RECAP: A Few Thoughts On Last Night
First, a personal note. We, as writers at CougCenter, lay ourselves on the line with our work. We put a lot of thought and effort into our writing in an effort to give you, the readers, as much information and analysis as possible. Please keep discussions civil and on-topic here. After a bad loss, the last thing any of us want is a free-for-all of "Fire Wulff" comments. I know things get heated in game-threads -- and that's fine -- but when the game is over don't bring it elsewhere on the site.
That sucked. It took everything I had to not launch into a long, profanity-laced tirade after the game. It was bad. I'm not going to lie to you and say everything will be fine. I just don't know if that's the case.
Here are some random thoughts from the game. Take from it what you will.
- How many times did we see a linebacker step up in the hole, only to get run over and dragged down the field? They were in the right places, but they couldn't do a thing to stop Kendall Hunter or OSU.
- Remember this? Replace Golden Tate with Justin Blackmon. Blackmon won what seemed like every 50/50 ball. Jump balls in the end-zone, deep balls over the middle, everything. I was high on the corners. I really like Nolan Washington and Anthony Carpenter. They're redshirt freshmen and they showed it last night.
- Want a bright spot? His name is C.J. Mizell. He isn't assignment sound, but it doesn't matter. At one point, he missed a tackle, got back up, chased down the running back and threw him down with one hand. Only one other player -- Myron Beck -- showed anything worthwhile in the linebacking corps. Let Mizell figure it out on the field. At least he'll hit somebody.
- Speaking of Beck, the senior snuffed out a screen play early-on, drilling Kendall Hunter so hard that he knocked out Sekope Kaufusi in the process. Normally I'd be worried about an injury to one of our guys. Instead, I couldn't stop laughing.
- I thought Chantz Staden was a third-down back. I think I thought wrong. Staden was hitting the hole and finding the second-level with relative ease at times yesterday. He's quickly making a case for more time in the backfield.
- Before the half, Tyree Toomer stepped up in the hole at the goalline in an effort to stop Kendall Hunter. He bounced off. I thought "Damn I miss LeAndre Daniels" at that moment.
- Inside of the defensive line: good. Outside of the defensive line: bad. I'll explain this more later.
- Jeff Tuel did not look good. He made the right reads, but couldn't make the throws. I can't be sure why from a mental standpoint, but his mechanics were off. He wasn't driving on his throws, leading to balls sailing on him. The announcers said the balls were sailing because he was throwing into the sun. This is where I remind you that announcers are stupid.
- Which leads me to the offensive line. I get the feeling Tuel got happy feet and was scared for his life in the "pocket". I say "pocket" because there wasn't one. The line simply could not block and it lead to a quarterback resorting to crap mechanics, throwing off his back foot and sailing balls left and right. They are what we thought they'd be. Again, I'll go into this more later.
- Marquess Wilson is everything we'd hoped and probably more. I couldn't be more happy with what I saw from him. One problem we don't have is in the receiving corps.
- Isiah Barton also gets his own bullet point. With Gino Simone out (side note: it took me three quarters to realize he was out. That's how pissed I was at the start), Barton stepped-in and stepped his game up. He was running free in the secondary many times, but Tuel dimply couldn't find him. When he did get his hands on the ball, he was steady and consistent.
- Where was the no-huddle? Who cares. For whatever reason, the Cougs didn't use the no-huddle offense yesterday. A no-huddle wouldn't have done anything. I know we all -- including myself -- expected to see it, but it really wouldn't have made a difference. In fact, it probably would've made things worse.
- I'm curious to see how the rest of Kendall Hunter's season goes. I know he shredded us, but I get the feeling he's a damn good back. Yes, he made the Cougs look like a JV defense, but he really is a powerful back.
- John Fullington probably just won the starting job. With Micah Hannam unable to anchor the right side of the line, Fullington stepped in and was a nice upgrade. He did get burned at times -- and I'd expect a freshman offensive lineman to -- but he showed why the coaches are so high on him.
- With the game still somewhat close, the Cougs called a fake field goal, running the option with Reid Forrest pitching to Nico Grasu. It was a great playcall, but Nico Grasu came up a yard short. Nico Grasu is definitely not the fastest guy on the squad.
- Reid Forrest is still amazing.
- Rickey Galvin and Jared Byers are both likely done for the year. Galvin broke his wrist on a freak play, landing awkwardly while going down. Byers took a helmet straight to the knee and saw his leg move in a direction it really wasn't supposed to. Thanks for showing the replays multiple times, FSN.
17 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The most important thing to remember
is that a loss is a loss whether its by 101 or just 1. Were 0-1 not 0-12. 0-1 just like UW, OSU, and UCLA. Hopefully we just bury the hatchet on this loss and start the season over next week.
I wish..
I had read your analysis first, Brian. It would have saved me the consternation of sifting through the emotional rants prevailing elsewhere. I won’t make that mistake again.
…we could get some decent live media coverage on the “wet” side. I live in Lynnwood, 20 miles from downtown Seattle, and get spotty reception on both 1380am and 1300am radio stations. 1380 cut away before the game was over to cover the class A Everett Aquasox. And good old FSN cut over to the Mariners game before the final whistle, too. Had this been a reasonably competitive game, this could have been disastrous.
…we could all be in Pullman for the home opener. I’ll be there.
Cheers and Go Cougs
Thanks, I appreciate it a ton.
I’ll be there in Pullman, too. Looking forward to it, believe it or not.
