WSU-Oregon at Qwest Field: Examining the alternatives
The WSU-Oregon series at Qwest Field is obviously Bill Moos' first plan. I like that he shot for the moon with his first choice, but there's a decent probability this idea gets shot down. It never hurts to aim high and attempt to make a big splash. Even if the proposal is shot down, this is the kind of thing that excites WSU fans.
With that in mind, it's time to look at the contingency plans. In the event this all falls apart, there's little doubt Bill Moos has some fall back options. Some of these options, however, are better than others.
If WSU is dead set on getting Oregon to the table, Moos may have to create a deal more in the Ducks' favor. This means slanting the revenue in favor of the Ducks, instead of dividing it equally. Money talks and Oregon has the leverage in this situation.
A 60/40 or 70/30 split in Oregon's favor is still good for WSU, and a net profit, but the Cougs could do better. From a PR standpoint, it makes WSU look desperate for money and attention, things that won't sit well with the fans or Moos himself. don't think Moos would bend to Oregon's will if a 50/50 plan is rejected, opting to walk away from the table at that point.
Another option floated by The Coug would alternate Oregon and Oregon State at Qwest Field every other year. The positive side is that WSU would keep the whole gate from the game, only having to cut a $200,000 check to either school. Keep in mind that WSU, and the rest of the conference, are in line to receive a significant financial windfall from the next TV contract. The added money is nice, but we're in a less desperate position than we were a few months ago.
The negative that comes with this is the loss of a Pac-10 game in Pullman. Taking a conference game out of Pullman, and being the only party making a sacrifice, would bother the fans, students, and community of Pullman. In my opinion, there's better options than this.
Replacing Oregon with Oregon State seems like a more logical choice for a Qwest Field game. Take it away, Matt Daddy.
I think it would be great for OSU and WSU to play at Qwest, and I think if Moos is smart (which I know he is) he'd be on the phone with DeCarollis right now saying, "if UO doesn't do it, we really want to do it with you guys."
I think OSU would jump at that chance, considering they don't even sell out Reser, plus they'd love the chance to have the extra benefits that a game in Seattle would bring. It's much more of an equal situation both financially and fringe benefits wise for those two schools.
Plus, I know it would bring a lot more interest to game that right now doesn't have a lot of sizzle. A game at Qwest between those two would most likely sell out early on just from a novelty sake then because I'm sure as WSU elevates their play from a rivalry standpoint. Plus, UO and UW already have a nice little "hate" rivalry going, WSU and OSU would add to the NW experience.
Oregon and Washington have a heated rivalry. Why not take the two "state" schools from the Northwest and create a rivalry? From what I've seen, Oregon State travels decently well to WSU games, almost outnumbering Coug fans during the game before Thanksgiving break a few years back.
The first game WSU held at Qwest, against a Nevada team that wasn't a big name, sold out. As Matt Daddy said, a game between WSU and OS would probably sell out the first few years just on novelty alone. After that, WSU should be much more competitive, allowing the Cougs to carry their own weight and generate interest in the game.
Oregon State also desperately needs money. Their athletic department is the second smallest in the conference, leading only WSU. This past year, they ran up a deficit around $5.9 million dollars, While Oregon is on fairly solid footing, Oregon State is is on shakier ground, with the state legislature telling them, and to a lesser extent Oregon, to shape up. The money to be made in this deal, if successful, would be enticing enough for OS to jump at the opportunity.
The Beavers may not be the sexy pick like the Ducks are, but they're a quality football program that can draw a crowd in Seattle. This option, in my opinion, is the best alternative.
Another idea is to continue with the status quo of using Qwest Field as a venue for a non-conference opponent every year. After years of doing the same thing, the idea had gone stale, with attendance numbers dipping lower in its last years. After a few years off, the idea may be able to pick up steam again.
The problem with using a non-conference opponent is the lack of big names the Cougs have been able to schedule. Bringing in the likes of Grambling State, UNLV, and SDSU doesn't draw the crowds out like a major conference opponent. The only way this deal works and lives up to its potential is if we can schedule a team that can draw crowds every year. Teams are more likely to want to play a non-conference game in Seattle, but sadly it keeps the big names out of Pullman.
Finally, we can just scrap the idea completely. If Moos can't get Oregon or Oregon State to agree to move the conference games there every year, I'd be in favor of walking away and trying again later. It would be a loss for the university, but losing games in Pullman, especially games that don't draw crowds that make it worth it, are a bigger loss. The community of Pullman gains another home game and it allows us to work on rebuilding a home field advantage.
