WSU Vs. Oregon State: Cougs Turn In A Completely Unacceptable Effort
For Cougar fans, I think there was a range of acceptable results of last night's game between WSU and Oregon State. Some of them probably even included a Washington State loss.
Crapping the bed, though, to the tune of a 44-21 beatdown? Which, if we were honest, wasn't even remotely that close?
Unacceptable. Just completely, utterly, totally unacceptable.
One of the things about the Seattle Game is that it's a showcase event for the university. AD Bill Moos gets to glad-hand with donors on the west side of the state for the entire week leading up to the contest. It's a chance for President Elson Floyd to gain precious exposure for his institution in the state's largest media market. And it's an opportunity for the largest concentration of alumni who don't otherwise make it over to Pullman for games to finish a day of events with a chance to see the team play in person.
You simply cannot cap all of that with what we were forced to witness last night. As I left the stadium -- with seven minutes to go in the game, I might add -- all I could think is, "Why do I even bother? Why am I even here?" Oddly, it was the exact same feeling I had two years earlier when I left the Hawaii game early, too.
These, apparently, are questions that other WSU alums had already asked themselves: Of the 49,219 who were in attendance at CenturyLink Field, perhaps 10,000 were Oregon State fans. A conference game taking place smack dab in the middle of 80,000 WSU alumni couldn't draw more than 40,000 or so fans. Apathetic doesn't even begin to describe the state of our fanbase right now.
And yet last night's game was a chance to show them that things really were changing, that this ship is sailing in the right direction. We've continued to tout the improvements this team is making, even if the final score doesn't always show it, and a 1-5 Oregon State team that has been a disaster on both sides of the ball and was fighting all sorts of injuries seemed to provide the perfect opportunity to break through with a big win.
Yet every time this team seems poised to do something big, it falls flat on its face. Remember when I wrote before ASU last year that they deserved to go get a win, to validate all the progress they've made? You know, right before they went down and lost 42-0? Because, in their words, they were flat?
You'd think they'd figure it out after getting their faces kicked in for 3 1/2 years. Apparently not, according to Sekope Kaufusi:
“This really hits home to us and opens our eyes. It starts in practice. We just didn’t get it going early in the week"
Really? REALLY? Shouldn't this team understand the value of practicing hard, of being prepared? NOW it hits home?
Many have asked at what point we blame the coaches for this sort of thing. I've held off, believing strongly in the personal responsibility of players. Not anymore.
I try not to put too much emphasis on the results of one game. But this is no longer "just one game." This is the 25th time under Paul Wulff that WSU has lost by 20 points or more, and at some point, these kinds of embarrassments have to end. Is halfway through year four of a coach's regime too much to ask?
Apparently so, because the Cougars got their rear ends whipped up and down the field. Again. By a bad team -- a team they should have, at the very least, been relatively even with.
Only don't look for Wulff to validate what you saw with your own two eyes last night. Here was his assessment of how the team played:
"I don’t think our kids played bad," Wulff insisted. "I thought Oregon State played a hell of a game."
Gee, coach, do you think they might have "played a hell of a game" because your team was completely unprepared to compete last night? OSU smacked the WSU right in the face, and the Cougars wilted faster than a bouquet of flowers left in a hot car.
It's not enough for Wulff to insult all of us with the play on the field the last 3 1/2 years; he feels the need to insult our intelligence as well. Not a good look for you, coach.
Look, I've been one of the most ardent Wulff supporters over the last few years, feeling like many fans weren't giving him a fair chance to succeed. If you've been around here for a while, you know that. But if I tried to defend any of this right now, I'd just end up looking like one of our DBs watching yet another receiver run past them into the end zone.
And I won't do it anymore.
The bottom line is that this team is 3-4 with arguably all of its most winnable games behind it, except for maybe Utah. And unless something truly unexpected happens over the final five games -- like, say, going 3-2 against Oregon, Cal, Arizona State, Utah and Washington -- I don't see any way Wulff could or should keep his job. When you're in your fourth year, and your team is showing that it still can't even compete on a regular basis with some of the bad teams on its schedule, there is a major, major problem.
I still hold out hope this team gets it turned around this year. I still believe they have the talent to pull off a major surprise or two. But if they don't, and if the coaching staff is replaced at the end of the year, you'll likely be able to point to last night as the moment at which such a change became inevitable.
Because you simply cannot lose that game like that.
302 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I think I used this analogy last night:
The dagger was hovering over Wulff last night. At 10:15 PST last night, it was driven straight in. I’ve had his back for damn near 4 years, told people he will turn it around. And I’m sick of being made to look like a moron. Don’t fire him in the middle of the season, that will only make things worse. But, pending some miraculous comeback, Wulff needs to go. And that’s the first time in 4 years I’ve said that.
Two in the cake, one in the puddin'! -Kevin Calabro, Twitter: MichaelTheCoug
by Michael The Coug on Oct 23, 2011 3:23 PM PDT reply actions
I like your analogy
I think that is a good analogy. I have been off and on with Wulff since the 2009 debacle of a season. Like you, last night turned me off and barring an entirely different team showing up these next five games I think that I am off for good. It’s heartbreaking to see things not work out but its time to make a change.
Great writeup
Moos should be putting together a list right now and start making phone calls to gauge which coaches/coordinators would be interested. If he isnt then we need a new AD.
Short list should be.
Mike Leach
Mike Belotti
Kevin Sumlin
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
I'm relatively sure phone calls to current coaches/coordinators violate NCAA rules.
And second, if Moos doesn’t fire him, I’d certainly disagree with him but there’s no way I’d want Moos out too. He’s done more for this university in 3 years than Sterk did in 10…..perhaps a bit of hyperbole but not by much.
Two in the cake, one in the puddin'! -Kevin Calabro, Twitter: MichaelTheCoug
by Michael The Coug on Oct 23, 2011 3:32 PM PDT up reply actions
3 years?
Hasn’t Moos only been here for two? Other than that I agree with your assertion.
by Samsinite on Oct 23, 2011 4:38 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
My forgetfulness actually strengthens my argument. Damn he's done a lot!
Two in the cake, one in the puddin'! -Kevin Calabro, Twitter: MichaelTheCoug
by Michael The Coug on Oct 23, 2011 6:48 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Looks Like We...
