OFFENSIVE PLAYBOOK: Todd Sturdy Not Getting It Done
Before you read this, ask yourself what the strength of the Cougar offense is. Is it the tight ends and running backs? Is it the wide receivers? The offensive line? What part of the Cougar offense should we emphasize every game?
The answer to the above questions should be simple for anyone that's seen this year's version of the Cougar offense. The skill lies at the wide receiver position. Thus far, the line is struggling and the Cougar running backs have yet to establish a consistent running game. When Rickey Galvin broke his arm on his first carry of the year, the Cougars lost their explosive, big-play threat on the ground. Instead of changing it up, Sturdy and the offense continue to pound the ball into running lanes that don't exist instead of getting the ball to the playmakers on offense.
The playcalling is easy to criticize in football. No matter what happens, fans will have an issue with how games are called when the offense is sputtering. The Cougar playcalling has been bad, but look beyond just the plays to find the root of the problem.
The Cougs are not a power team, yet the packages the offense continues to run out are centered on a power running game. The double tight end set is a staple of the Sturdy offense, with one usually playing as a wing. We knew that coming it, but the hope was they'd spread the field more with the talent at wide receiver.
When the offense comes out with two tight ends, one running back and two wide receivers, the defense can compact itself into the middle of the field, taking away running lanes and clogging the middle. The offensive line and tight ends simply aren't good enough to run it up the gut in these situations.
So we've identified the wide receivers are the strength and that running out jumbo sets isn't working two years into the Todd Sturdy experience. Add it all up and we have a solution. Spread the field. With Jared Karstetter, Marquess Wilson, Isiah Barton, Gino Simone, Daniel Blackledge and Jeffrey Solomon, the Cougar offense has the depth and talent at receiver to run out three- and four-wide sets. If the defense doesn't respect it, the Cougs can easily get the ball out wide. If they do, it takes players out of the box and opens up the running game. Either way, it plays to the Cougar strengths.
Now, we move to the playcalling. Against SMU, the playcalling simply didn't take advantage of the weaknesses of the Mustang defense. SMU plays the run fairly well but has been susceptible to the pass. The Mustangs sport a secondary without a player over six feet tall. In fact, with Sterling Moore out, SMU rolled out a 5'8 corner on one side and a 5'9 corner on the other. Marquess Wilson is 6'3 and Jared Karstetter is 6'4. Do the math.
In addition to the obvious height advantage, SMU loves to blitz. They brought pressure right up the middle most of the day against the Cougs and typically blitz seven out of ten times. To counter that, WSU left tight ends in pass protection instead of simply getting the ball out. Taking players out of the pattern may have helped with protection, but it also made coverage easier and severely limited the options for Jeff Tuel.
Countering blitzes up-the-gut should be simple. Swing the ball out to to receivers using jailbreak and bubble screens or let the SMU players come and throw a running back screen. At one point in the second half, Tuel had James Montgomery on a screen that should've gone for a big gain, only to overthrow him. Nevertheless, the screen was there all day.
Finally, when the offense did run screens out-wide, they were done in head-shaking fashion. After begging for a screen, we finally got one, only to see a wide receiver screen run out of a jumbo set with an offensive lineman pulling to block. The playcall and formation lead everyone -- including the CBS College Sports commentators -- to wonder what the heck Sturdy was thinking.
We're all worried about the offensive line and whether or not they can protect Tuel in the passing game. That doesn't mean that our fears -- and the fears of the coaches -- should stop WSU from trying to throw the ball. If the line can't hold blocks long enough for Tuel to throw deep, then come out of the blocks with short routes and screens.
Throwing out of a three-step drop or catching and throwing out of the shotgun negates the deficiencies of the offensive line. It protects the quarterback and quickly gets the ball to the Cougar playmakers. Run some slants against corners playing off. Throw outside screens to receivers and quick screens to the running backs. Plays like these serve as a high percentage pass-play that's almost like running the ball.
Is there an easy fix here? Probably not. Calling for Sturdy to be fired isn't it. Taking away the playcalling duties may do some of it, but the fundamental philosophy implemented over the last two years and emphasized in camp would also have to be changed on the fly. The system is flawed and broken at its root and, barring a massive change that will likely result in growing pains, can't be fixed in a matter of days.
At this point, the coaching staff is dancing with the girl they brought. Throughout the spring, WSU had a small number of capable receivers and installed the scheme accordingly. It sure looks like they think they can win as a power team. They can't. The talent isn't there to do it. The sooner they realize this, the sooner they can work to correct it.