Scrapping the whole idea and walking away from Qwest Field for a while may not be ideal, but in the end it may be for the best if Moos can't engineer something that works out in the Cougs' favor.
I trust that Moos will do what's best for WSU and the athletic department with this decision. What he decides to do, and whether he can pull off the original plan, will say a lot about the direction he's going to take the Cougs.
Edit: Matt Daddy posed a question in the comments that I'm moving up here because I'm curious what the response would be.
Would you guys be willing to set up a consistent game with Boise State at Qwest?
I'll keep my opinion to myself for now, but what do the rest of you think.
If you missed them earlier, please see the WSU and Oregon perspectives on a Qwest Field series, or use the wsu-oregon at qwest field tag to see them all..
101 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I agree with your last sentiment about Moos
and it’s something I hadn’t thought about. Getting a deal like this done right away sets a really good tone for his tenure at WSU. If he can re-energize the base, get a “marquee” game set up for every year, increase revenues on his own and finally as the new TV money starts to roll in, balance the athletic budgets and grow the department, it bodes well for him there.
I also don’t think if he’s not able to get it done that too many people are going to hold it against him. He’s really in a no lose situation in trying to set this up. I think there are some exciting things in store for WSU with Moos at the helm.
Quick question: Would you guys be willing to set up a consistent game with Boise State at Qwest? I’ll leave it for your answers before I chime it.
I want Canzano to stand there in that [expletive] white uniform, and with his Harvard mouth, extend Chip some [expletive] courtesy! Addicted to Quack
Why not?
A BSU vs WSU rivalry would be good TV entertainment. Are you saying that because you don’t think BSU deserves that type of recognition? If so I agree. Are you saying that because you think football wise it wouldn’t be worth it? If that’s the case I think there’s an argument to be made.
I don’t think BSU vs WSU garners the seats and sell outs that an OSU or Oregon game would but since they moved to the MWC it may not be a bad idea to consider going forward. Please explain.
I want Canzano to stand there in that [expletive] white uniform, and with his Harvard mouth, extend Chip some [expletive] courtesy! Addicted to Quack
Because we are playing Bigger or Better
WSU has an image problem and a money problem right now (there are other smaller issues as well, but those are the biggest right now).
In an effort to remedy both those problems in one stroke, Moos is trying to set up an anual game in a major venue with a nationaly recognized, consistantly challenging oponent. Boise State really fails both of those criteria. Sure, the Broncos have had some recent success, but they are far from a powerhouse in anything, and are not nationaly recognized as a consistantly strong program. This definitely doesnt help our image. We ended our rivalry with Idaho a few years ago for just this reason. it made no sense for us to consistantly play a team in the WAC when we could schedule a game against a more powerful opponent and actually get recognition for it.
Remember, the end goal is to get recognition and respect from the rest of the Pac-10 (were tired of being the “lucky” school thats grandfathered in). How do you think it will look to everyone if we schedule an anual game with BSU? Bigger or Better, and realistically Boise State is neither
I actually am not trying to hate on BSU
But there is still a huge percieved difference between the MWC and the new Pac-12, and we need to play our cards on the right side of that line to maximize WSU’s benifits
No, please please hate on BSU. Donkey State is a terrible school and doesn’t deserve anything but scorn.
I want Canzano to stand there in that [expletive] white uniform, and with his Harvard mouth, extend Chip some [expletive] courtesy! Addicted to Quack
Sorry I didn't have time to explain the first time around
I think it fits into the Oregon/WSU conversation of “who benefits?” As a WSU fan, I’m not real excited about playing BSU on an annual basis. I’d get more excited about a mid-tier BCS school (e.g. Kansas State, Boston College, Louisville, Mississippi, etc.) than I ever would about BSU. And I feel like such an arrangement would benefit BSU much more than it would benefit WSU.
Plus, I don’t think you can manufacture this sort of a “rivalry.” When it’s a conference opponent (UO or OSU) or a strong geographical rival (Gonzaga in hoops), then it works.
I can see that
It needs to have a balance to it so that the rivalry will grow from the competitiveness of the series (both on the field as well as off). That’s why I think OSU makes a lot of sense. I like the idea of “State vs State” rivalry game, and as a Duck fan, I would probably be inclined to watch this game more often then I do now. Plus, I also think Moos and DeCarollis can do some nifty work with the scheduling to make it an attractive in season game (Thanksgiving Weekend, Night Game with alum festivities going during the day in Seattle, etc).
