CougCenter: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Voodoo Five for South Florida Bulls Fans!

Wow.

So, Athletic Director Jim Sterk had one of those Cougar Chats today. Normally, they run the gamut from mildly boring to extremely boring.

Not today.

How about this bombshell?

In the 1960s WSU's membership in the conference was at stake and only a close vote saved the school from being ousted from the conference. The Pac-10 is one of the most prestigious conferences in the country and allows the WSU athletics program and the university's academic programs to be on the same field and classrooms as Stanford, UC-Berkeley, USC, etc. The athletics program at WSU is the only way this membership is achieved.

Our annual budget is currently $14 million below the next lowest member in the conference. If we do not take action to create revenue and level this playing field, we may be at some point in the future be facing another vote. I will do everything that I can on my watch to prevent such an action. This is why I am pushing for Phase III of the renovation and am considering the Apple Cup move.

Um, come again?

In some respects, I find this a little hard to believe and place it in the scare tactic category, given how recently we've won conference championships in football and how good our basketball team has been recently. As long as we're competitive, there shouldn't be an issue.

But don't let the point be lost -- we have to do more with less in just about every respect at WSU, and that gap is only going to grow unless some alums with some cash start ponying up. And the more that gap grows, the harder it's going to be to stay competitive with the rest of the conference.

The only problem is, apparently Sterk is hamstrung when it comes to asking potential donors for cash:

Alumni may not know this, but until they express interest by making a donation to athletics or a recorded ticket purchase, WSU Athletics cannot contact these people for support. Each college has a relationship with their recent graduates and only that particular college can contact that individual until they express interest in athletics. As of last year, our Athletic Foundation membership totaled 6,185, which is last in the Pac-10. If we could grow this number to 15-20 thousand annual members, iIt would significantly address some of our financial challenges.

That is the most absurd thing I've ever heard. I'm guessing it's done to protect the donations to the academic colleges, but that's just plain ridiculous.

So, here's what I take away from this: This is a cry for help.

Since he can't directly solicit potential donors unless they've already given to the program, this is the best way he knows how to get his message out there. This goes a little bit along with this Cougfan piece earlier in the week, saying we only have ourselves to blame for the Apple Cup move to Qwest.

Sterk insists the Qwest move is not a leverage play in order to motivate people to donate; I believe him. But if the furor over this move allows him to get the message out, then that's a fantastic benefit. I, for one, had no idea the disparity was that large. I also was unaware until recently of the contributions to the athletic budget from the university's general fund. There is some serious educating that still needs to go on among Coug fans. It's time for all of us to start opening our wallets.

Could we really be voted out of the Pac-10? I don't think it's something that's imminent. But Sterk is probably right -- unless we start to close the gap between us and the rest of the conference, this is probably going to become an issue a lot sooner than we all want to admit.

Hat tip to SeantheCoug for the heads up via e-mail on the transcript, and sorry for stealing GoCougs' thunder on his FanPost.

0 recs  |  Comment 20 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

hmmm
WSU ranks dead last, by a long ways, among all Pac-10 and Big Ten schools in total donations to athletics. WSU is last in the number of individual donors to athletics, and last in the size of each donation to athletics.

- By GREG WITTER

by Roy Weaver Stuckey on Apr 22, 2009 8:02 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

What's stopping WSU....

from making a new mandate or changing the existing one to where ALL alumni can be contacted for donations to athletics?

The school that can least afford to have a mandate of this nature has one? Do any of the other Pac-10 schools have such a mandate? What the hell is going on anyway? Only 6,000+ alumni donate to athletics? How rediculous is that? It sounds like an awfully small number to me compared to the number of potential doners out there that could make a small contribution that would eventually add up to a significant amount.

Somebody out there, please educate me.

by SW WA Coug on Apr 22, 2009 8:18 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I'm sure it has been around for a long time

Floyd is our only hope…..Help me Pres Floyd, sorry Star Wars geek moment.

I don’t know the process to remove a mandate, or to put one in place. But I’m sure all the ‘schools’ would be against it. They know there is a limited number of dollars out there and would fear people will start pushing those funds to the AF. I’d be willing to bet there would have to be a vote or Floyd could just remove it. Is he willing to deal with the S storm if he did?

