WSU-SMU RECAP: A Few Game Thoughts
Well, the Cougs hung with SMU for two quarters before stumbling down the stretch en route to a 35-21 loss. There's no doubt WSU looked better today than it did the last two weeks, showing some promise and more glimpses of what they can become.
On to the game thoughts.
- Paul Wulff deserves credit for today. The Cougs lost but the team came out prepared and didn't stumble out of the gates today. The emphasis on tackling in practice? It showed. WSU was mentally prepared for SMU and played sound, solid football for most of the game. We wondered if Wulff could take some of the heat after the MSU game. He did well and impressed me today.
- Two years and three games is enough time for me to decide that Todd Sturdy simply isn't a good offensive coordinator. His playcalling is bland, the adjustments are non-existent and the weapons the offense has aren't being utilized. With the talent WSU has at the skill positions, the offense shouldn't look like it did today.
- SMU loves to blitz. They bring pressure nearly every play, coming right up the middle with most of their blitz packages. Instead of trying to get the ball out wide, the Cougs continued to run square into the blitz or drop Tuel straight back. Would it kill Sturdy to throw a few slants, wide receiver swings or running back screens? Against a defense that pinned their ears back and teed-off, these simple adjustments would've done wonders.
- This was what we expected from the defense before the season. The Cougs threw different looks at SMU, made plays in space and got pressure from every angle. Some of the blitzes were predictable -- like on every third down -- but it worked much of the time. The defensive line was stunting and twisting, giving the Mustang offensive line trouble all day, forcing some bad throws from Padron. Chris Ball and Jody Sears -- though I have no idea what Sears does -- get a tip of the cap today.
- Kevin Kooyman had the game of his life. The senior defensive end was glued to SMU quarterback Kyle Padron's hip pocket most of the day. When he wasn't, Kooyman got his hands up and still made plays. At one point, Kooyman came around the end, stripped Padron, recovered and made the tackle across the field.
- Jeff Tuel had another inconsistent day today. At times, he was brilliant. Other times, he looked lost out there -- like I'd expect a sophomore to look. Tuel has a tendency to lock on to receivers, missing wide-open reads and forcing throws into coverage. Keep in mind he's still young, but he needs to shore up some of these mistakes. On the plus side, we're three games in and Tuel has only thrown one interception, making a throw against MSU he had no business making.
- Something has got to give with the offensive line. Between whiffing on blocks, not being able to hold blocks and missing blitz pickups, it left Tuel with little time to throw and a running game that sputtered for much of the game. The Cougar running backs carried the ball 28 times for a paltry 66 yards, averaging 2.8 yards per carry. Just like the last two years, trying to establish the run is a futile effort.
- Protecting wide receivers is a point of emphasis this year, but the hit Deone Bucannon laid in the first quarter was not a penalty. The hit itself was clean -- he led with his shoulders/forearms and didn't hit head-high -- but may have been a step late. Still, I'd rather he lays the hammer than pulls up and plays scared. It was a bang-bang play and I loved the aggressiveness.
- Speaking of Bucannon, I'd love to see more of him in the backfield. He's young and may make mistakes, but he has a boatload of talent at safety. I know Chima Nwachukwu is a senior leader, but Bucannon has been pushing him since fall camp has begun and held his own against a potent SMU offense today. The kid needs to see the field.
- Casey Locker also had himself a nice game. The redshirt freshman had his name called quite a few times today and was all over the place in the defensive backfield. The future is bright in the Cougar secondary.
- Welcome back, linebackers. Myron Beck, Alex Hoffman-Ellis, Mike Ledgerwood and, of course, C.J. Mizell played admirably today. They wrapped up, made tackles and were all over the place on blitzes and in pass coverage.
- Marquess Wilson had his second game with 100 yards receiving. It's not just the yards, but how he's getting them. In the first half, Wilson went up and out-jumped a corner to haul in a pass from Tuel. Late in the fourth, he finally broke one, taking it 68 yards to the house. The man is a play-maker.
- Seven punts for 335 yards and an average of 47.6 yards per punt. Reid Forrest did more for his Heisman campaign today than Jake Locker.
- On the other side of the special teams coin, Nico Grasu shanked his only attempt of the day, a 27-yard chip shot. The false start before the kick served as the old self-icing the kicker for the Cougs. Some will wonder why WSU didn't kick the field goal twice in the fourth quarter. I'm guessing Grasu was still nursing his oblique strain and Wulff wasn't exactly confident in the kicker. In the end, it didn't matter too much.