Damnit, now I’m starting to re-think my Oregon shouldn’t do it stance… I’m leaving now before you guys totally corrupt me.
I want Canzano to stand there in that [expletive] white uniform, and with his Harvard mouth, extend Chip some [expletive] courtesy! Addicted to Quack
Personally, I would love to do it with either Oregon or OSU
I would love it with Oregon because I hate your school almost as much as Washington. I would love it with OSU because I like their school as much or more than just about any school outside of WSU. I feel like we’re kind of kindred spirits.
Both options would be really fun.
That hurts man, that really hurts.
I would love it with Oregon because I hate your school almost as much as Washington
I want Canzano to stand there in that [expletive] white uniform, and with his Harvard mouth, extend Chip some [expletive] courtesy! Addicted to Quack
I think we all feel this way
Sorry ducks, but your easy to hate with the way some of your fans act when they come to Pullman.
And I’ve always thought WSU and OSU have been kinda brotherly. We’re similar size wise, funding wise, facilities wise, and we are often put in the same “bottom of the Pac-10” category. You could say a mutual hatred of everyone else has brought us together. In this spirit, I wouldn’t mind starting a friendly rivalry with Oregon State. Especially since neither of us is the type to gloat and rub a victory in the others face. And God knows we could both use the money!
See, this is why I like it for either Oregon school.
Don’t think of it as WSU marketing a Seattle game. First and Goal, and subsequently Vulcan Sports, would have a vested interest in marketing this type of series. As we’ve seen, whatever they touch has been turning to gold lately. They took an expansion MLS team and made it immediately profitable and created an overnight sensation.
I have little doubt that Moss has real numbers from First and Goal, along with a plan, that will be very enticing when he does present it to whomever he does.
Vulcan Sports…whatever they touch has been turning to gold lately.
Kevin Pritchard would like to have a word with you.
I want Canzano to stand there in that [expletive] white uniform, and with his Harvard mouth, extend Chip some [expletive] courtesy! Addicted to Quack
Nope. I hate the Blazers almost as much as Oregon or UW.
Years of beating the crap out of them in my youth with Gary Payton and Shawn Kemp did that for me. Plus THEIR BEST PLAYER IS A HUSKY. Oh, and it’s the NBA.
“We’re so poor, we can’t survive in a crappy arena … Hey (Mediocre Player X)! Want $50 million?”
The only reason I even watch the NBA
is so I can keep up with my co-workers here is SoCal. The Laker talk makes me sick. If Joe Johnson get 119mm for 6 years (as reported), I am going to throw up in my mouth and definitely be done with the NBA.
"Ruth, Gehrig, DiMaggio, Mantle ... Costanza?"
The sonics were destroyed intentionally.
No way can it be mismanaged for so many years on accident.
And Roy is so awesome that his Husky-ness is forgivable.
As well you should be.
I’d be furious if I lost the Blazers, especially in that fashion.
I miss the rivalry. Having another team within close proximity was cool. Now road games are slightly less appealing.
It gives me several reasons so absolutely HATE OKC.
1. Franchise thieves!
2. They used to be the sonics.
3. I’ll never hear the end of the Durant/Oden debate.
4. Seriously—you’re calling your team the “Thunder”?
5. The Orlando Magic called and said,“Nice uniforms, dicks. Next time, stay out of our laundry pile.”
6. Clay Bennett is a piece of crap.
7. Clay Bennett is a piece of crap.
8. Fuck Starbucks.
by ArbyOSU on Jul 2, 2010 1:38 PM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
Agreed. Stern and Bennet were in bed together.
This could be one of the greatest pictures I have ever found.

"Ruth, Gehrig, DiMaggio, Mantle ... Costanza?"
by SoCalCoug on Jul 2, 2010 2:24 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs

We discussed this one over at Bedge a long time ago. My comments are still there!
http://www.blazersedge.com/2009/2/11/756552/clay-bennett-s-franchise-r
I haven't finish it yet, but from what I have seen so far
it is good. The movie is over 2 hours long. I just haven’t had the time to sit and watch the whole thing. I am sure a lot of you have seen it. Sonicsgate.
http://sonicsgate.org/
"Ruth, Gehrig, DiMaggio, Mantle ... Costanza?"
Watched the whole thing.
Pretty good. A little too pro Key Arena (that place IS a dump) but I thought it was interesting and well done. Lots of good NW hip hop too.
