Washington State 78, Arizona 60
Very happy charts for your Sunday morning:
Finally, WSU puts together a full forty minutes.
The Cougs are a very good offensive team when they do two things: shoot the ball well and rebound. Last night, for the first time in what feels like ages, they flat out dominated an opponent on the boards. That wasn't so surprising on the defensive end, where the Wildcats struggle to get second chance opportunities. It was surprising, however, that the Cougs so thoroughly dominated U of A on the offensive glass. ASU is a solid, if not spectacular, team at pulling down defensive rebounds. A lot of that is due to Derrick Williams and Jamelle Horne, whose combined impact just wasn't that strong in this game. Horne finished with only two total rebounds in 24 minutes.
The real story, of course - after Nuss and I spent the last two days picking it apart - is the team defense. This was as great a Cougar defensive effort as we've seen this season, and it came at a time we desperately needed it. While we're not big fans of the 2-3 zone, the important thing is that WSU committed to it and closed out on open shooters. Regardless of playing man-to-man or zone last night, WSU pressured the ball and kept ASU from attacking the basket and drawing fouls. Nic Wise had virtually no impact on this game, which is nothing short of spectacular. If you had bet me $10,000 on Friday that Nic Wise and Brock Motum would finish with the same point total in this game, I would've taken it in a blink of an eye, and then laughed at you for giving your money away.
So let's talk about Motum, and the bigs - which came up huge in this game for the Cougs. Motum and BigBabyBjorn (I'm trying to get that nickname to catch on) played significant minutes in the first half, and Motum did the same again in the second. Coach Bone said after the game that Abe Lodwick was feeling "under the weather", which is why he ended up with a DNP. The result was a coaching move out of semi-desperation that not only worked, but worked well. Motum and Bjornstad not only held their own; they made an impact. Bjornstad registered a block, and Motum (in 17 minutes!) went 4 of 6, scored 10, grabbed and offensive board, dished an assist and most importantly never turned it over. The strides Motum have made in practice must be substantial - he's always been able to hit jumpers, but last night he was able to score inside off passes from the guards. He even got to the foul line. Again, that magical big man we need isn't walking through the door, but the potential of Motum developing into it is extremely exciting.
I'd be completely out of my mind, though, to downplay DeAngelo Casto's performance in this game. 19 and 9 with 3 blocks no 8 of 13 shooting. Just ridiculous. Part of me wonders if Arizona is just soft in the middle, but I think they're not so much soft as they are young. Natyazhko, Williams, Parrom and Hill are all freshmen. For obvious reasons we match up well against that. D is the secret motor behind this team. Klay and Reggie can be penciled in for 10+ points on any given night, but when Casto is on fire than this team is very hard to stop. Not to mention his obvious contributions on defense. In fact, after picking up a quick first foul, Casto played good defense the remainder of the game without fouling (often). Which is pretty refreshing.
No discussion of the bigs would be complete without mentioning Watson's silky smooth jumper (probably why Bennett liked him so much) and 3 rebounds in only 6 minutes, and Koprivica (who isn't really a big) snatching 5 boards in 20 minutes. In fact all the guards rebounded well - Reggie with 6, Klay with 3, Capers with 2.
One more thing before the awards: I was surprised that down the stretch, when Ken Bone knew defense would be the difference between a blown lead and a victory, we stayed in the zone. Not only that, Marcus Capers was on the bench and Xavier Thames was out on the floor. We all know Capers is a solid defender, so I have to believe the reason for this lies in the idea that Thames is a better fit for the zone defense. Interesting. I certainly enjoyed the results, given with how well we closed this game and forced Arizona to burn clock and take jumpers inside the arc.
Player of the Game: DeAngelo Casto. Again, 19 points on 8/13 shooting, 9 rebounds, 3 blocks, only one turnover. Something about Arizona brings out the best in D.
Unsung Hero: Brock Motum. I'm so happy I can give this award out to Motum, and I'm shocked and excited it was in a Pac-10 game. That we won. 10 points on 4/6 shooting, a board, an assist, and no turnovers. He's suddenly making the AIS to NCAA transition look a lot easier than it should.
It was over when... Reggie's three-point play off the steal put the Cougs up 18 with 1:45 to play. It might've been over before that, but I've learned not to take anything for granted in Pullman.
Play of the Game: Tie tonight. First, Motum's dunk in the first half off a beautiful assist from Klay Thompson. Second, Nik's three to put the Cougs up 11 with 4:18 to play. Hard to believe it was a six point game with just over 5 to play.
Stat of the Game: The 32-23 rebounding advantage for WSU. If you're into advanced stats, the Wildcats had a stretch of 8 straight games with over 100.0 offensive efficiency prior to traveling to Washington this weekend. The Huskies held them to 90.2, and we held them to 93.8. However, where UW only had a 97.5 efficiency night against the U of A defense, the Cougs went off for 121.9. Good times.
