The incredible disappearing defensive backfield
Another day, and sadly, another piece of bad news regarding player conduct (by the way, screw you Seattle Times, for putting the Cougs under the "More" tab on the sports page while the Huskies are featured prominently in the banner):
When Washington State released its 2009 football roster Saturday, some familiar names were missing, including defensive back Devin Giles and wide receiver Michael Willis.
"They were dismissed for a violation of team rules," coach Paul Wulff said.
The seniors join defensive back Romeo Pellum, who was dismissed last spring, as expected contributors who won't be back.
It's been a strange summer for Cougar sports. Like Ken Bone has been attracting recruits, the WSU defensive backfield has been attracting bad behavior. And dismissals.
Let's bypass discussing Michael Willis in detail. While sad, Willis was a senior who might have been a contributor only because the wide receiver position is the thinnest its been in years. However, if you had forgotten, it shouldn't come as a shock to you that Willis originally came to WSU as a promising defensive back.
Giles' loss is a bigger hit to the team. He joins Romeo Pellum in the former Cougar corner category, and the position is already dangerously thin. GIles had appeared to put the academic issues from '08 behind him and was looking at a promising Senior campaign. Fortunately for both Willis and GIles' future, they appear to be on track to graduate.
Of course, this is just another disciplinary hit to the backfield. Pellum and Aire (Tyrone) Justin are facing felony burglary charges. Lesser-known backs Tyree Toomer and LeAndre Daniels are facing discipline over an alleged bike theft (seriously, a bike?) this spring, but are still with the team.
Sean over at WSU Football blog pegs Cal transfer Brandon Jones as the likely replacement for Giles, and that seems like a good fit. But the WSU defense, at least the pass-defense portion of it, is becoming a patchwork.
And let's not forget it wasn't even very good to begin with. If you look at yards per game, the pass defense was a relative strength for the Cougars, ranking 44th nationally with 195.8 yards surrendered. That's not bad when you consider how lopsided many of the games were last season.
But that's not the whole story. WSU's rush defense was so horrific last year (5.78 yards allowed per attempt - worst in the nation), that teams simply didn't even have to put the ball in the air to pick us apart. When they did, they had success: WSU allowed 7.8 yards per pass attempt, making it a sobering 101st in the nation (still better than the Huskies, who were 111th - hey, maybe that's why we beat 'em).
While it's mostly doom and gloom, the reason for hope is the same as it has always been since Wulff arrived. Essentially, the majority of problems are involoving players that were recruited under Bill Doba's regime, and those players are being dealt with. Consequences are being handed down, players are dealing with discipline on an internal basis, and the new players coming in should be working at a higher level of discipline. Although that's no guarantee they will be.
For now, WSU has to remain firm with its disciplinary process. Even if it means having to cringe every time the opposition puts the ball up in the air.
0 recs |
13 comments
|
Comments
If our corners are as bad as I think they might be
Then it might not matter at all how much the rest of the team has improved.
by Jeff Nusser on Jul 13, 2009 9:09 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Has anyone else look at all the walk-ons included on the roster?
Are there usually that many walk-ons? lol
by james_WSU on Jul 14, 2009 12:00 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
PLEASE just don't go 0-12
Thanks for your honesty in the passing defense department. SO many times you see columnists just quote pass yards against per game as a sign of having a good defense. We really did do poorly last year.
That said, a large reason why we gave up so many points last year (imo) is because the offense was so atrocious that the other teams always got great field position and our defense was always tired from constantly being on the field. With an offense that’s looking better this year (how could we get worse?) hopefully we’ll offset a few losses in the defense.
I’m more worried about actually having people to play these positions. We ALWAYS get a lot of injuries and never have any depth, and now that situation will be even worse.
by johnnycougar on Jul 14, 2009 11:33 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Honestly, our team was so horrific last year, I am still in a daze and just
can’t seem too get excited about football. I usually watch highlights from the previous year to get pumped, but man there is nothing worth watching. Even the UW game hurts because they were so bad. It is like beating up on your little brother and then telling everyone about it. Who cares!!
Hopefully we will not be the train wreck we were last year and actually have some competitive football games all the way down to the 4th qtr. The season will be a success if we are within 10 pts at the start of the 4th qtr in at least half of our games.
Wake me up when b-ball season starts.
by ptowncoug3012 on Jul 14, 2009 2:20 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Glad to see them gone
I know this hurts our team next year, but I would rather go 0-12 then have a bunch of wannabe gangsters on our team always getting in trouble. On the bright side if we go 0-12 then maybe we can finally fire Wulff – Yes, I hate him and always have, even when he was coaching at EWU and coming into Blockbuster Video when I worked there and was a total deuce bag to everyone who worked there. I thought once I went to WSU I would never have to deal with this guy anymore. (by the way another reason to hate Wulff is how he left the EWU program, read up on it if you don’t know about it, it sucks what he did, and he knew what he was doing – my uncle was a coach on the team at the time)
Also, love the comment on the Seattle Times, yes, they are pathetic, they give a tab for high school sports but not for the Cougars. Apparently they keep forgetting they are losing millions of dollars every year and dont want to keep the few readers they have left happy.
by spokanecougar on Jul 14, 2009 2:39 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
That doesn't mean he's a bad coach
Just because the guy didn’t treat you with the utmost respect at Blockbuster does not mean he is not doing the right things for the program or that he is a bad coach. And the fact that some of the Eastern faithful felt jilted when he left is not surprising…it happens everywhere when a coach leaves for a better situation. Hell, look at how some of our fan base reacted to Tony Bennett leaving. As a parallel to your Uncle’s situation, I’m sure that every WSU assistant with the exception of Matt Sanchez felt a little upset when Tony left.
