BREAKING: Apple Cup to move to Seattle full time
Huge news tonight, broken by the best beat reporter around:
PULLMAN – Washington State University and the University of Washington are near an agreement to move the Apple Cup rivalry football game to Qwest Field in Seattle, The Spokesman-Review learned Wednesday.
The agreement, which is expected to be finalized soon, would mean the yearly game between the schools would move off campus sites – Martin Stadium in Pullman and Husky Stadium in Seattle – and be played in the Seattle Seahawks’ home each season beginning in 2010.
It's an idea that a lot of fans have kicked around, but something nobody ever thought the schools would seriously discuss. So why the change of heart? Money, of course. First & Goal, Inc., has guaranteed that each school will walk away with -- are you ready for this? -- $2 million every year. Compare that to the roughly $1 million the schools make every other year currently. As Grippi's source says in the story, it would basically be irresponsible of the school to not pursue this in the current economic climate.
Personally, I think this is fantastic.
The atmosphere will be absolutely electric -- since the tickets would be split evenly between the schools, I'm just picturing this massive stadium split evenly between crimson and purple, with a line in each end zone where the two sets of fans meet. And while it's a bummer that students and Eastern Washington fans will have to travel to Seattle every year, I can guarantee each school will have no problem selling its allotment -- the Huskies' likely gobbled up by season ticket holders, the Cougs' by season ticket holders and the myriad fans in Western Washington.
The downside, of course, is that this is bad for the city of Pullman -- businesses gain a lot financially from Apple Cup weekend. But the September game normally played at Qwest will be moved back to Martin Stadium, and while that game obviously will not likely draw as many fans to the city as the Apple Cup, there still will be five games in Pullman.
Additionally, in order for First & Goal to guarantee such a payout -- which is larger than some bowl games -- ticket prices are going to probably be pretty darn expensive. I'm sure First & Goal is banking on making it into a must-attend event to increase demand. It will be interesting to watch.
But all in all? Wonderful.
156 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I'm really (pleasantly) surprised you like the idea.
Been over at Cougfan, and it seems everyone HATES it.
It will be such a crazy big event
I’m just imagining the tailgating that will take place with 33,000 Cougs and 33,000 Huskies in one spot. Too much stinking fun. And while people obviously associate Seattle with UW, there will be no home field advantage for either team.
Beyond that, it’s just a lot of money that will allow our athletic department to be more competitive. That’s huge.
I’d understand flaming it if we were making some kind of crazy money grab that would kill the spirit of the game, but I see this as something that enhances it.
I have Seahawks season tickets and we tailgate before every game
Trust me … it is a lot of fun.
by Jeff Nusser on Apr 15, 2009 10:02 PM PDT up reply actions
There won't be tailgating
They don’t allow it for the Coug game in Seattle now, so they won’t for this game either. I tailgate in Pullman for every home game, that is what tailgating is about. The Apple Cup weekend is one of the best tailgating days in Pullman other than homecoming. Taking that away hurts not only the team and the fans, but the local econemy. Moving the early season out of conference game to Pullman is not going to replace that. This would kill season ticket sales. As it sits now, I would imagine the even years do a lot better in sales with the AC, USC and Oregon all at home those years. This is a terrible idea and will kill this program faster than almost anything else they could do. Read the artilce by Nick Daschel linked off of Sportslink, it is right on.
There are plenty of places to tailgate
They don’t “allow” tailgating for Seahawks games, either … yet we do. All over the place. And I’ll address Daschel’s piece in a bit.
by Jeff Nusser on Apr 16, 2009 10:14 AM PDT up reply actions
Not true selahcoug, did you not go to the WSU - Oklahoma State game?
I went to that game this last season and had a kickass time tailgaiting.
by Displaced_Spokanite on Apr 16, 2009 10:32 AM PDT up reply actions
The tailgating for the Seattle game is super fun
This is where per game statistics go to die.
CougCenter
by Craig Powers on Apr 16, 2009 3:57 PM PDT up reply actions
I have tailgated in the Tailgate heave as well.
It is fun, but it isn’t anywhere near the same as in Pullman. The tailgating in Pullman lasts all weekend, usually starting on Thursday as that is when the RV lots open up. You can go out at half time and tailgate more rather than watching the band march in slow motion to the same songs over and over. You meet all kinds of people there. In Seattle, you get a lot of fair weather fans blowing in, drinking and leaving. The one game a couple of years ago was really embarassing how trashed the lot was afterwards. The lot owner said they wouldn’t allow tailgating after that, but reconsidered. Try tailgating in Pullman sometime, and you will see the diference.
As a potential student in 2011, I hate this idea.
But if the game is over Thanksgiving break it is a lot to home. While I would prefer to be in the college atmosphere, you can’t argue with the almighty dollar. 2 Million is a lot more then the 250,000 the team gets for a game in Pullman.
If you look at a lot of great rivalries (Red River, Colorado and Colorado St, Kansas and Kansas st.) they are all played in neutral sites. There are a lot of pluses and minuses about it and I’m not sure how I fell right now.
Eh...
I voted yes, but I’m torn. I graduate next year so it’s not like I’ll be in Pullman, however I liked the idea of returning to Pullman every year to watch us play against the Huskies… I guess Homecoming will be an even bigger event.
Also I feel really bad for the businesses in Pullman since they really could use the money that the game brings in.
You'd only be returning to Pullman every *other* year to see them play the Huskies
You can still come back on another weekend …
by Jeff Nusser on Apr 15, 2009 10:02 PM PDT up reply actions
When the team is good
Apple Cup tickets are hard to come by for Alumni. Martin stadium is small. When the team is good, Pullman is rocking every football weekend. $2 mill a year hopefully will help us become more consistent.
I love this idea
Few reasons why
1) With the increase from 11 to 12 games a few years ago, UW and WSU have struggled to find bye weeks in their schedule during the years the AC was played in Pullman. This was due to WSU’s week long Thanksgiving, and need to host the game the week before that vacation. That meant games after the AC for both teams over the past few years, something I’m not a huge fan of.
2) Making it a bigger event makes it a bigger event. OK, that was a ridiculous sentence. But national attention is good for both schools. And if First and Goal is paying that much, they will promote it, increasing it’s visibility and national attention.