0 recs |
23 comments
|
Comments
I said it to Grady via text last night
But it’s amazing what can happen when Klay’s not taking 20 shots. It sounded – from talking to Grady and listening to the second half on the radio – that he was being patient, mostly taking shots within the flow of the offense, and finding the open man when the defense overcommitted. I called for that two weeks ago, and I’m glad to see it finally happen. Hopefully, his teammates stepping up gives him the confidence to continue to give up the ball when the shot isn’t there.
by Jeff Nusser on Feb 7, 2010 10:18 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
He was playing within the offense
In fact everyone was. I think a lot of it was Bone yanking guys. Reggie puts up a bad 3, Bone pulls him and Johnson talks to him. This happened early for a lot of guys.
Late in the game they ran a Bennett like slow down offense and were selective with their shots. It seemed like the were valuing possession and finding good open looks
by cougfan on Feb 7, 2010 10:27 AM PST via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
What I liked about our slowing it down
Too often it has seemed that if we use the whole shot clock, we panick at under 10 and something bad happens. But last night we looked comfortable when slowing the game down and running an offense. We weren’t afraid of looking for early shots, but we also weren’t playing like we had to shoot right away.
With a lead, if we can be patient and also willing to score early if it is there we can be dangerous. We were able to wait until the defense broke down, if that was early then we took it. If it was late in the shot clock, we took that. Great play by our guys.
by 02Coug on Feb 7, 2010 10:47 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I think thats part of the reason we couldnt play with the lead
Slowing down takes us out of our game. Last night we took shots when they were there but were patient. We didn’t really get in to our sets for 20 secs but then ran them efficiently and moved the ball late
by cougfan on Feb 7, 2010 11:10 AM PST via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
X and Moore
I think he likes having those two out top in the zone. In the absence of Marcus, we needed a way to keep Wise from penetrating. The two man fullcourt they run also helps slow up the opponents offense nicely
by cougfan on Feb 7, 2010 10:46 AM PST via mobile reply actions 0 recs
Motum
sets the best screens on the team.
by jj_fekl on Feb 7, 2010 11:27 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Not just that
But also what he does after setting the screen. He can slip it, hard screen, or pick and pop. He did all three pretty well and was making good cuts last night too
by cougfan on Feb 7, 2010 11:35 AM PST via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
watching the game through again right now
did Bjorn run a 2-3 in high school? he seems VERY comfortable anchoring a zone. Something that can’t really be said about Casto or Watson.
by BigWood on Feb 7, 2010 11:47 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I thought he did
I also thought Casto did some at Ferris too. Might be wrong though but it seemed like he was a floater and shot blocker in hs
by cougfan on Feb 7, 2010 11:51 AM PST via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
Obviously the defensive intensity was
far, far better. Also, some of the changes were due to guys getting hooked for errors on the court- but Bone had rotations going that kept the Cougs fresh. He pulled a few guys right after nice makes on shots… whihc indicated to me he was calculating minutes and rests- much needed for the leg weary shooters on the Cougs.
However, a subtle shifting of the offensive set to a frequent 1-3-1 with Casto sort of lightly flashing to the elbow or center at the FT line to receive a pass really opened up lanes. Collapsed the zone to the interior a bit more and took pressure off the ball at the top. It also allowed the “5” be it Bjorn (to be wild) or Motum or Nik to roam that base line behind the zone and force the D to back looks. When those looks failed, the result was many shots along the baseline going AT the rim. Klay found Motum for a couple of beauties and those ‘mistakes’ caused Williams to drift deeper in the zone and then Watson, and the others had nice open 12 footers. Great adjustments— I loved the way they played. They adapted quickly to the 1-3-1 and thus, the usual 1-2-2 was less heavily defended.
The use of the 2-3 when AZ needed an ‘answer hoop’ really confounded them. Great job by Bone. Props to DeAngelo for being a true stud as well! Welcome Brock to the rotation as well— 4 assists for Klay is vital— if that part of his game develops- he will be deadly.
If you can't Go Cougs... don't go.
by hollyweirdcoug on Feb 7, 2010 12:07 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Phenomenal game
and exactly what the Cougs needed.
Klay was careful and calculating, refusing to shoot while covered and getting the ball in rotation when his shot wasn’t there. He also got to the rim well, which is the best way to stop a shooting slump.
X is really developing, I remember being so excited about him before Reggie shocked us all and is now potentially the most talented player on our team. X is a great shooter, he can knock it down from anywhere, which is something that this team desperately needs. We haven’t had a guy who is really a threat to pop it from anywhere on the floor. That, along with Watson and Motum looking good from mid-range, would go miles for our play against the zone.
