2010 WSU FOOTBALL PREVIEWS: Linebackers
Part one in an eight-part series previewing the WSU football 2010 offensive and defensive units.
Overview
For the past two years, the knocks on the WSU linebackers have been many. Too small, too slow, too inexperienced -- it all plagued these guys in one way or another. In some ways, the inexperience was the most damning problem; whenever one of the upperclassmen got hurt, he was replaced by someone seemingly seeing their first substantial Pac-10 action. At best, that led to hesitation and slow reaction times; at worst, it led to blown assignments that turned into big plays.
It appears those knocks have finally been addressed. At any given time, there should be speed to burn and/or size at at least two of the three spots, and most everyone on the two deep (with one notable exception we'll talk about in a second) saw extensive time a year ago. Yes, the unit is hurt by the loss of touted redshirt freshman Andre Barrington (academics) and probable loss of Louis Bland (knee surgery recovery), but there's still plenty of talent here.
With what figures to be a dramatically improved defensive line in front of them, there's really no reason why this unit shouldn't begin to shine this year.
Projected Depth Chart For Sept. 4
# = Has used redshirt. This is our best guess based on the preseason depth chart and published reports.
| Pos. | 1st String | 2nd String | 3rd String |
| SAM | Myron Beck (6-0, 209, #Sr.) | Hallston Higgins (5-11, 210, Sr.) | Darren Markle (6-1, 224, #Fr.) |
| MIKE | Mike Ledgerwood (6-1, 231, Jr.) | C.J. Mizell (6-1, 225, Fr.) | Hallston Higgins (5-11, 210, Sr.) |
| WILL | Alex Hoffman-Ellis (6-1, 241, #Jr.) | Mike Ledgerwood (6-1, 231, Jr.) | Arthur Burns (5-11, 206, #Fr.) |
Key Player
Whoever plays middle linebacker. If competition makes everyone better, then this is Pete Carroll's dream.
With Hoffman-Ellis moved to the outside -- presumably to make better use of his otherworldly speed and size that should give him the ability to rush the passer -- there's quite the battle going on for who takes over in the middle. There's Ledgerwood, who has the most experience; Mizell, who is raw but rivals Hoffman-Ellis for the title of "best athlete" in the entire group; Higgins, who is an undersized but steady Texan who's waited four years to make his mark; and Markle, who was so strong a year ago that he made some noise that he might force a burn of his redshirt.
The bet here is that Mizell eventually wins the job -- if not for the opener, then somewhere down the road. After taking a year off out of high school last year, it's going to take him some time to get reacclimated to full-speed football, but once he does ... watch out. My guess is Ledgerwood starts the year there, given that the junior should provide the most steady, assignment-sound performance early on. Look for Mizell to be phased in as the season moves along, unless injuries force him into immediate action.
Biggest Question Mark
Is the experience really going to translate into improved play?
Of course, one could argue that's a big question for every unit. But with so much of effective linebacking coming down to the ability to quickly read and react, logic dictates that experience should make a huge difference for a group that isn't perhaps as athletically gifted as the Pac-10 offenses it will be facing.
If it turns out the experience didn't make much difference and these guys just can't play ... well, skip down to the Worst Case Scenario.
Best Case Scenario
I'm just going to clip my Best Case Scenario from last year and replace the names -- it still applies.
The defensive line is much improved, allowing these guys to do what they do best -- fly around and make plays. In stark contrast to last year, the front seven trusts each other and it shows: Hoffman-Ellis is disrupting other teams' plans from all over the field, Mizell is a quick learner and a sideline-to-sideline maniac, and Ledgerwood proves to be a valuable situational player. The rush defense is much improved, limiting opponents to "just" 4.5 yards per carry.
Worst Case Scenario
Experience hasn't made a lick of difference because, as it turns out, these guys just aren't good linebackers. They continue to blow assignments and overcommit, leading to severe depression amongst Coug fans at the realization that we're just a lot farther away than we thought.
Likely Scenario
The defensive line is a lot better, and the experience really does pay off. These guys are assignment sound, and the rush defense is vastly improved. C.J. Mizell forces his way into the lineup by the time conference play gets rolling, and proves to be the one of the best young defenders in the Pac-10. They make some big plays on a defense that is good enough to keep the Cougs in some games.
21 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
3rd string SAM for Markle? Highly doubt it.