Not a dump at all
It’s a fabulous place to watch a game. Intimate, great sightlines for EVERYONE, loud. The only thing it doesn’t have is a zillion luxury suites.
I disagree with that. RG has great sightlines AND is up to snuff for NBA basketball and NHL hockey, should Paul Allen ever allow hockey into the Rose City.
No need to get sore about it—if the NBA ever comes back, you’ll have a ridiculously awesome arena to go with your other two ridiculously awesome stadiums.
Safeco in particular is freaking amazing.
There's a difference between being a great place to watch a game and being up to NBA snuff.
It’s two completely different conversations. One is about fan experience. The other is about making money.
I’ve sat in the back row of both arenas. It’s not even close.
I have lost interest in the NBA
ever since they “quietly” moved the Grizzlies to Memphis.
They did not even bother to changed the name and just slap the city on top of “Vancouver”
You want to hate Roy because he was a Husky,
but it is hard because he is hometown kid making it in the NBA and he is good. From what I have seen, he seems like a good guy and he quietly goes about his business (which I like), not like a lot of the other loud, cocky NBA stars.
"Ruth, Gehrig, DiMaggio, Mantle ... Costanza?"
Every account I've ever heard is in-line with that.
Good guy, humble, polite and genuine.
A lot of husky jerseys at the Rose Garden unfortunately. Everyone has skeletons in their closet, I guess.
Think of how terrible it would be if Seattle got him. He’d be in OKC right now. Blech.
2-Year Anniversary is today. still sucks.
If you see a bunch of depressed former Sonics employees drinking their sorrows away, please give them a mulligan. They are nice people who mean well, but July 2nd will never be forgotten.
by LeaveItToWeaver on Jul 2, 2010 3:32 PM PDT up reply actions
Oregon St
is an interesting idea. You should touch base w/ the people at BtD and see what their $0.02 is. At the least, it’s well worth exploring if the UO series doesn’t work out.
I did
I created a fanshot over there to try and encourage them to come here to post their thoughts. We’ll see.
I want Canzano to stand there in that [expletive] white uniform, and with his Harvard mouth, extend Chip some [expletive] courtesy! Addicted to Quack
I can only speak for myself...
…BUT I can’t see OSU folks flocking to Seattle to watch our team play against WSU. I’d go watch the huskies play OSU, but only because they’re slightly less bad as of recently and I like watching my team beat them more than I like watching my team beat you guys.
I’d honestly rather go to Pullman and play you in your actual home stadium than go to Seattle to watch a game in a 1/2 full NFL stadium. I fail to see the draw but perhaps this is more or less an effort to attract alums/fans in the Seattle metro area?
I vote for OSU as well.
I’d take the Beavs in Seattle over The Quacks. Only the ducks arrogance rivals that of the Huskies. I thin k a WSU/OSU matchup in Seattle would be great.
Yes, Huskies and Ducks are only tolerable once your team has beat them.
by ArbyOSU on Jul 2, 2010 10:02 AM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
Cougar fans
Bill Moos idea with taking a conference game to Seattle is to replace it in Pullman with a high profile “home and home”. Someone like Michigan State, Auburn, etc. Did it at Oregon and thinks that he can do it at WSU.
Just a general comment about Cougar fans. They love their tee shirts and license plates but in general will not step up to support the Cougs by driving a little further to a ball game, or pulling some bills out of their pockets. That is one of the reasons we are stuck deep at the bottom of the Pac-10 with respect to an athletic budget. A comeback will be, well they need to show me something. What comes first, the chicken or the egg. I just hope that when we are successful again, we don’t turn into idiot fans like Washington and Oregon tend to do.
The money needs to come first
People are more apt to open their wallet for a winner, but it takes money to build a winner.
by Brian Floyd on Jul 2, 2010 7:46 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
OSU
I mentioned in the comments for the other article, but I think OSU makes the most sense. They would like the money as much as us and it could really ramp up that rivalry. Currently that game is not attended very well in Pullman and probably not in Corvallis either. It would also be a pretty even distance between schools and Seattle.
Just please, no sellout by having only our home games against both Oregon schools in Seattle. I think this would be a horrible idea. It would take two of your main NW rivals, especially in a division alignment, and move that game away from home and lose a lot of the home field advantage. Sure in that case you get the most seats, but the game atmosphere in Seattle is nothing like it is in Pullman. I have gone to all the Seattle games and the crowd is often pretty flat. Probably has a lot to do with the opponents, but I still don’t think it is the same. A neutral site game with a 50/50 split would get the crowd more pumped up as they are trying to be louder than the other side.