Unfortunately, without a bye -- and, in fact, two byes in a row -- until the end of the season, it seems unlikely we'll see a wholesale change. Instead, the best we can probably hope for is a gradual shift toward a more spread-oriented offense.
43 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Blaming the play calling is easy.
But I’ve got a question for you: Do you really think the game plan (and hence, the play calling) is done without the input and buyoff of the head coach? I agree that there might be someone better than Sturdy. It’s just as likely that the head guy has made a decision, and is requiring that Sturdy work within the confines Wulff has established.
Yes, working from the gun and utilizing quick releases works – until the defense adjusts and either backs off the blitz, or steps up and takes the quick throws away. At that point, the offense you’re advocating exacerbates the biggest weakness the Cougs have. The line. It’s also by no means a given that Tuel has the ability to make the pre-snap reads required to do what you’re saying, or that he can make his progressions quickly enough. Maybe he can. As good as your receivers are at catching the ball, their biggest collective weaknesses are speed and strength. Forcing defenses to press the Cougs’ receivers (the natural counter to the quick passes you suggest) plays away from their strengths.
What you suggest might be the plan that works. It might also be the recipe for seeing a lot of your backup QB. After a few weeks, I’m sure someone would post about how James Montgomery, Mitz, and the rest of the Coug running backs were languishing on the sidelines while the new OC’s spread attack got the QB’s pounded….
Mike Williams was not a speed receiver with USC
but was a great receiver off screens because no corner could tackle him. Karstetter and Kristoff Williams seems like they could be tough to bring down one-on-one against a corner. And I’m sorry Wilson will be good at anything.
by dertingfactor on Sep 20, 2010 1:15 PM PDT up reply actions
Quick passes actually plays to the strengths...
If 5’8" DBs press our WRs it is game over for the defense. Plus that’s not even taking into the screen that was there all day and would have kept the defense honest. I watched the game on Saturday and felt like we were actually a lot better than SMU. I am not sure if anyone else got that feeling. They just kept blitzing our line and in return we did not answer with anything to keep them honest. We simply cannot be predictable, and I think this article accurately highlights that weakness on Saturday.
This..
Yes, working from the gun and utilizing quick releases works – until the defense adjusts and either backs off the blitz, or steps up and takes the quick throws away.
And at that point you adjust. I’m not advocating moving to a strictly short-passing offense. I’m advocating using it as a set-up to start with. If the defense backs off and the corners press, that still plays into strengths. The line doesn’t have to deal with blitzes and the receivers are strong enough to get off a jam.
As good as your receivers are at catching the ball, their biggest collective weaknesses are speed and strength. Forcing defenses to press the Cougs’ receivers
Disagree with this. Different receivers have different strengths. Wilson and Barton are quick, Karstetter is strong and Simone is a shifty possession receiver when healthy.
I don’t think you’re going to find us complaining about a run-game that has been non-existent for the last two years. Wasting plays by continuing to pound the ball into the teeth of the defense simply isn’t working.
I don’t think you’re going to find us complaining….
My point is that, unless any change leads to more wins, fans will find something to complain about if all it leads to is a new way to lose.
And that’s the issue. Not winning enough.
I understand the points you are making. And, they’re valid. But really, you’re saying that the offense absolutely needs to stay one step ahead of the defense on every single play. That’s just not possible. Defenses are going to guess right enough times, and any offense can do any of a number of things to stop itself on any given play. If you’re constantly just going to try to out-adapt, you’ll 1. Never really be able to be good at anything, and 2. You’re going to end up right were you started from at some point, anyway. At some point, the easiest way to mitigate youth, inexperience and lack of talent is to allow your team to outexecute the opposition instead of outscheme it.
The bigger issue to me is how the plays are run. What sets are they run from and what personnel groupings are on the field? Running the same play out of a another package could have very different results.
This is a great point. This is the sort of stuff that I’d be looking for far more than a more wholesale change in offensive approach.
It's not necessarily out-adapt
It’s simply changing the philosophy behind the offense. Use short, quick routes to get the ball out and get rid of the constant use of the jumbo sets that the staff loves so much. At the same time, it’s a big change for the offense.
So really I don’t look at it as playing a cat-and-mouse with the defense. Instead, I look at it as using high percentage pass play instead of power run plays.
I don't think any of the authors are advocating for wholesale changes
We’re advocating for being smarter about using what we’ve got. It’s not a major shift to run basic slants, counters, toss sweeps and screens more often to exploit what the defense is going to give you.
B-b-but!
Its in a different menu in NCAA!
The K is special
by J.J. FeKl on Sep 20, 2010 3:13 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
I really wish they had a "Favorite Plays" menu.