He will be back-up MIKE and Mizell will start at SAM. Cougs may eventually go to 3-4 due to depth at LB IMO.
That would run counter to every published report out of this camp
And there is no possible chance they go 3-4. Sorry.
nose?
I like the idea with all this talk about speed at linebacker, but idk if rankin or wolfgramm can take onblocks as well from the nose position. If life were a video game, it would work, but depth at linebacker doesn’t mean we suddenly have a boulder of a defensive lineman we can stick at nose.
It was the only one with Hoffman-Ellis in it
And it perfectly illustrated pretty much everything.
I guess what I’m really saying is “you’re welcome.”
Call me crazy...
but I think our front seven is improved enough to launch our run D to the middle of the Pac10… so around 3.7, 3.8 ypc (assuming we stay healthy, etc.).
FWIW, last year we were giving up 5.9 ypc, and the next closest was UW at 4.5 ypc. Oregon and ASU were tops at 3.4 ypc.
I’m really nervous about the offense, but I think the D looks pretty average to above average this year (which is a MASSIVE improvement).
OK.
You’re crazy.
But in all seriousness, if this team can even approach 4.0 ypc, we’ll be in more than a few games.
by Jeff Nusser on Aug 17, 2010 11:50 AM PDT up reply actions
Your starters are right
So far that is the list of the 1’s. However, Hallston Higgins is pressing Ledgerwood and the fight is fierce. The coaches are buzzing about him. Dropped pounds and added some speed and looks freaking good.Good news for Coug fans. Higgins appears far faster and put some blistering hits on in the practices of which I caught glimpses. Happy to report that Markle who has worked predominantly outside, shifted to the middle and had a good run at that slot. “Who is #17?” was running in my head the whole practice as he wreaked havoc. Turns out it is Hoffman Ellis touting a new number; the guy is way bigger and veins are popping- no apparent loss of speed though. I think Burns wearing a new number as well… either that or we have another really fast LB w/ serious closing speed.
Unfortunately Mizell is a great athlete but is lost thus far. I hope your projection is right that he rises, you can’t have too many good LB’s, but right now he just doesn’t know the system. Kid needs time. Beck is so steady and really keeps the younger guys on their toes and points out gaps and slots and clearly has them listening and reaction. Gotta love a senior- we have so few. A lot of discussion on the sideline between al of them too- the vets filling in the RS’s.
One other note- #5 was dominant. Rankin has a new number. I thought it must be Wolfgramm running w/ him and they were tearing it up. But it was Pole! The guy is bigger than 275… my guess is he is going 290. Nice rotations in the work outs I watched- LB by committee and DT by Committee.
One more thing- the safeties are WAY better. Chima, Toomer and Daniels are a nice set and Locker got confused a good bit but has serious recovery speed. Anyway— it is world’s different than last fall. No clue how it translates, but I believe the D will comptete.
If you can't Go Cougs... don't go.
Where they are REALLY playing now
WIL – Hoffman-Ellis, Ledgerwood/Markle, Burns
MIK – Ledgerwood, Higgins, Mizell/Markle
SAM – Beck, Markle,
Ledgerwood and Markle are the only two moving to different positions and Mizell is with the 3rd string MIK
We weren't too sure what was going on with the depth chart
From the pre-camp depth chart and not being there to see live action, it was kind of an educated guess after the first stringers right now. It’s a hazard of not being able to see them in practice right now.
It’ll be fun to see how it all plays out. There’s some serious competition going on at least.
If that comment is accurate
I’d say I was pretty darn close. Grippi did mention, however, that Higgins has played some SAM during camp. That might have changed. I just don’t know since I’m not there.
Anybody good at linebacker trivia? Hope so because I don't have the answer!
I’m wondering if anybody can think of a team – college or pros – that had its starting linebackers first names matched up with the nicknames typically given to each position (Sam, Mike and Will).
Any takers?
I feel like our holiday bowl team might have come close – we for sure had a “Will,” but I’m not sure if he played WIL or SAM?
by LeaveItToWeaver on Aug 17, 2010 8:40 PM PDT reply actions
No reps
Higgins has not taken any reps at SAM this Fall.
Interesting
Could just have been a mistake, or maybe I read it wrong. At any rate, I just don’t see how a 210-pound middle linebacker can survive in the Pac-10.
by Jeff Nusser on Aug 17, 2010 11:45 PM PDT up reply actions

by 
