3) It means Cougs get to go every year, with less of a problem. As a student, during the Gesser years, I attended AC’s at both Martin and Husky stadium. Martin stadium is small, we all know that, and WSU has to offer UW a decent part of the stadium to make the game work. UW offered a few more tickets then we did, but with the bigger stadium, it meant that Coug fans were a much smaller percentage of the crowd at Husky stadium. It will generally be 50/50 at Qwest, and I think that’s great.
One thing I also forgot to put in the story
Increasing our exposure to recruits on the west side is nothing but good.
I hope they serve beer
Thus paving the way for the biggest college football-related riot in U.S. history.
But seriously – wherever they put the minuscule student sections (and they will be minuscule, trust me), they better make damn sure they are on opposite sides of the field from one another. I’ve gotten the oh-no-a-fight-might-actually-break-out feeling a couple times at WSU/UW events in Pullman, and something tells me the dam will break at some point.
Potential brutality aside, I’m not liking the idea. It’s about a 60/40 split in favor of the Huskies. And when the Huskies are good (a long shot, but it could happen someday) get ready to watch some purple creep in to the sea of crimson thanks to stubhub.
I just liked the fact that every other year the game was in the heart of Cougar country. Making those wusses from the west side travel 300 miles to the Palouse is all part of the fun. Also, no more snow bowls. Probably.
I’m really split on this. I’ve always been a proponent of the Seattle game (although, becoming a season holder today, I’m not a fan of it being a separate deal), but that’s in part because it’s exposure for WSU on the west side that isn’t normally there. When the AC rolls around we get more exposure.
Then again, there was no experience like rivalry games in high school with fans lined up on each side of the arena. I was a proud participant in the Stinky Sneaker games in Spokane, and the loudest I’ve ever heard any arena was my senior year. And because University is awful at most things, I was part of the first graduating class at Central Valley to go undefeatedin the contest. We rushed the court at our rivals’ gym. That’s cold as ice, and it was awesome.
Part of me feels that it is awesome. Part of me thinks its sucks. I abstain (courteously) from the poll.
Coug fans have shown that they'll pony up for stuff, though
I’m thinking of that Apple Cup flag-on-the-Space Needle contest a few years ago, and also the 65-35 ratio of the 1997 Rose Bowl. When we want something, we go get it. I’m a lot less concerned than you about whether either side would be able to gain an attendance advantage. I think both sides are going to be eager to protect their territory.
by Jeff Nusser on Apr 15, 2009 10:24 PM PDT up reply actions
I agree
Yes, in years that UW is really god and we are really bad, maybe we see a 60/40 attendance. But in most years, I just don’t see Cougs selling tickets away.
I also think, over time, this could become big. I have plenty of Husky fans as friends, I’ll probably live in the Seattle area for awhile, I’d love to take my son (future, potential son) to an Apple cup and tailgate with my UW friends and their children.
You can tailgate with me and my son ...
I’m thinking giant, massive CougCenter tailgate.
by Jeff Nusser on Apr 15, 2009 10:33 PM PDT up reply actions
It's not inconceivable that I could be sold on this...
But you’re gonna have to start selling. Hard.
Just think of it as a crazy big event
Especially if it’s Thanksgiving weekend, think of all the game-related stuff that could go on all week. It would be like a bowl game, if you’ve ever been to one of those.
by Jeff Nusser on Apr 15, 2009 10:33 PM PDT up reply actions
One of the most memorable things in my time at WSU was the 06 Apple Cup
I don’t think it would have been as fun if I’d had to travel all the way to Seattle. As someone who never lived in the Seattle area, it would be too much like having the game at UW every year.
by displacedcoug on Apr 15, 2009 10:37 PM PDT up reply actions
The 06 Apple Cup?
Where we gave up 150 big plays and lost, ending our chances at a once sure bowl berth. I must say that is one of the least fun things I’ve ever attended.
This is where per game statistics go to die.
CougCenter
by Craig Powers on Apr 15, 2009 10:39 PM PDT up reply actions
That was my freshman year... It sucked...
I also forgot to bring a coat and after the sun set, it was freezing :(
well, not the game
I meant the weekend. The game may have sucked, but it was the whole feeling of actually being at my first apple cup.
by displacedcoug on Apr 15, 2009 10:45 PM PDT up reply actions
At first glance I thought this was some delayed April Fools' joke
Then when I realized it is real my first reaction was NOOOOOOOOOO. But now I must say it could be fun.
This is where per game statistics go to die.
CougCenter
This is the worst idea I have ever heard
My first year here was in ‘04, the first of the 4 wins out of the last 5. For each Apple Cup in Pullman I have camped out starting at about 5 AM the day of the game to get in the front row. Some of the best friendships I have forged in my time in Pullman were borne out of freezing my butt off waiting for the Cougs to play football. This last year, despite our difficulties, was the most fun I have ever had at a sporting event. I screamed until my throat bled, I cried a little when we stormed the field, and I had the time of my life. Qwest can not and will not be the same. EVER. I don’t care about the money or anything else. How will we ever get as pumped for defending Qwest as we do, both the team and fans, for defending Martin. There is nothing like stomping a rival at home, or beating them in their house and dancing on their turf. A piece of Cougar Football died today.
I get that
But I also think a new piece of Cougar Football could be born.
by Jeff Nusser on Apr 15, 2009 10:46 PM PDT up reply actions
I agree
to me, it is the same as the talk of moving the main campus to Vancouver. Financially it makes sense, but it won’t be the Wazzu I love anymore, just another commuter school.
by displacedcoug on Apr 15, 2009 10:47 PM PDT up reply actions
Some are saying this will be like the Texas/OU game.
It won’t. The cotton bowl is almost perfectly equidistant from both schools. Qwest is 300 miles from Pullman and 3 miles from UW.
This move is what hiring Terry Porter would’ve been. A homerun potentially if all goes well, but far too high of a probability of a complete bust.
and if
Coug sports continues on it present path, and the struggle for money gets worse, who will you scream for if football has to go away ???
if we become less competitive and can’t recruit or attract quality coaches ?
OR, do you have 2 million dollars that you can commit RIGHT NOW, to save the sacred site of Pullman ?
A quick glance at the mutt-themed scout.com site shows
That they aren’t really keen on the idea, either.