Should Have Hired Sumlin 4 years ago when he was a finalist for the job.
by ghostof97Coug on Oct 23, 2011 5:19 PM PDT up reply actions
reply
that’s an awfully short list. I find some things to like about Mike Leach; I like his chip on the shoulder attitude. with our shortcomings, WSU needs a coach who is innovative, creative, and doesn’t mind stirring the pot. For that reason, Walden was a good coach for WSU. The whole pirate bit leaves me cold, given the brutality and lawlessness of the pirates off the African coast. I hope this pirate bit is all tongue in cheek. He is a divisive figure. I can’t imagine why Bellotti would be interested. Kevin Sumlin has a good gig at Houston, and is on a roll there.
—There are good coaches out there. I’ve been impressed by Gary Anderson at Utah State. There is a challenging situation. They play hard, and should have beaten f>>>>>g Auburn (Chizik disgusts me) but fell short. Chris Tormey on our staff was the coach at Idaho when they beat WSU in the late 90s, and at Nevada when they beat UW. He got a raw deal at Nevada when Chris Ault kicked him out and took over. Tormey laid the groundwork for Nevada’s recent success. I’ve been impressed by the coach at ND State (craig bohl) who has twice taken his team( made up of a lot of players from Minnesota who were pissed off by being overlooked by UMinn) to Minnesota and kicked their ass. I like the attitude. Whoever we pick, I want a coach who says we can win, and not whine about "the pac12 is so difficult (sniff sniff) in spite of evidence to the contrary. I’m sick of coach speak.
This is the list I've been waiting for
Whenever you look for coaching candidates online, you find Coordinators from the Big 12 & SEC, etc … but we all know we aren’t getting the next Will Muschamp.
I feel like Charlie Brown trying to kick the football. Ugh
I can imagine why Bellotti would be interested
The team will have a stud QB presumably surrounded by talent. He doesn’t have to undertake a 3- to 4-year rebuild, which will be attractive at his age.
wasnt there a rumor last year
that Bellotti bought a house in pullman?
right
like there’s even a house in pullman he would want to live in….
MIKE BELLOTTI IS 65 YEARS OLD. WHY WOULD WE HIRE A 65 YEAR OLD?
not directed towards you. just sick and tired of this ridiculous idea.
We hired Dick Bennett.
That worked pretty well didn’t it? (Sidenote: not entirely sure how old he actually is)
"Tonight, we skate with them. Tonight, we stay with them. And we shut them down because we can!" | Herb Brooks
different scenario
Dick Bennett was a package deal with his son and was never expected to coach longer than his initial contract. He was the very definition of a mercenary.
You can’t take that kind of gamble with your football program.
if we're going to hire someone in their 60s, i'd rather get the coach at UTEP
but i’d rather not hire someone in their 60s.
All things being equal, I'd also rather not hire someone in their 60s.
But I can think of worse things than hiring a proven coach to take the talent we have and bridge us to a longer-term solution.
by Jeff Nusser on Oct 24, 2011 10:05 AM PDT up reply actions
I think if we can find a situation
Where an elder statesman coach has a known assistant he can bring in that will have a clear road to the HC position if things go well, I might be sold.
But like you, all things being equal I’d rather have an up and comer than an AARP member.
if we're going to hire someone in their 60s, i'd rather get the coach at UTEP
but i’d rather not hire someone in their 60s.
I'd take Bellotti in a heartbeat.
I guess Leach would probably be higher on my list, but the guy has basically built what Oregon is now. Even if it did only end up being for a few years, get the guy in here to get the program on track, and then get someone new to take over. It’s really not a big deal in my mind.
"Tonight, we skate with them. Tonight, we stay with them. And we shut them down because we can!" | Herb Brooks
Mike Leach and Mike Bellotti?
Die in a Fire.
I hope the people voting in this poll to keep Wulff
Or who think he should be retained are just Husky trolls messing up the poll results.
How anyone can seriously think Wulff should be retained or deserves to be is beyond me.
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
There's plenty of room for varying opinions, here.
by Jeff Nusser on Oct 23, 2011 3:44 PM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
Im aware people are allowed to have their own opinions
But I would love to hear their reasoning for why Wulff should be retained.
Since I cant think of a single good reason he should keep his job it makes me wonder how anyone else could logically come to the conclusion he should be paid another 600k to be the worst coach in WSU history for at least another year.
This leads me to believe anyone who voted for Wulff to keep his job is just an anonymous Husky troll because its the only thing that makes sense.
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
Which means you really don't want to hear the reasons, right?
And point of clarification: He’s going to be paid the $600,000 either way.
Well, he did a good job cleaning the program of most of it's troublemakers
And has recruited some decent talent. It’s not that he hasn’t done anything right. It’s that, by now, this team should be competing and stomping a team like Oregon State. Honestly, if they had beaten Oregon State, I would still be behind him. But I think, much like Jeff, this was the straw that broke the camel’s back for me.
Two in the cake, one in the puddin'! -Kevin Calabro, Twitter: MichaelTheCoug
by Michael The Coug on Oct 23, 2011 4:06 PM PDT up reply actions
Although I don't want to put words in Jeff's mouth obviously but that's what I'm getting from this post
Two in the cake, one in the puddin'! -Kevin Calabro, Twitter: MichaelTheCoug
by Michael The Coug on Oct 23, 2011 4:06 PM PDT up reply actions
Sort of
I’m not washing my hands of him, and I really want the team to do something unexpected over the final five to prove he’s the guy. I just feel like I can’t defend him or his staff anymore.
I feel the same way
Among my friends I was always his strongest advocate, but now… I feel so betrayed… He can always win me over again by providing a miracle ending to the season in the final 5 games, but this kind of disgrace is hard to come back from…
It's how I feel.
I have been behind Wulff from the beginning, wanting to give him time to get his guys in and set up his system. I even looked at guys like Tuel and Wilson and gave him credit for bringing in talent like that.
