NCAA finally realizes agents are a problem
Using the ghost of Reggie Bush and the USC investigations as a scarecrow, the NCAA eradicated agents once and for all by hammering the Trojans with penalties in the wake of a four year investigation. In one swift act of justice, the NCAA recognized improper benefits were a problem and moved quickly to eradicate it from the entire body they preside over. Realistically, however, the actions of the infractions committee came years too late.
Sports agents have long been a problem in the NCAA. The constant tussle for high profile clients often ends with athletes being given benefits -- cash, cars, and homes -- in exchange for allowing the agent to represent the athlete in their professional career. This isn't new and it certainly isn't going away.
The prevailing theme over the years has been that the NCAA has had their head in the sand. Right under their noses, high profile athletes have been driving fancy cars and living lifestyles uncommon to the typical college student, all under the guise of amateurism.
The USC penalties were just the beginning, not the end of a move to squash improper benefits. The events of the past few weeks are showing just that.
First, North Carolina was hit with a broad sweeping investigation into agent contacts with some of their football team. Phone records were requested and athletes are being interviewed to determine whether they may be ineligible. It's not lost on me that the football team -- not the Tarheels star-studded basketball team -- is the one being investigated. Welcome to the twilight zone.
The plague then spread South, with word that USC -- no, not that one; South Carolina -- had a player under investigation, as well. Rivals getting together to be wined and dined by the same agent; I've seen it all.
Finally, it's Florida's turn today. Allegations surfaced that a star offensive lineman was receiving cash from an agent between the SEC championship and the Gators Sugar Bowl victory last year.
Edit: Alabama, come on down. Now is the time every athletic director should be looking in to what their athletes are doing, especially in the SEC. Sounds like an agency had a heck of a party in Miami.
Odds are, these investigations are just the beginning.
The Trojans weren't the black sheep of the NCAA, even if the high profile investigation and massive sanctions suggest it. Agents have been running amok and chasing college stars for years while the governing body turned much of a blind eye.
Last year, Dez Bryant brought the issue to the forefront nationally. Meeting with Deion Sanders -- who runs a camp to prepare athletes for the next level and showcases them for agents -- wasn't what rendered Bryant ineligible; lying to the NCAA was the problem. Months later in the draft, the Cowboys traded up to draft Bryant in the first round. Coincidence?
The problem isn't limited simply to national champions and BCS contenders. Anywhere there is a high profile athlete with a decent draft stock, agents will flock. It's an epidemic that has exploded at the same rate rookie contracts have bloated.
Now it's almost too late to stop it. The college landscape has become almost too big to fail, creating a situation where the NCAA lacks the teeth it had during the days of the SMU death penalty. Try as they may, it's going to be nearly impossible to stop agents from contacting and luring players that are still in school.
Welcome to the new NCAA, where amateurism is merely a suggestion.
32 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Here comes the domino effect.
This may give the rest of the NCAA teams a chance to get great players including us.
by well you win some and lose others on Jul 19, 2010 12:00 PM PDT reply actions
This could be the death of the NCAA.
Well, not really.
More like the nail that sends the BCS leagues splintering away from the NCAA and forming their own profit based oversight body.
BCS Evolution -- Punctuating the Equilibrium - twitter
Interesting idea
I see it actually leading to bloated oversight. Players — and their parents — are going to have to turn over all kinds of financials to compliance officers. This is going to get out of hand.
Of course, there will always be ways to get around it …
by Jeff Nusser on Jul 19, 2010 12:43 PM PDT up reply actions
This is the direction I see it heading
And I still don’t think it will impact it. Agents and athletes are always going to find ways to skirt it.
Now we’re hearing about the NCAA making kids turn over phone records. On the other side, schools are having athletes do some pretty detailed declarations about everything from living arrangements to cars and income.
At the end of the day, it’s still a pain in the butt to police, and impossible to stop.
by Brian Floyd on Jul 19, 2010 12:46 PM PDT up reply actions
Which is why, at the end of the day, it will be allowed
Either the NCAA will allow it, so it can monitor the situation above the table, or the NCAA will regulate so hard teams no longer see the hassle of being a part of the NCAA as being worth its benefits.
BCS Evolution -- Punctuating the Equilibrium - twitter
There are two choices?
