Ken Bone's recruiting
With the change in systems from Bennett ball to Bone ball, the immediate concern is recruiting the types of athletes needed to run the Bone system. A Bennett player didn't necessarily need to be a freakish athlete, but did need to be a smart player with a dedication to defense and the system. On the other hand, Bone is looking for high energy scorers that can get up and down the floor. You'll see right away why it's a process to transition between the two.
The question that keeps coming up pertains to whether or not the staff will be able to bring these types of players to Pullman. The answer is more complicated than it seems. The first thing to consider is whether or not he needs nationally ranked players to be able to execute his system. While it does help to have a team of five star recruits, it's not realistic most places, nor is it necessary. Even if Bone is not pulling in big names, the players he brings in will fit the mold of how he wants to run the team, something we've seen so far.
In order to paint a clearer picture of who Bone recruits, and where he finds players, it's important to look at what he's done so far, both at WSU and at his other stops along the way.
Washington State
The easiest thing to do is look at the recruits Bone has brought in thus far. I'm leaving out the players in Bennett's last class that were re-recruited by Bone since they don't really belong to him.
Reggie Moore: Moore was Bone's "hello world" moment as the coach at Washington State. He's athletic, played high school ball at Rainier Beach, and is the type of recruit we wouldn't have seen during the Bennett years.
How he was recruited: Moore took an interesting path to WSU. He played at Rainier Beach, signing with Fresno State, before heading off to Brewster Academy for a year of prep schooling. We all know the story of his recruitment by now. He came to play for Coach Bone, with Nate Robinson and Tre Simmons nudging him towards WSU.
Steven Bjornstad: Bjornstad is still a project center. He came to WSU undersized but with a decently high ceiling. It was also the first taste of what Bone was looking for in a big man.
How he was recruited: Bjornstad was almost literally in Bone's backyard in his high school days. He attended Columbia River high school in Vancouver, along with, I believe, one of Bone's daughters. The twist is that he was signed with Nevada before asking for a release due to a coaching change. Once he was finally released, Bjornstad reopened his recruitment and chose WSU in the summer.
Faisel Aden: A JC all-american that had some eye popping numbers. JC recruits have been far from the norm in Pullman, with Bennett preferring to build his program strictly around freshman. Ivory Clark was the last JC transfer at WSU.
Andre Winston: A quick, athletic combo guard from Lakes HS in Lakewood. He was named the 3A co-player of the year and also set a state tournament record for scoring this year.
How he was recruited: Another under the radar kid that was recruited after being signed with another school. Winston made up his mind before his senior year and signed a Letter of Intent with James Madison in the Fall. After being named the state 3A co-player of the year, he somehow managed to break his LOI and reopen his recruiting.
Patrick Simon: Patrick Simon committed to Tony Bennett when he was 14 years old. I'm adding him in here due to the age he committed and what it says about college recruiting. Simon was also the youngest commitment in WSU history. I do think that Simon will be a better fit in Bone's system than in Bennett's, as well.
How he was recruited: I don't know if he was really committed to the player or to the school. From reading about him and hearing from people I know that are around him, he was a WSU kid all the way. When Bennett left, Simon briefly reopened his recruitment, only to reaffirm his commitment to WSU a short time later.
The biggest change you'll notice here is that 3 of these 4 players come from the Northwest. The days of WSU recruiting all of the world, but not in their own backyard, are coming to an end. The emphasis with Bone and his staff is to recruit the Seattle area and compete for the top talent there. The Northwest as a whole is currently a hotbed for talent and the staff wants to maximize their presence there.
Portland State
The thing to understand about PSU is that it is incredibly difficult to recruit to. Yes, it's in Portland but it isn't a typical school in a big city like, for instance, UW. The enrollment numbers at the school are similar to WSU, but the structure of the school is completely different. PSU is a commuter school in every sense of the word. It is also very difficult to recruit athletes to, magnified by the fact that it is a Big Sky school.
Looking at the current basketball roster, the thing that stands out is the amount of transfers. 12 of the 15 players on the roster came from either Junior Colleges or from other Universities, including Michael Harthun. In Bone's final year at PSU, 8 of 13 players were transfers, including their best 3. All of this tells me that Bone had to get creative when recruiting as the head coach there. This is where some of the feelings about him finding talent off the beaten path come from. However, just because it was a necessity at PSU doesn't mean it will be the norm at WSU.