But last night I was appalled. We didn’t even show up. I never thought I would see pity from a fan of a team that was currently 1-5. We aren’t improving, and there are no signs that we will improve. I don’t feel that this is a knee-jerk reaction, just reality setting in.
by displacedcoug on Oct 23, 2011 4:15 PM PDT up reply actions
That gets at what I feel as well
In the past I have been a defender of CPW, and one to spout that we are young and need to mature. And while I get that we aren’t the most experienced team out there, other teams can win and compete with sophomores and juniors at major positions. This is where we are at. And while there is some progress, if you lose to a team that you consider one of the worst in the conference, that reflects poorly on what your team is.
"I dont think our kids played bad"?? def disconnect
I’ve been a Wulff supporter and wanted him to stay because I believed in the character he was building. I’m just a loyal coug fan; not a football expert by any means. But I believe he’s had time and just can’t get the wins. Time to move on. New coach.
For the most part I have been a CPW guy...
BUT WOW!, after driving 6 hours and spending money on 6 tickets to witness that mess last night! And not mention taking the bus from the Stadium with a bunch of questionable characters at night! It’s getting really hard to defend the coaching staff!!! CPW is a good guy and a good Coug, but I’m think we need a change… I was sitting next to my dad ( I know this sounds stupid) but we need a coach who is dynamic and out there like our AD. I’m still at this point I’m still pretty disturbed of last nights performance, but I need to take some time and cool down and look at it rationally. It was embarrassing to watch because we had some family with at the game who weren’t Cougs, and we told them how awesome the game would be and the stories of great Cougar teams of the past! To have such performance like that was truly embarassing! I have never been embarrased as a Coug fan, ever! Until last night’s debacle!
I cant define it, I cant tell somebody who isnt a Cougar what its like. Theres something that happens at Washington State;. You quietly and subtly become infected Washington State is a passion. - Coach Jim Walden (1978-1986)
by Cougz4Life509 on Oct 23, 2011 4:33 PM PDT up reply actions
I've supported Wulff
And think he has improved the program, but he’s taken it as far as he can. I don’t even buy the excuse of “we’d be better if Tuel wasn’t hurt” from the games we lost to SDSU and UCLA. WSU had leads late in those games and could not finish. That comes back to the coaching staff, getting the team prepared to play a full 60 minutes. Its no longer good enough to compete with the Stanfords of this conference for a half and then wilt away. No more moral victories of “they played hard and hey, the final score wasn’t THAT bad”, and no more games where the team just falls apart just when the fanbase thinks they’ve turned a corner (this game, and ASU last year).
I’m sure no one is more frustrated with this than Wulff and his staff, but its become apparent over the past three games that they aren’t the ones to lead WSU back to a bowl game. Everyone on this board knows what the program is capable of, its time for the university to remember it too and find the staff that will make it happen.
It's a sad state
I think a good analogy here is Willie Bloomquist: Hustles, works hard off the field, does everything right in terms or trying to be a successful baseball player. But the fact is he’s just not talented enough to be a great baseball player. He’s a baseball player, yes – maybe even a good one – but even this year on a good team he still wasn’t as good as he was in his last year as a Mariner. And he wasn’t that good then.
My point is, just like players have a raw level of talent, so do coaches. By all indications Wulff’s process is good on and off the field. We know that because we’ve followed it closely for four years. What he may not have is the raw talent to be a great head coach at this level. Nothing’s ever a sure thing with coaching.
I thought about it a lot last night and there’s no real point to getting worked up about his job status now. We’ll see how this plays out and go from there, because no decision will be (or even should be) made until the end of the season.
Writer: CougCenter Twitterer: @Grady_WSU
I think you are very right
And part of that, with a coach, might be the process they followed in becoming a head coach. Wulff hasn’t really “been around” in his coaching career, he has basically been at Eastern and WSU. What might be clear now is that there was simply a lack of tools in his toolbox to coach at this level.
To take the baseball analogy further, we were hoping to at least get a 4 tool coach and dreaming we had stumbled into a 5 tool coach. We are now realizing he is a 2 or 2.5 tool coach, and that isn’t good enough in the Pac 12.
I like and respect the man, and maybe he will shock us again, but I am done expecting or even hoping for it.
Jim Tressel had only ever been a head coach at Youngstown State before coaching Ohio State
Dennis Erickson had been a coach for 4 years at I-AA Idaho and one year at Wyoming before coming to WSU.
Mike Price had been a head coach at I-AA Weber State for 8 years before coming to WSU.
I don’t buy that the fact that he came from an FCS school immediately doomed him or made him unqualified for the job.
I wouldn't have said the FCS school was the real downfall
I was looking more at the fact that he had only coached at one school than the level of the school.
In other words, it looks like as a professional coach he only experienced the way that one head coach, Mike Kramer, ran a program. Wulff overlapped a little bit with Dick Zornes it appears, and Zornes would be who hired him, but primarily he worked under one coach before becoming a head coach. In the case of Wulff, I think this is to his detriment. He was clearly really attached to that coaching tree and brought many of “his guys” with him. I think at this point the evidence shows “his guys” just weren’t with that great. I think if Wulff had been seasoned with more experience around the country he might have been better at evaluating and making choices for both his staff and how to restart the program.
Came to the site....
…hoping to find this post….and the results of this poll.
Cougs should just be happy they didn’t have to start with the same schedule as AZ.
Tearing down the program is going to haunt WSU for a while
Wulff dug the hole too deep and cannot get himself out.
I miss *REAL* Four Loko
by B-Lot tailgater on Oct 23, 2011 4:45 PM PDT reply actions
Its part of the problem
But Wulff hasn’t shown he can overcome talent shortcomings. Coaching is definitely the biggest problem.
I miss *REAL* Four Loko
by B-Lot tailgater on Oct 23, 2011 4:56 PM PDT up reply actions
That's sort of what I'm driving at
It’s the ability to get out of the hole, more than the hole itself.
The analogy I think best suites the situation at hand
Is that the hole is big and very deep and Wulff is stuck at the bottom. His solution to get out was to try and dig his way out. Unfortunetly for all the dirt the managed to get out of the way more just kept falling in from the sides and he has barely made any progress and is not exhausted and dying of thirst and hunger.
What WSU needs is a coach who falls into a hole who is in better shape(skill) and even better a phone to call a buddy to come help him up (Better assistants)
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
I'm sorta the other end of the spectrum from most people here.