I'm for this idea given the assumptions in the article
But I am skeptical that Oregon State will bring the fans in Seattle. After the novelty wears off, I just don’t think it’s an interesting enough game for casual fans to come see. If we really could create a rivalry, filled with drama and excitement, then maybe. But for now I think people would only come because OSU is usually a good team.
I’m not trying to be a downer, but all-time WSU and OSU are the worst teams in the Pac-10. If history holds true in six years, why would people come to the game in Seattle? There are few of the traditional, on-campus reasons to attend if the teams are bad. I suppose it wouldn’t be a disaster if we have managed to build up a true rivalry by that point, but again I am skeptical. Short term, this is great, but long term I am uncertain.
All-time yes
But we have missed the Rose Bowl by ONE GAME in the past 2 Seasons. Forget about the history, if the teams are good right now, the fans will show up.
I Hate Your Ducks
Look at the last 4 years under Riley
10-4
9-4
9-4 (lost Civil War to go to the Rose Bowl)
8-5 (lost Civil War to go to the Rose Bowl)
They’ve been to a bowl game 8 times in the last decade. As long as Riley’s around, OSU should sustain success in the conference.
OSU has a good program going and they do travel decently well to Pullman. I think they’d travel very well to Qwest.
Don't know if there is a bad side to it
For myself, I’ll probably drive up to Pullman once in my entire life to see an Oregon State Game. If they played it at Qwest, then I would be there every year.
And of course it helps for money and TV and all of that good stuff. I don’t see a bad side to it.
I Hate Your Ducks
I like watching college football in college stadiums, so that’s my main drawback here.
That and I would never agree to some goofy annual game in Seattle. Fuck that. They can play host to us at Qwest but they should come down to Corvegas on alternating years.
Even if it meant an extra $1-2MM per year? I get the sentiment that college stadiums are cooler than partially empty NFL stadiums, but wouldn’t an increase in the budgets, recruiting advantages, and extra alum marketing be worth it to you guys?
I want Canzano to stand there in that [expletive] white uniform, and with his Harvard mouth, extend Chip some [expletive] courtesy! Addicted to Quack
I wouldn’t give up a home game. If they want to play their home game with us there every year, I suppose I could deal, especially if the money is right. This annual game shit is the stuff that I wouldn’t want. I love Corvallis on a Saturday afternoon—rain or shine—and wouldn’t want to lose a weekend opportunity for football.
If we're the only ones giving up a home game, you get no money
They only way you get an added monetary benefit is agreeing to a series there. Otherwise, we play the game, we keep the gate, except for the standard check a conference opponent gets (peanuts comparatively).
Hmm...
I don’t know. I hate the idea of giving up the home game. That’s a hard one… (that’s what she said?)
Haven’t you heard, Gold is a good investment now.
I want Canzano to stand there in that [expletive] white uniform, and with his Harvard mouth, extend Chip some [expletive] courtesy! Addicted to Quack
And what if you still had the same number of home games, PLUS the shiny stack of money
I want Canzano to stand there in that [expletive] white uniform, and with his Harvard mouth, extend Chip some [expletive] courtesy! Addicted to Quack
I actually thought the same thing
I want Canzano to stand there in that [expletive] white uniform, and with his Harvard mouth, extend Chip some [expletive] courtesy! Addicted to Quack
They definitely look similar. I mean, if Ryan Leaf had a brother he’d—wait, he does have one, doesn’t he.
damnit.
I want Canzano to stand there in that [expletive] white uniform, and with his Harvard mouth, extend Chip some [expletive] courtesy! Addicted to Quack
As you can imagine, I like seeing the Cougs do well (just not against the Beavs) as we both have somewhat arrogant state-mates to deal with. Hope things rebound soon. Godspeed, cougs, godspeed.
I'm looking for a light at the end of the tunnel
I’ve resorted to pitching hypothetical games that will make us money. D’Oh.
Hope that tunnel is a short one. Of course, I also hope you never score another touchdown against OSU too, but still, win all the other games.
I don’t mean to spark a whole debate, but the past two seasons of coug football make me wonder if you have a competent head coach or not.
As far as hoops go, I’m a Portland guy and really like Bone. I think he’s a good hire.