Really?
I don’t see any downsides from their perspective…
What if...
UW starts playing all their home games at Qwest when HS collapses? Won’t that be a home field advantage?
I’m sure Jim Walden is crying somewhere.
by StraightOuttaPullman on Apr 15, 2009 11:43 PM PDT reply actions
Nuss I see what you're saying...
but I can’t fathom trying to get everyone as worked up in Qwest as they get in Martin. Qwest is loud, and I’ve been there for all but one of the Seattle Games, and I realize the AC would fill it to capacity. However, it just isn’t the same. Sure when it’s all done we could rush the field and dance like idiots, but the whole atmosphere before and after the game goes out the window. There would be no yellow lot tailgates across the street where everyone is having a blast, but there would be a bunch of tailgates way off the beaten path since you can’t tailgate in the main lot. There would be sweet victory, but no booing Huskies into leaving the Sports Page when you just wanna savor victory and knock down a few brews. There would be none of the same big town-little town stuff anymore, it would be just another “neutral” site, where people would be happy or sad, and then go disperse through a city that probably doesn’t care all that much. Seattle is a terrible sports town to begin with, so moving everything there just makes no sense. Not only that, but we would effectively eliminate any hope of ever getting another snow capped Apple Cup. It is not worth it, and the athletic department is not in such financial dire straits that we are looking at having to do what Western did to their football program. If we were it would be a different story. If you want a bowl game atmosphere then go to a bowl game when we earn it, not just when we inflate the rivalry game to that level, which I still don’t think would work.
Aside from the $$$ ...
this f*&%ing sucks.
When was the last time it snowed in Seattle on Apple Cup Saturday?
I still have a piece of Husky Stadium when we ripped appart the bleachers in ’97 (it sits in presented glory in the window of my man-cave)
How ‘bout making all those losers drive out 26 in shitty weather to play against us? I love it whenever I hears some 60 year old dawg bitching while he’s walking back to his Chevy Tahoe saying “we drove all the way out to this f*&%ing place for that.”
Picture Brandon Gibson catching a game winning touchdown and standing in an end-zone with the word “SEAHAWKS” writen on it.
Part of what makes college sports so great is the campus atmosphere. What’s next, home football games in San Antonio?
I bet, with th large money at atmosphere they are going to try and create,
they will repaint the field and make sure the hawks are away that week.
Sure the 'Hawks will be away that week
but why would they go through the trouble of re-painting the field?
Game
The game has to be played the Saturday after Thanksgiving!
by Roy Weaver Stuckey on Apr 16, 2009 12:06 AM PDT reply actions
I can't believe Coug fans right now
Really trying to start a FireSterk.com site? Not renewing season tickets? Never attending anymore games? I thought we were Cougs through and through!?
I'm not really for this Apple Cup move...
But I think Jim Sterk is one of the best things we have going for us right now.
by displacedcoug on Apr 16, 2009 12:25 AM PDT up reply actions
I'm hoping this is a belated April Fools prank
I understand that money speaks, but seriously this takes every advantage that WSU has out of the equation (weather, travel, home crowd, large rowdy student body). I’d be curious to see how much revenue Pullman businesses lose in this change. We all want Pullman to be a growing town with plenty of business, restaurants, and hotels for college students and their families – yet we will be throwing that away with this decision. Also, in regards to the stadium remodel, do we really need that anymore? Apple Cup is the big ticket for season tickets, so expect ticket revenue to drop if STHs are not given GREAT seats at Qwest for relatively the same pricing. The main reason for getting season tickets at WSU is to be assured of Apple Cup tickets. Now with no need for AC tickets, why pay for the Oregon State, Idaho, Nevada type games? If we move the best game of the year to Seattle, we might as well move them all.
All we are doing is sabotaging our stadium remodel, taking away home field advantage, and putting additional revenue in King County instead of Pullman/Whitman County.
This decision sucks 10x more than Tony Bennett leaving. I live 5 minutes away from Qwest, so its not like I’m an East-side of the state person either. Coach Walden has to burning up right about now. The man who fought so hard to get the Apple Cup back to Pullman will be losing it – to Seattle. Are you kidding me?!!!
Plus, even with the 2 million – UW is getting the same 2 million. So maybe we get a little edge on the other 8 Pac-10 schools (which 2 million means nothing to – other than OSU); but we are just staying even with our rival. UW will be re-investing their 2 mil into athletics, and so WSU will have to follow suit. Athletics use what they receive, so an extra 2 mil just means we are spending 2 mil to keep up with the Jones. And again, taking money away from Pullman businesses. Everybody loves a half-dead Pullman, right? The upcoming addition of Suites, Loge Seats, Club Seats, concessions, etc. are what give WSU a financially competitive advantage (WSU earns extra revenue, while others stay the same). Taking away Apple Cup takes away a huge portion of this revenue stream. The only way I’m accepting of this if if its a 4 yr agreement or less; and would be taking place immediately. If its to help get us through the economic down-turn, then I understand – but permanently is a terrible idea.
by LeaveItToWeaver on Apr 16, 2009 1:38 AM PDT reply actions
I hate this.
I’m a student and I selfishly hate this move. That’s two potential Apple Cups in Pullman that I will be missing out on as a student.
There are going to be massive protests here on campus… I can already tell. I’ve already received two facebook group invitations about not moving the Apple Cup to Quest and the news has only been out for a few hours. Word is traveling fast and if students at this University have any say, this will not happen.
But that is a big ‘if’. Us students probably don’t have any say. After all they did take away some of our basketball seating this past year. Yet eventually they gave in and are going to be giving it back… so maybe there is hope this decision will be reversed/ won’t go through.
Hearing you say this is fantastic makes me feel a little better.
But I still felt sick to my stomach when I saw this. I don’t like playing the Apple Cup on the other side of the state in the Husky’s back yard every year. I don’t like the campus not being electric all week and all day for an event happing right next to the class rooms and down the street from the dorms. It’s just not the same thing when rivalry games aren’t played in the home stadium.
To me it loses a lot of what makes the games great, and does so by leaning an advantage towards Seattle.
Thought it was a bad idea when I first heard about it
Now that I’ve had some time to let it sink in I think it’s a terrible idea.