I thought Wulff was a bad hire from the start, having been a fan of Montana I had seen and followed EWU and the rest of the Big Sky pretty closely over Wulff’s tenure. I understood why we hired him (lack of money since we still had Doba’s buyout, he’s an alumn, etc) but still was disappointed in the decision. I certainly wouldn’t have been even remotely upset if we would have fired Wulff after last season, though I understood why (and agreed with) our decision to retain him for this year.
Like many, I bought into the hype this off season. We finished last year well, had quite a few players coming back and honestly there was a lot of excitement about our skill position guys. Last night’s loss wasn’t a deal breaker for me like it was for many. It was just another miserable loss in a long string of miserable losses. I keep trying to get excited or optimistic about the Cougs, but it’s becoming like last year all over again, where every time I build up my expectations, they just get shattered. I am in total agreement with Moos that a coaching change shouldn’t happen mid-season and Wulff should get the remainder of the year to try to turn things around. At this point though, I am convinced that anyone expecting something amazing from this team over the final five games is going to be sorely disappointed.
Streamin' and Threadin' and Shellin
When life gives you lemons

by well you win some and lose others on Oct 23, 2011 5:20 PM PDT reply actions 7 recs
The logical have been moved to emotion....
As is often said by commenators, football is a game of emotion. One of the main reasons I frequent this site is that emotion generally takes a back seat to logic and process analysis. This may have been due to the state of the football program over the past four years as we try and find something to give us hope. That being said, even those who value a reserved response to the emotions of football, including myself, seem to have come to the conclusion that the experiment has not been a success. Like most, I hope there is a reason at the end of the year for me to want Wulff back (him being a frugal expense and an alum). However, I don’t plan on expecting us to win a game again this year.
I am still reserving judgement until the season is over...
A) Because I would not be shocked if we make some noise down the stretch
B) Because I very badly want Wulff to be the right guy to lead this program.
To me it is not about Wulff having earned a fifth year, because he has not to this point. However, I just have a feeling in my gut that if we are patient, we will be rewarded with a stable and successful program. Wulff wants to be at WSU, and to me that is worth risking another year of disappointment.
The best part to me, however, is that I have complete faith in Moos. If he believes he can land the right coach to take this program to the next level then he will. However, I do think Moos will see this thing out until the end of the year and make the right call when the time comes.
by bson25 on Oct 23, 2011 5:43 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
I want to be at WSU
I won’t leave for a bigger job. Wanna hire me?
I miss *REAL* Four Loko
by B-Lot tailgater on Oct 23, 2011 5:49 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Your thought process and view about Wulff were essentially...
…right in line with mine.
Last night was the first time I felt we needed to move on. I hate to come to this conclusion, but I have no other reason to believe otherwise.
No real hope for the program getting to a higher level with Wulff in charge.
We look like a team in disarray from what I saw last night.
by westsidecougar1 on Oct 23, 2011 7:17 PM PDT up reply actions
this is why you wait until the end of the year
it’s not going to hurt to keep him around and there is the 2% chance this was a bump in the road and they finish up the season 3-2 and get to the Fight Hunger Bowl.
But you also have to be prepared for the 98% chance that’s not going to happen.
“Of the 49,219 who were in attendance at CenturyLink Field, perhaps 10,000 were Oregon State fans. A conference game taking place smack dab in the middle of 80,000 WSU alumni couldn’t draw more than 40,000 or so fans. Apathetic doesn’t even begin to describe the state of our fanbase right now.”
Undefeated fans, right?
Welcome to the Sound Pound...
I'd say it's time to scrap the idea of conference games in Seattle.
Anything less than a sellout isn’t OK.
Welcome to the Sound Pound...
I still think It's a good move
Its a little bit of a gamble when the team is not consistant, we didn’t get a great crowed because we couldn’t perform against UCLA and Stanford was complete waste of a weekend. But had we beaten UCLA like we could(should) have and actually put up a good fight against the Cardnal, we probably could have seen 60,000 WSU alums on Saturday.
The problem is you can’t know whats going to happen a year in advance when your writing up the schedule, all you can do is put yourself in a position to get the biggest bang for your buck. Given that we do have a lot of alum in the seattle area that would not otherwise attend a home game, its not a bad bet to make just on the off chance that you have that halmark season and hit the jackpot.
I can tell you what is going to happen in a year
The game will be a near sellout, and at least 1/3rd of the stadium will be flashing hand signals that loosely resemble the letter O.
I miss *REAL* Four Loko
by B-Lot tailgater on Oct 24, 2011 7:52 AM PDT up reply actions
Maybe
But 1/3 of 67k about 22k. They will travel deep, but I will be amazed if they bring more than 25,000 fans.
I miss *REAL* Four Loko
by B-Lot tailgater on Oct 24, 2011 10:39 AM PDT up reply actions
But had we beaten UCLA like we could(should) have and actually put up a good fight against the Cardnal, we probably could have seen 60,000 WSU alums on Saturday.
I don’t think there’s any evidence whatsoever of that type of support.
And if the Beavers weren't having their worst season in 15 years
You might have seen 20,000 orange & black instead of 10,000.
by Sahr on Oct 24, 2011 11:37 AM PDT up reply actions 4 recs
would the boise st coach
Be a possibility or too much of a reach??
by Kimball10 on Oct 23, 2011 6:39 PM PDT via mobile reply actions
yeah i kinda figured
Fun thought tho. Hopefully all this tv deal money will pay off…
But id just rather if the cougs showed up the last 5 games! An upset would be nice! Also we have to beat the dawgs apple cup is a big game for the fans
by Kimball10 on Oct 23, 2011 6:47 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
I would much, MUCH rather this team play the heck out of the final five
I want him to succeed so damn bad.
yeah i kinda figured
Fun thought tho. Hopefully all this tv deal money will pay off…
But id just rather if the cougs showed up the last 5 games! An upset would be nice! Also we have to beat the dawgs apple cup is a big game for the fans
by Kimball10 on Oct 23, 2011 6:48 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
I managed to attend the game.
I was pretty excited seeing the Cougs for the first time in a big stadium. When Oregon St. scored, and so quickly, I felt a bitter chill in the stadium. For some reason, I knew things were going to go south in the game. I kind of sat through the rest of the game in a gaze, reminiscing in the night U2 was in town. Qwest felt small and crowded when they were there, but the game last night just felt big and empty after things spoiled for the worse.