I didn’t notice that anyone with a recorded ticket purchase can be contacted, and that we new to me. I also know the AD is trying to gain access to anyone who purchased a sports pass but I’m not sure how that is going.

by woolybugger on Apr 22, 2009 8:47 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't totally buy this

I really don’t think WSU is in any danger of getting thrown out of the Pac-10. Tom Hansen hates change, and I highly doubt the new commish will see us as some kind of liability. If anything the Pac-10 should be expanding, not contracting.

To me – and this is just my opinion – this is Sterk trying to get people to understand the realities of WSU’s financial position, and whey the Apple Cup decision was made. It’s an opposite and equal overreaction for the overreaction WSU fans have had over the past couple weeks. He’s fighting fire with fire – and it’s probably not a bad strategy.

by Grady. on Apr 22, 2009 8:35 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I agree with the overreaction on the part of huskies and cougs..

6 years is nothing and I’m only 21. Enjoy the Quest apple cups for what they are and then go back to the tradition. We’ll have a nice stadium and actually make some money. It’s not selling our soul to the devil—it’s just renting it out for a little bit ;P

I hope I become a multi-millionaire (or billionaire? XP), just so I could throw a lot of money into our school (both academic and athletic). It’s amazing how poor we are and still function well considering. Hell, I’d allow the huskies’ 150million if we can just get a fraction of that. I think we’d all have a heart attack if 50 million dropped in our laps.

by james_WSU on Apr 22, 2009 9:08 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not as concerned with the Pac-10 issue....

which I think is a load of crap, as I am with alumni supporting athletics at WSU. Good athletic programs are a necessary evil in today’s climate in the sense that they bring exposure to the school and hence, more donations to the university. I don’t see how the ‘schools’ will suffer by asking for donations from all alumni. That’s a pretty short-sighted stance if you ask me. And pretty effing selfish too. Take athletics, and football in particular, away from WSU and see how negative an impact that would have on the ‘schools.’

Floyd needs to take a good solid look at this situation and get his ass back to Pullman and rid the school of that rediculous mandate. NOW!!! It’s time to address and bridge the financial gap that exists between us and the rest of the Pac-10.

I hope I’m not out of line by posting these feelings but I’m sort of ticked off at how our school would hamstring itself in such an irresponsible way. It appears that way to me. We have enough alumni that even a modest donation would make a huge difference. Ask and ye shall receive.

by SW WA Coug on Apr 22, 2009 9:37 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

An obvious Scare Tactic

“Support WSU athletics and our move of the Apple Cup game to Qwest field and give us money for Stadium renovation or Maybe… Just Maybe… We’ll get kicked out of the Pac-10”

There is about as much chance of that happening as there is of… (Stall for me to find apt analogy)… of me putting on a purple T-Shirt and going to the Husky Spring Game (Absolutely 0%). Every School in D1 is in a money crunch and the Pac-10 will understand that. I usually like Jim Sterk but I absolutely despise this comment and totally disagree with the way he is approaching this.

by GoCougs on Apr 22, 2009 8:41 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I beleive we have the minimum number of sports to be part of the pac

Cut one…….

But I don’t see the PAc 10 voting us out anytime soon.

by woolybugger on Apr 22, 2009 8:48 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

you'd be surprised

I commented on wsufootballblog.com ….. i think you’d be shocked to hear some of the comments from some of the profs in the sports management dept. All of whom have admin/coaching experience at WSU.

It really sounds like its something thats talked about behind closed doors, and is a legitimate worry for our staff.

Our athletic programs need to start generating more money STAT… because, as you pointed out… everyone is cash strapped, and WSU won’t be a worthwhile trip for anybody if the economy and our ‘success’ continues the way it has for the past few years.

by calebcherry on Apr 22, 2009 9:48 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Uh what?

What profs are you speaking of? Only one in that department has head coaching experience at WSU…

by MLips on Apr 22, 2009 10:00 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

sorry, didn't mean to call you out

I realize that is not the point of your post. Apologies.

by MLips on Apr 22, 2009 10:02 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

no worries!

i’m talking about Crawford. former Crew Coach… i’ve heard (not from her) that she’s still pretty in the know in the athletic dept.