I think all of us have those 3-4 plays that are our Go-To plays when we need yards, and a few trick plays we love to use as well. I can’t audible into the wildcat if I have a different formation. Plus, I use a WR/KR/PR as my Wildcat QB.
by Kyle Rancourt on Sep 20, 2010 3:50 PM PDT up reply actions
It's a decent sized shift to change the packages and plays
And, depending on how far it’s taken, it means installing a new offense. It seems easy on paper, but when they’ve drilled this for six months, it looks like a bigger change.
Well, most of what I'd like to see, they've already shown
They’ve shown they have screens. They’ve shown they have counters and toss sweeps. They’ve shown they have formations other than the double tight, power I. Yet, they seem to rarely use them on unpredictable downs, if at all.
I think my biggest issue
with the strategy of “Out-executing”as opposed to “out Scheming” our opponents is that our offense does not have the players to execute a Power scheme. Monty is not the power back he once was, and that is to be expected. We do not have good offensive lineman. On any given snap our tackles are 275 lbs and the interior guys are far from giant world beaters.
However, we do have the talent to execute a different scheme, and become very good at that scheme and eventually Out-Execute a team. Especially on offense, a scheme should constantly look to exploit positive mismatches and hide the negative ones. This is simply not what we are doing, and making the players run plays opposite of their skillsets is setting them, and by extension the rest of the team, up for failure. If they can recruit the guys necessary to run the system they are looking to run (they haven’t and likely won’t) then so be it. Or they could tweak their system to fit the sizeable amount of young talent they have recruited and oh, I don’t know, maybe win a game for once.
by Fightfightfight on Sep 20, 2010 3:36 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
It's not just the playcalling in terms of plays run
The bigger issue to me is how the plays are run. What sets are they run from and what personnel groupings are on the field? Running the same play out of a another package could have very different results.
Yes, I agree the head coach does have input on the gameplan, but I can’t really quantify how much input Wulff has on the gameplan on either side of the ball. It’s not like he’s the same kind of coach as Pete Carroll, Steve Sarkisian or some of our past coaches, where you could tell what they got their hands in. I really don’t know how much Wulff has to do with it.
Because of this, I get the sense that he's delegated most of this to Sturdy
No hard evidence. Just a sense I have.
He's supposedly good friends with Sturdy,
and may simply trust his judgment. Even if Wulff has reservations, if Sturdy is firm in his belief about “establishing the run” or “max protect on pass”, you can make good arguments for both, and you have to either trust your OC to do the job required, or part ways after the 1st, 2nd, 3rd game of the season, which I just don’t see happening.
by TiltingRight on Sep 21, 2010 1:12 AM PDT up reply actions
Somebody has been watching too much Cougar Football
and is stuck thinking that we have to do the same thing offensively over and over, despite the other teams adjustments and changes. This is simply not the case.
We run the ball on first and second down, and then are forced into a 3rd and long and are forced to pass. This is a recipe for disaster. We do this despite being behind, despite it never working, despite it accentuating our weaknesses and hiding our strengths. I can’t believe that you would be against this plan because the defense might have to adjust and stop pinning their ears back. THAT IS THE FUCKING POINT! Slow down the blitz (And possibly even alter another teams game plan, wouldn’t that be a nice change) and make them try and cover our very talented receivers. I am struggling to see how you feel that slowing their blitz and making them play coverage is going to lead to seeing our backup qb’s, being as logic says that it will do the opposite.
Our receivers are good at catching the ball, and the biggest reason for that is that they are bigger and stronger than a lot of DB’s, especially Karstetter and WIlson. Barton is a load, and Simone would destroy zone coverage as his greatest skill is finding the hole in the zone. The issue with our passing game is that Tuel usually has a defender draped around him when he is throwing.
Our running game is abysmal, and is the opposite of a deterrent to blitzing. If I were a DC I would blitz the cougs every damn play, because if we are running the ball that blitz will LIKELY end in a TFL. We simply cannot man up and run down people’s throats because we are scared of sacks. We NEED to beat the blitz with our passing game, or else they will continue to send the house without fear of getting beat.
by Fightfightfight on Sep 20, 2010 1:31 PM PDT up reply actions
Way too many 3rd and longs...
…for a QB that’s having a relatively solid day
Sturdy has to be removed.
