My self-debate over the Apple Cup
As I mentioned in the comments last night, I'm really split over the potential move of the Apple Cup to Qwest Field.
Therefore, I'm going to debate the issue against (arguably) the 3rd most knowledgeable Cougar sports blogger on the planet - myself.
Away we go:
So, there's potentially a deal in place to move the Apple Cup to Seattle full time in 2010.
What the what?
No, seriously. The seats will be split down the middle. 50% Huskies. 50% Cougars. Like a high school rivalry game.
Wow. Ok. That's random. It would be a nice atmosphere, except for the fact that you could have the first all-out brawl between student sections in collegiate sports history.
Yeah, I'm guessing the student sections will be strategically placed at opposite ends of the stadium. They will also probably import the most power-drunk Crowd Management attendants from Pullman and Seattle alike to ensure that nothing goes down - and that your personal insults directed at the other team will NOT be tolerated.
Right. I'm sure the student sections will also be about 100 people each, because let's face it - when you have a chance to squeeze out students for revenue-inducing season ticket holders, you go for it. The attitude of athletic departments toward their lowly students really bothers me sometimes.
But what the heck is going on? This game is in Seattle. Qwest is 6.1 miles from Husky Stadium. That's pretty much a home game. For the Huskies. Every year.
Yes, but it's 50/50 seating. And since half of WSU alumni come from the west side, the crimson section should still be full. After all, we sold 63,000+ seats for a game against Nevada at Qwest. Is there really going to be any problem selling 35,000 to the Apple Cup?
Hmm. I guess not - but we need to wait for the ticket prices to come out. If they're really promising the kind of payout they are promising, those are gonna be some migthy pricey tickets. And the deal could inadvertantly price out East side Coug fans who would otherwise be willing to make the trip.
The money is a huge boost to the athletic department though. It could potentially give both schools a leg up over their Pac-10 brethren.
True. And remember, while it takes away our home-field advantage, it also takes away the Huskies' by ensuring that we have a fair share of fans in the stands every year.
But what about our home field advantage? What about the Snow Bowl? What about making those prissy little girls from Seattle play in man-weather? The kind of weather you'd only expect in two places: Pullman, or an episode of the Deadliest Catch?
That's pretty much gone. I hope we can play in rain. Although this Steve Sarkisian guy keeps telling me that it really doesn't rain that much over there.
Lies. UW constantly quotes the "hey, we get just as much rainfall as New York" statistic for recruits. But the fact is that while average rainfall is about the same, it doesn't take into account the number of days with rain. In the Puget Sound area it's a lot of light rain on numerous days. In New York, and the Southeast, it's more about heavy rains that happen less often. Fact of the matter is there are still more gray days in Seattle.
Ok, we're getting away from the point here. This is a win-win. The only real advantage the Huskies get from this game is travel time, and an additional game every other year in their hometown. Other than that, both teams get fans, both teams get paid. A lot. And we were already headed to Seattle once a year anyway.
Even though I'm a fan of the Seattle game, I still feel sympathy for the fans who flat out hate it. And it really is unfair to leave the Seattle game detached from the regular season tickets, like it is currently. Having said that, it's still pretty amazing the turnout we still get.
You're also missing the big issue for the city of Pullman: that business depends heavily on football weekends. If a few business close in Pullman that would've been open otherwise, is it really worth it that the athletic department gets paid?
I know - that's a downer for the city. However - Pullman gets the old Seattle game back. And while that opponent draws less, it also means that during non-Apple Cup years, all the 'home' games are in Pullman. The city loses one big game every other year, but gets back two smaller games. That seems to be a wash when you really look at it.
Also - less speeding ticket revenue for Colfax. Gotta love that.
Alright. Maybe it works out. But part of me is going to miss the crimson-filled stadium cheering against the Huskies year after year. One out of every two years, we get to join together in our mutual hatred of all things purple. Last year, the teams were terrible, and the game was still a classic. You can't take away those moments.
Not to mention that the vast majority of Coug fans are against this. The Spokesman poll is 85-15 against the plan. Our poll (thanks, johnnycougar) is still about 2/3 against. It's hard to argue with the vast majority of our fellow Cougs.
I think people are just attached to having the game in Pullman. How quickly people forget that the game was played in Spokane as recently as the 70s. Plus, as Nuss pointed out, we're 6-8 at home since the move to Pullman, and 5-8 on the road. That doesn't scream home field advantage to me. Is this really just east side Cougs being lazy?