Its gonna be my 21st birthday on Saturday
And I’ll be in the Student section! please cougs, I need a win! I have to have something to smile about on my bar run!
For what it is worth ...
… Wilson looks like the most exciting young player to come around Pullman in a long time. What happened to Simone last night?
Damn, my eyeball tastes good.
I'll be there for Montana State
Excellent recap—with a little help I’ve talked myself off the ledge. This is college football, hope abounds!
Go Cougs
I'm glad they didn't use the no-huddle
Not that it mattered much yesterday, but with a team so young getting everyone together to get on the same page seems like a good idea to me.
I’d like to see them stick with a huddle at least until we show we can put together a string of drives during a game.
Good recap
That game definitely fit my description of worst case scenario, but at the same time, I did see flashes of talent that appeared slightly more developed from last year. We still aren’t consistent, and the lack of depth is definitely still killing us, but as stated, this is college football, and we do have some talent that can pull us out of this seemingly bottomless pit we’ve been tossed into. don’t let the past drag you down, and start thinking about next week
I disagree ona few points.
The OL definitely exceeded my expectations, at least in pass blocking. Maybe that is because I watched them a lot in practice when they were shuffling around, but they were BAAADDD in practice and I thought the protection was decent last night. Tuel had a little Matt Hasslebeck (the bad) in him last night, in that he was so used to pressure and running for his life that he would quickly roll out instead of stepping up in the pocket.
I thought our defense was schemed poorly during the first half especially. We ran a LOT of 3 DL sets, which is a good scheme for the air raid but a horrible scheme against an All American friggin freight train. Further. I question our coaches thinking that the 3 DL would be a good decision at all considering our personnel. With the injuries in the secondary and the coach expressed strength of the DL, I feel we should have had 4 DL for the majority of the game, especially when it became wildly apparent who their horse is.
I understand looking at their OC and scheming for what he has shown in the past. However, it appears that they did not take a look at the OSU roster and find its strengths. It had an All American running back and a QB who hasn’t started a game in a decade. It is not exactly hard to realize that they are going to run the ball. Once they gashed us with it (or after like the tenth time they gashed us with it) our backers and db’s were so worried about the run that any play action would send all 11 of our guys to the RB and easy receptions ensued.
Even still, our players were often in a position to make plays and just simply couldn’t make them. A lot of the touchdown passes were covered excellently, but no plays on the ball were made. We made contact near the line of scrimmage on several of the biggest runs, but 4 broken tackles later Kendall is walking into the end zone. Something has got to be done about the tackling, if we brought them down at first (or even second) contact consistently the Cougs are in that game in the 4th quarter.
The darkest spot for me was the lack of production from Montgomery. I was under the impression that he was at or near 100%, and if he was then I have some serious questions.
That's the whole "first game" thing
It really is just a guessing game. Sure, you can look at their roster, but even then, you’re guessing. The best thing you can do is go according to that playcaller’s tendencies. New offensive coordinator, new QB, new/old RB … it’s just guessing. That won’t be the case from here on out.
I agree on Montgomery. Iffy.
I'm not worried about monty.
We got behind so quickly that we had no chance of establishing the running game. When he had a hole he seemed to hit it fairly well. It is too bad we couldn’t have played OSU after MSU and SMU. Tough opening game for a bunch of 18 and 19 year olds.
by Cougars Hunt and Kill on Sep 5, 2010 3:56 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
did anyone go to the memorial?
If so, it certainly puts the game’s outcome in perspective.
Damn, my eyeball tastes good.
by Gekko Mojo on Sep 5, 2010 4:27 PM PDT via mobile reply actions
I'd like to bring a does of reality to your last paragraph, with all due respect Mr. Floyd.
As a die hard Coug who has been displaced and unable to fallow this team for a couple seasons due to some unavoidable circumstances, I was able to watch the game last night from a fairly objective point of view. I’ve not watched either of those teams play, and don’t know very many names on the Cougs current roster. But I can tell you this; this team is bad right now.
Yes, they have the potential to improve as the season progresses, but his team is bad. I would challenge you to look into how many teams in the past few years have lost a football game by that kind of margin, and not been “bad.”
I appreciate your approach and the fact that writers here aren’t blowing the place up, but as I sat at lunch today with my family (in Lawton, OK) I over heard a 12 year old girl in the booth next to me describe in detail why she felt Washington State University was probably the “second worst team in the nation,” it occured to me that I couldn’t even defend them from her. Why? Because she was right. Not necessarily about being the second worst team in the nation, but that they are a very bad football team.
I’ve heard many people talk about how all they want to see is progress, and I’ll ask you this; did you see progress last night? That is the issue at hand for this program. Because a loss of that magnitute says a lot about the state of a program. Especially when it isn’t an oddity anymore. For all the talk about things moving in the right direction, last night provided a common result. So I’ll ask again, did you see progress?
For a guy who claims not to know a whole lot about this current team
you sure do have a strong opinion.
Also, I’m not sure you realize that it’s a long process to rebuild. It doesn’t happen overnight.
by Kyle Rancourt on Sep 5, 2010 11:13 PM PDT up reply actions
would you prefer that i have a weak opinion?
What would be the point in having an opinion at all of it wasn’t strong?
And yes, I know plenty about how long it takes to rebuild a program, and it had nothing to do with my previous comment.
by Jo-Jo on Sep 6, 2010 6:36 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Good you have you back, Jo-Jo
Make sure to tell an Oklahoman that while their team might have beaten ours, they’re still dumb and smelly.

by 












