The emergence of James Watson
Let me reintroduce myself to the community. Hi, my name is Craig. In case you all forgot (and I wouldn't be surprised if you did) I am an author for this site, despite the fact that I haven't put up a post about the Cougs in what seems like a decade. Please enjoy my thoughts on Washington State forward James Watson.
One of the worries for Cougar fans early in the non-conference schedule was the production coming out of the five spot when DeAngelo Casto sat on the bench. It seemed that Charlie Enquist was Ken Bone's answer and Charlie was just not cutting it. Even against low-major competition, Charlie was ineffective on offense (or as Kenpom puts it, "nearly invisible") and had trouble keeping up with stronger and faster big men. During that time, it was clear that Enquist was getting minutes in favor of the obviously more athletic James Watson. Many of you on this site wondered along with myself why that was the case.
Well, we got our wish and James has been getting the minutes. All his play has done is keep us wondering what took so long.
Watson's story this year has been an interesting one. He suffered not one, but two head injuries in preseason practice. There was some concern that his career was headed towards the Stephen Sauls route. Luckily, those fears were put to rest as James was ready to play by the second game. His role was limited to foul trouble and mop-up minutes until the Kansas State game. In that game he put up an impressive stat line, going 3-3 from the field and pulling down three boards. He was poised to take over as Casto's primary backup. Then... (Click the jump to read on)
He plays two minutes against Idaho and is a no-show for Air Force.
Luckily, the last four games have seem him play solid minutes and he has produced very well in that time. His ORtg so far this season is at 137.0, he rarely turns the ball over, rebounds on both ends of the floor (very good 17.4 offensive rebounding percentage), and uses 16.7% of the possessions. That last number is important because Enquist was using 8.5% of the possessions, and a lot of those were turnovers. James gives the Cougs one more finisher on the floor that they did not have in the first few games of the year.
On top of the statistical observations, I was able to take a look at the Oregon (why I did that to myself, I have no idea) and the Oregon State games thanks to the magic of digital video recording. In those contests, Watson uses his speed advantage over bigger opponents to get out and run in the open floor. On several occasions he got some easy buckets or free throws simply because he was on the break with the little guys and made himself available. He also is very confident in taking the mid-range jumper, hopefully it will consistently fall. I'm guessing by the way he shoots it without hesitation that he has that ability.
One more interesting note is that Bone used him a few times in offense-defense substitutions to get him along side Casto on the defensive end. It would be nice if that could happen more often, but the lack of height on this team doesn't really allow for that. Don't expect to see a Casto/Watson combo on the floor for significant stretches.
James has got the athleticism and height to be an effective backup for the Cougs this year. His toughest matchups physically will be Michael Dunigan from Oregon and Alex Stepheson from USC, and he performed decently against Dunigan. He is disciplined and doesn't seem to go for the big block all that often (even though he was pegged as a "shot blocker" out of high school, which is of course code for "tall, athletic kid with little offensive game"). He has some nice tools and should be a solid player in years to come with a little polish (remember, he is only a freshman), but his contributions so far give Bone and his staff a nice option when DeAngelo needs a breather or gets into foul trouble.
Let's hope he sticks in the rotation this time. He can finish, rebound, and he runs the break (with a point guard like Moore, he will definitely get some easy buckets if he keeps doing that). Washington State will definitely be better with James Watson filling those reserve minutes and he could emerge the way Casto did last season and have some big games by season's end.
28 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I don't quite get what you mean by "the lack of height on this team doesn't really allow for that."
I’m guessing the logic is that if either of them gets into foul trouble we’re in trouble, or if they both play at the same time our only dangerous bigs will both be tired by the end of the game.
But to some extent, doesn’t the fact that they both are potentially offensive and defensive threats mean that we should play them together? Outside of Oregon, no one really has more than one big man, and most of those bigs are also young and / or bad. Playing a tall lineup might be to our advantage, at least as a change of pace. I’m no strategist, but I would play one in the low post to the side and the other near the baseline on the other side; then, when Moore or Thames drives to the hoop, they can either go strong side (with the post player to help screen) or weak side (post player to either put back a miss or collect a pass for an easy shot). An additional advantage to having a 2nd big would be that the two post players could switch sides / positions easily and if Watson really does have a midrange jumper, he can take 10 footers when Moore draws Watson’s defender on help-defense.
I guess ultimately someone has to be available to rebound and defend the hoop all game, but I think there are several ways Bone could play both bigs at the same time to our advantage.
They can't play 40 minutes.
And we don’t really have anyone else for the five spot on the bench. If you play them at the same time, you probably have to take them out of the same time.
I do agree with you about how nice it would be if both were on the floor, though. One more big please!