You’re right… I shouldn’t have said profs. I was thinking about all of the guest speakers she’d call in from the staff that echoed what she was reiterating all semester. The importance of a reliable revenue stream that is most often associated with winning.

Was she who you were thinking of?

by calebcherry on Apr 22, 2009 11:04 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah Tam was who I was talking about

She does still work a lot with the rowing team, traveling sometimes with them. I know that her class specifically has all the guest speakers from Football and I think Jim Sterk even comes to talk to her class.

by MLips on Apr 23, 2009 11:41 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes, once WSU was an Independent

So, did you know that your beloved Cougars played as Indepents in the late 50’s and early 60’s ?

The Pacific Coast Conference (PCC) was a college athletic conference in the United States which existed from 1915 to 1959. Though the Pacific-10 Conference (Pac-10) claims the PCC’s history as part of its own, the older league had a completely different charter and was disbanded in 1959 due to a major crisis and scandal.

PCC members

    * University of California, Berkeley (1915-1959)
    * University of Oregon (1915-1959)
    * Oregon Agricultural College (1915-1959)
    * University of Washington (1915-1959)
    * Washington State College (1917-1959)
    * Stanford University (1918-1959)
    * University of Idaho (1922-1959)
    * University of Southern California (1922-1959, suspended in 1924)
    * University of Montana (1924-1950)
    * University of California, Los Angeles (1928-1959)

The conference was wracked by scandal in 1951. Charges were made and confirmed that the University of Oregon football coach had violated the conference code for financial aid and athletic subsidies. After firing the violating coach, Oregon urged the PCC to look at similar abuses by UCLA football coach Red Sanders. The conference spent five years attempting to reform itself. In 1956, the scandal became public.

A second scandal broke in Washington, when in January 1956, several discontented players staged a mutiny against their coach. After the coach was fired, the PCC followed up on charges of a slush fund. The PCC found evidence of the illegal activities of the Greater Washington Advertising Fund run by Roscoe C “Torchy” Torrance, and in May imposed sanctions.

In March, allegations of illegal payments made by two booster clubs associated with UCLA, the Bruin Bench and the Young Men’s Club of Westwood were published in LA newspapers. UCLA refused for ten weeks to allow PCC officials to proceed in their investigation. Finally, UCLA admitted that, “all members of the football coaching staff had, for several years, known of the unsanctioned payments to student athletes and had cooperated with the booster club members or officers, who actually administered the program by actually preferring student athletes to them for such aid.” The scandal thickened as a UCLA alumnus and member of the UCLA athletic advisory board blew the whistle on a secret fund for illegal payments to USC players, known as the Southern California Educational Foundation. This same alumnus also blew the whistle on Cal’s phony work program for athletes known as the San Francisco Gridiron Club, with an extension in the Los Angeles area known as the South Seas Fund.

Aftershocks and disbandment.

The first major reaction came from the University of California system. Robert Sproul, president of the University of California, along with the chancellors of Berkeley and UCLA, drafted a “Five Point Plan”, emphasizing academic eligibility standards, setting the two UC campuses apart from the PCC and laying the groundwork for their departure. For Sproul the PCC dispute was not just about athletics; at stake was the ideal of a unified University of California that enjoyed statewide support. This ideal collided with aspirations of UCLA alumni who believed that Sproul’s vision would always favor the Berkeley campus at the expense of the younger UCLA campus.

Oregon State College president August Leroy Strand wrote, “The reasons for California and UCLA dropping out are as different as night and day… the significance of the whole affair was the union of Berkeley and UCLA… admissions and scholarship had nothing to do with the withdrawals…” Berkeley’s desire to schedule athletic contests only with academic equals is real, though it seldom has been expressed. “The marriage of this desire on the part of Berkeley with the known ambitions and necessities of its sister institution has produced a bastard that has the bard of a purebred but the innards and hair of a mongrel.”

By 1957 the conference had fallen apart, leading to the decision to dissolve in 1959. Soon after the PCC was dissolved, five of its former members (California, Washington, UCLA, USC, and Stanford) created the AAWU. After initially being blocked from admission, three of the four remaining schools would eventually join (Washington State in 1962, Oregon & Oregon State in 1964), but members were not required to play other members. Tensions were high between UCLA and Stanford, as Stanford had voted for UCLA’s expulsion from the PCC.

