soul to the devil…so to speak.
It sort of reminds me of the movie It’s a Wonderful Life, where Mr. Potter waves his big bucks at Jimmy Stewart’s character and after the handshake between them, Stewart’s demeanor changed drastically when he realized he’d just agreed to do something totally against his value system.
Tony will go elsewhere someday, but It’ll be on his terms. He’s stated that he just wants to coach some good basketball at a place that appreciates him and what he’s doing. I hope he’s at WSU for a long time…and I believe he likely will be as long as his leadership is supportive of his principles.
PS I think that Mike Anderson would be a very good hire for UK. I wouldn’t take the job if I were him, but they could do much worse.
by westsidecougar1 on Mar 29, 2009 1:48 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm guessing...Sunday Morning Point Guard
by 02Coug on Mar 29, 2009 2:09 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
right you are
Too much effort is required to spell it out
by Grady. on Mar 29, 2009 5:16 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It is obvoius that
Tony won’t be leaving in the next 2-3 years. He is not an opportunist or he would have left for Indiana or LSU. Now he has a really young team that won’t be reaching the sweet 16 anytime soon. I would not be surprised if he were to leave the year after this year’s freshmen class graduates.
If I were Jim Sterk, and Tony came to me and said he was considering leaving WSU for a different school, this is what I would tell him. First off, tell him that he should do what is best for him because he stayed longer then he had to because he is a good guy. However I would tell him that we will give him a lifetime contract where his salary will increase $125,000 every year he stays. Then I would move to rename the court to Tony Bennett court. If he wants to be elsewhere, well then all I can say is thank you very much and good luck. If he wants to be the Lute Olsen of the Northwest, he can be.
by peaty411s on Mar 29, 2009 3:06 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I don't think that Tony would be motivated to name the court...
after him (anyway, it is already named Friel Court, so that couldn’t happen). He’s clearly not a big ego guy.
He would certainly be motivated to name something after his dad though.
WSU should continue to upgrade Beasley and perhaps add an attached assembly hall to the coliseum (kind of like what the Zags have) and maybe name that after Dick Bennett. After all…no Dick Bennett, then no Tony Bennett.
Just my $0.02.
by westsidecougar1 on Mar 29, 2009 3:25 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tony already has done something special here
Two NCAA tournaments in a row in Pullman I would say definately qualifies for doing something special here. The pinnacle of Cougar basketball was the previous two seasons. If we think Tony can build a contender every year in Pullman, maybe it’s us that are delusional, not the Kentucky fans!! Tony could leave today and I would be forever grateful to the great run we have just been on !!
by golfpunk on Mar 30, 2009 9:13 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I would be grateful too
But I think Tony wants to see if he can build something that’s more than a flash in the pan. You may or may not remember, but nobody thought it was possible to build a winner in Tucson, either. If you’ve ever been to Tucson, you know it doesn’t exactly have all that much more to offer than Pullman. Get a special coach in a place where he wants to stay … it can be done.
by Jeff Nusser on Mar 30, 2009 10:16 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It can be done
I wouldn’t exactly agree that what Tony has done would be considered a flash in the pan, no matter how long he may stay. Tucson is definately easier to get to logistacally, but it does take something special to want to stay in the desert too..That being said, I think hoping to build an Arizona like program is forward thinking for sure. I was thinking an NCAA tournament game every five years or so would be acceptable.
by golfpunk on Mar 30, 2009 12:42 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Tony gets it....
If “it” is my boot in his ass.
by TrueCoug on Mar 30, 2009 3:22 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 