It's important to mention PSU due to the unique circumstances that come up when recruiting to the school. Bone was able to take a commuter school in a small conference to the NCAA tournament two years in a row. In his last year there, he took his team to the Kennel in Spokane and beat Gonzaga. The team wasn't full of top-notch talent, but was able to compete with some bigger name schools.
Washington:
It's hard to say how much affect he had on recruiting at UW. Being an assistant, it's tough to dole out credit for recruiting. Washington, on a whole, had some very good classes and the results on the court to go with it. Romar seems to be a very hands on recruiting and I know that Cameron Dollar played a big role in recruiting at UW.
As for Bone, his brother is the coach at Snohomish, the high school of Jon Brockman. Once he moved on to PSU, Phil Nelson found a home there after transferring out of UW. Bone had some kind of role recruiting to UW, but it's hard to tell what. The players, however, seemed to enjoy having him as an assistant.
Where are we going from here?
What we don't know, and probably won't for another year or two, is if Bone will stay off the beaten path in recruiting. A coach that comes from another major school can bring the relationships he's built with high caliber players and continue recruiting them. These are relationships that are starting when kids are freshman in high school, or even earlier. Bone, coming from a commuter school, doesn't have those relationships with specific players yet. He has good connections with Northwest area coaches, however, which does help.
The reason it takes 2-3 years to see him bringing in his own guys is a product of the recruiting system presently. Patrick Simon was cited earlier due to his incredibly early commitment. Coach Romar mentioned in his press conference about Terrence Ross that he had been recruiting him since Ross was a freshman in high school. It's difficult to try to recruit a player for a year, or even two, when other coaches have been on him for three or four. Due to this, I think Bone is getting creative with his recruiting out of necessity. I also don't think it will stay this way during his tenure here. Once he is able to establish his relationships with some of those top talents, we'll really find out whether he can recruit the Northwest like he wants to.
Can he get the players he needs to win?
He's on the right track. It's only been a year, one that didn't have great results, but his recruiting efforts have been good. With the lack of balance between recruiting classes, his hands were tied from the start. Only now does he have room to play, yet it will still be some time before we can really judge how he recruits.
Remember that he doesn't need to continually hit home runs for his system. The thought that he has to magically bring huge names to Pullman is false and is a reason I used his experience at PSU as an example of his recruiting ability. He simply needs to evaluate talent and find players that will fit his system, whether they are four or one star players. The recruits he's brought in so far fit the mold of his system and should provide an upgrade over what we had last year. We're seeing a positive trend with his recruiting, but what happens in his next two recruiting classes will tell us what he's made of.
23 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Good points about coaches needed to build relationships
Romar did something similar to what Bone is now. He signed a couple JC’s his first year, while building relationships, then it paid off in his 3rd full class (Brockman, Webster, Dentmon). So your assessment of 2-3 years seems pretty spot on. Bone should be on the lower end of that though, having been in the Northwest before getting his Pac-10 gig.
Yup, and this is the money line
“Once he is able to establish his relationships with some of those top talents, we’ll really find out whether he can recruit the Northwest like he wants to.”
Let’s hope most fans are intelligent enough to realize this and keep their pieholes shut for a while. I’m not optimistic, but one can hope.
You had me laughing at:
“Let’s hope most fans are intelligent enough” and “keep their pieholes shut.” Remember that Grady just wrote a post about if WSU fans are too negative.
Im trying to get the scholly situation figured out
bear with me if you’ve already hashed and rehashed this topic.
As it sits now, we have one scholarship spot open after the signing of 3 guys this year. Assuming we sit on the scholly, which looks likely, is that the only one available for next year? Or is Fabian Boeke still on scholly, which gives us two with him leaving next year.
Even if we have two spots next year, it puts Bone in a bind of sorts for getting his style of player, because each of his first 3 classes will be severely limited in the availability of schollys. It may be that we don’t get to get a good look at his recruiting abilities until after the Thompson-Casto class graduates.
You're correct in your first guess
Assuming we hold over the scholly, we will have one to use next year, barring attrition. Boeke is on a medical scholarship, which doesn’t count.