- We covered the spread! Jeff and I were trying to figure out the last time this happened. Last year against USC, maybe? Sad that covering the spread is a big deal these days...
107 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Wolfgramm
great recap… I am feeling some optimism for sure after this game, especially about our defense. question: is wulfgramm eliglble/applying for an additional year?
No
He used 2008 as his redshirt year. In order to apply for a sixth year, he’d have to miss two full years to injury.
Monty?
Dang… I remember seeing that Monty was planning on applying for one at some point?
Sturdy
I can’t help but wonder what happened between his performance at Eastern and his work here, seems like an entirely different coach.
Had a jr high teacher named sturdivant..
Everyone called her sturdy turdy…and that’s all I can think about when I hear sturdy
by tclaus on Sep 18, 2010 8:00 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Couple things
First, maybe he is in over his head.
Second, the OL has been terrible until this year and they still are a year away. Gonzales and Fullington are young and need about 20 pounds. They need to find a solid center. They need more depth.
Third, Rogers, Lobbestael, Wagner, etc. probably are a tough group to “coach up”. Hopefully Lobbestael continues to gain some confidence because at some point we see him this year.
Fourth, Tuel looks the part but has less than 10 games as the starter. He’s young and probably can only handle so much.
So maybe Sturdy is awful or maybe there are reasons he plays things very conservative. I for one asked for a change to both coordinators last year and was instantly shot down so I’m not against a change. I am trying to understand what we and he is up against though. You don’t just suddenly forget how to coach and people have said he was very good at Eastern. So maybe the reason is talent and experience. Maybe it is just that he isn’t a Pac 10 coordinator.
Our issues with Sturdy go beyond giving Tuel "only so much"
It starts with the personnel groupings and extends to the play calls within those formations. It’s a joke.
by Jeff Nusser on Sep 19, 2010 12:26 PM PDT up reply actions
Just a quick note that is unrelated to the WSU/SMU game
In the Idaho/UNLV game the head ref is named Marvel July
That’s a totally badass name…
Cougar Football 2010: *FOCUSTENSITY!*
@JeffDCollier - PSN-Colltrain
That sounds like a Porn Star or a WWF Champion
perhaps a SuperHero?
by Kyle Rancourt on Sep 19, 2010 12:54 AM PDT up reply actions
We covered last year against
Cal, the Irish, and Oregon state late in the year I believe. I could be wrong but that is how I remember it.
by Cougars Hunt and Kill on Sep 18, 2010 8:16 PM PDT reply actions
We didn't lose by much to ASU.
CougCenter Formerly known as Dancing Football
Twitter!
by Craig Powers on Sep 18, 2010 8:52 PM PDT up reply actions
The biggest issue I have with Sturdy is we don't adjust/take advantage of what the defense is doing.
I don’t care if your entire game plan is based around deep post routes, if the other team is giving you a quick slant every play you take it until they stop it.
by Mark Sandritter on Sep 18, 2010 8:42 PM PDT reply actions
Exactly
Sturdy seems incapable of wavering from his initial gameplan. That is a sign of a poor coach. Our WR’s were abusing their DB’s all day. That is a mismatch that should have been exploited all afternoon.
not going to Karstetter
against that smaller DB more in the 2nd half was clearly a mistake. a good coordinator finds ways to keep abusing that mismatch
Have to agree
Sturdy needs to go. I think the rest of the staff could pull through, if they took play calling away from Sturdh for the rest of the year. Let Levy call the plays, Sturdy should have been replaced after last year. The last two weeks, the color guys have questioned him numerous times. This week was Mike Leech, who we all know can coach and last week it was Gesser, who I think may end up being a good coach as well. The things they point out are things the OC should be seeing. If Wulff is smart and wants to save his job, he needs to replace Sturdy and the end of the year may very well be too late.
After contemplating today's game over a plate of chicken nuggets and Halo Reach,
I’ve realized that I feel better after todays loss than last weeks win. Seems kind of backwards, but oh well. Today we showed that we do have the ability to hang with an FBS team. Final score was 35-21 but it just of easily could have been 38-35 in our favor without the missed FG and if we hadn’t stalled out in the red zone in the 4th. Either way, I’d call today a productive day for the team. My only question is how long it will take Sturdy to realize that when we were throwing the ball, we actually produced.
Cougar999 version 2.0. Now with a shorter name!
The question is
were they the Dinosaur chicken nuggets from Costco? Because those are the best chicken nuggets ever, and made up about 90% of my diet in college.
by Kyle Rancourt on Sep 19, 2010 12:57 AM PDT up reply actions
They were not.