This is purely a money move for the AD department.
This sucks BIG TIME for the students. Are they going to accept student passes at Qwest for the AC? For the Dawgs, their home field advantage is somewhat diminished. For us, it is ANNIHILATED, I don’t care how many alum show up, the student section is always the most boisterous group of fans and rightfully so…it is THEIR team more then ours. THEIR time, and THEY deserve to enjoy it.
Even with all of the agony I experienced watching our horrendous AC losses in ‘00 and ’02 in person as a student I wouldn’t trade being at HOME for any venue in the world, no matter how nice it was. I would be sooooo bitter if I were a student right now, I feel for them, I really do.
This also sucks BIG TIME for the businesses in Pullman, who have ALWAYS been over the top supportive of Cougar athletics. I used to work at the Corner Market on Greek Row, I imagine if Bob is still there, he’s pacing around his place this morning, puffing smokes, just LIVID. The Apple Cup is arguably the biggest money-maker for Pullman’s businesses to come around all year long, and the AD just decided to pocket all of that money for themselves.
I live in Green Lake, so obviously this makes the Apple Cup 50% easier to attend than it was before from my perspective, but I don’t want it. I don’t NEED it.
The students and the businesses of Pullman, they NEED it.
Positives and Negatives
Here are a few points.
1. Negative – This would not be good for the East Siders, because traveling over the mountains at this time of year can be treacherous. A lot of people in Spokane and other places won’t want to turn a 4-1/2 hr drive into a 10 hour drive because of weather. They also have to pay for gas and lodging.
2. Positive – But…yes, there is a lot of Cougars on the West Side.
3. Negative – We could miss memorable games like the 1992 Snowbowl in Pullman.
4. Positive – I personally can fly into Seattle stay with my family in the southland and go to the Apple Cup.
5. Negative – Hopefully they divide the tickets evenly, because you know those annoying Huskies (because it is basically a home game) will be snatching up those tickets. Hopefully we can get 33,000 Cougars there.
6. Positive – Financially it is good for the program and will also get us more publicity. If First & Goal, Inc. is paying all this money and promoting it, most likely it will be nationally televised.
7. Negative – We are breaking tradition.
8. Positive – This could become like “The World’s Largest Outdoor Cocktail Party.” The Georgia and Florida fans have to travel to Jacksonville ever year to watch there rivalry game. I think ours will become “The World’s Largest Keg Stand.” I hope they play this game on a weekend that is good for everyone. Thanksgiving weekend? Or maybe WSU needs to give students Monday and Friday off for the event. I will post the link about the “The World’s Largest Outdoor Cocktail Partly” below. The same thing goes for the Red River Rivalry, but that is located in Dallas, which is centered between OU and UT (which is ideal), so there is no advantage, but those crazy fans will travel anywhere.
Tell me this…How does OU have more rabid fans than WSU. The state of Oklahoma only has 3.5 million residents and the state of Washington has 6.5 million residents. Hmmmmm. I remember going to the 2003 OU/WSU Rose Bowl and there was twice as many OU fans as WSU fans. I know there they have tradition, but it just makes you wonder… By the way it was annoying to cover wagon run all over the place when they were pounding us. Rrrrrrrr!
Links:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_World%27s_Largest_Outdoor_Cocktail_Party
I am not going to say it is a horrible idea
because there is a lot of money on the table it appears. But c’mon really guys? Jim Walden had the foresight to push for us to get ACs at home. Its a travel game for our guys, and generally they have to bus over.
I got an idea, why don’t we move all of our homes games to Seattle. Now that’s creative.
I am not going to put +/- because if you don’t understand why it is such a big minus you don’t understand Coug athletic history. No way, no how we should allow our home game to be moved to the Westside. If it means making less money and paying for cheap coaches like CPW, so be it.
Geez..
I’m sure if they are giving the school 2 million instead of one that we can afford to fly over for the game.. You guys are being very dramatic right now. I think the move is better for many reasons. This allows the game to hopefully regain its prestige that it once had by creating a crazy atmosphere between two die hard schools who want to win.
If we are such crazy die hard cougar fans, why is traveling over the mountains such a tough task. I understand the weather concerns on the pass, but the whole “we lost our home field advantage thing”? Give me a break, its 50/50 ticket split so thats obvious for both schools.
Great move, I love it and I can’t wait to go yelling at the stupid purple section covering the field right across from me in 2010!
Splitting the seats doesn't guarantee a crazy atmosphere
It just makes it sometimes crazy and sometimes not. Whereas a true home game is insanely crazy the whole time.
by johnnycougar on Apr 16, 2009 1:29 PM PDT up reply actions
I disagree with that
I’ve been to plenty of home Apple Cups that weren’t crazy the whole time. So much of that is dictated by the game.
Okay
I’ve only been to Apple Cups in the student section, which generally is in fact crazy the whole time. Unless Brink throws five (or six?) interceptions in the first half on a cold rainy night.
Maybe it’s different in the other sections.
by johnnycougar on Apr 16, 2009 1:47 PM PDT up reply actions
Whine, whine
Go ahead and cancel your tickets then, I cannot believe my cougar fans right now, acting like whiny huskies.
Accept the new challenge, rise to it and enjoy it. The atmosphere will be so much more fun because huskies and cougars hate each other during apple cup games.
The huskies think this will be an advantage? Well lets show up and see who’s louder and who’s team has what it takes. All this crying is making me sick, I didn’t know our fans were this dramatic..
Why should we accept and enjoy every change blindly?
If we disagree with something the school does that means we’re not fans? I beg to differ.
You can watch it on TV
I’ll be there every year. I like discussion on whether it is good or not but when people start saying things like “I am not renewing my season tickets” it crosses to the realm of irrational. It that’s what you are really going to do, then go for it.
I'm not addressing the season tickets thing.
Though I would certainly be less likely to purchase season tickets if I lived near Pullman and the game got moved.
I’m not sure what makes that “irrational.” Disagreeable, maybe, but it sure seems rational. If anything, spending that much money just to watch kids play a game is irrational (which, as someone who has done so, I’m not attacking).
Also. . .
How does saying “the game will still be there on TV,” address any of the issues most people have expressed with the game? It’s always been there on TV. That’s irrelevant to any of my concerns.
