PAC-10 EXPANSION: Haters gonna hate
After whiffing on the Texas schools, the media hasn't been so kind to Larry Scott this week. While the attempted coup of the Big 12 was in progress, Scott was a media darling, with national and local media alike being effusive in their praise for him. The addition of Utah and Colorado has been met more with a "meh" instead of a "woo" by most media types.
Greg Hansen, of the Arizona Daily Star started the festivities a few days ago.
"I grew up in Pac-10 territory, and although there are outstanding institutions, the facilities and fair-weather fans are a disappointment. I suggest their fan support, and the accompanying image it projects, should be carefully examined."
Fair-weather fans? Empty seats? Is that really how the rest of the world views the Pac-10?
With Colorado coming in, and Utah apparently on the way, Beebe might be right.
Hansen spends his article alternating between terrible puns and stereotypes, getting plenty of mileage out of Colorado and Utah. He also opines that Scott shouldn't have invited Colorado before knowing the fate of the Big 12.
Colorado was always going to be invited, whether expansion was large or small. There was no reason to wait to invite them, especially with Baylor jockeying for position.
The biggest thing to take out of this is that the presidents and ADs hired and then trusted someone progressive enough to make these kinds of bold moves. It's a risk in a conference that has historically been conservative and favored the status quo. In order to move forward and evolve, the Pac-10 needed to think outside the box.
Next up on the haterade tour is Ken Goe of The Oregonian. Goe writes that the Northwest schools got hosed by this round of expansion.
From here, it appears that Scott over-reached in an attempt to create his mega-conference by raiding the Big 12 for six schools, including Texas, which would bring with it the monster Dallas and Houston television markets.
The good ol' boys in Austin played him like a six-string guitar, while quietly using Scott's offer to negotiate a better deal from the Big 12.
In the end Scott was left clutching nothing but his hubris and Colorado, with no better Plan B than Utah.
And now, the Northwest schools are going to pay for it.
Are the Northwest schools really going to pay? Ted Miller polled all four Northwest coaches a few days ago, with only Mike Riley voicing any complaint about a North/South alignment. Nobody, including Scott himself, knows how alignment is going to shake out, either. It's a bit too early to be pointing fingers and calling this a failure.
The most level-headed piece comes from the AP.
The verdict on how successful Scott’s plan was won’t come until the conference negotiates its new television deals next year, which could include the creation of its own network to rival the Big Ten’s.
It's easy to sit here and write retrospectives now, but the expansion dust is just starting to settle. We don't yet know what the Pac-12 divisions will look like or what the TV contract will look like. Let the dust settle before calling this a success or failure.
In the end, I will say that Scott is looking better in one year than Tom Hansen did in his entire tenure.
20 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
In the end, I will say that Scott is looking better in one year than Tom Hansen did in his entire tenure.
So does my shoe.
Obviously these writers have nothing else to write about
Now that the expansion talk has died down they need something talk about. I feel like Scott did a great job, after the years of do-nothing Tom Hansen it is nice to have a commissioner being proactive.
Deploy the vuvuzelas on the Pac-12's foes!

The #1 greatest threat to America: BEARS
by norcalnick on Jun 18, 2010 5:23 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Under the eight game format in years past
by Jeff Nusser on Jun 18, 2010 5:41 PM PDT via mobile reply actions
mobile comment fail
We used to miss the la schools too. Wasn’t a killer.
by Jeff Nusser on Jun 18, 2010 5:42 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Scott may not have killed the Big 12 this year
but I think he mortally wounded it. Time will tell, but he may very well get Texas, TT, Oklahoma and OSU in a couple of years.
Love this take on Texas...
..implies they were cowards & didn’t want to just be another program in the P16 vs. being THE program in Big XX.
Being an admitted traditionalist I was against this to begin with, but have warmed up to it completely. Looking forward to 2012.
http://ncaafootball.fanhouse.com/2010/06/16/meet-the-texas-longhorns-the-biggest-coward-program-in-college/?icid=main|main|dl4|link5|http%3A%2F%2Fncaafootball.fanhouse.com%2F2010%2F06%2F16%2Fmeet-the-texas-longhorns-the-biggest-coward-program-in-college%2F
Clay Travis just wants UT in the SEC
But he makes a good point.
by Grady Clapp on Jun 19, 2010 10:55 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
It makes sense
An extra couple million but being in unknown waters, or asserting dominance over the conference they’re comfortable with. They get to keep their stranglehold on the Big 12 and get a pay raise at the same time. They couldn’t lose either way.
by Brian Floyd on Jun 19, 2010 11:17 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
I am bored with this criticism from outsiders
If this episode has taught us nothing else it has shown that Larry Scott knows business and is learning the NCAA. He has surrounded himself with intelligent and informed people and I consider this expansion to be a brilliant test run. It is better that he get his feet wet by jumping in head first. If this is how Scott handles conference expansion in his first year when the conference has not expanded in 32 years then I cannot wait to see him negotiate a TV deal. The gentleman has a large brain and huevos to match.
Its easy to criticize him as an outsider
But most forget his first hire was Kevin Weiberg, who knows the NCAA and worked as B12 commissioner and a Big 10 exec. Scotts a business and TV guy but has surrounded himself with NCAA types. Its a smart move.
by Brian Floyd on Jun 19, 2010 11:15 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
I wasn't calling Scott an outsider
The people criticizing him (who were praising him before Texas stuck with the Big 12) are not connected to the Pac-10 in any tangible way that I am aware of. They remind me of the 24 hour news cycle, essentially creating their own news.
by Couginthepink on Jun 19, 2010 5:23 PM PDT up reply actions
He is an outsider, though
I know you weren’t, but that is the knock on him by many. He brings an outside prospective and isn’t your typical conference commissioner, which is also a good thing.
Better Than Hanson
Two years ago the thought that there would be a PAC 12 would have been laughable. Larry Scott has gotten more done in the last year than what has been done in the last 20. Is there any doubt that he will get us a better TV contract, better bowl line up, better everything. No matter what the division are or the details, we are all going to be better. If everybody stakes out their claims and does not budge, then our new conference will tear itself apart and be no better then the Big XII. That’s the beauty of the PAC. There is now real top dog. The closes things are USC in football and UCLA in basketball; however, until recently in football, even those programs do not dominate year in and year out. It has not been that long ago that UW was in a Rose Bowl, and UW won the regular season in basketball two years ago and the conference tournament last year with Cal winning the regular season title. It hasn’t been that long since Stanford almost went undefeated in conference. It has not been that long ago since WSU went to the Rose Bowl, and Oregon just went to the Rose Bowl. USC domination is the exception, not the rule. For the most part over the years, the conference has been wide open in both football and basketball. I think U-DUBS three straight Rose Bowls in the early 90’s was the first time that has happen in decades, if ever. My point being, traditionally, the conference is open to everyone. Everyone should stop sweating the small stuff and be happy the PAC 12 is finally here. Now we will be on par with the rest of the college sports world, and we all will be better for it.
I have to agree with the nay-sayers. The Pac-X’s next TV contract will be much better than the last one with or without CO & Utah. WSU will now be stuck with a lackluster schedule. We’ll have a trip to LA once every two or three years and USC & UCLA will never come to Pullman again.
How do you figure that USC and UCLA will never come to Pullman again?
CougCenter WSU's second main blog
by Craig Powers on Jun 22, 2010 4:36 PM PDT up reply actions

by 
