That would require me to drive to Lewiston, which I don’t wanna do
Cougar999 version 2.0. Now with a shorter name!
I think they're at Safeway now, actually. I just hear chicken nuggets and my mind jumps

by Kyle Rancourt on Sep 19, 2010 1:16 AM PDT up reply actions
BEST. CHICKEN NUGGETS. EVER.
also, they’re dinosaur shaped. People always would look at me like I’m super weird when I bought them.
In case anyone is wondering, the brontosaurus is the best, because it’s the meatiest.
by Kyle Rancourt on Sep 19, 2010 12:40 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
i just racked up a million points on firefight
so i’m having a great day.
took me about 2 hours
but it was the highlight of my week.
I feel like I'm the only person NOT playing Halo.
I logged in last night at 1am and had EIGHT friends online, all playing Halo. At 1am, on a Friday night. I’m just glad I wasn’t the only one playing xbox so late.
by Kyle Rancourt on Sep 19, 2010 1:17 AM PDT up reply actions
OMG, "WULFF DESERVES CREDIT"
This website and it’s staff need to end the Wulff love affair. WSU just lost by 14 points to SMU. Please quit settling for failure. We lost to SMU, this is a University that just rebuilt a program from a grave and beat a pac 10 team soundly. I cant believe as a COUGAR that you would endorse failure over and over and over again. This loss is unecepatble.
So what part of this loss is placed on Wulff?
by Brian Floyd on Sep 18, 2010 10:10 PM PDT up reply actions
Last I remember Head Coaches were judged
By wins and losses. And we just lost to a program that has rebuilt themselves in one year far more than Wulff has rebuilt WSU in 3 years. When did Wulff get the one exception in the country where wins and losses don’t matter? As a football fan, I’ve never seen anything like the love affair of this website for such baby steps. We lost to a horrible football team that rebuilt themselves from the graveyard of football.
by DoubledownA on Sep 18, 2010 11:07 PM PDT up reply actions
I've seen teams win despite terrible coaching and teams lose despite good coaching...
So please present an argument on why this is on Wulff.
by Brian Floyd on Sep 18, 2010 11:08 PM PDT up reply actions
How bout this....
If they lose a bowl game…
by well you win some and lose others on Sep 18, 2010 11:51 PM PDT up reply actions
shhhhh.....he's on a roll
i want to see where this goes.
I don't think that there are many teams out there that win despite terrible coaching.
Damn, my eyeball tastes good.
While I'm not going to say in onboard with Paul Wulff
I’m still willing to give him credit where credit is due, and today credit is due. The team was prepared for the game. That’s his job. While I’m not going to say that he doesn’t have a role in play calling, it is not his primary thing during the games. The team looked prepared, and the only thing that really killed us was some stalling drives late and a bad 3rd quarter.
Cougar999 version 2.0. Now with a shorter name!
Even a blind squirel will find a nut
Your willing to praise Wulff for a 14 point loss raving of improvement, yet every 40 point loss is just time, stating the team is improving and Bill Doba left the shelves dry. I’m not going to get into detail…but to say Wulff deserves credit is just ridiculous. He desereves a pink slip.
by DoubledownA on Sep 18, 2010 11:11 PM PDT up reply actions
So you are saying that this team
didn’t look improved from the 1st two games?
"John, I was first team All-State. I can put the ball anywhere I want to. I'll make it rain out here." - Jeremy Grey
We played SMU?
When did this team become a powerhouse? last I saw they lost to WSU, just a season ago. To give Wulff “credit” for competing for a half is so ridiculous to me. I mean this team arose from a graveyard. We hung for a few quarters, great, but c’mon, this is SMU. I will hold on giving credit to Wulff until they actually can compete against legitamite credit. My tone is due to the fact that WULFF and CREDIT were the first words stated in you article. Sorry, I just find that as a farfetched statement. I mean you guys are willing to cut people down for making outlandish statements. Thats about as far as a stretch as I’ve seen. We did lose right?
by DoubledownA on Sep 18, 2010 11:20 PM PDT up reply actions
Did you stop reading?