And my point in responding in this sub-thread was that people can question decisions without being bad fans. Blind loyalty is pretty absurd.
I think the loss of the game in pullman is made up with by...
the opening of so many possibilities with the hype this will create.
More revenue to help finish the remodel of Marting Stadium or to draw better opponents to Pullman? YES PLEASE! College gameday? Maybe if the teams are really good one year, but never in Pullman. National TV on FSN or ABC? Absolutely. A crowed divided 50/50 every year? That sounds awesome.
I did not say they were the same thing Jo-Jo
I said the extra money could be spent towards drawing better opponents OR finishing the stadium.
What's the point of remodeling the stadium when the biggest game of the year won't be there anymore?
by johnnycougar on Apr 16, 2009 1:31 PM PDT up reply actions
Because there are five other games that they need and try to get people to
Remember, it’s only the biggest game of every other year …
They’re remodeling the stadium because they want to increase revenue for the other 11 games every two years. They’ve already maximizing revenue for the Apple Cup.
I guess
It just feels like something integral to the Cougar Spirit is being taken away for the sake of money
by johnnycougar on Apr 16, 2009 1:34 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
I understand why you feel that way
I just feel like this is an opportunity to make a new, cool, different kind of memory.
That is definitely true
But you’re replacing the Pullman memory with a Seattle memory, in a stadium that isn’t ours. I think that’s my biggest opposition to this whole deal, I’m not really that worried about travel or local business losses (for the reasons others have mentioned).
by johnnycougar on Apr 16, 2009 1:41 PM PDT up reply actions
One more thing
As for saying Pullman “needs” this for their businesses and stuff? Have you ever tried to go eat ANYWHERE during a football weekend…good luck. It doesn’t matter who is playing, football weekend and the town is packed, the game lost by this move is replaced by moving our annual qwest game back to pullman. There shouldn’t be much money lost at all to local businesses.
You would kill WSU season ticket sales.
Not to mention that the tickets would now be controlled by the Qwest people rather than the schools and they are guaranteeing the schools $2mil a year. The prices would greatly increase and not be a part of the season ticket package. The WSU season tickets sales would greatly decrease by not having one of the biggest games there anymore. Plus, by staying in hotels there, you may actually be paying for Hussie stadium. Doing this not only hurts WSU in the long run, it will really hurt many of the Pullman businesses. The move of the OOC game back to Pullman, will not even out. Have you been to the OSU game or one of the Portland State games? There is not nearly as many peopple there. It will be basically a home game for UW every year, even if they supposedly sell them 50/50. There will be no huge WSU student section anymore, no more snow bowls, no rushing the field after the game and definitely no more tailgating. I already sent Sterk an email telling him what a bad idea this is.
Here is a good article about it: http://www3.bustersports.com/blog/pac-10-news/2009/04/16/apple-cup-to-qwest-field-a-deal-that-stinks/
Kill season ticket sales?
It will affect it to a degree, but are people really paying $400 for tickets plus more money for mandatory donations for one game? I think USC, UCLA, Oregon, and depending on the year a few other schools are still very good draws for Pullman. If people cancel their season tickets instead of keeping them and purchasing a ticket to the apple cup, then they shouldn’t be season ticket holders, because they are the ones that leave their seat empty 5 times per year. The $2 million we make of the game would more then make up for a 5% drop in season tickets.
A lot of fans buy season tickets and only go to the Apple Cup and like 1 other game...
They buy the season tickets, go to the games they want to, then they sell or give away the other games.
Therefore, a lot of the people who do this, just to have a ticket to the AC, may or may not be doing that anymore.
This is hard to swallow.
This is a horrible, horrible, HORRIBLE idea!
Forget the obvious loss of revenue for Pullman business, unfair travel burdens for a lot of students, alumni and fans from E. WA, potential apathy for the completion of the remodel of Martin Stadium and disconnect from the actual campus for a minute (all of which in my mind are pretty compelling arguments already). Let’s take a look at modern (and by modern, I mean post WWII, when the game began to resemble football as we know it today) Apple Cup History before 1982. That is the year, as any good Cougar knows, that Coach Walden got the games back to Pullman from Spokane. From 1950 to 1980 the WSU "home" Apple Cup game was played at Joe Albi Stadium in Spokane. At Albi, the Cougs won just 3 of 15 games. Since 1982 when the home games were truly home games, the Cougs have won 6 of 14 games, a very significant improvement. Why do you think that is?
Coach Walden says it best in his book. Pullman gives us a distinct advantage for many reasons. First, the mutts have to travel across the state, usually in inclement weather. They then have to play in that usually inclement weather. Their fans hate the travel, and only around 3,000 make the trip even when they are really good. Martin Stadium is a very hostile environment, with 38,000 people (about a third of which are students) right on top of the action, making it uncomfortable for the visitors. There is pride in "defending our turf" that the players are not hesitant to talk about.
Those are a lot of pretty darn good reasons, all of which give us more of an advantage to WIN. To quote Herm Edwards, "YOU PLAY… TO WIN… THE GAME!!!!" On a side note, I’d be interested to know how much extra for the athletic dept. this guaranteed $2MM would be compared to the revenue lost by moving the game from a remodeled Martin Stadium with the luxury boxes, loge boxes and premium seats sold out.
So, I guess that you have to ask yourself, what’s more important, a little extra money, or a greater likelihood of winning? To me, that is a no brainer.
I should end this diatribe by noting this argument is coming from a Vancouver resident. I’d much rather pass up a 2.5 hour drive to Seattle every year for a 6 hour drive (plus overnight accommodations) and a greater likelihood of winning every other year!
Since 1982 when the home games were truly home games, the Cougs have won 6 of 14 games, a very significant improvement. Why do you think that is?
Because our program and teams have been better. From 1951-1981, we were 5-11 in Seattle. From 1983-present, we are 5-8 in Seattle. I’m sorry, but there is no statistical evidence to support that playing the game in Pullman gives us any extra advantage. (Ask the 2002 and 2006 teams …)
And to answer your question about extra revenue, no game in Pullman will ever — EVER — approach $2 million. It’s not a little extra money. We’re talking about increasing revenue from the Apple Cup 300%.
by Jeff Nusser on Apr 16, 2009 10:28 AM PDT up reply actions
I guess that's my point...
