Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Explaining Jeremy Lin's Early, Surprising Success

On Jamal Atofau's Move To SAM

When news hit yesterday that Jamal Atofau was moving from his safety position to SAM linebacker, I started questioning the motivation. At 5-9 180 lbs, Atofau is well undersized, even for an outside linebacker. Yes, that was his position at Bellevue High, but playing linebacker at the college level requires much more physicality.

The Cougars likey lost Louis Bland for the year and did lose Andre Barrington, weakening the depth at linebacker. At the same time, the safety spot saw LeAndre Daniels and Jay Matthews go down with injuries.

Was Atofau's move to SAM made to shore-up the depth now and in the future, or is there something else at play here?

Star-divide

I'll be up front and say I don't buy Atofau as a SAM. He's still not a sure tackler and goes for the helmet-jarring hit more often than not. He's too small to play that close to the line of scimmage right now, almost ensuring he wouldn't see the field this year outside of special teams. It doesn't make sense for the present.

Everything we've heard so far indicates Atofau is ready to play right now. After taking a year to redshirt, he was running with the second-team at safety and had seen plenty of action during the spring and fall camps.

Instead, I don't think Atofau is actually practicing as a SAM. While the official line is that he's changed positions, a look at the non-conference schedule tells me all I need to know about this move. It's my opinion that Atofau will play as a rover during the first three weeks of the season, or at the very least against Oklahoma State and SMU.

Both SMU and Oklahoma State play variations on the spread that utilize high-powered pass-first attacks. They're going to spread the field out and use short routes while peppering the secondary with quick passes. In that regard, it makes sense to throw the base 4-3 defense out the window and run a 3-3-5 (Edit: As newportcoug said, A 4-2-5 is also a possibility), with Atofau in coverage as a fifth defensive back.

It's no secret that a 3-3-5 is a better way to defend the 'Air Raid' than sitting in a base defense and allowing the opponent to pick it apart. Adding an element of speed in the defensive backfield and being able to match-up with the multiple receiver sets a run-and-shoot throws out there is key in stopping the high-powered offense. Atofau can take the principles he's learned as a safety, and apply them to coverage against the run-and-shoot.

Don't be at all shocked if this move is temporary and a scheme-based position switch. The rover spot fits Atofau's skill set and gives the Cougs a much better shot at slowing down OSU and SMU.

Comment 32 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Also a possibility

I’m banking on seeing a 5-man secondary in one way or another.

by Brian Floyd on Aug 31, 2010 1:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

If you took Ledgerwood out

and had a back seven of Beck, AHE, Atofau, Chima, Toomer, Washington, Simmons the slowest guy of that group might be Chima. Speed, speed and more speed.

by Mark Sandritter on Aug 31, 2010 2:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

On offense

I can run Shotgun Normal – Crosses every single play of the game and put up 50. Someone call the coaches!

CougCenter Formerly known as Dancing Football
Twitter!

by Craig Powers on Aug 31, 2010 7:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

Game Planning???

If your theory is correct, the fact that the staff feels confident enough with this group of players to shift positions and alter schemes is a great sign. It seems like the last couple years we’ve been stuck in base formations (on O and D) because of inexperience and lack of personnel. With OSU right out of the gates, it’ll be key to get the fastest guys on the field.

Cougar Athletic Supporter

by B-Lot on Aug 31, 2010 1:42 PM PDT reply actions  

Agreed

I feel like they’re doing some heavy gameplanning and have the options to be able to throw different looks around. I’m not sure if they’re doing it, but it sure seems like it.

by Brian Floyd on Aug 31, 2010 2:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

This is a great point

Last year we witnessed position changes out of necessity. Just bodies to fill positions…This move does not seem like that, it seems much more calculated and deliberate. Much like the Coug D’s of earlier in the decade that mixed it up on a game by game basis and flat out shut teams down. I personally like what I am seeing from these coaches. Now it is almost time to see how there preparation has paid off.

by Coug03 on Aug 31, 2010 3:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

Whatever happened to

good old “outside linebacker” and “inside linebacker”? I don’t know what a SAM or a MIKE is.

by coug2828 on Aug 31, 2010 3:16 PM PDT reply actions  

Fancy terminology!

You know, it probably is easier to label them SLB, WLB, and MLB.

by Brian Floyd on Aug 31, 2010 3:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

The reason they distinguish between SAM (strong side) and WILL (weak side) outside linebacker

Is because they require different skill sets within the scheme. I’m not a football scheme expert, but this is my understanding.