CougCenter WSU's second main blog
As I've said all along
We’re one defensive rebounding big man away from being a really, really good team. Let’s hope we get one before next year.
I don't see a dominant one coming
Right now, looking at the lineup, I’m keeping my fingers crossed that Bjornstad or Motum can develop into one.
Or, you know, we could actually give minutes to the one non-Casto guy that is rebounding well defensively. And that man is Abe Lodwick. I may have more on that later.
They were both out there for a small portion of the OSU game
And it made me happy.
Just like the first time Tony ran Baynes and Casto out together for the first time.
If Watson can demonstrate he can stay out of foul trouble, you might see it more
But right now, his foul rate is 8.0/40. That could be a little bit because he knows he’s only going to be on the floor ~15 minutes, but that’s still obviously insanely high.
The key is getting another competent big man. If someone else can can give us some meaningful minutes with Casto on the bench, then maybe we’ll get something going. The best candidate would seem to be Motum, but he played four minutes against Oregon and didn’t play against OSU, so we probably shouldn’t hold our collective breath.
Watson is coming out strong
Even with those injuires, I really like him. I felt horrible for him from for taking all these hits. I had no idea what to expect from him when he was to hit the floor. Didn’t play last year if I remember right. But I see now, even though how young he is, that he was just an unsung player. He is a spectacular player, even though his playing time is low, but is now increasing. I understand why, he is damn good for coming out of injuries.
I agree with the Enquist statement. I never liked him on the floor. Too many turnovers and he is a foul magnet. Not to mention he is SLOW. I hope if he randomly rises into a efficient player, I think we will be able to pack another player down with Casto/Watson. For now, he needs practice. A lot. No other words.
Aside, Watson is becoming a standout for his first early conference play appearances. I believe he can keep it up and help rake Bone’s team some needed wins for the March Tourney.
Great minds think alike
I was just putting together a post for the WSU Football Blog singing Watson’s praises. With Watson on the floor with any combo of Thames, Moore, Capers, Thomson, we are lethal in transition. He had a nice transition dunk and a number of times against OSU he raced down the court to receive the last pass on the break and the Beavs were forced to foul. I don’t ever recall Enquist getting down court on a break.
Nope, you're not alone
Although kenpom didn’t call him invisible, so he must have done something at some point
He was effective, albeit in small stretches, in some of our first games
The ones that weren’t on TV. But I’d prefer those minutes have gone to Watson or Motum, who need it more in their development. Sorry Charlie.
Well, if we could have gotten something out of Charlie, that would have been big for us
He’s tall. Can’t teach tall. So you have to find out if he can play, which is why I had no problem with him playing early. What did we find out? That he’s ineffective against smaller, less athletic opponents … which, of course, explains his 12 minutes combined in the last four games, including DNPs this weekend.
Moore/Thames/Capers/Watson/Casto
The most exciting lineup we could put out there with Klay on the bench.
I think this may be slightly racist against our white players, though.
Because our white players clearly deserve to be on the floor!
Harthun and Charlie are awesome! (Although I truly wouldn’t mind some more Abe …)
E:60 did a piece on this
To sum it up:
White Americans in the NBA: suck
White Europeans in the NBA: good!
I think he falls under the white foreigner crowd
Last white American NBA all-star: Brad Miller
Reason they allow zone defenses: white Americans
If I can find the video again, I’ll post it. It’s interesting
I saw that
It was based around Kyle McAlarney not being able to get a “fair shot” in the league. Gee, it couldn’t be because he can’t do anything other than shoot a 3 …
Exactly
It also addresses the GMs thinking that white American players are too slow to defend and not athletic enough to play with the big boys which is a fair point.
These arguments never hold any water with me
This isn’t the unwritten rule keeping African Americans out. These guys want to win, and they want to keep their jobs. (Not necessarily in that order.) If the guy’s skin is blue and he’s got three eyes, it won’t matter if he can shoot and defend.
The argument that makes sense.
Is that super sports keen white parents stream their kids into baseball since they don’t think they can compete in hoops.
Also, the North American system for developing basketball players is terrible.
by Coug Friendly Canuck on Jan 6, 2010 5:58 PM PST up reply actions
Terrible for developing elite basketball players
But I think pretty good for developing better rounded kids.
Agreed.
For my average schmuck high school kid when I used to coach it was a great experience.
But, for the few kids I had that were actually borderline elite talents I couldn’t give them nearly enough.
by Coug Friendly Canuck on Jan 7, 2010 10:19 AM PST up reply actions
Totally agree, teams want to win
If that were the case, a GM would start picking up undervalued assets and start winning. There are dumb GM’s, but not all of them are dumb.

by 


