Statistics don’t always tell the whole story. There is no statistic that can reflect attitude. Any long time Coug will tell you that the attitude of the Coaches, fans, alumni and even the players changed when the games were shifted to Pullman. The series has been vastly more competitive since 1982 and I just happen to believe that getting half the series games in Pullman has a lot to do with that.
Additionally, the Cougs lost in 2002 because Gesser got hurt. Simple as that. They lost in 2006 because of horrible coaching and lack of execution resulting in special teams miscues. So, you’re right, location can’t help a team overcome everything. However, you’ll never convince me that the fact that the Cougs were playing in Pullman had a lot to do with the AC wins in 1982, 1988, 1992 and 2008. Every one of those teams were inferior to the mutts in talent, yet they won…you can’t possibly believe that having the game in Pullman didn’t at least have something to do with that.
Lastly, I don’t think you can quantify how much of a loss in support this move will have in terms of gifts to the athletic fund. I’m sure that you’ve taken note of all the backlash from 80% of Coug supporters on the message boards today. I’ve already exchanged emails with Coug contacts about this (some of them pretty big monetary supporters of WSU Athletics and the Cougar Club) that have flat out said that if this proposal is seen through, that they will voice their opinion by donating less and forgoing their season tickets. Call them fair weather if you will, but I really think that a decision like this is going to alienate a LARGE segment of the Cougar support fund.
by '03CouveCoug on Apr 16, 2009 11:30 AM PDT up reply actions
Schedule
We still get to play a cupcake team in Seattle every year now with this too haha
A Graduate of 2003
I saw 5 Apple Cups during my time as a student and we lost every single one of them. I have vowed never to step foot into the same stadium as the Huskies … EVER!! I will not go to the Apple Cup in Husky Stadium even if the tickets are free and I turned down a free ticket, hotel and flight into Moscow/Pullman this year.
But strangely, I want to see the Apple Cup in a “neutral” field. What sort of disease do I have? Any guesses?
Thanks Jo-Jo
Just when I got over my case of Terrac-itis
Net result of this move: more Pullman home games...
Everyone is bashing this move because of the economic effect of moving the biannual apple cup out of Pullman. But why is everyone ignoring move of the annual “Seattle Game” back to Pullman? Will this not offest a majority of the revenue loss to Pullman area businesses?
Furthermore, I highly doubt the Pullman economy is so heavily invested in one weekend of football every other year…
by Displaced_Spokanite on Apr 16, 2009 10:51 AM PDT reply actions
That game won't bring in the same kind of revenue
We just aren’t going to have the same number of people coming to watch SDSU or Nevada as would come to the Apple Cup
by displacedcoug on Apr 16, 2009 11:01 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
I agree, but should we not do the deal because of a 25%
drop in revenue for local businesses for one weekend out of the year? I admit if I was a local business owner I would not like it. But this school does a ton for local business, and we can’t make every decision based on how it will affect business.
Mabye with the addional $3 million in reveue every two years we can improve our team enough to attract decent opponents.
I believe that anything that is this good for WSU is good for Pullman in the long run…
by Displaced_Spokanite on Apr 16, 2009 11:12 AM PDT up reply actions
That's a nice theory
I’m worried that all this “extra income” is going to go straight back to the school to use in other areas. The AD already gets something like $400,000 a year from the WSU general fund, and I’d guess that much more than that will get paid back from this $2 million. We’re more or less in a hiring freeze right now and budgets are dramatically getting cut across the board.
So maybe after this whole recession deal eases up, the AD will get the money back? Not likely.
by johnnycougar on Apr 16, 2009 1:38 PM PDT up reply actions
to clarify
I meant to also add that I am not against the school getting money for academics, but just that it’s not likely our AD will get a big bump in prestige
by johnnycougar on Apr 16, 2009 1:39 PM PDT up reply actions
I don't believe
Money paid into the athletic funds, which this would be, can be used on academics.
WA law is pretty clear on a seperation of the two, so while the Athletic Dept. might not get the same money out of the general fund, this would move them to being more self sufficient. A self sufficient Dept is key to improving our athletics as a whole, not just our football or basketball teams.
I think the gameday experience will be awsome.
It sucks that there won’t be any more apple cups in Pullman, but in the long run this will create much more hype around the game. As some have mentioned, they are going to be paying big bucks for the game which means they have big plans. I wonder if they have any authority to negotiate a TV deal outside of FSN. At the very least, it will be FSN nationally televised. I just love the idea of 33,000 fans from both sides hanging on every play in the best football stadium in the country.
You're fooling yourself...
…if you think that there will actually be an even split in terms of fans at Qwest. It just will not happen. The mutts will always have an advantage because there are more of them in Seattle. If the mutts ever get good again, expect those in attendance to be split at least 60/40 in favor of purple. It’s just the way it is. If you’re satisfied with that, so be it.
by '03CouveCoug on Apr 16, 2009 11:36 AM PDT up reply actions
We sold 51,000 seats to OKST last year
we can’t sell 33,000 for UW? Really?
True, but...
How many Husky fans wanted tickets to that game? WSU fans weren’t competing with anyone else for the seats.
by '03CouveCoug on Apr 16, 2009 11:58 AM PDT up reply actions
Remember the 2003 Rose Bowl?
Ticket alottment was supposed to be split 50/50 with the Okies. If you went to the game as I did, you’d know that definitely was NOT the case.
If this thing goes through, we’ll rarely have equality, let alone advantage and I think that stinks.
by '03CouveCoug on Apr 16, 2009 12:05 PM PDT up reply actions
It they are just going to put the seats for sale
with no guidelines for who sits where and who gets how many seats, I would not like it. I am assuming it will be like TX-OK where their is a line drawn down the 50 yard line and half the stadium will be delegated for each team. Nobody will want to purchase tickets to sit in the heart of the other school’s section. I hope thats the way they do it, and I don’t think Sterk would agree to this if he thought there would only be 20,000 cougs there. No way.
But that's my point...
The designation for the Rose Bowl was supposed to be exactly like you’re describing for the Red River Shootout…but it wasn’t. Oklahoma fans just wanted the seats more. We flubbed up the allocation, so several Cougs like me ended up buying our tix through a third party and wound up in the end zone. I just have a sneaking suspision that it would be similar with a “neutral” Apple Cup.