Paul Wulff deserves credit for today. The Cougs lost but the team came out prepared and didn’t stumble out of the gates today. The emphasis on tackling in practice? It showed. WSU was mentally prepared for SMU and played sound, solid football for most of the game
You point out a win against SMU, but did you watch that game?
by Brian Floyd on Sep 18, 2010 11:23 PM PDT up reply actions
Unfortunately No, couldn't get the game at my hotel/bar
But we lost, and we lost to SMU. S M and U. Did they even exist when Wulff took the job here?
by DoubledownA on Sep 18, 2010 11:27 PM PDT up reply actions
I'm pretty sure they did.
and if you watched the game last year you’d know that we pretty much lost the game until their QB started throwing tons of picks in the 4th quarter. This year, we were competitive, and competitive against a team which did pretty well actually last year and won the Hawaii bowl. (which i think is why june jones still wore the leigh) Thats a helluva improvement over being pushed around by an FCS team until a 4th quarter come back last weak. More importantly, it was COMPETITIVE.
SMU lost their football program for two years in 1987 and 1988.
And it is not as if SMU is some tiny school. Their gross revenues are very close to that of WSU and they pay June Jones two million dollars a year.
CougCenter Formerly known as Dancing Football
Twitter!
by Craig Powers on Sep 19, 2010 7:19 AM PDT up reply actions
they had a four figure crowd yesterday
how is that possible?
and that crowd of four figures
has some serous deep pockets. I had a friend who went to SMU and he said most people that attend there are loaded (serious cashola) and there were hotties all over the place. He said the rich Texas farmers/ranchers would send their daughters there.
"John, I was first team All-State. I can put the ball anywhere I want to. I'll make it rain out here." - Jeremy Grey
Is this a serious question?
Did they even exist when Wulff took the job here?
They’ve only had a football team for about 100 years.
"A bad day at the track is better than a good day at the office."
by Matt Gardner on Sep 19, 2010 8:53 AM PDT up reply actions
i don't see anybody "raving"
settle your tone.
Even Leach admitted
that Wulff was in a uphill battle when he took over this program. We had APR scores that need to be fixed, troubled players and no NFL talent. It think June Jones took over a program (in the heart of Texas) that was not in as bad of shape. His 1-11 team was much different than our 1-11 team. Put SMU in the Pac10 and they wouldn’t look that good. They are in Conference-USA. I think a lot of people on this website are realist. You are not going to get a lot of basing on this site. There are other message boards for that. I would suggest reading the websites mission statement before taking pot shots at the website and using OMG.
"John, I was first team All-State. I can put the ball anywhere I want to. I'll make it rain out here." - Jeremy Grey
by SoCalCoug on Sep 18, 2010 11:09 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
I woke up this morning
and read my comment from last night. Boy was I tired last night. I butchered some words badly, forgot words and added words. I put basing instead of bashing. Sheesh…
"John, I was first team All-State. I can put the ball anywhere I want to. I'll make it rain out here." - Jeremy Grey
But it's mostly what I wanted to say.
Sure going 8-5 in year 2 is easier if you’re playing teams like Tulane, UTEP, and Memphis instead of USC, Oregon, and Stanford.
by Kyle Rancourt on Sep 19, 2010 12:43 PM PDT up reply actions
"This loss is unecepatble"
…so is your spelling ability.
Nobody is settling for failure and I don’t see today’s game as a failure.
What would you suggest? I’m curious.
by mmevans15 on Sep 18, 2010 11:23 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
I would suggest
You don’t compliment 3 years of consistant failure as progress. How many of us have jobs where we fail for 3 years and get reviews of positive improvement. Eventually there has to be progress. Losing by 14 to SMU doesn’t seem like something we should get excited about.
by DoubledownA on Sep 18, 2010 11:30 PM PDT up reply actions
fffeeeewwww.
I thought I actually was on a cougfan.com thread for a while. Yikes! This was like a bad dream.
"John, I was first team All-State. I can put the ball anywhere I want to. I'll make it rain out here." - Jeremy Grey
That's the best we've played
in 2 years. this is what we all wanted to see coming into this season. hater’s are going to hate regardless.
our D made more plays today than they have in just about all of Wulff’s previous games combined. Cougar football felt fun today for the first time in a long time. got away from us at the end but a good effort none the less.
The first half was really clean...
I thought the Cougs avoided a lot of the horrible mistakes and penalties that have killed the team recently. Like you said, it got away from them in the 2nd half (along with the questionable offensive play calls) but there were at least some things to like on both sides of the ball.