Not sure it's a debate yet
He really had no talent whatsoever. This year should be more telling about what we have in a head coach. He can recruit well for WSU, now we’ll get to see his recruits on the field.
true.
i admire your patience. i just thought the hire was strange when it happened. the qb situation has been troubling to say the least. you guys need an upgrade big time.
Should be better now
Tuel has plenty of promise and Halladay, the incoming freshman, also looks good. Outside of those two, yeah we’re boned.
I don't mean this in any negative way.
If it benefits your program long term (financially, recruiting, etc) are you willing to give that up for the tradition of going to Corvallis? Also, remember that if the Pac 12 goes to an 8 game conference schedule you’ll have an extra home game already so you won’t actually be giving up the same number of trips there. Instead you’ll just be giving up a trip there every other year to watch WSU. For the benefits it provides, isn’t that worth it?
I want Canzano to stand there in that [expletive] white uniform, and with his Harvard mouth, extend Chip some [expletive] courtesy! Addicted to Quack
If it lined up the way you say it would, it would certainly be intriguing. I love going down to Corvallis for game day but if the money was right and it contributed to the overall health of the athletic department at OSU, I guess I’d be OK if we did a four year series?
I dunno. The whole thing just doesn’t feel good, but it might be necessary.
SEA and WSU
Personally I would prefer it if we did our alternating Oregon school home games at Qwest. As a westside Coug I could see them play the Oregon Schools every year. One of them at Qwest and the other in Oregon. Also, it helps WSU in westside recruiting and it hurts both of the Oregon’s schools ability to recruit in our backyard of the eastside. Financially I think using it as a home game with us gaining majority share is more enticing. Plus, we hold all the cards with where we hold the game, if we get 3 years down the road and we don’t like it then we just stop the deal with qwest. The other way seems ike it would take an act of congress to stop once it got going.
Beaver fan here, would love to see games at Qwest
When I first heard the rumor of UO and WSU playing at Qwest, I thought to myself “why not OSU?” for basically the same reasons as Matt stated.
OSU is closer to Seattle and has more to gain financially from moving a home game there. Plus it gives the Portland fans a chance to see a game without hitting game day traffic getting into Corvallis, which super sucks, although from what I’ve seen Seattle traffic kind of sucks too. It would also be nice to build up some hype for a state-vs-state rivalry. We’d have to come up with a cool name to hype it, like the the Red River Shootout, or (my fav) the World’s Largest Outdoor Cocktail Party. I’m thinking something about the Oregon Territory, the Columbia, or the word “state”, but nothing comes to mind immediately…
How about the World’s Largest Outdoor Cow-Town Party?
I want Canzano to stand there in that [expletive] white uniform, and with his Harvard mouth, extend Chip some [expletive] courtesy! Addicted to Quack
by Matt Daddy on Jul 2, 2010 2:06 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
My suggestion: the Land Grant Challenge
What if you marketed the game as an annual Land Grant football game. The Cougs specifically pick a land grant institution every year to compete against. You could get some national sponsorships from FFA, 4H, Washington Beef, Got Milk?, etc. You could couple it with an agricultural/farming summit each year leading up to the game.
We could potentially move an OS, UA, or Cal (not sure if they are still considered land-grant) over to Qwest. But outside of our conference there are plenty of teams to choose from – Arkansas, UConn, West Virginia, TAMU, UI, Tenn, Oklahoma St, Minnesota, etc.
I think if we embrace our roots a little, it may draw more of the east-side folk for the game and they might be a bit more supportive in attendance especially if they had some agriculturally related activities to suppliment the game. West-side fans would continue to see it for what it is – the cheapest, most convenient way to see your Cougs live and in action. Would add some great tailgating components as well — some BBQ, fresh produce/farmer’s market, maybe Ferdinand’s could figure out a way to mobilize their ice cream and get it to the Qwest Events Center/tailgating area each year!
I’m the furthest thing from an agriculture/farming type, but I think it would be fun added element to keep the Qwest game going and maybe pressure some of these mid-tier BCS teams to accept an invite to play us at Qwest.
Cow Tipping contest at half time!
Will Derting would be national champ.
"Ruth, Gehrig, DiMaggio, Mantle ... Costanza?"
This is way off topic, but no where else to say it.
Did anyone see the ending to Uruguay and Ghana? Man did Ghana choke. Hope no one here was recording it on their DVR.
"Ruth, Gehrig, DiMaggio, Mantle ... Costanza?"

by 






