I honestly have no idea what to think right now. In the first three games, I was very positive the team would find a bowl game. Now, I think they have put the final nail in the coffin. The Apple Cup lies with the Huskies this year, as much as I hate saying that. The only winnable game, as some have said here, is against Utah—but they aren’t that much different from the Beavers in regards to health, are they? Personally, the Utah game worries me, but only slightly.
Anyway, simply put, it’s time to move on, I think.
Everything you know is wrong.
mediocre to bad QB's
our D will make them look like first round draft picks.
I liked Wulff from the start and believed in him...
But now I feel it’s time for a change. Once you get your players in your system you should be able to be successful. As for the next head coach I honestly have no idea of who to hire. I kind of like the idea of Nick Holt as the next coach, not for his coaching abilities but his intensity and his ability to sell the program to recruits and the media.
by luciuswolfey_96 on Oct 23, 2011 7:11 PM PDT reply actions
Holt?
That is really funny.
PS Dog fans would consider that we did them a huge favor.
by westsidecougar1 on Oct 23, 2011 7:20 PM PDT up reply actions
To me he seems like a guy that players enjoy to play for.
Then again their defense sucks.
I don’t want him calling the plays, but he can be in charge of PR and recruiting.
by luciuswolfey_96 on Oct 23, 2011 7:27 PM PDT up reply actions
Sorry if I sounded like I was making light of your suggestion...
I just think Holt is so overrated…and thus incredibly overpaid.
by westsidecougar1 on Oct 23, 2011 7:59 PM PDT up reply actions
About him being our HC?
He’s not my first choice. But I feel that he could be successful, by giving our young team motivation and a reason to play. Not that Wulff didn’t do either of those.
by luciuswolfey_96 on Oct 23, 2011 7:34 PM PDT up reply actions
I noticed that.
I do not want him to be the DC. All I want him to do is to motivate our team and get high caliber players in our system, along with some publicity (Which I realize that with the new T.V. deal we will get publicity, but it’s not bad to have more)
by luciuswolfey_96 on Oct 23, 2011 7:52 PM PDT up reply actions
Let's save $750k
And just shave an ape, give it a big gold chain, and tell it to scowl, huff and puff on our sideline.
by Fractal on Oct 23, 2011 8:21 PM PDT up reply actions 5 recs
You sir, just changed my opinion on Holt completely
Don’t ask me why i changed because I couldn’t tell you.
It’s probably because of the mental picture I got in my head while reading your post.
We wouldn’t have to shave the ape.
by luciuswolfey_96 on Oct 23, 2011 8:36 PM PDT up reply actions
Idaho is still digging out of the hole Nick Holt left it in.
Just let that sink in for a moment.
by Brian Floyd on Oct 23, 2011 11:38 PM PDT up reply actions
Tom Cable deserves a dishonorable mention.
He started digging that hole for four seasons before Holt.
I feel like this is the most genius sarchasm in the history of the sarchasm
if the object was to get as many people to fall in, you win sir.
by Kyle Rancourt on Oct 24, 2011 12:06 AM PDT up reply actions
Weclome to the dark side!!
The worst part of this all is that we really wanted PW to succeed because of his coug connection. We have had so many coaches utilize us as a stepping stone that we grab on to anyone that finds us the least bit attractive.
You all know that I have been off the PW bandwagon for since the 69-0 USC bashing. He threw the ball 9 times in the game (completed 6!). Who throws the ball 9 times when getting stomped like that? I tell you who, someone who is wiling to quit when things get tough, when a poor hand gets dealt, etc. I watched Coach Carroll motion as to what PW was doing and why he wasn’t trying. PW shrugged his shoulders. Utterly disgusting.
I would expect the CAL assts to be on the list and potentially some UO assts.
Again, welcome to the dark side. It truly sucks being on this side, but at least my fall from a cliff was only 10 ft as opposed to many PW supporters who feel like they have just fallen off a 1000 ft cliff.
I don't think I'm all the way on the dark side
I’m not actively campaigning for him to be gone. I’m just not willing to try and justify this regime any longer.
I just hope we get a coach (if we do get a new coach)
That brings a offense that runs first, goes under center, has a fullback and TE, call me old fashion but I absoultly love stanfords offense, but i also love what works and if we get a spread coach i wouldnt mind that but i think the problem are team runs into is we have alot of 3 and outs because were always in 3rd and long because we cant run the ball so there for are D is tired and getting beat (i know thats not the only reason but just one of many)
that's a great question
it sure did not appear that way on saturday nite.
No he wasn't just a spread coach
He was the OG of the spread.
by Brian Floyd on Oct 23, 2011 11:01 PM PDT up reply actions
Well, pardon me.
And if people have no idea what we’re talking about, here you go.
by Jeff Nusser on Oct 23, 2011 11:05 PM PDT up reply actions
We are not built for power football
Never have been, and I will be shocked if the day comes that we try it.
We are a passing team, and given our moderately consistant ability to get good quarterback and wide reciever recruits, why would we change that? A good passing offense should really only run into 3rd and long if:
1. The quarterback can’t throw
- Hasn’t really been a problem
2. The wide recievers can’t run or can’t catch
- Some consistancy problems, but we have talent
3. Offensive line can’t give the quarterback the time
- Bingo
So if the offensive line is the problem, how could going to a run first stratagy fix our problems? I don’t think we need a change of philosophy, just someone who can get it done and get the players ready to play on Saturdays.
I wasnt saying we could do it now
but it would be nice if we had a coach to build our team that way, but yes all your points are valid and like I said I would take anything that works but I just love watching power run football.
by korb M coug on Oct 23, 2011 11:05 PM PDT up reply actions
Precious few teams in college football win that way.
by Jeff Nusser on Oct 23, 2011 11:06 PM PDT up reply actions
I guess what I really want is a running game
I wouldnt mind going back to the old Mike Price O, I feel like we had a nice little running game with that Offense, but I was 8 when we went to the rose bowl against Michigan so my memory is blurry lol
by korb M coug on Oct 23, 2011 11:10 PM PDT up reply actions
Mike Price's offense was so far from a power running attack
See the comment above.
by Jeff Nusser on Oct 23, 2011 11:11 PM PDT up reply actions
But yes, we were able to run effectively
Which is what it’s really all about, right?
by Jeff Nusser on Oct 23, 2011 11:11 PM PDT up reply actions
Oh im off the "power running game"
Im just talking about a running game, but yeah I saw that OG of the spread lol
by korb M coug on Oct 23, 2011 11:13 PM PDT up reply actions
Would be curious to how "the team" really feels about this staff...