It is amazing that in a scheme that is supposed to spread the field and be dynamic. The first half of the SMU game looked like we were a 2.8 yards and a cloud of dust team. I mean the play calls were run, run, pass, run, run, pass. Not a lot of imagination and adjustments being made. Floyd you are right in that we did not recognize enough that we could exploit their short DB’s heck we couldn’t recognize it enough to make any kind of adjustments at all. As much as it killed me to have to listen to Leach commentate you could tell in the tone of his voice that he could not believe that we could not run our offense better. Leach by the way could be a pretty good candidate for PW’s replacement.
I do have to say that on defense we may have given up some points and yards but we sure looked like we had some passion for once and we did not give up.
If this continues through the season...
…but I think he’ll abandon it at some point if it continues to struggle.
We need to realize that this is the first year under Wulff that we have a QB and receiver combo that makes this discussion possible.
by dertingfactor on Sep 20, 2010 1:30 PM PDT up reply actions
Obviously the playcalling needs to evolve to fit the strengths of the team
and what the defense is showing, but to me, and to those that listened to Leach commentate; the main thing to take from this game is the cougs now have a swagger throwing the football, a QB that has gained some kind of confidence from the MSU game, and talent to back it up. It seems the team has the pieces for a very exposive passing game, with an upside that might be better than ever.
Whether Wulff, Sturdy, and co. figure it out is another story, but to me, I sleep comfortably knowing Tuel and the receiving corps have a high likelihood to lead us back to the bowl-picture. Just not this year.
by dertingfactor on Sep 20, 2010 1:43 PM PDT up reply actions
This is the point I wanted to make as well.
How nice is it to actually have enough talent to where a discussion on scheme is actually relevant? It’s been a couple years.
CougCenter Formerly known as Dancing Football
Twitter!
by Craig Powers on Sep 20, 2010 1:44 PM PDT up reply actions
And it's mainly due to someone who should still be in High School.
Never thought a 17-year old might save Wulff’s job.
by dertingfactor on Sep 20, 2010 1:48 PM PDT up reply actions
"but I think he’ll abandon it at some point if it continues to struggle."
Do you have any evidence whatsoever that he’s willing to abandon anything, ever? Other than ditching the no-huddle offense?
Leach for OC
Bring him in now! Seriously though, he needs to lose the play calling ability, he can have input, but let Levy have final decision. I think Sturdy can do more good just being on the sideline coaching Tuel. Levy does have a couple young receivers, but there are several upper classment who can help them out. I think it would be better to put Levy in the booth and put Sturdy on the field. Not something that is totally unheard of. Wulff needs to realize what is best for the team, not what is best for Sturdy.
I actually would have called to have Sturdy removed
Wulff is fighting for his job at this point and if he wants Sturdy and his play calling to take him down because he wants to be loyal to his coaches, so be it. I like Wulff though, it took me about 2 years to realize that but I don’t want Sturdy to take down Wulff which is exactly what is happening. If Sturdy cannot figure out his own strengths on his own offensive by now then that says a lot about what kind of coach he is…..horrible.
If Wulff does not want to fire him in season, fine, then strip him of his play calling duties and take over yourself or hand them off to Levy who I am sure would have no problem getting the ball into the hands of his receivers. Weren’t we promised when Wulff was hired that he and Sturdy would have a spread, no huddle offense, not some Big Ten power running game that doesn’t even fit our personnel.
The defense came out w/ altered looks
and they had more early success than we, as fans have seen in some time. SMU clearly was expecting the 4 man front and when the Cougs were alternating between 3/4 and 4/3 you could see Pardon checking off. We forced their hand by altering what we were doing.
The O has to take not of this. Sturdy simply has to recognize where his mismatches are and take advantage of them. The WR size advantage was obvious… it should have been exploited. /The nose tackle in the SMU 3-4 cheated his lanes all day and we never ran a QB sneak or a quick hitter to the obvious open gap- be it 1 or 2 hole- depending on the side of the NT’s cheat. Any time, 1st or 2nd and mid to short yardage, the NT isn’t head up on Zach you must take advantage. This is simple recognition. Zack and Tuel need to develop a short hand to seize these opportunities and Sturdy must give them the option to do so. We used to call it ‘go’ play- and Samoa Samoa, Clete Casper, Ricky Turner and even Jack Thompson were quite adept at taking what the D gave them. It is incumbant on the O Coor. to take care of this recognition for the young guys who may or may not grasp it just yet. After all, Tuel and Zack have all of 3 games together over center. Take what they give you- run slants and flat screens early to freeze the LB’s and give yourself time to see what the D is doing. Force their hand for a change… that is Sturdy’s job. Not Wulff’s.
If you can't Go Cougs... don't go.
here's one of the many struggles and challenges we face...
Let me start by saying that I have zero confidence in Sturdy’s playcalling and his lack of adjustments being made and feel we would be 10x better with Levy calling plays.