I don't think it's East side Cougs being lazy - a lot of them still travel to the West side for the road game at UW. But it's certainly controversial to rip the game out of Pullman - Husky fans can still take solace in the fact that the game is still a stone's throw away from campus.
But it's not at Husky Stadium either. Bloated old piece of crap that it is, the Huskies still have an advantage there. It's still loud, it's still huge, and the Huskies don't come close to matching the percentage of seats that we give them for the annual contest. Now they still play in their hometown, but half the seats are occupied by visiting fans. Seems pretty neutral to me.
Well, my head is about to explode. I can't decide. I guess at the end of the day, we'll still play the Apple Cup every year, and it will still be as fun to watch as ever. I loved rushing onto the field last fall after arguably the greatest Coug comeback in the Cup's history. But I also loved watching Brandon Gibson go completely untouched into the end zone from the comfort of my in-laws' living room. It'll still be the same game, and in the end all that matters is that we keep playing it. Wherever it's played, it's one of the best rivalries in America.
And keeping that rivalry alive is what's really important. I mean, we'd never wuss out of playing Gonzaga in basketball, right?
Right.
24 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
My Thoughts
It’s not a bad idea but it should rotate every three years. One year at Husky Stadium, the next year at Martin, and then the next at Quest.
It wouldn't work with the Pac-10's unbalanced schedule
Some years it would give the Washington schools either a 5/3/1 or 3/5/1 home/road/nuetral amount of games, which I’m sure everybody is against when they get the short end of that stick.
http://www.spartyandfriends.com/
Grady... It's not normal to talk to yourself like that... You should see someone...
Seriously though, that’s pretty much the conversation I was having with myself. I can see a lot of positives and a lot of negatives. I also though of what OSU thought of above me. Either rotate it every three years of every two (Ex: UW, Qwest, WSU, Qwest, UW, Qwest, WSU, Qwest) but you would have to do a back-to-back home team thing with the latter.
Yup, this is pretty much the debate I had
Then I remembered it would pump $2 million annually into the athletic department budget, and it was easy to decide that this is a good idea. Remember, $2 million for us is a lot more than $2 million for Washington.
Besides — if it totally sucks and is a terrible, terrible thing, we can just go back the way it was. It takes two sides to agree to this, you know.
Really?
You think that once the school (or both schools) taste the additional $2MM annually, that they’d ever consider letting go of that additional revenue? It’s like taxes, once their in place, they never go away. Unless WSU Athletics finds a revenue stream to replace the additional funds coming from the Qwest AC, don’t bet Sterk just moving the game back to Pullman willy nilly.
I really hope this contract is only 6 years…
by '03CouveCoug on Apr 17, 2009 11:00 AM PDT up reply actions
I posted this on the other thread
But I wanted to repeat it here. Can we agree that the vast majority of the fans at the Apple Cup — outside of the students — have to travel a substantial distance to come to the game? Let’s assume that most of those people come from the west side. (I have no idea what the breakdown is between people from the West side and people from Spokane.)
How much money do you think people coming from the west side spend going to the Apple Cup between tickets, gas, lodging for two nights and eating out for the weekend? Even if the tickets start at $75 and go up from there, that’s still a heck of a lot less then what you pay to go to Pullman from the weekend unless you live in Spokane and drive down for the day.
So, So true
I love travelling to Pullman, but the cost is prohibitive. As Westside Cougs know, to get a hotel in Pullman on a football weekend is difficult and requires a two night reservation, even if you only need the one night. That’s easily 200 bucks, plus food and gas. And the ticket. If I split the hotel and gas with someone it’s a little cheaper, but since it’s likely to be my fiancee it doesn’t really save us anything.
and I know it sounds like I'm being a selfish alumni
And maybe I am, I haven’t ruled that out. But I keep coming back to the fact that for the Apple Cup to be the last game of the year, it needs to be Thanksgiving weekend. And that weekend just doesn’t work for Pullman, as the students are out of town and would all have to travel back early. Requiring the dorms to open early, costing the school a lot of money.
If the game is the Saturday after Thanksgiving, many students will be home on the westside or have friends they can stay with over here, and many alumni live over here.
this is just another example of the West side trying to run the whole state.