Look, the jury is still out on Wulff. But the facts are that he’s only been in place for a year and he inherited one hell of a mess. He proved that he can win in a less than ideal situation at Eastern, let’s wait and see if he can do the same thing at WSU. Additionally, like I say to everyone that wants to fire Wulff, are you going to scratch the check that buys out his contract? WSU just cannot afford to pay THREE coaches at once.
It’s kind of hard to take your complaints about Wulff (the coach, not the person) seriously with such a personal ax to grind.
by '03CouveCoug on Jul 14, 2009 3:10 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just to let you know, my uncle left EWU before Wulff left to WSU so he was never upset when he left as he had already moved on and had another job.
As for me having an axe to grind, that was over 8 years ago, I have also moved on, I mentioned those stories not to show that I have an axe to grind, but show some reason on why I do not like him as a person and as a coach. He treated people he thought were below him like crap and he ruined the EWU football program before he left by cheating and now despite having a good team (with a very good QB) and a good coach they cannot make the post season because of the actions of their former cheating coach and not anything the players or current staff did.
Wulff was not qualified to be the coach of a Pac-10 school when he was hired, he should have started out as a coordinator first to learn that the Pac-10 is a little different than the Big Sky . Then to top it off instead of hiring people more qualified to be on his staff he filled it with basically the same staff he had at EWU – so they went from the Big Sky to the Pac-10. One other thing, in his 8 years at EWU he was an average coach who actually underachieved in most years. He had two 9-4 seasons, other then that he was 35-32. Also, if you followed EWU football (like I did since my grandpa was also a coach at the school years ago), he was not as well liked because he was underachieving compared to the success they had under coach Zornes. Also, after his 3-8 record in 2006 there were some who thought he was going to be fired and was on the hot seat the next year as he went 9-4 and parlayed that into the WSU job.
I llike Jim Sterk and think he does a lot of good things for our athletic department, but this was by far a horrible hire that was done only so we did not have to pay a better coach more money.
by spokanecougar on Jul 14, 2009 3:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Fair enough...
It’s too bad if Coach Wulff did something to belittle you and you’ll have to accept my apologies for using the word "if." Lots of people make outlandish claims on the internet when they have the luxury of anonymity, so you’ll have to excuse my skepticism of your claim. Nonetheless, I’ll reply to your writing.
I’m no expert on the history of EWU football, but perhaps the fact that Wulff took a program deep into the FCS playoffs in the span of a few years with limited resources is what was more enticing to the WSU brass. Let’s be frank, EWU is at a serious disadvantage in terms of fan/alumni support and athletic budget, especially to conference powerhouse Montana (much like our beloved Cougs in the Pac-10). Yet, Wulff and Co. still managed to share 2 conference titles, which Zornes never did.
Additionally, regarding the "cheating" that Wulff did at EWU…if you want to be mad at anyone about it, be mad at EWU’s former AD for a lack of support and at the NCAA for making an example out of little old Eastern Washington while the USC’s and Oklahoma’s of the football world get away with blatant cheating. You’ll also recall that Wulff fully disclosed the troubles at Eastern when Sterk interviewed him, and Sterk was still comfortable hiring him.
I’m pretty sure that Sterk and Co. knew that Jesus Christ himself couldn’t have led last year’s group to more than 3 wins and were willing to allow Wulff and staff time to grow into their positions as a tradeoff for a reasonable salary and the likely loyalty the Dept. will receive from an alum as coach. There may be some validity to your statement about not having to pay a better coach more money, but you have to keep in mind that Sterk had to take into account that Doba was (is) still on the payroll. WSU is just not in a position to throw a seven-figure salary at a new head football coach when we’re still paying the one that just got fired.
Again, I too am skeptical about Wulff as the man to lead WSU back to the upper-half of the Pac-10. I just think it’s way too early to be calling for his head.
by '03CouveCoug on Jul 14, 2009 4:36 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
"Finally fire Wulff"
I know what you mean. The Paul Wulff era has lasted so long I don’t even remember what WSU football, or even college football in general, was like without it.
I never really liked the old tagline.
CougCenter
by Dancing Football on Jul 14, 2009 3:20 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Really?
Do you honestly think that this mess is all his fault? Do you think that if another coach had been brought in that we’d magically be going bowling this season? I’m sorry, I just don’t see it.
Like I said above, I’m not totally sold on Wulff either. However, there is just no way to tell yet if he’s the answer. And to beat the dead horse…are you gonna cut the check to send him packing?
by '03CouveCoug on Jul 14, 2009 3:34 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sarcasm.
Sorry. I’ve been reading LL a lot lately.
I never really liked the old tagline.
CougCenter
by Dancing Football on Jul 14, 2009 3:51 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry
That went right over my head! I guess that I’m getting too used to Coug fans with unreasonable expectations and took you seriously.
by '03CouveCoug on Jul 14, 2009 3:58 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I am not into fiiring a coach right after his first season, but I must
say I am not a big fan of our offensive scheme. It’s funny that in our hire, we looked to an offensive coach when we were clearly having defensive struggles.
Hopefully CPW gets it turned around in 2010 (I didn’t say 2009 because I don’t think that is realistic or fair) because our program does not need more turnover in coaching when we having so many players being shown the door.
by ptowncoug3012 on Jul 14, 2009 3:53 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 