Are they still on-board?
by westsidecougar1 on Oct 23, 2011 7:24 PM PDT reply actions
I was on the fence about Wulff but this game put me over the edge as well.
Anybody think that June Jones would be a realistic option if things don’t turn around in the last five games?
"Win or lose Cougars booze!"
Oh I didn't know how big is contract was, didn't think it would be that high at SMU.
Well good thing Jim Tressel is available!
"Win or lose Cougars booze!"
by foreveracoug on Oct 23, 2011 7:52 PM PDT up reply actions
Show Cause
He got slapped with the dreaded “show cause,” meaning that Tressel is essentially banned from coaching in the NCAA because he got caught lying. It’ll be a minimum of 2 more seasons before any school can even talk to him, if I’m not mistaken.
by '03CouveCoug on Oct 23, 2011 7:59 PM PDT up reply actions
I was just joking anyway.
I think Tressel still has the ability to land a very high paying job at a big time program if he were allowed. I think our best shot is going to be to find a successful mid major coach, or a coordinator from somewhere. Maybe being in a BCS conference will make some coach’s consider even if they have to take less pay.
"Win or lose Cougars booze!"
by foreveracoug on Oct 23, 2011 8:05 PM PDT up reply actions
Sad thing is ..
Another coach will come in and win with these players and the redshirts. But its obvious Wulff is in and has been over his head since taking over and Moos has had to direct him to keep replacing assistants to bring in more experience. If somehow Moos believes Wulff can stay but a new offensive coordinator is needed, then Sturdy will be replaced and we’ll finally see the Cougars call a good game.
Either Wulff fires Sturdy and Moos allows him to remain, or Mike Belotti is the new head coach next year winning with Wulff’s players and other players he recruits. If not Belotti, Moos can bring in a coach in the $1-$2 million range (based on the incoming TV money) who will bring recruits to Pullman. I think Belotti would be a great fit and would be someone to run the program for the next 10 years to finish what Moos and Belotti wanted to at Oregon but this time at WSU.
I've wondered about that and I think you are right
And it’s a damn shame. I don’t know why Wulff hitched his wagon to Sturdy.
by Couginthepink on Oct 23, 2011 8:31 PM PDT up reply actions
Any expansion on this?
I believe you, I’m just curious.
I get the feeling that they're BFF's.
I have little to no evidence to back this up, other than the fact that I saw them together at the CUB once. But I have to think that if they weren’t really good friends then Sturdy would’ve been gone a while ago.
"Tonight, we skate with them. Tonight, we stay with them. And we shut them down because we can!" | Herb Brooks
You guys
this is why Nusser hasn’t fired me. I’m the Todd Sturdy to his Paul Wulff.
by Kyle Rancourt on Oct 24, 2011 12:10 AM PDT up reply actions
Every one of his assistants ...
Wulff has failed with some of his assistants which have hurt the program. I’m mortified that after 4 years the O line still struggles to protect the QB. Sturdy needs to go for this offense to improve because its obvious he has failed the team this year with questionable playcalling. I have been one wanting balance, but not to the detriment of the rhythm of the offense. They completely looked out of sync against OSU. Yes running the ball is great, but the Cougs need the pass to work for them to be successful and need the pass to set up the run. Sturdy called a horrible game, again like he did against Colorado, San Diego State, UCLA, and and now Oregon State. He can call a great game against Eastern Washington’s competition, but if it’s PAC 12 he struggles.
If Wulff won’t fire Sturdy, then I hate to say it, but Wulff will need to go.
After Saturday, you're really most concerned about the offense?
by Jeff Nusser on Oct 24, 2011 8:05 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
The whole program
But I do say the offense could have played remarkably better against Oregon State. Obviously the defense failed, but they are too young to consistently rely on them.
The defense was a sieve obviously, but with the offense only scoring 21 points against Oregon State was pathetic.
The defense giving up 44 points is the much much bigger issue
The offense was effectively playing from behind the whole game. And played the second half without Tuel. It’s time to stop blaming Sturdy and the offense for our woes.
Our defense was beyond a sieve, as a sieve is something that exists but has many holes in it. On Saturday, our defense just didn’t exist. They weren’t present enough to claim that there were holes, as holes indicate there was something OSU could have done that we would have stopped. And it didnt’ matter what they did, run, pass, scramble, moonwalk, fumble and recover, or roll over and play dead, we didn’t stop any of it. Even a little bit.
At times our coverage scheme appeared to be “cover space and hope that the young QB throws directly to you instead of the recievers that are wide open all over the field.” That isn’t youth, that is just really bad execution.
The defense technically existed, but they didn't really exist.
sort of like Peter Bishop.
by Kyle Rancourt on Oct 24, 2011 12:58 PM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
Fringe reference auto-rec
#CougHarmonyonTwitter with your pants off, M*tha F*cker!
by TiltingRight on Oct 24, 2011 2:43 PM PDT up reply actions
I love Fringe so much
and I feel like no one else does. It’s so brilliant.
by Kyle Rancourt on Oct 25, 2011 12:02 AM PDT up reply actions
"Obviously the defense failed, but they are too young to consistently rely on them."
If you subscribed to Cougar Sports Weekly, you’d see just how staggeringly bad the defensive performance was against a very not good offense. I’m really sick of the excuse making for that side of the ball.
Jeff, you seem like a whole new person
I miss *REAL* Four Loko
by B-Lot tailgater on Oct 24, 2011 9:56 AM PDT up reply actions
Sometimes, there just comes a point when it has to stop
Wulff promised something. I felt like it was a reasonable expectation. He and his staff are not delivering.
by Jeff Nusser on Oct 24, 2011 10:03 AM PDT up reply actions
Obviously the defense failed, but they are too young to consistently rely on them.
Oregon State’s offense is very, very young as well. Probably younger.