"A bad day at the track is better than a good day at the office."
by Matt Gardner on Sep 19, 2010 8:56 AM PDT up reply actions
To me it is obvious that Study is the problem
Mike Leach did his best not bash the play calling, but if he was off the record I think he would have been livid. There was holes all over SMU’s defense and they blitzed 70-80% of the time. Leach was drooling at what he could have done to that defense. From what I gathered from Leach he really liked Tuel (good high release & strong arm) and Wilson. It sure seemed like Leach was thinking how good he could run a offense with those two young guys. It seems like Sturdy has the entire game scripted and he does not waiver from that. I can understand the 1st (or 2nd) drive being scripted and then making adjustments. Everyone sees his play calling weakness. I am sure Wulff is starting to recognize it, but I don’t know if you can fire Sturdy or hand the duties over to Levy in the middle of the season. It could turn into a grease fire if you do that. Other than that I was happy with the progress today.
"John, I was first team All-State. I can put the ball anywhere I want to. I'll make it rain out here." - Jeremy Grey
Leach
was absolutely great on that broadcast. I agreed with about 99% of what he had to say.
It was wierd seeing Leach nervous
because he is usually so confident. The broadcast booth was out of his element, but he did a good job of assessing the game. He really showed Sturdy’s inexperience or lack of play calling talent.
"John, I was first team All-State. I can put the ball anywhere I want to. I'll make it rain out here." - Jeremy Grey
if you're looking to fill a head coaching job
and he’s not somewhere near the top of your list you’re crazy. he impressed me big time today. even when he was critical of the mistakes he seemed to say it in a positive way.
I am not ready to start speculating
because we kind of steer away from that around here. (I know you know what I am talking about) But I would be lying if I said that he has never crossed my mind. He even compliment the Palouse region during the telecast.
"John, I was first team All-State. I can put the ball anywhere I want to. I'll make it rain out here." - Jeremy Grey
Wherever Leach coaches next the band members need to be on alert.
“Throw that ball into the stands and hit the fat kid playing the tuba.”
by Mark Sandritter on Sep 19, 2010 12:00 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
I don't understand.
I think maybe we need a GIF of that to explain
Cougar999 version 2.0. Now with a shorter name!
Yaaaardsma has officially been typecasted
People are going to start being disappointed when your posts don’t have an awesome GIF in them. I guess that’s what happens when you’re this awesome…
Cougar Football 2010: *FOCUSTENSITY!*
@JeffDCollier - PSN-Colltrain
I guess I'm going to have to make more GIF's then.
I don’t think I’ve posted this ownage yet.

by Mark Sandritter on Sep 19, 2010 12:09 AM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
I miss him.
That was just beautiful.
"John, I was first team All-State. I can put the ball anywhere I want to. I'll make it rain out here." - Jeremy Grey
and BOOM goes the dynamite!
man took Gibson for granted, he was a beast! I miss the bad Idaho teams.
by Cougz4Life509 on Sep 19, 2010 12:15 AM PDT up reply actions
If I could GIF that I would.
If I find video of the game I’ll be sure to GIF that Paul Wulff bad taste look.
by Mark Sandritter on Sep 19, 2010 12:06 AM PDT up reply actions
That wasn't Gatorade
It was Vodka. Grey Goose. “Get you Goose on!” as Maurice Clarrett would say during Broncos training camp.
"John, I was first team All-State. I can put the ball anywhere I want to. I'll make it rain out here." - Jeremy Grey
That was a classic line.
I was waiting for him to say the Cougs need to stop hanging out “with their little girlfriends.”
"John, I was first team All-State. I can put the ball anywhere I want to. I'll make it rain out here." - Jeremy Grey
Correction
“fat little girlfriends”
"John, I was first team All-State. I can put the ball anywhere I want to. I'll make it rain out here." - Jeremy Grey
You must be mistaken...
You would think their girlfriends were in the row team.
by well you win some and lose others on Sep 19, 2010 12:11 AM PDT up reply actions
Good broadcast.
I thought the broadcast was pretty good overall, I guess I’m just used to the garbage of FSN. Did you guys hear Leach on Ian Furness on Friday?
by Cougz4Life509 on Sep 19, 2010 12:06 AM PDT up reply actions
Missed it.
I will have to catch it on podcast.
"John, I was first team All-State. I can put the ball anywhere I want to. I'll make it rain out here." - Jeremy Grey
3rd Quarter
Overall we were pretty competitive today, but the 3rd quarter really showed how this team has been affected by the last couple of seasons. It only took a couple of mistakes before we were playing like chickens with our heads cut off.
We cant have quarters like that anymore. Unfortunately, I think USC might come in next week and destroy whatever positive momentum this team has going for it, and then we’ll be back to square one. Next week is critical.