But to play devil’s advocate on this one: our defense gets worn down relatively quickly when we are stuck on the field all game. The unfortunate thing about our passing game is although we possess a whole lot of raw talent, its still very inconsistent. This can result in quite a few 3-and-outs taking up less than a minute of clock time. Not only does it leave our D hanging, but it keeps their D refreshed every series without taking any type of pounding from our bigs. This allows them to tee off on us in pass rush/blitzes.
Secondly, and maybe this is more reason to go 4 wide more often, but I don’t think its a matter of schemes that we are getting manhandled at the line (which only gives Tuel 1 or 2 seconds to make reads and/or pass progressions). Blitz or no blitz, if our OL cannot pickup their assigned pass rusher, Tuel is going to be crushed and not have time to do anything. The reality of it – is most teams could go to a 3 man front and still get solid pressure on Tuel.
I’m surprised this hasn’t been mentioned, but even Coach Leach made note of this when he was commentating. I think we should go back to some old film and take a long look at moving the pocket for Tuel. He’s more mobile than Brink and the extra second or two will buy him time to make his progressions and allow the young and talented WR crew to stretch the field and/or find spots in the zone to sit down in.
by LeaveItToWeaver on Sep 20, 2010 3:24 PM PDT reply actions
Both your first and second points can be negated
Like we’ve been saying, use quick, high-percentage pass plays. They’re almost exactly like an outside run play. It protects the quarterback and the plays don’t lend themselves to quick three-and-outs. Instead of diving into the middle of the formation, I’m advocating throwing a jailbreak or bubble screen. Think of it as a toss sweep where the toss is more like 20 yards instead of a flip.
This is where I wonder why we're not running shotgun more
If the offensive line is having that much trouble, giving Tuel the extra second that would provide would seem to be helpful. It also obviously helps in terms of the sorts of pass plays your advocating in that the QB is already set up and not try to drop, get set, and make an accurate throw.
I assume we're not running more shotgun because Williams snaps have been very poor.
by Mark Sandritter on Sep 20, 2010 3:41 PM PDT up reply actions
classic example
of easier said than done!
If you can't Go Cougs... don't go.
by hollyweirdcoug on Sep 20, 2010 6:28 PM PDT up reply actions
Really?
I was a center in high school. It’s not that hard to snap the ball — either under center or in shotgun. Just takes some practice.
When he was showing us how to update the Recruiting Central page
he used himself as an example. I’m pretty sure this is the ace up Wulff’s sleeve.
by Kyle Rancourt on Sep 21, 2010 11:26 PM PDT up reply actions
come on Nuss
I was all state in HS and when I got there it was a whole new world of stellar guys, bigger faster, stronger and the responsibilities were mind boggling in comparison to HS. That is quite a simplistic take for a guy of your obvious acumen.
There is a reason Eynheart has scouts looking at him. He is a specialist, a pure long snapper. It is far from simple to be a center in NCAA ball. When you were in HS you didn’t have a 300 pound NT ready cave your head in on each snap. I doubt you were calling splits and signally gap blitzes too. You hadn’t been switched from LG to center w/ 3 weeks to go in fall camp. Like I said, easier said than done. He is improving, but you see examples of the shot gun snap hurting teams frequently in college games… it isn’t simple.
If you can't Go Cougs... don't go.
by hollyweirdcoug on Sep 21, 2010 12:09 PM PDT up reply actions
Don't misunderstand me
I’m not saying it’s easy or simple. I’m aware of the increased level of challenge at the college level. I’m just saying it’s something a college-level athlete ought to be able to do with some degree of competency with practice.
(And I think you know that comparing a deep snap — which I couldn’t master for the life of me — to a shotgun snap isn’t really valid.)
I've snapped shotgun snaps
did it exclusively for one season because we ran the spread. I actually find it easier than a normal snap, for the simple reason that you don’t have to make sure the QB has it before you can take off.
However, if the center is struggling with it for whatever reason, then we absolutely cannot run the shotgun. He should be able to lock it down soon, but until he does it is asking for disaster, and that is something that we create quite enough of already.
by Fightfightfight on Sep 21, 2010 10:52 PM PDT up reply actions
Were you hiking to Ryan Johnson?
That guy was like 5’6" … I can’t imagine that was easy.
I feel like Charlie Brown trying to kick the football. Ugh
You still missed the biggest plus
Field vision. With a young quarterback, setting him back in the gun and giving him a broad view, both pre- and post-snap would be a huge benefit.

by 


