In the Cougs’ system, the strong side d-linemen’s job (Long and Wolfgramm) is to tie up the o-line on that side, which makes it OK for the SAM linebacker to be a little lighter, since he’s not going to be taking on heavy blockers as much. Plus, he has to pick up the TE in coverage.

The WILL’s job is to freelance a little more — chasing down plays from behind, blitzing, etc. — while also being stout against the run as the d-linemen in front of him (Rankin and Kooyman) are expected to penetrate. Hence, the speed and size of Hoffman-Ellis over there.

by Jeff Nusser on Aug 31, 2010 4:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

Montana

Given we have Mt. St sandwiched between OK St and SMU, my guess is we’ll keep a similar game plan/personnel grouping for Mt St to give the guys some continuity. I know some think otherwise, but we’ll wipe the turf with Mt St. regardless of what we run, so might has well have similar scheme’s for all 3 (this is assuming that we’ll run similar schemes for SMU and Okie st.)

by MVCoug on Aug 31, 2010 3:58 PM PDT reply actions  

Good point

I wondered what this move was all about. Your theory makes perfect sense.

by selahcoug on Sep 1, 2010 7:58 AM PDT reply actions  

I think it's much simpler...

Being that Locker and Buchanon are both Freshmen, as is Atofau, they proved to have more upside at the safety position. They probably like Atofau in the box, and think he can bulk up for next year to be one of the possible replacements for Beck (though I think Bland will have the edge). So in other words, it has more to do with Ball liking the upside of Locker and Buchanon as future safeties, more than the theory of the rover.

by dertingfactor on Sep 1, 2010 9:52 AM PDT reply actions  

Ball interview talks about Atofau...

http://950kjr.com/cc-common/podcast/single_podcast.html?podcast=ian_furness.xml

About the 8:30 mark he discusses Atofau, seems to like his ability to shed blocks. Also, before this, he seemed really excited for Horton and Buchanon, it seems to me that they passed up Carpenter and Atofau. It’s obviously still early, but I don’t think those redshirts would have been burned if that wasn’t the case.

by dertingfactor on Sep 1, 2010 10:10 AM PDT reply actions  

On the secondary

“I’d like to be deeper”. Then why do you move a second stringer?

by Brian Floyd on Sep 1, 2010 10:20 AM PDT up reply actions  

Chima, Toomer, Locker, and Buchanon...

All ahead of Atofau, with two of them being Freshman. His liklihood of seeing the field next year at SLB is greater than at safety.

by dertingfactor on Sep 1, 2010 10:42 AM PDT up reply actions  

If Barrington makes grades

Both he and Burns are ahead of Atofau at SAM and both are freshmen.

by Brian Floyd on Sep 1, 2010 10:46 AM PDT up reply actions  

To me it appears Ball and company are very solid for the future of the safety position...

…with Toomer, Locker, and Buchanon. The LB position seems to me a lot less solid. A lot more things can go wrong. I do think this whole thing has more to do with Locker and Buchanon looking very promising, more than Atofau’s failures.

by dertingfactor on Sep 1, 2010 10:53 AM PDT up reply actions  

It could be

I liked Atofau at safety and thought he was best suit for it. While our scheme admittedly take more finesse at SLB than brute force, Atofau has a way to go to be able to be effective at that spot in my opinion. On the surface it didn’t make sense. When combined with the fact that I know adding another DB when playing against OSU and SMU is schematically better, that’s how I arrived at the conclusion I did.

It may be permanent, but the depth at safety isn’t exactly great so making the move right now seemed odd to me.

by Brian Floyd on Sep 1, 2010 11:16 AM PDT up reply actions  

Exactly.

Just based on long term depth I don’t get the move.

Next year at linebacker you have Bland, Barrington, Ledgerwood, Hoffman-Ellis, Burns, Markle, Mizell, Oertel and already have four linebacker commits with Mayes, Sua, Hersey and Monroe. Thats potentially 12 guys, 8 of which will be redshirt freshman or older, 6 will have playing experience.

At the SLB position you would have Bland, Burns and possibly Oertel. Maybe the coaches think Atofau will be the best of the bunch, I don’t know.

by Mark Sandritter on Sep 1, 2010 11:49 AM PDT up reply actions  

I think the last thing you speculated seems the most probable...