I don't agree completely with this assessment
The third quarter was bad, but I don’t think I saw what you saw. I saw SMU make adjustments, and I saw our defense a little behind the curve. But never, at any point, did I feel like they were having that, “Oh no, here we go again” look.
I know it felt like a lot, but it was “only” a 14-point quarter. I’d say they proved pretty resilient. But they just had small breakdowns here and there that led to some big plays. That’s where the inexperience shows. But otherwise, I thought they comported themselves very, very well.
Flagged
For use of the word “comportment” in a non-ironical way.
by TiltingRight on Sep 19, 2010 5:22 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
For the record
I said “comported” not “comportment.” ACCURACY!
by Jeff Nusser on Sep 20, 2010 10:12 AM PDT up reply actions
Flagged
for using a derivative of the word “comportment” in a non-ironical way TWICE!
by TiltingRight on Sep 21, 2010 8:54 AM PDT up reply actions
I'm sorry I didn't read the mission statement...
I just don’t get how COUGARS have come to judge the success of their program to how many points we lose by and the fact we actually performed once, for the first time under the Wulff regime, in the first quarter. I will leave you obviously much better fans than for greener pastures. Yet I know, when we finish 1 and whatever after the end of the year, you will all be singing my tune. Have fun judging the point value and losses
READ the mission statement?
hell, i think they should ADD this post to the mission statement.
i’ve never felt so served in my life….
by BigWood! on Sep 18, 2010 11:44 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Because if we judged ourselves by wins we would all be in padded rooms right now.
When this team is this bad, we have to judge ourselves with something and judging our self by the amount of wins we get is like judging a blind squirrel by the amount of nuts he picks up.
Cougar Football 2010: *FOCUSTENSITY!*
@JeffDCollier - PSN-Colltrain
Bottom line.
Was the outcome of the game good? No it sucked. Was there improvement from last week? Yes, quite a bit actually. No one is going around saying “Yay! we only lost by 14 give Wulff a 3-year extension.” The fact of it is Wulff is going to be here this season and as bad as it may seem, under Wulff this is probably the best we’ve played without the other team completely shitting the bed.
Weekly improvement is weekly improvement. There will be plenty of time over the next nine weeks and the offseason to rake Wulff’s coaching ability over the coals, but after today’s game Sturdy deserves the criticism more so than Wulff.
Just because a lot of people have become desensitized to losing have have ridiculously low expectations doesn’t mean they are Wulff apologists.
by Mark Sandritter on Sep 18, 2010 11:55 PM PDT up reply actions 5 recs
The first half
was the most fun half of cougar football I’ve watched since I don’t know when, but it’s been a while. We came out ready to play, tackled much better, and didn’t let the crowd get to us. The play calling was atrocious, Sturdy, running right up the middle on first and second down didn’t work, and Mike Leach giving his perspective just showed how bad it really was. I really did enjoy the improvement, since I watched the game, maybe that’s caused by low expectations, but being competitive and losing is much more fun that getting blown out.
by GHCoug on Sep 19, 2010 9:34 AM PDT up reply actions 3 recs
We are able to judge the Cougs besides wins and loses
because we actually watch the game, therefore we can access it.
"John, I was first team All-State. I can put the ball anywhere I want to. I'll make it rain out here." - Jeremy Grey
by SoCalCoug on Sep 18, 2010 11:55 PM PDT up reply actions 3 recs
Interesting... when we are worst off.
by well you win some and lose others on Sep 19, 2010 12:46 PM PDT reply actions
Well, there's your problem right there.
Reading the comment section at SeattleTimes.com is like asking for it.
by Kyle Rancourt on Sep 19, 2010 2:12 PM PDT up reply actions
Huskies are all over Seattle Times.
I am not surprised.
by well you win some and lose others on Sep 19, 2010 10:39 PM PDT up reply actions
Good analysis
Frustrating game considering the cougs were, as most have pointed out, prepared to play and there was intensity on the field. Unfortunately, as Brian points out, the adjustments were not made going into the second half and the game plan was a bit linear from both offensive and defensive coordinators. Wulff may require a 4th year, but he really needs to rethink his staffing decisions – because the cougs won’t be able to compete without having a dynamic game plan – you know – with half time adjustments focusing on exploiting your strengths (athletic receivers) and the opponents weaknesses (def secondary).
So give Wulff some amount of credit as well as the players – they obviously made progress. The play calling however….that needs to be addressed sooner than later.

by 



