I guess I should focus on the positve if this is nearly a done deal…I’ll embrace the idea of an extra $2MM in the fund and revel in every win the Cougs get being in the mutts backyard. I’m still planning on writing an email to Mr. Sterk and Dr. Floyd, though…
by '03CouveCoug on Apr 16, 2009 12:36 PM PDT up reply actions
Thats a good point,
but I think Cougar fans traveling in state, and many not having to travel at all is different then going to Cali. I will be very interested to see what the allocation will be like. The guy on the husky blog on sb nation does not think it will be 50/50. I’m not sure why.
To be fair, John said nothing about the fan split.
He simply said that it would be a de facto home game for UW every year, and I believe that he meant that in terms of distance from the school. The Huskies get to prepare like it’s a home game, and go through all their same home game routines, whereas the Cougars will have to travel every year. So in that sense, yes, it would be a home game every year for UW.
http://www.spartyandfriends.com/
If they make it the weekend after Thanksgiving, which I would think they would do
That will mitigate a lot of those concerns. The team can come over to this side of the state at any point that week.
That is still a road game for the players though, Nuss.
You’re not sleeping in your own bed, preping on your own practice fields. The Cougs have to spend more money on travel every year. This isn’t just about the students and alumni, it’s a football game.
Yes, thank you.
You do know that I have first hand experience traveling with a Pac-10 athletic team, right?
There is a difference between spending one night in Lewiston, over a few days in Seattle. Trust me, the Cougs will have to prepare for this game as if preparing for a road game every single year. And that is something the Dawgs will not have to worry about in this case.
I was just tweaking you, dude
I know it’s not the same. But I’m skeptical as to how much of a difference that actually makes when you consider that the records home and away are virtually identical for these teams since the game moved back to Pullman.
I know
I respect your take on the records.
But that is outside the fact that WSU will have to spend more $$ on that game each year than UW does, and that alone gives UW an advantage on the total +/- of $$ in this game.
On a personal note, teams hate having to come to Pullman to play games. Bottom line. And I love that. I think it is a big part of the WSU personality. It’s an Identity thing that I am just not willing to sell for a couple million $’s.
How many millions will you sell it for?
Because those millions are really going to start to pile up …
Like Jo-Jo said
Even if they come over early, they’re still going to be practicing and staying in places that they aren’t used to, whereas the Huskies will be using their own facilities and staying in their same hotel they use for home games.
http://www.spartyandfriends.com/
"They won't split...they will alternate years as the home team"
he said it twice.
Bowl games and this are completely different animals
Rose Bowl game requires students/alumni travelling to California, during the Holidays, on relatively short notice. That’s a huge economic investment for a fan. Ticket allotments go to the school, and what they don’t sell by a certain date they return to the bowl. We didn’t sell all of our allotment, they went back to the Bowl, and then they went to OU fans.
A game in Seattle, if the tickets are distributed through the school, will be about 50/50. There are enough Cougs on the west side that they will jump at the chance, and it’s not a huge travel committment.
I completely, totally, 100 percent disagree
There are TONS of us over here, and I guarantee we would have no problem buying up our allotment of tickets. If we can sell 50,000 tickets to a meaningless September game against Oklahoma State, we can’t sell 33,000 to the Apple Cup?
by Jeff Nusser on Apr 16, 2009 11:38 AM PDT up reply actions
I guess that I'm not getting my point across very well
I’m not saying it will be for lack of WSU fans wanting…it’s just that there are more die-hard UW fans in Seattle that will be willing to pay top dollar for a seat at the Apple Cup, especially if UW ever gets good again.
I went to the game in 2000, when the Huskies were already slated to go to the Rose Bowl. It was in PULLMAN and the attendance was only 60/40 in favor of us. Granted, our team finished the year 4-7, but I was appalled by the amount of Purple in our stadium. If you don’t think that it will be even worse given similar future situations where the mutts are good or great and we’re average or not so good and the game is at Qwest…again, you’re fooling yourself.
History tells us that the Huskies always have the upper hand for a variety of reasons (bigger fan base, more $$, more “tradition”, etc.), so why do we want to hand them yet another advantage by taking away one of ours?!?
No amount of money can make up for the game being in Pullman…but that’s just my opinion. There is no way to quantify that with statistics, as you are wont to do. I tried to lay it out in my above post regarding the change in attitude. Coach Walden and several others with long-time ties to WSU Athletics regularly point to that as when the series truly got competitive.
I guess we have to agree to disagree.
by '03CouveCoug on Apr 16, 2009 12:00 PM PDT up reply actions
Then again
In the 1997 Apple Cup, there was about a 60/40 split for the game in SEATTLE. I honestly think that due to the fact that this is the AC, there will not be much of a disparity at all, unless one team is drastically better than the other.
Still doesn’t mean I am sold on the idea, but I don’t think that unequal attendance will be an issue.
That was the extreme exception
Not the rule. A chance for the Rose Bowl for the first time in 67 years was a pretty dramatic event not likely to be seen again in our lifetimes.
by '03CouveCoug on Apr 16, 2009 2:17 PM PDT up reply actions
I agree
But when you couple that, with events such as the fund raising with the Space Needle, and various other things even as small as having sold more license plates, I see no way that year in and year out we will be outnumbered by a great deal.
But your are alienating the regulars
By moving this game, you are going against the “regulars” that go to all the home games. Most of them from the east and central part of the state and some people from the west side. Sure you will sell that game out with the west siders who don’t go to Pullman, but you just piss off your regular fan base. This will just kill the rest of the games in Pullman. It will reduce the number of season tickets sold just so you can sell out one game in Seattle. That game may pay more than all the Pullman games combined, but you will lose a lot of fan support and then donations.
i agree
i think people are completely underestimating coug fans right now, plus all the students will be home for thanksgiving.
This quote sums it up perfectly
“Everybody would grumble a bit but ultimately wouldn’t actually sit it out. That’s pretty much worked in every sport where the powers-that-be throw tradition to the wind in the chase for the almighty dollar and fans keep shelling out the coin” Bob Condotta, Seattle Times Husky blog writter
It should be noted that Condotta is a Coug
So he knows what he’s talking about from both sides of the fence.
by Jeff Nusser on Apr 16, 2009 11:37 AM PDT up reply actions
Sure, but
That doesn’t mean we have to like it.