While it does limit him a bit now, Id almost bet there will be some kind of attrition, as with any year. This also falls into my point of it being another year or two to find out how he will recruit. The good news is that we know well have an abundance of scholarships in two years and it gives Bone plenty of time to build relationships with kids.
by Brian Floyd on May 6, 2010 6:36 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
People worry waaaaaaay too much about the scholarship situation
Remember how people were obsessing about the fact that we wouldn’t have scholarships available this year? How Bennett “really screwed us” by not spacing them out? Now we’ve got one that Bone might sit on. Rarely do these things not work themselves out.
It will be interesting to see how many he signs in the fall.
I’d be willing to bet he signs two or three with only one scholarship open.
by Coug Friendly Canuck on May 7, 2010 4:21 PM PDT up reply actions
If no one leaves after next year, then I could see Enquist's scholarship not renewed for his senior season
to pick up an extra scholarship. I remember the uw did this with a post player several years ago. Enquist was only promised the first year and he is fortunate that he has had a scholarship for most of his time at WSU.
This is not meant to be a negative post regarding Enquist, just reality that he is one of the lower players on the totem pole.
I'm sorry, I just have to post in response to this...
Every time scholarships are brought up, somebody posts how it wouldn’t surprise them if Enquist doesn’t get to keep his in the end…
This kind of talk just bothers me for some-reason and I think it is because of this:
If I was Charlie Enquist and I happened upon this blog and saw some jo-shmo who knows nothing about my personal situation telling all the world to hear that I’m not good enough for my scholarship and somehow I don’t deserve it, I don’t think I would like that.
Nothing against you Coug1990. I just think that Enquist’s scholarship should stay as a null topic at this point.
I don't take it personal. But, apparently you do
If Charlie were reading this site and he was getting upset because I or anyone was writing about his scholarship, then he doesn’t belong on the floor anyway. What do you think is tougher, reading this or playing against UCLA? Against Washington?
Again, this was not meant to be a negative post regarding Enquist. But, it is reality that he is lower on the totem pole than most of the other players on the team.
Everybody's had their say
Now, read the comment below regarding further Enquist scholarship speculation.
My understanding is
that when he was put back on scholarship, it was to stay. When he was brought it in, it was a one year deal, he was ready to transfer if he wasn’t put on scholarship to stay after the walk-on year (can’t blame him for that), and Bennett and then Bone agreed to put him on scholarship the remainder of the time at WSU.
In other words, I don’t think it’s an option. Also, if Charlie continues to improve, his hustle should have him giving us a few (5-10) quality minutes, particularly when match-ups present.
Do we really know that was the case?
I have heard it the way you said and I have heard it would be re-evaluated every year.
We really don't know anything at all
I’m working with the assumption that Charlie is on scholarship and will continue to be. Whether or not it isn’t true, I don’t care. All we do know is that there is one scholarship left that Bone has a week to use or he can keep it for next year. The scholarship situation really isn’t bad, though. As Nuss said, these things always end up working out.
Actually, he can use that scholarship at any point up until the next school year.
He just can’t take any more letters of intent.
Oh, and I am now instituting a moratorium on all Charlie Enquist scholarship speculation
He’s on scholarship. That’s good enough for me. Further speculation will result in bannination.
You just don't get it, cougfan!
Bone’s already screwed us! Emerson Murray is a Golden Bear!
Brian Hersh weeps.
by TiltingRight on May 7, 2010 12:30 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
I don't know if you know
but Brain Hersh is the best talent evaluator on the West Coast. We are screwed!
member of CougCenter since 9/2/08
I am bummed that I won't get to see him on the team next year.

member of CougCenter since 9/2/08
by SoCalCoug on May 7, 2010 8:22 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
The newxt two years
I think over the next two years we will see an overall improvement on the court. The players coming in will be able to see right from the start how Bone wants to his style of play. Expectations will be met quicker then last year, and our starters will really understand what is expected of them in his system. There won’t be any ‘fall back to the pack’ like what happened last year. With improvement and success, we’ll see more local athletes take notice and hopefully become interested in playing at WSU. I am a fan of Bone (we went to the same high school in Seattle), I really think he can land some of the great players here in the metro area, and the state as a whole.

by 

















