Hawai'i 38, Washington State 20
We're big picture folks here at CougCenter. For weeks, we've been rambling on about how Paul Wulff has this program headed in the right direction. How he's turning things around. It's a lengthy process, for sure, but we knew that coming in. He wasn't exactly handed a program with USC talent, but he's done his best so far to build the foundation. Recruiting is on the upswing even for a team near the bottom of the conference. Hope, if not near, is at least on the horizon. And there's always that overtime thriller in the Apple Cup last year to keep our spirits up.
But then, you watch a game like this.
You see Hawai'i - a team that has never, ever beaten a BCS opponent on the road since that acronym was invented - jump out to a 35-0 lead on us a week after scraping by Central Arkansas. You see mental errors and a lack of execution. A lack of preparation. A lack of any spark or signs of life until the second half. By then, of course, it was too little too late. For much of the first two quarters of play, this game resembled the apocalypse that was last year's USC game. Only this wasn't USC. This was a team returning one lonely defensive starter and a program that is now a far cry from its Sugar Bowl glory of two years ago. And, if you don't remember, they got creamed in that Sugar Bowl.
Sorry, Hawai'i, I don't mean to disrespect you, but you aren't USC. You know that as well as I. The Warriors can take pride in the fact that they came out looking like they desperately needed to win this game. WSU didn't. Forget the fact we ended the game on a 20-3 run. All that did was prevent total embarrassment.
It makes you wonder. Is Wulff the right fit for this program? How much is the buyout anyway? How did we get to this point? Did Doba sink this program with apathy and his recruiting of now-gone athletes with character issues? Or did Wulff take a competitive program and throw it into the blender, with all its creamy goodness left behind to be the laughingstock of the Pac-10?
You'd never know we were in the Rose Bowl seven years ago. That we actually beat USC this century. That we were a team that put Vince Young on the losing end of a ball game; a program that teams used to hate to play on the road. Where'd Wazzu go? The stands are now filled with the most die-hard of die-hard fans, and the student section is loaded with kids who have never seen a season that resulted in a Bowl game.
In the big picture, though, we can't fire Wulff. It's bad for us financially, and it's bad for us in that we'd be making a similar bet on someone else to rebuild a program out of the ashes of its former self. For now, we have to wait. Hope for the best. And, most importantly, forget about this week.
Player of the Game: James Montgomery. 6.9 yards per carry! 117 yards! A thingy where you go in that one zone that scores points! What's that called? I forgot. Anyway, Monty is for real, and he keeps convincing me that we need to put the ball in his hands more often. A bright spot in a sea of gloominess.
Unsung hero: Jeffrey Solomon, Nico Grasu (tie). Solomon came out of nowhere to notch six receptions for 71 yards. Grasu continues to erase the memory of his awful first miss of the season, with two good field goals that I'm pretty sure none of us wanted to see kicked in the first place, given the game situation (down 35-0, 35-3).
Play of the Game: Montgomery's 2 yard TD run in the third quarter that made us believe for a half second we might have a chance to come back.
It was over when... Bill Doba was resign-fired, and Paul Wulff was hired to take over the Cougar program. Or, if I must, when Leon Wright-Jackson from Pasco, Washington scored on a run with 8 seconds left in the first to put the Warriors up 21-nil.
Stat of the Game: 7 TURNOVERS.....ARRRRRHGHTHTHGNHNROHNE I HATE THIS TEAM SOMETIMES
0 recs |
36 comments
|
Comments
That video made me laugh
Which is not an easy thing to do right now.
by Jeff Nusser on Sep 12, 2009 9:43 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Forgot to mention this
My main fear, at this point, is that we’re headed for 0-12. A very likely scenario if we can’t hang with SMU next week.