I bet there are more choices then that.
by well you win some and lose others on Jul 19, 2010 1:11 PM PDT up reply actions
It's like they suddenly realize agents are a problem?
NCAA… ever heard of Marcus Camby?
His problem wasn’t an agent, but how about Chris Webber?
Nah… it MUST be a new problem.
Remember, they just got a new president
His agenda could very well include fighting back against agents. Just because they haven’t done much about it until now doesn’t mean they should continue to look the other way, I don’t think.
True, they shouldn't turn a blind eye
But they also shouldn’t have let it go this far by ignoring the problem until now. If they didn’t, perhaps they wouldn’t have to take the sledgehammer out to try to slow it down.
At this point, it’s such a big business — both agencies and the NCAA — that it’s going to be hard to put the brakes on it.
Not at all saying they shouldn't start now... almost 20 years after the examples I just gave....
Just showing my contempt for the sudden “oh crap… agents might be a problem….” epiphany.
by TiltingRight on Jul 19, 2010 1:51 PM PDT up reply actions
So at what point does the NCAA try and bring in the Professional Associations?
It seems to me that to end the problem, all they would need to do is bring in the NFL/NBA into the mix (now, I’ll also concede that neither the NBA nor the NFL have a vested interest in helping the NCAA with this so called “problem”).
But for instance if you are found to be working with an agent or whatever while in college, and you were suspended from the pros for doing so, players would think long and hard before letting one influence you. As it stands right now, the only people who get hurt usually are the people you leave behind (the school, the coach, future recruits, and the fans). What incentive is there for an athlete to turn down money when their only punishment may be that they have to repay it later when they’re making millions more?
It’s like the coach that has recruiting violations but goes to another school and the original school has to pay the penalty, while the coach gets to move on and do it all over again… cough… Calipari.
ATQ's #1 HRD Fan
Addicted to Quack
And therein lies the problem
The punishment hammers the institutions, not the athletes or agents. Does an athlete really care if it’s institution is stripped of wins and punished after they’re gone? Probably not. Is the athlete going to care they’re stripped of awards? Probably not, they’re getting paid.
The NCAA can continue to hammer schools, but athletes and agents skating continues the vicious cycle. Opening investigations and trying to get strict is a start, but until they figure out how to deter athletes from taking money (easier said than done), it’s all an exercise in futility.
But I think that's what is so amazing about what they're doing now
They’re investigating CURRENT players. That’s a pretty enormous shift, and could end up scaring a good number of other players straight.
I don't think it's an exercise in futility because coaches and admin
who will be there long after the athlete are going to care and set up policies and procedures so they don’t have to deal with the ramifications.
I just think the NCAA is going about it all wrong (i know, shocker, right?). It’d be like punishing the employees of Enron for what Ken Lay did and letting him go become CEO of BP and saying, “oh well, he’s not at Enron anymore, nothing we can do about it.”
If the NCAA was serious, they would a) do what Jeff says and go after current players and b) try and get the pro organizations on board in helping them. I’m just not sure how happy Stern or Goodell would be to assist the NCAA in keeping the best athletes out of their sport.
ATQ's #1 HRD Fan
Addicted to Quack
It'd be tough to convince the NBA and NFL I think
While going after the institutions does provide the scare tactic, I feel like it’s going to lead to compliance offices being extremely bloated. I know compliance is the most important part of an AD, but if the NCAA takes up the crusade, compliance offices are going to have to more or less follow around athletes and babysit them.
Of course right now it’s turned into games of “we didn’t know” within athletic departments, which the NCAA seems to be moving toward punishing anyway.
The better idea is trying to cut off the source in conjunction with the usual penalties.
And I definitely agree. I hate the fact coaches can jump and leave a school in flames anytime. There’s gotta be a better way.
Working in a compliance driven profession myself
I can attest to the “bloating” aspect of it. It will be just more red-tape and paperwork that the AD and his assistants will have to certify on an annual basis. There will be internal and external audits, all used in the name of plausible deniability.
What you will end up seeing is actually an increase in lawsuits from the Universities to the NCAA when punishments get handed down. That is why the USC appeal is so interesting because it sets precedence for the schools that if the NCAA comes down hard, you don’t have to just sit back and accept it.
I don’t think it’s a futile move by the NCAA, it’s just going to cause the cockroaches to scurry into the corners when the light gets turned on. It won’t actually get rid of them.