My only question, and concern, would be where is Charlie Enquist? He played a good first half against UW and hasn’t logged a minute since. I was beginning to look at him as our second best big. He certainly looked the part until this last game where Watson and Motum took off. Anybody know why Charlie has fallen out of favor?
by Fightfightfight on Feb 7, 2010 1:59 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Bone has said he'll use the bigs based on matchups
He logged some good minutes against Stanford last time, so you’ll probably see him some on Thursday.
by Jeff Nusser on Feb 7, 2010 2:05 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
who cares
Enquist should be a 4th or 5th option. what concerns me is bone playing Abe for soooo long as a starter. nik has been border line amazing for about 10-12 games now and has played well as a starter. brock FINALLY gets to play and plays very well. you can’t teach the physical tools he has.
how much better is the pick and roll with moore when there is a big who can actually catch and score? no one can cover moore 1 on 1 and with a big like watson or motum who can shoot…watch out.
finally, klay. i was so happy to see us finally stop forcing 3 out of every 4 poss. his way. mentally he and bone need to get ok with the idea of him going for 15 a game. i loved his stat line last game. at some point if we let the game come to him he will just get hot. and if not he can draw doubles and dish. and if we have bigs who can score on the court we will get points.
split this weekend, sweep the LA schools at home and sweep the oregon schools. thats the goal. go cougs.
by donkeyjon12 on Feb 7, 2010 4:53 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If you sit back and digest the game you will see that AZ played us just like
we played ASU. They lacked ball movement, rather often choosing for one pass and shoot, jacking up long 3s not in the flow of the offense. Just taking quick jump shots all over the place. They also got frustrated when they penetrated because we collapsed well.
On the offensive end, KT really started to recognize the defense attention that he draws when he drives. A couple of Motum’s easy buckets were because Motum went to the hoop on the baseline when KT was driving and drawing the D.
I still maintain we are a good 3 pt shooting team, but I hate the fact that Bone’s offense seems to rely on it so much. Obviously KT has hit a wall. Let’s not forget that he played summer ball! But he limited his 3s in this game. Looking to drive and score or draw and pass. We were 3-10 overall from the 3 pt line but one of those was a last second jack by Moore at the end of the half and the other was a quick jack by Moore that resulted in him getting benched. Other than that I felt our 3s were within the offense and guys like Kop and XT shot them well. If we shoot only 10-12 3s a game and make about 35%, we should be successful, particularly if we continue to rebound like we did last night.
Let’s keep that inside-outside game with DC. I love it. He is capable of playing with his back to the basket.
by ptowncoug3012 on Feb 7, 2010 2:12 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
We don't actually rely on the three very much.
274th in the country in 3PA per FGA.
CougCenter WSU's second main blog
by Dancing Football on Feb 7, 2010 8:38 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You guys should go work with the red sox. You stats are missing it
We have been using the 3 to try to bail our offense and have been forcing it as our source of offense.
Today you saw an offense the shot the 3 within the flow of the game rather jacking it up late in the clock with guys in the face or jacking it up early. It’s funny watching Miller on AZ’s sideline as he was demanding 5 passes before a shot was taken. That was us before last night. There was no interest in ball movement and hence the reliance on the 3 at inopportune times.
by ptowncoug3012 on Feb 7, 2010 9:06 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Wait, what?
He’s saying we don’t attempt that many 3’s per game which is indisputable. The ratio between 3’s and FG attempts is near last in the nation for us, hence we don’t rely on it.
Therefor, Bone’s offense this year does not rely on the 3 as much as you think it does and the stats back it up. Visual observations only go so far and the stats don’t lie. Our game is going to the hoop and getting to the line, which is also backed up by the statistics like our FTRate, which the stats back up. Our FTRate is 12th in the country at 48.9 FTA/FGA.
If you’d like more:
22.2% of our points come from 3s
52.6% of our points come from 2s
25.2% of our points come from FTs
We rely on 2 pointers and FTs. In fact, we rely more on FTs that 3s. If you think we’re a good 3 point shooting team and want to live by that, then you’d better be prepared to die by it. It’s a much lower percentage shot, it takes away our ability to get to the line for our highest percentage shots as well. As far as good three point shooting, we are at 36%, or just above the national average of 34%. This isn’t great by any means and shouldn’t be our game.
Observations don’t tell you everything, the statistics tell you quite a bit.
by cougfan on Feb 7, 2010 11:15 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
It would be helpful if your stats tell me how often of our 3s were either shot with
less than two passes being made or with less than 5 seconds on the shot clock.
If you could post that would be great.
by ptowncoug3012 on Feb 8, 2010 2:29 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I cant figure out what youre getting at
You say Bone relies on the three. The stats say we don’t. Its a ratio of 3s to total fg. Pretty cut and dry. The points you bring up are negligible in the scheme of things. The 3 pt % is accurate with this large a sample now and the points you bring up won’t skew it greatly.
Finally, id say the points you bring up about early shots etc are outliers with the sample size given. Id also argue they aren’t a part of Bones offense and are players taking poor shots
by cougfan on Feb 8, 2010 3:29 PM PST via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
The entry pass to Casto
at the FT line and elbow made all the difference in the world. Hit the open man. The frenzied collapse to the ball left lanes and of course… the back door… and Motum and Nik used the base line openings beautifully.
If you can't Go Cougs... don't go.
by hollyweirdcoug on Feb 8, 2010 11:14 AM PST reply actions 0 recs

by 