For the record, it appears that most mutts are very much opposed to the idea as well.
by '03CouveCoug on Apr 16, 2009 12:02 PM PDT up reply actions
Ok, I'll take your word for it.
I don’t know him and I think he does a good job on his blog. If he truly is a Coug, I don’t know how he could do that job though. But in these times, you take what you can get I guess.
Your job is your job
I covered UW women’s hoops for a year while at the TNT while June was the coach there. Your job is just your job. Which is why I love this — I don’t have to pretend I care, because I really do care.
Besides, when you work in journalism, you get to know people really, really well — you come to appreciate them as actual humans and not just people in purple or green or whatever. I’ll tell you that Lorenzo Romar is a great guy, and so were Brandon Roy and Nate Robinson, all of whom I’ve interviewed. I’ve honestly had more negative experiences with WSU players and coaches than I’ve ever had with UW coaches.
Except for Keith Gilbertson. He was an a-hole.
Yeah
That’s what I’m getting at (above) with losing the chance to have more rushing the field memories. It definitely sucks for the students, but since Alumni don’t usually rush the field or whatever maybe they’ll like it better.
by johnnycougar on Apr 16, 2009 1:45 PM PDT up reply actions
I know a few drunken Alums
who rush the field on games like this, including that exact game. I won’t name any names, but they sit right next to me and if I could remember one game from 2006, I’m pretty sure I was out there as well as an Alumnus.
I was a drunken alum who rushed that field
It wasn’t quite the same as when I was a student.
This is where per game statistics go to die.
CougCenter
by Craig Powers on Apr 16, 2009 11:42 PM PDT up reply actions
Walden weighs in.
“Personally, I’m against it,” said Jim Walden, the ex-WSU coach who was on the sideline during that time and lobbied hard for a return of the game from Spokane to Pullman.
Walden said he understood Sterk’s position and appreciates the need to increase revenue at a time when proposed tuition increases and university budget cuts have strapped athletic departments.
But he added, recalling WSU’s double-overtime victory in Pullman last November, “Believe me, the ballgame [WSU] just got done winning, they would not have won anywhere else but Pullman. The emotion, that whole energy, was what kept hope alive.”
Thank you Jim. Nuss and the rest, I don't mean to bash, but can we
interview past coaches and players on this please? Again, I will take less revenue and willing to pay for cheaper coaches than to give any Dawg a leg up. How is that for irrational?!!
This is absurd. If you have ever traveled for competition than you know what I am talking about. And if you have traveled and continue to deny that issue as well as what home field means, than you are being irrational.
For those who want the game in Seattle that is fine. Just please acknowledge that your position is about the money and possibly the convenience. Just be honest, lay the cards on the table and stop trying to pretend that “home field” and travel hang over don’t exist. Maybe the money will make Wazzu better, or maybe it won’t (e.g., why did we play games in Spokane?) Also can anyone tell me when we play at Qwest why do we look like we are half asleep for the first couple of quarters?
The facts just don't back that up, though
We are 6-8 in our Pullman games since the move back in 1982. We are 5-8 in our Seattle games since 1982.
In talking with people around campus, almost everyone is against it
But when I talk to non-students, they seem to really like the idea. I’m a student now, but in a couple years I think it will be great to make a trip or two to Pullman for games, and a trip to Seattle for one.
But how do we know we wouldn't be better than 11-16 if all the games were in Pullman?
Or worse if all the games were in Seattle?
I’d be willing to bet we would be.
well, you are forgeting that the years
we would have been at huskie stadium, we will now be in quest with half cougar fans. Give some for the home game, gain some for the road game.
Exactly
Who that is in favor of this, is a season ticket holder? Regulary got to games in Pullman? The people in favor seem to people who live on the west side and see this as convenience to them and the money for the program. Think about it for all the regulars, many of whom live in Spokane.
We probably look like we are half asleep
Because it is usually one of the first two games of the year
This is where per game statistics go to die.
CougCenter
by Craig Powers on Apr 16, 2009 11:44 PM PDT up reply actions
One thing I love about Coug fans-
We all really care about this team. There are like 125 comments on this thread. Over at the Dawg Pound, there are 23. Whether you like this move or not, at least we can all agree we care about it way more than those guys.
Also, this is the most commented non-game thread post in the site's history
Even more than when Tony Bennett left. Interesting.
Sticking up for the minority voice
If I were a student right now, I would be pissed but at the same time feel helpless in this whole situation. They are the one constant that adds so much to Pullman game-day experiences and they are getting left out on the streets. Also for the east-side Cougs, this blows chunks for them. I feel like we as a school lose our identity in this decision. If WSU alumni do not want to go to Pullman, then why should recruits want to commit 4 years of their life to that institution?
I seriously doubt that the last two Phases happen now, and if I were a student I would demand a stop to the student fees being paid towards the Martin Stadium upgrade. WSU is changing the terms on them. When these funds are stopped, you see a 10% drop in STH revenue, and a 30% drop in Student Passes, will the 2 million blood money still feel interesting, exciting, and new?
I’m sorry Nuss, but I can’t jump on board this wagon. For me, its personally a great thing travel-wise, but I feel we are robbing current students and future students of what we were able to enjoy. And to say those games were not enjoyable because of the weather is laughable. I watched the 1998 and 2000 Apple Cups in freezing cold weather when I was a student, and we lost both of them (the second one was down right terrible!). But in that cold 2000 (50-3) Apple Cup – is where I officially became a die-hard Coug. Seeing the advantages UW has, and disadvantages WSU encounters was enough to turn my allegiance to WSU and be a die-hard. With so many potential westside Cougs that grow up in Husky territory, the Apple Cup (in Pullman) might be that game where they understand what it means to be a Coug. I don’t know if you get that same experience by moving out of Pullman.
by LeaveItToWeaver on Apr 16, 2009 2:12 PM PDT reply actions
I assume those with student passes will still use them for the game in seattle
Its just only 5,000 or so will be able to get in that section. However some students, like myself will probably opt to sit with friends and family that could not get into the student section.

by 