Atofau has a better chance of beating out Bland (may not come back factors in), and Burns, then he does Buchanon and Locker. I think they really think the world of Buchanon and Horton. I think if you were to ask Ball who he projects as All Pac-10 from the freshmen, his first two names would be Horton and Buchanon, not Mizell and Pole. I really think they love these two guys, maybe moreso than any players in the back 7 they’ve picked up in the ’09 and ’10 class.

by dertingfactor on Sep 1, 2010 11:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

But simply because they like two or three guys isn't a reason to move players

Hanging their hats on two or three safeties (Locker, Toomer, and Bucannon) is a poor decision. There will always be injuries and depth is always necessary, so taking out a capable safety that can compete with them goes against everything they’ve said so far. Bucannon, Locker, and Toomer may be the safeties of the future, but anointing them in their freshman year is short-sighted.

Between Burns, Bland (maybe?), Oertel, and Sua, the OLB spot won’t be hurting, as far as I can tell. Add that to the fact that Atofau is severely undersized — both in height and weight — for a SAM, and it seem like an odd move.

by Brian Floyd on Sep 1, 2010 12:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

So in the interview when Ball was asked about Atofau...

…you think it’s possible he just avoided answering the question honestly? Because he didn’t mention anything about a rover, and he said he feels he fits better there with his great hands and ability to shed blocks.

I guess I can see the reasoning for that, to throw a curveball at OSU, but I guess I’m not sold on the idea.

Locker, Bucannon, and Toomer seem more likely to be productive players for WSU than Sua, Bland, and Burns.

by dertingfactor on Sep 1, 2010 12:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

When Ball did the interview, Atofau had been playing at SAM for maybe two days, as far as I can tell.

Being that it’s the first game, coaches have everything on the table scheme-wise and the opponent really doesn’t know what they’re getting. A little gamesmanship isn’t out of the question at all and I wouldn’t expect them to give away the game-plan they’re bringing to Stillwater. I definitely wouldn’t expect them to say they plan on using a stack, or any defense for that matter, against OSU.

But again, this is just an educated guess based on what I know. I can’t see practices and even if I could, I wouldn’t say what they’re doing with the defensive scheme. I’m very sold on using a 5-man defensive backfield against teams that plan a run-and-shoot or ‘Air Raid’ offense, though.

by Brian Floyd on Sep 1, 2010 12:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

Right, but Horton, Carpenter, Locker, and Bucannon have proven to be much more solid...

…against the pass than Atofau. So there’s eight ball-hawks ahead of him. I would say Atofau is just the odd man out, which is a little setback for Atofau prospects, but great for cougar football.

by dertingfactor on Sep 1, 2010 12:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

I hope they love Simmons and Duckett just as much

Next year you have Toomer and Bucannon as starters and Locker as a backup after that you have redshirt and true freshman. If anything I would question the timing of the move before Bucannon, Locker, Atofau have proven what they can do in a game.

by Mark Sandritter on Sep 1, 2010 12:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to CougCenter, a website dedicated to WSU football, basketball and other athletics.

Community Guidelines

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

King_small
2007 Recruiting Class: A Look Back
Cougar_01t_small
Wrapped Up In Recruiting

Recent FanPosts

Small
Some respect for Wulff
King_small
Post Signing Day 2012 Schedule: Eastern Washington
King_small
Post Signing Day 2012 Schedule: BYU
Donttakethebait_sd_021011_small
2013 class's first recruit?
Cougar_01t_small
Leach & ESPN
Small
Questions for Washington State Commits Khalil Pettway, Alex Jackson, and Gabriel Marks
17351_652492462983_27214870_38132779_139527_n_small
Quick Analysis on Why We Are Still Going After Linemen
Small
TTU is no WSU

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

The only female CougCenter reader?
Your reminder that Pullman is awesome. Yes, someone called the police because a squirrel was stuck in a peanut jar. Yes, the description is awesome. And yes, a Google Image Search for a squirrel stuck in a peanut butter jar turns up this adorable photo.

Police log screencap via Pullman PD.
If you missed the Steve Gleason piece during the Super Bowl pregame show, here it is. Brian has his...

Recent FanShots

Austin Statesman: Leach welcomes challenge at Washington State
Yahoo Sports Radio Interview With Mike Leach
Committment for next year?
Khalil Pettiway and Alex Jackson Talk about WSU
Best reason to pick a school EVER.
Gabriel Marks... is confident
Taylor Taliulu Switches Back to WSU
Conner Johnson - Preferred walk-on
Shaq Thompson Flips From Cal, Commits To Washington

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Go Cougs


Attractive, intelligent managing editors

Jeff_mug_h2_small Jeff Nusser

62817_716885768283_27206155_40333453_7664553_n_small Grady Clapp

Arizona_small Craig Powers

Brianheadshot_small Brian Floyd

Attractive, intelligent editors

Florida_small Kyle Rancourt

Header_small Mark Sandritter