by Grady. on Sep 12, 2009 9:50 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
the glory days are gone
I was watching a few youtube highlights the other day..on the 2002-03 seasons…we ONCE had legitimate NFL caliber athlets all over our defense..players like…Billy Newman, Scott Davis..Milwauli Davis. Fred Shavies..Ryan Long…Jason David…as well as DD Acholonu and Isaac Brown..the 2 debatable best pass rusheres in the conference…our defense looked fast, strong and big…we are now not even a shadow of what we used to be…
there are no key figures on our D..Blunt and Montgomery are our 2 biggest playmakers… on the positve note our team is still very young and inespiernced..lets not lose all hope just cause of a unspeakably horrific 2 quarters…players like freshman travis long…sophomore blunt…QB Jeff Tuel..a retuning 4 out of 5 lineman..freshman Simone…we got some players who seem to compete hard every week to build a team around for next year…it’ll be alont time though esp. with the D line and secondary being huge question marks…
were jsut playing to compete at this point..SMU next week should not be as easy as we think..they’ve played some easy opponents but at this point they are 2-0…
by Wazzucrazed on Sep 12, 2009 9:55 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I don't think anyone is thinking SMU will be easy at this point
by Jeff Nusser on Sep 12, 2009 10:40 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
wow sorry lol.....
Louis Bland is who I was referring to…..btw whatta think of alex Hoffman-ellis performance yesterday? he had a decent game, he was playing with intensity…
by Wazzucrazed on Sep 13, 2009 9:07 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
If only this team didn't have to play the first half
The Cougs played a decent 2nd half vs. Stanford and played a good 2nd half today, at least defensively. Even if they didn’t show up for the 1st half today, it would have been the same result.
by GoCougs on Sep 12, 2009 10:26 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Gee, could it be because teams playing from ahead employ different strategies?
Ones that place a premium on eating up clock, rather than scoring points?
by Jeff Nusser on Sep 12, 2009 10:41 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Something Hawai'i is horrible at
The only thing we had going for us in the second half was that Hawai’i is not great at eating clock, and they don’t really know how to do it.
by 02Coug on Sep 12, 2009 10:50 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's kind of an inherent downfall of the run and shoot
Or any offense that passes > 60 percent of the time.
by Jeff Nusser on Sep 12, 2009 10:58 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
It’s not surprising that they fumbled so much as they tried to punch it in, they simply don’t run very often. But if they had stayed on the gas, their offense was still potent in the second half. They really should have scored at least 2 more touchdowns.
by 02Coug on Sep 12, 2009 11:01 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Against USC
we played a kick ass second half too.
by HitKing69 on Sep 12, 2009 11:00 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The defense was only good because Hawaii made mistakes and turned the ball over.
It could have just as easily been 70 to ?? at the end of the game if Hawaii had not turned the ball over.
by cfred on Sep 14, 2009 11:28 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
True, but there's a flip side to that, too
Whenever there’s a turnover, people’s first instinct is to call it a mistake by the offense. But unless it’s a fumbled snap or botched hand off, there’s at least some element of the defense making a play. I’d put the Cougs’ forced turnovers in that category, and defnitely something encouraging.
In fact, I think I’ll have to write a positivity post about that!
by Jeff Nusser on Sep 15, 2009 9:57 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
QB battle?
When does the Sh*t hot Freshman see the field this year? Is it safe to say that Lopina and the Lobster aren’t cutting it?
"Anytime, Anyplace"
"Life is hard, it's harder if you're stupid." - John Wayne
by Husky nav on Sep 12, 2009 11:03 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
i don't care what happens the rest of the year,
playing tuel would be the biggest mistake wulff could make.
by displacedcoug on Sep 12, 2009 11:04 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
What difference would that make?
He doesn’t play corner or safety … or COACH …
by Jeff Nusser on Sep 12, 2009 11:06 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Will CPW get desperate?
A win is a win, right. If the coach thinks that burning a redshirt will save his job they’ll do it. I think that the “other WA team” would agree that it’s a bad decision. But it’s a decision that has been made many times.
"Anytime, Anyplace"
"Life is hard, it's harder if you're stupid." - John Wayne
by Husky nav on Sep 12, 2009 11:10 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Did you read what I wrote?
THIS TEAM HAS SO MANY PROBLEMS, AN UPGRADE AT QUARTERBACK ISN’T GOING TO MAKE ONE DAMN BIT OF DIFFERENCE.
by Jeff Nusser on Sep 12, 2009 11:12 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm sorry.