ATQ's #1 HRD Fan
Addicted to Quack
Truth
It’s not futile and may be beneficial if they keep it up. The realist in me says this will never go away. There’s too much money to be had in athletics now.
I’m very curious about what happens with USC. The interesting thing about appeals to the NCAA is that you’re appealing to the organization that punished you. So although it’s different people within that organization, I have a hard time believing anyone will get a fair shake. This all changes if USC moves on to a lawsuit next.
Yep
That’s what intrigues me too. What happens if Garrett (who’s batshit crazy anyway) says, “screw this, we’re never going to get a fair shake from this organization, they’re just jealous of us trOJans.” and moves to sue the NCAA.
Personally, I don’t think he wins, but now the governing body is seriously undermined and any new sanctions they hand down will quickly start to go that route too, and where does the Gov’t stand on all this? Who knows.
ATQ's #1 HRD Fan
Addicted to Quack
I am still waiting for USC to sue Reggie Bush for damages.
BCS Evolution -- Punctuating the Equilibrium - twitter
just watching SEC media day
and Sabin wants to see the agents getting a lot of the punishment. I think he wanted a one year suspension of their licence.
Bingo
And we had this discussion yesterday on Addicted to Quack (another great SBN blog), too. You can teach your players not to talk to agents all you want, but when the agents are actively courting them, it makes life a lot harder. There has to be some fallout for the agents doing this, too.
by Brian Floyd on Jul 21, 2010 12:44 PM PDT up reply actions
I agree
but they won’t go after the athlete. They should go after the AGENT. If they made the rules so giving gifts before being signed was considered TAMPERING and you therefore could not represent the player, it’s stop tomorrow.
by TiltingRight on Jul 19, 2010 1:53 PM PDT up reply actions
I don't think it stops
The slimy agents would still try and do it, and try and cover it up so they don’t get caught. What do they lose by trying? Either don’t get the player to sign because you didn’t give him money or don’t get the player to sign because you gave him money. Either way, they’re still in the same spot.
Once again, it comes back to the NFL/NBA. If they wouldn’t let the agent represent ANY players (say take away a license or regulate the agents) then it might be a deterrent, but taking away just one player isn’t going to stop the slime from being slimy.
ATQ's #1 HRD Fan
Addicted to Quack
I didn't realize that agency licenses were controlled by the players associations
To that effect, it could be ridiculously hard to get the NFLPA/NBAPA to jump on board with suspending licenses. It almost seems like something that would have to be written in to the CBA.
hmmmm
Well isn’t that convenient? Let’s see we get to regulate the people that help us get paid. Talk about a conflict of interest from the NCAA’s perspective. They have little to no recourse in trying to fight the agent side of things.
Try convincing players that they shouldn’t work with the people that got them the millions they currently have.
ATQ's #1 HRD Fan
Addicted to Quack
Perhaps
possible punishment of the athlete is enough leverage to convince the NFLPA/NBAPA to impose these types of regulations on the Agents.
But, that would still mean that the NFL and NBA would need to be involved as an organization, and actually attempt to set a policy that punishes the athletes. This of course, something they have absolutely no incentive to pursue.
So I guess my initial conclusion is that this avenue has no chance of stopping the gravy train.
I am worried...
that they may strip us of our 2003 Holiday Bowl, because Will Derting was driving a brand new John Deer that year and Gesser was eating in the nicest restaurant in town (Sella’s) weekly. If they go farther back in the archives they might find that Dorian Boose was driving around a 1982 Corolla. I hope we don’t get sanctions because Trufant’s parent were both hard workers, great people and could afford their own house in Tacoma.
"Ruth, Gehrig, DiMaggio, Mantle ... Costanza?"
I am worried
That they will continue to dig even more and they find me lucky charms.
by daedalus17 on Jul 19, 2010 11:12 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Will banning agents solve the problem?
In the bleacher report, they think banning agents is a good thing. Why not? To get rid of the problem at the source is a good thing. Wrong! That may hurt the transition from college sports to other sport programs beyond college. The agents need to watch how they introduce themselves. The student, as the judge, should be aware of bribes, money, food, gifts, etc. Bribes are bad, and NCAA wants that to end.
by well you win some and lose others on Jul 21, 2010 9:24 AM PDT reply actions

by 

