Yup
Got completely and totally shredded by a RS-Freshman who had thrown 8 picks in the previous 3 games.
by Jeff Nusser on Oct 24, 2011 12:20 PM PDT up reply actions
Youth
Considering most of the defensive starters have 2 years or less experience, I tend to give them a bigger leeway than I would the offense. The defense is still very green and will make great plays, but also give up stupid plays.
But ultimately after 4 years neither the offense or defense should be playing like this team is. Wulff got a breather the first 3 seasons, but it has to stop this year. As fans we can’t keep saying Wulff had a mess to rebuild ….. There has to finally be some repercussions if the team isn’t doing what was promised 4 years ago.
I love Wulff and thank him for everything he’s done in rebuilding this program, because he has put some players on this team and has made the talent level across the board 10 times better than what he started with. But I believe a more seasoned head coach who isn’t getting the PAC 12 minimum head coach salary will help WSU take the next step.
You can say that Wulff inherited a mess to rebuild
and still say he’s not meeting the reasonable expectations of progress for the 4th year.
#CougHarmonyonTwitter with your pants off, M*tha F*cker!
by TiltingRight on Oct 24, 2011 2:45 PM PDT up reply actions
Paul Wulff went out of his way to point out that they defensive side of the ball was recruited heavily from the start
In the first real recruiting class, he said he went after defense. The focus was defense. He wanted young playmakers on the defensive side of the ball. He was building this team from the defensive side first.
These are his own words. Sorry, but the defense doesn’t get a pass, and continuing to say “well, it’s young” is bullshit. When the head coach says that he was working on the defense first and it’s still a tire fire this year, perhaps it’s time to light up the defensive coordinator and recruiting efforts on that side of the ball.
I'm becoming less concerned
with speculating who will get credit for success/failure and more concerned with finding success and avoiding failure.
by spencer peaty on Oct 23, 2011 7:57 PM PDT up reply actions
that's not a sad thing
Paul Wulff was paid over 2 million dollars for his services. I don’t care who gets credit for winning. i just want to win.
I'm gonna say the same thing I said on twitter last night.
That game was unbelievable, unbearable, and unacceptable. It was embarrassing sitting in the stands watching that. As far as CPW, I’ve upped my expectations for him to keep his job (I know it seems backwards). Really the only way I want him around next year is if we get a bowl game. The reason I’m saying this is because I don’t want us to keep him with an iffy record, and then just run into the exact same thing next year. The guy has done some good stuff, there’s no doubt. He laid a good foundation, but the problem is that I think we are going to need another person to come put up the walls and the roof. I’ve been openly critical of him in the past, and I’ve been willing to give him the benefit of the doubt since then. I just can’t do it anymore. I’ve said this before about Wulff (and Bone as well): show me that you are a good coach. That’s all fine and dandy if you were successful at your previous school, but show me that you can be successful here.
As far as that quote goes, I’m quite frankly insulted by it. I don’t claim to be a big x and o person, but I can pick out our problems pretty easily and I’ve never played a down of organized football in my life.
Again, I want Wulff to succeed. The guys had a rough go of it in life and it’d be nice to see him have some success. Unfortunately I just don’t see it happening. But who knows, maybe a horrible loss if just what they needed to pull it together and get the season back on track. Win 3 of 5 and we’re going bowling. I guess at this point I just don’t see it happening.
"Tonight, we skate with them. Tonight, we stay with them. And we shut them down because we can!" | Herb Brooks
You said way more than me on Twitter.
All I had to say was:
F*ck OSU, F*ck these uniforms, F*ck this coaching staff, F*ck rooting for shitty teams, and F*CK THIS EMPTY WHISKEY BOTTLE!!!!
#CougHarmonyonTwitter with your pants off, M*tha F*cker!
by TiltingRight on Oct 23, 2011 8:57 PM PDT up reply actions
Well that first sentence of the paragraph was what I said on twitter.
that would’ve been quite the tweet.
"Tonight, we skate with them. Tonight, we stay with them. And we shut them down because we can!" | Herb Brooks
It goes against this whole branding identity they are trying to create
Moos said last year “when you turn on the TV you are going to know you are looking at Washington State.”
With those uniforms last night I don’t think any casual observer would be able to say that.
I miss *REAL* Four Loko
by B-Lot tailgater on Oct 23, 2011 9:22 PM PDT up reply actions
who else has a gray home jersey?
It will be identified with us soon enough. It isn’t like a variation of red jersey is easily distinguishable until you see the helmet / logo.
by Blackie1829 on Oct 23, 2011 9:37 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
basically, I think it completely fits the branding movement
by Blackie1829 on Oct 23, 2011 9:38 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
I concur.
Everyone was talking about the homecoming unis on Twitter. You might not have seen it, because I know you guys were at the game. But there was lots of talk.
by Jeff Nusser on Oct 23, 2011 10:31 PM PDT up reply actions
And by everyone, I mean lots of national writers.
by Jeff Nusser on Oct 23, 2011 10:32 PM PDT up reply actions
When it comes to uniforms,
even negative publicity is still publicity. The recruit will still take a look at the picture and decide for themselves.
"Tonight, we skate with them. Tonight, we stay with them. And we shut them down because we can!" | Herb Brooks
Yup
I know I’m going out on a limb here, but I think old white guys have different taste than potential recruits.
by Jeff Nusser on Oct 23, 2011 10:37 PM PDT up reply actions
The uniform comment
Came from being blown out in both games we’ve worn them. Now the words “ritual burning” come to mind when I see them.
#CougHarmonyonTwitter with your pants off, M*tha F*cker!
by TiltingRight on Oct 24, 2011 12:07 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
One thing that I want to eventually see
is white pants. The charcoal tops would like great with white pants as a contrast, and the ghost helmet. Or the grey tops with white pants and the ghost helmet. Or the charcoal pants on the road with the white tops.
by Kyle Rancourt on Oct 24, 2011 12:59 PM PDT up reply actions
Oh god no
White pants are awful, especially with our colors. We aren’t Oklahoma.
If you need a refresher, I suggest you go back to the ASU game in 05 when we wore white pants. They were terrible.
I miss *REAL* Four Loko
by B-Lot tailgater on Oct 24, 2011 1:04 PM PDT up reply actions
Fair enough.