I was merely asking a question that had been asked several times on discussions prior to this game. I believe that this blog has even raised that question a time or two.
I agree that changing QB’s doesn’t seem to be the solution to the Coug’s problems. However, I do believe that a desperate coach doesn’t think rationally about what is best for the longevity of the program.
"Anytime, Anyplace"
"Life is hard, it's harder if you're stupid." - John Wayne
by Husky nav on Sep 12, 2009 11:21 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
No need to apologize
It’s just not going to happen, unless injuries demand it. If this team was a QB away, maybe. But QB is really about No. 6 on the list of problems.
by Jeff Nusser on Sep 12, 2009 11:26 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ty Willingham would disagree.
Damn, my eyeball tastes good.
by Gekko Mojo on Sep 12, 2009 11:22 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
thank you gekko
"Anytime, Anyplace"
"Life is hard, it's harder if you're stupid." - John Wayne
by Husky nav on Sep 12, 2009 11:23 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
my seats were right behind the coug bench
and i was actually pretty shocked at how small Tuel is. For everyone in the media, etc who talked about how he outplayed everyone in fall ball, it’s remarkable how his body is NOT ready. He was standing next to Marshall at one point and Rojo has a solid 25 pound advantage.
Remember when Brink came in as a RS-Frosh and people were nervous he’d be killed? This would be twice as bad.
Once Tuel sheds his high school body, we can talk about playing him, but that’s going to be at least a year.
by BigWood on Sep 13, 2009 9:12 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Playing a true freshman doesn't give him a better chance to win
Tuel is our future, but he’s not a 5 star recruit expected to carry a team as a freshmen starting or anything. Wulff may get desperate, but burning the redshirt in any situation other then Lopina and Lobbestael going down to injury would be the death nail.
by 02Coug on Sep 12, 2009 11:13 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hopefully never
And honestly, Lopina should be our starter and he is far from our worst problem. He made some good plays today, and if our defence had been in the stadium in the first half I think Lopina could have given us a chance to win. But we have to stop playing two QB’s, Lopina might have gotten going quicker in the first half if he hadn’t been put down after the first pick.
by 02Coug on Sep 12, 2009 11:09 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Our receivers need to learn how to catch...
in the 2nd half, Lopina finally started throwing some pretty nice balls only to be dropped.
I agree that burning Tuel’s redshirt is stupid but what about a Nolan Washington? We NEED faster and more talented CBs and we have no depth at all in that position. I really wish my brother would just try out for the team. We could really use another DT…
by james_WSU on Sep 12, 2009 11:49 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Coaching
i just read chris ball’s post-game comment s:
“he said if he had to play the game over he would have put more pressue on the offense " in the ist drive wsu rushed 3 – no pressue w/ a young and inexperinced secondary w/ no speed – pitch and catch . what gives !!! – the only way to stop the run and shoot is to break up the timing. my granddaughter could have worked up a better game plan – we saw the problem in hawaii’s 1st drive – WHAT ON EARTH WAS THE COACHIN STAFF THINKING > SMU w/ jume jones runs the same run and shoot – 0 and 12 > $$$ will contiune to drop as no tv and attendance declines. can not wait 4 years.
by willarose on Sep 13, 2009 8:09 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
No carp we should've gotten more pressure on the QB
A fan behind me kept saying so. That fan was eight.
by jj_fekl on Sep 13, 2009 3:39 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Gotta Fire That Coach
I have never been that embarrassed by cougar football.
by Pman on Sep 13, 2009 8:28 AM PDT via mobile reply actions 0 recs
The peak of embarrassment was when...
Down 35-0, in the first half, with an offensive line that was much bigger and stronger than Hawaii’s defensive line, on the 2 yard line… He kicks a field goal. Ugh.
by Pman on Sep 13, 2009 8:31 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
I was more embarrassed by USC in '08
But yep – nothing says confidence in your team like refusing to let them try to earn two measly yards
by Grady. on Sep 13, 2009 8:41 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Seems to be a trend.
There were a few times in the Stanford game when we had the opportunity to go for it on 4th and short past midfield and elected not to.
by Dancing Football on Sep 13, 2009 9:31 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 







