2010 WSU FOOTBALL PREVIEWS: Running Backs
Part two in an eight-part series previewing the WSU football 2010 offensive and defensive units.
MONDAY: Linebackers
Overview
The running back position may hold some of the most interesting stories coming out of Washington State's fall camp.
First, we cannot ignore the remarkable comeback of James Montgomery. He loses part of his leg to a freak injury, then also has to undergo microfracture arthriscopic knee surgery. The fact that he is even able to participate in practice is an accomplishment and a testament to modern medicine. Any production the Cougs get out of Montgomery this season is gravy. The good news is, that is a very real possibility. Here is a quote from Sir Vincent Grippi from his first practice report:
And James Montgomery was cutting and moving with the same panache as last season.
Kudos to Vince for usage of the word "panache."
Now, before you go and get all excited and pencil Montgomery in for 25 carries a game, realize he isn't all the way back. Wulff has been holding him out of some practices, especially on two-a-days, and James has admitted that there is still some pain in his knee when he makes really hard cuts. Others will have to step up as WSU will most likely use the "by committee" approach.
Luckily, Washington State finds themselves with some pretty real depth here. Another guy coming off major surgery, Chantz Staden, by all accounts was outstanding in spring camp. He is a guy with some burst and he led the team in all-purpose yards in 2008. (He returned kicks, so he had A LOT of opportunities). Marcus Richmond and Logwone Mitz are a couple of experienced power backs who are likely to get some carries in short yardage situations. Carl Winston may be another feature back in the making and has taken reps with the first team. Finally, true freshman Rickey Galvin has done nothing but impress in fall camp. Each day, it seems he has made yet another big play. Do not be surprised if he gains more and more of a presence on gameday as the fall progresses.
Running back should not be a question mark for the Cougs this year. They have some experienced depth and a solid mixture of bruisers, burners and balanced guys.
Projected Depth Chart For Sept. 4
Rather than listing the running backs in a sort of 1-6 depth chart, we've decided to group them together in categories. This fits more along the lines of the approach that is expected from the coaching staff. (H/T to Brian for the idea).
| Feature Back | Speed Back | Power Back |
|---|---|---|
| James Montgomery | Chantz Staden | Logwone Mitz |
| Carl Winston | Rickey Galvin | Marcus Richmond |
Key Player
I'd love to be a super genius and predict one of the other backs to have a breakout season here, but really the most important player is James Montgomery. If he can come back and be his old self, carrying the ball 20 times a game on the way, he can really give this offense some stability. That stability can make game planning easier on the coaches and give our young quarterback a little more confidence.
James Montgomery has the experience and size to do that; it really comes down to whether or not that knee holds up.
Biggest Question Mark
Last season, yards per carry numbers were sad across the board, no matter who had the ball in their hands. It does not take a football expert to figure out the common thread there: the offensive line.
The running backs can and will make plays. The question is how many opportunities will the offensive line give them to do so?
Best Case Scenario
James Montgomery is able to carry the ball 15-20 times a game and put up a YPC number around 4.5. Carl Winston does the same in spelling Montgomery. Chantz Staden and Rickey Galvin provide plenty of big runs. Logwone Mitz and Marcus Richmond are solid in short yardage, moving the chains and converting red zone opportunities.
The improved running game opens up the passing game for Jeff Tuel, who finishes in the top half of a QB-loaded conference in passing efficiency.
Worst Case Scenario
The offensive line is still so bad it does not matter who is in the backfield.
Chantz Staden and James Montgomery are not fully recovered and are essentially useless to Paul Wulff. Rickey Galvin provides none of the exciting plays we've heard about in practice, as Pac-10 defenses make him look a step slower. Carl Winston is not effective as an every-down back. Logwone Mitz catches another case of fumbilitis and wastes scoring opportunities.
Opposing defenses are able to focus on the pass rush, leaving our quarterbacks battered and bruised for yet another year.
Likely Scenario
Running back by committee is the name of the game. Montgomery is effective, but really can not sustain 20 carries a game. Chantz Staden provides some excitement when given big holes. Having added some bulk, Carl Winston is much more able to handle carries on an every-down basis. Logwone Mitz and Marcus Richmond are used sparingly in short yardage, sometimes as fullbacks. Rickey Galvin provides a play or two that ensure Coug fans will remember his name a la Johnny Forzani last season (don't worry, he won't declare for the Canadian draft), but still is too light to handle the rigors of double-digit carries in the Pac-10.
10 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I believe Brian had noted that Montgomery's knee surgery was arthroscopic, not microfracture
This group of backs has a ton of talent. Gotta love that burst by Galvin and the extra dimension that adds to the feel of the offense. It seems likely that even if the o-line can stay healthy it won’t be until later in the season that we start to see results with these guys. Probably will take a few weeks into the season for the line to gel and start creating some significant holes.
Correct
It was confusing because it was arthroscopic to clean up a previous microfracture surgery.
by Brian Floyd on Aug 18, 2010 10:30 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Today's article in Seattle Times
Seemed to indicate it was microfracture surgery, but I think it is just a general confusion as I believe it was a scope to clean up the microfracture.
Staden will provide dual ground and air yards.
He’ll be a nice multi purpose player. He looked very good coming out of the back field in spring, and now again in fall camps. Not ignoring the others, I am just saying that the threat of a good receiver coming out of the back field is something the Cougs have lacked for some time. Chantz and Tuel have a nice sense of each other and it is a good release valve on plays that break down.
If you can't Go Cougs... don't go.
by hollyweirdcoug on Aug 18, 2010 10:19 AM PDT reply actions
Not sure if people remember
But Montgomery was a heck of a receiving threat before getting hurt.
by Jeff Nusser on Aug 18, 2010 12:03 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Richmond emerges and does Galvin play?
When they picked up a verbal from Galvin and I watched his video I thought he would play as a true frosh for sure. He obviously has had a good fall camp but with Montgomery available I don’t know if he goes now. I can’t wait to get Galvin on the field though. I think he ends up a thorn in defenses backside with his burst, speed, size, and physical play! Galvin and Sankey would seem to really compliment each other a few years down the road.
Richmond was having the best spring of the running backs before going down with an injury and missing the rest of spring ball. This fall I haven’t heard a whole lot about him. It’s his senior year and I could see him emerging as an every down-type of back. Surprised we haven’t heard much about him this fall.
I pray for Montgomery. He was able to get 4+ ypc last year in limited carries. He’s a true threat at full strength and behind a solid line. From all accounts he is also just a great guy and leader. You gotta’ hope he makes it back and is able to play a full season. Easily one of the best stories I have heard of in quite some time.
I don't see how Galvin gets kept off the field
I would think he’s a lock for special teams. But I haven’t been there to see.
by Jeff Nusser on Aug 18, 2010 12:52 PM PDT up reply actions
He adds a dimension
they obviously need just with the speed he brings to the backfield. There are enough running backs that if he isn’t a clear cut 2nd-string guy then I would redshirt him. I have never been a fan of playing a true freshmen if they are “only” going to see the field on special teams but that’s just me.
I think that's flawed thinking if he's a return man
A big special teams play has all sorts of impact. Imagine if our defense is holding up, say, late in the third quarter 20-7. What difference could a punt return to the house make? Or a punt return to even the opponents’ 30?
I think special teams is a vastly undervalued aspect of football. Very few teams give it attention proportionate to the impact it can have on a game.
Agree on the impact special team has on the game
I just don’t agree on playing true freshmen only on special teams.

by 
