I would guess the majority of the season ticket holders are from the East side of the state, probably mostly from Spokane. This move is just kicking us all in the nuts. It is just like the Governor race, Rossi wins all of eastern Washington and even SW Washington and Gregwhore wins only the greater Seattle area and gets re-elected. Now we see how well that has gone. Look, I actually live closer to Seattle than to Pullman, but I don’t like the idea at all. It is just crapping all over your regular customers and by the sounds of it, they are all going to be alienated and you are going to lose business. This is going to force the school to then look for more money and will make them look at moving more games to Seattle. I will probably still buy season tickets, but I don’t think I will go to any more Apple Cups as long as they are in Seattle. I don’t go to Apple cups in Seattle now because they are priced way higher for a crappier seat and I can’t stand being around that many Purple Punks, I would most likely end up in jail.
I know $2 million is $2 million ...
… but I just can’t get behind this idea. Don’t get me wrong, I like the annual Seattle game, and think it should be used for home-and-home deals with schools (read: Notre Dame, Auburn) who would never come to Pullman.
But to move the most important game — of every season — to Seattle — every season — screws fans from Eastern Washington, students who aren’t from the Seattle area and ALL fans who love the Apple Cup atmosphere in Martin Stadium and Pullman in general. (And yes, I know that sentence structure was God-awful.)
Hell, simply knowing that this proposal would mean the end of the Apple Cup pregame experience at the Fieldhouse is enough for me to oppose it.
And in addition to the inevitable ticket-price hike, I’m sure the concession prices at Qwest are going to be significantly higher than in Martin, too. Gameday in Pullman is actually a reasonably priced proposition (or so it seems to me, unless you factor in gas prices and 14 red drink tickets).
Finally, saying that if this turns out to be terrible “we can just go back to the way it was,” is a nice thought. But I think of it this way: Once you start getting that $2 million a year, you start depending on it. It’s just like getting a raise. Of course, experts say you should just sock the amount of your raise away and live on what you were making before, but people who actually do that are the exception rather than the rule. So once we start this, I would bet that the odds of going back to Pullman are slim to none.
There’s no question this move would save me money and time, because I live in Seattle. But I don’t like it one bit. I wish I could just send in a $2 million check and say, “The game stays in Pullman.” Unfortunately, I’m about $1.999 million short.
— Plaster
There’s no question this move would save me money and time, because I live in Seattle. But I don’t like it one bit. I wish I could just send in a $2 million check and say, "The game stays in Pullman." Unfortunately, I’m about $1.999 million short.
I actually thought about this. (No, not me giving the money …) If it truly sucks really, really bad, then Sterk goes to the donors and says, “Hey, if you hate it so much, open up your wallets so we don’t have to do it anymore …”
No?
2 million is damn near close to 10% of our athletic budget
Which is huge. It has way more of an impact for us than the Huskies, who have about a 40 million dollar athletic budget.
This is where per game statistics go to die.
CougCenter
by Craig Powers on Apr 16, 2009 11:19 PM PDT up reply actions
Going to the donors ...
So donors help pony up to renovate Martin Stadium, and then you want Sterk to hit them again just to get the Apple Cup BACK to said renovated stadium? Come on, Nuss.
Thanks for the encouragement; it’s nice to be around. I don’t come to the actual site that often, as I usually read via RSS. But I love what you guys are doing. So if you don’t see a ton of comments from me, rest assured that I’m still reading.
— Plaster
OK, you're probably right
Still, I don’t see anyone who has come up with another idea that pumps four times as much money as the current arrangement into the athletic department coffers. Cougfan says find another way. If there is one, I’m all ears.
And thanks for the compliment. You know you have a standing invitation to write anytime you want, dude.
Nuss, you do raise some good points in your earlier post. I realize there are positives to this, and that I will benefit from some of them. And that the Cougs will benefit in some ways as well. And that there’s really no other way to generate that kind of money.
But there are just so many things I don’t like about it, including the fact that it essentially kills the prospect of any big OOC games in Seattle.
As for me writing, did you not see the start of this sentence?
But to move the most important game — of every season — to Seattle — every season —
Not sure you want me choking up your site with that kind of crap. But as always, I appreciate the offer. I’ll get back to you when I learn how to use long dashes properly.
I think, in the end, that's the conclusion we're all going to have to reach
It’s a trade off. Even those that hate the idea have to admit there are positives, just like I’m willing to admit there are negatives.
my wife would probably make more money if she got a job stripping
doesn’t mean i want her doing it….
i’ve accepted the fact that this qwest thing is going to happen. now we all have to decide if we’re going to support it financially. so far the 4 people i sit with want out….so i may have to find people to take their seats.
You know, if I didn't have Seahawks tickets, I just might take you up on that ...
I’m assuming you were inviting me. :-)

by 