Idaho, which was not involved in the scandals but had become noncompetitive in the PCC, was also barred from AAWU admittance in 1959. Unlike Washington State, Oregon and Oregon State, Idaho did not pursue AAWU admission, and competed as an independent before becoming a charter member of the Big Sky Conference in 1963. Idaho retains no strong connections to its PCC past, other than a continuing rivalry with neighboring Washington State; the two land grant campuses are just 8 miles (13 km) apart on the Palouse.

The AAWU eventually strengthened its bonds and became the Pacific 8 Conference (Pac-8), renaming itself in 1968.

by Steptoe Fan on Apr 22, 2009 9:39 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

you think the Cougs got problems ?

go read the on line Wall Street Journal article : New Unrest on Campus as Donors Rebel

by Steptoe Fan on Apr 22, 2009 10:12 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

A good way to get the word out

I wasn’t aware that the athletic foundation couldn’t contact people that hadn’t donated. I have donated so I get contacted and just figured they contact everyone. Anyway, a person on Cougfan wrote a great email to send out to all your Coug contacts to get this word out and show that we need more donors. If everyone does this and it gets a large chain going, it could really increase the amount of donors. Here is the link to his/her letter:

http://mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=137&f=1995&t=4251207

by selahcoug on Apr 23, 2009 8:44 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

short $

The cash problems the Athletic Dept. faces are very real. The one way to to start a grass roots campaign to change that is for everyone to just join the foundation. It’s $100 annually. The local foundation chapters have events all year long that are afordable to be a part of and a hell of a good time. The King County Chapter has its annual golf tourney, The King County Cougar Golf Classic, coming up May 31st at Newcastle. A bunch of coaches and former stars will be there, the course is spectacular and the beverages are hosted, yes hosted. If you would like to put together a group of five, or join is as a single, throw your email out there and I will shoot you the info. The other chapters around the state also have events going on year round, so take a look and get involved. But at the very least, if you care about WSU athletics at all, just join the foundation.

by HubertWimberly on Apr 23, 2009 9:24 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to CougCenter, a blog dedicated to Washington State University athletics.

Community Guidelines
Start posting about the Cougars »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
SB Nation Survey + Chance to donate $500 to a charity of this community's choice

Recent FanPosts

Small
NCAA Day Four Recap
Small
The Madness Rolls On: Day 4 Preview
Small
NCAA Day Three Recap
Small
NCAA Tourney Day Three Preview
Small
NCAA Day Two Recap
Small
NCAA Day One Recap
Small
NCAA Tournament Day One Preview
Small
The Human Side of College Athletics
Small
Another fitting loss for the PAC-10

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Facebook

In addition to Twitter @CougCenter, find us on Facebook!

CougCenter.com on Facebook

Go Cougs

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Michigan State's Kalin Lucas holds his left ankle as coach Tom Izzo checks on him after Lucas was injured in the first half of an NCAA second-round college basketball tournament game against Maryland in Spokane, Wash., Sunday, March 21, 2010. (AP Photo/Rajah Bose)

Tom Izzo: '85% Chance' Kalin Lucas Tore Left Achilles' Tendon

Duke's Brian Zoubek, left, and  Miles Plumlee congratulate Kyle Singler after defeating California 68-53 during an NCAA second-round college basketball game in Jacksonville, Fla., Sunday, March 21, 2010.   (AP Photo/Steve Helber)

Duke Controls Cal From Start To Finish, Advances To Sweet 16

Purdue's JaJuan Johnson celebrates with the Purdue mascot's hammer after Purdue beat Texas A&M 63-61 in overtime in an NCAA second-round college basketball game in Spokane, Wash., Sunday, March 21, 2010. (AP Photo/Rajah Bose) +1 updates

Purdue Rallies In Second Half, Edges Texas A&M In Overtime

More from SBNation.com >


HUMANS WHO WRITE ABOUT SPORTS

Jeff_mug_h2_small Jeff Nusser

Spaghetti-cat_small Grady.

Arizona_small Dancing Football

Official Partner of CBS Sports