Bill Moos talks WSU football, expansion, and more
Bill Moss had a busy last week, sitting down for two online chats and speaking to Cougar alumni in Seattle. From all of this, there were some interesting and notable tidbits.
First, this story from The Coug (the website, not the awesome bar).
We told you about plans for a Red River Shootout style rivalry with Oregon about a week ago. You can read about what that would look like here
.
[...]
So, they'd make about the same amount as they do at Autzen when giving up a home game to play at Qwest and they'd make about 1-2 million additional dollars in years when we are giving up the home game. Additionally, there is big time value in being the "home" team in Seattle as they'd be able to have recruits on their sidelines and obviously doing that right in the heart of Huskyville is something that's very appealing to Cougs and Ducks alike.
This was interesting to me. I know some of the Oregon guys were wondering why a game like this would be worth it. Over at The Coug, they lay it out very well.
Not having to travel to Pullman, making more money, and being able to use it as a recruiting event seems to make this kind of a game a no-brainer. Hopefully as soon as a new AD is selected at Oregon (maybe in my lifetime), this thing gets rolling.
4) Spokane is going to get a Spring football scrimmage.
[...]
He's looking at making it a destination weekend thing that would bring fans from the West side to hang out at Northern Quest Casino and stay in Spokane hotels.
This is a step in the right direction. Moos' thoughts about moving scrimmages around and taking Cougar football to the people is a perfect way to market an otherwise dull Spring practice time. A trip to Spokane for a scrimmage may just be a first step. Pretty soon, he could be hosting practices/scrimmages in Vancouver and even Seattle.
I highly suggest going to read the rest of the article as well. They discuss all the details of possible future Qwest Field games, Donnie Marbut, and more. It's a very good read.
Next, we head to the chat mobile. Moos sat down with the Seattle times on Tuesday and the official athletics site on Thursday. Both are good reads, with the following quotes coming from his chat with the official site.Bill Moos: Bruce, my hope is that the conference will adopt a formula that will share tevelvsion revenue equally among its member institutions. This is the model used by the Big Ten, the SEC, and the NFL. In my opinion, it's the only way to assure parity in the conference and also provide the overall strength needed to be successful.
We don't yet know if the conference will move to equal revenue sharing, but a lot of signs are pointing in that direction. Commissioner Larry Scott kept talking about equal sharing while expansion discussions were going on, but it's unknown whether the current model (not equal) will be changed. Obviously if it is, Washington State stands to benefit the most.
Bill Moos: Tommy, I like the look of the 12-member conference and believe that there will be a significant increase in television revenue as a result of our expansion. There is reason to believe that it could be in the neighborhood of where we hoped the 16-school conference would take us.
Cha-Ching! I don't buy that a 12-member conference will pull in as much as a mega-conference, but the revenue generated should be a significant upgrade. Again, it's something that may be a minor uptick for some schools, but for WSU it's a shot in the arm.
Moos also says the weight room is done and almost paid for as a result of the "Make Jim pay" campaign. The athletic department is in evaluation mode, with Moos trying to figure out a plan of attack for the future. He sounds optimistic about all of the programs and expects WSU to be much more competitive in the near future.
Things are looking up for Cougar athletics.
11 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Per team
the revenue increase might be on par.
Oklahoma State and Texas A&M didn’t really bring much to the table other than political baggage.
BCS Evolution -- Punctuating the Equilibrium - twitter
I don't think it will.
I see little chance a Pac-12 conference can secure as much as a 16 team conference that includes Texas and Oklahoma. The numbers just don’t align to make that true. The revenue increase is real, and being so low should make that increase dramatic, but a Pac-16 probably dwarfs it by 5-10 million per school.
Even when you have to slice the pie more ways, the pie in a 16 team mega-conference like that is just so much bigger.
I hadn't even thought about
the proposed annual game in Seattle making it so we don’t ever have to play at Autzen. From a winning standpoint, that seems like a huge bonus. The discussion then shifts to how committed Moos will be in securing the improved OOC home games he talks about to replace the Ducks coming to town.
Qwest won't be an annual game with the ducks
2010 – Ducks
2011 – Beavs
2012 – Don’t know, except it will be a Pac 10(12) team
Sure it will
Plan A is for it to be the permanent place for the WSU-Oregon.
Plan B is for alternating Oregon and Oregon State, with WSU giving up the home game but getting the whole gate.
meh
if Jim Sterk had proposed we move a home game every year to Qwest without getting anything in return, people would’ve been calling for his head.
Not a huyefan
If it involves giving up a Pac-10 home game and getting nothing in return.
by Jeff Nusser on Jun 22, 2010 6:22 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Mobile comment subject fail
Thank you, my son, for bumping my arm.
by Jeff Nusser on Jun 22, 2010 6:24 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
No doubt...
Gotta love the 1st year “halo” effect. Jim & crew explored this last year and alums were definitely divided. The good thing, financially for WSU, is that Moos’ halo will play better with the general alum, which makes making a move based solely on finances easier to swallow.
If it’s Oregon every year in Qwest (for 4 years or whatever agreed upon fixed length) I’m for it – it’s balanced and brings in more $$$. If it’s Plan B – playing all our Whoregon games at Qwest (UO & OSU), meaning we still travel to Whoregon every year, I’m against it. More money < some balance….
As much as I hate to lose a home game in Pullman
It makes sense to move one game a year to quest. It will help breathe new life into the Seattle WSU fan base. It will really help our image, we need to make it clear that WSU owns half the seattle market (which it easily could with a winning team and anual games in seattle).
I also love the idea of increasing our presence in Spokane. I am always dissapointed when I see that half the city wears purple just because they have a better reputation, Spokane should bleed crimson, that needs to be WSU’s home market, as well as the entire Estern Washington and Northern Idaho area. All it takes is some clever advertising schemes (like scrimages in spokane).
I can’t wait to see what else Moos has planned
WSU hosting visiting teams from Oregon schools at Qwest is a great idea
If I understand shootout plan A, WSU and Oregon would play their annual game in Seattle’s Qwest, allowing the Cougs to avoid Autzen altogether. I don’t see Oregon going for that deal, but I do think that plan B, which would replace Pullman with Seattle for WSU home games against either of the Oregon teams, would be a winner for everyone concerned. That’s a plan I really look forward to seeing implemented ASAP.
Even though I root for the Beavers, I’d like to see the Cougs field a more competitive team. The shootout in Seattle should raise awareness of the teams on the part of the general public and potential recruits beyond what’s possible in Pullman. Of course, the revenue would be much bigger, too. Great idea, Moos. Go for it!

by 


