I played a ton of NCAA ’12 and I pretty much tried every color combo imaginable. I remember the white pants looked good because they popped against the dark tops, but that was on Xbox, not in real life.
by Kyle Rancourt on Oct 24, 2011 1:09 PM PDT up reply actions
It just looked funny
Silver helmet/Crimson jersey/White pants
Didn’t make sense.
On a side note, for road unis, I have always loved gray/white/gray.
I miss *REAL* Four Loko
by B-Lot tailgater on Oct 24, 2011 1:18 PM PDT up reply actions
Oh I meant grey helmets with grey jerseys and white pants.
I didn’t like the crimson helmets with the grey tops. it looks weird. Crimson helmets work with the crimson tops or the white roads.
by Kyle Rancourt on Oct 24, 2011 1:27 PM PDT up reply actions
They have two gray jerseys on NCAA 12.
The darker one doesn’t exist in real life.
CougCenter In Reid We Trust, Twitter!
by Craig Powers on Oct 24, 2011 2:09 PM PDT up reply actions
I honestly want to hear from the people that want to keep Wulff around.
This isn’t a personal attack at all. I really want to know what they see.
"Tonight, we skate with them. Tonight, we stay with them. And we shut them down because we can!" | Herb Brooks
We saw improvment in talent and some signs of life
Attractive, Intelligent, Smart A**
by Neil Vincent Roberts on Oct 24, 2011 11:32 AM PDT up reply actions
This program wasn't dead when Wulff showed up
Might have been dying, but it wasn’t dead.
I miss *REAL* Four Loko
by B-Lot tailgater on Oct 24, 2011 12:12 PM PDT up reply actions
The 4 years of slow decline was agonizing enough
I’m glad Wulff burned the program down. I don’t know how much more of the slow decline I could have put up with before going bezerk
Attractive, Intelligent, Smart A**
by Neil Vincent Roberts on Oct 24, 2011 12:34 PM PDT up reply actions
One more thing:
I want to commend Chris Ball for stepping up and taking the blame for the poor showing on D. It doesn’t excuse it, but at least one of the coaches has stepped up and is taking responsibility.
"Tonight, we skate with them. Tonight, we stay with them. And we shut them down because we can!" | Herb Brooks
That's not exactly my take on it.
I think Ball’s willingness to step up and accept responsibility is commendable and all, but I’m not sure what else he would do. Candidly, I’m surprised that there is not more ranting in this thread demanding Ball’s head. I have never – and I’m not exaggerating – seen such a lackluster, flat and downright inexcusable effort from a Cougar defense. Ever third down, I cringed. Third and seven? No problem for OSU. This defense has some talent, even and the CB position. The defensive line is better, but still pathetic. But how do you excuse that many blown coverages and missed tackles? Anyway, is firing Wulff the answer if the loss is largely on the defense?
That wasnt really what i was saying.
Im saying that its nice to see one coach take responsibility (Ball), and meanwhile the other one seems to be deflecting blame (Wulff, see quote above). I wasn’t saying that him accepting responsibility made it all ok.
"Tonight, we skate with them. Tonight, we stay with them. And we shut them down because we can!" | Herb Brooks
by Coug999 on Oct 23, 2011 10:56 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Right, I get that...
I didn’t think that’s what you were saying necessarily, but as much as anything, I’m wondering if I’m alone in my thinking that demands for Ball’s resignation are at least as valid as demanding Wulff’s. Like many others here, I have been – and remain – a Wulff supporter. I admire what he’s done with the teams reputation off the field, but am not impressed with the team’s reputation on the field. Does anyone else think it’s curious that Ball’s job is not in doubt? Maybe I’m missing something…. Maybe we could bring Doba back as defensive coordinator. He led some pretty scary blitzing defenses. Isaac Brown? DD Acholanu? Rien Long? Dorian Boose? Steve Gleason? Marcus Trufant? Coleman? David? All Doba’s guys if I remember correctly. (Okay, maybe I’m kidding on the Doba bit….)
I think at this point, people are targeting Wulff
because Wulff is higher on the totem pole, not necessarily because they think Ball is any less deserving of criticism. If Wulff goes, Ball goes with him.
This post is shockingly parallel to my opinion on the topic, even down to the wording.
My Facebook status from after the game last night was, “Wulff, I was really on your side ‘til this point. I really wanted to believe. Good luck wherever you end up next year, because it won’t be in Pullman, fair or not. You just crapped the bed in front of your biggest alumni base against a 1-5 team. Go Cougs.”
I don’t think there is a better phrase to describe last night than “crapping the bed.”
I’m not going to go too deep into my analysis of the football aspects because I was so emotionally irritated by the 2nd quarter that I couldn’t watch objectively. The only thing I’ll say is that I am completely disheartened at how the defense isn’t good at any one thing. It’s not that they can’t stop the pass, or they can’t stop the run; it’s that they can’t even slow down one or the other. I think cliches like “offense wins games, defense wins championships” are overused, but completely hapless defenses do make it very hard to keep your crowd in the game. I tried to have energy at the beginning of the game, but I just can’t bring myself to yell when the D gives up 8 rushing yards on 1st down over and over.
Speaking of the crowd, and regarding the Seattle game as a whole – I said this to the people I was with at the game. If this game was any indication, the Oregon game at CLink is going to be a complete disaster. 10k OSU fans, cheering on a 1-5 team, were considerably louder than the the WSU crowd. Oregon fans will completely drown the crimson in the crowd next year, if not in numbers than in volume and atmosphere. It won’t just be not a home game for the Cougs, it will be a significant home field advantage for Oregon.
I’m a recent graduate living in the Seattle area who works weekends. I was able to afford this game and was really excited to go. The only other weekend I will have off from work this season is Nov 12th (vs. ASU). I had planned on budgeting in a trip to Pullman for that weekend, but I can definitely say that is no longer the case. I don’t want this to turn into a “fandom” debate, but I think I represent a statistically relevant portion of the fanbase when I say that it’s just not worth my financial investment when I have such a small chance of emotional return. Performances like this one put a HUGE dent in the “one-game-a-year” pilgrimage to the Palouse crowd.
I will say that I loved the flags everywhere in and around CLink. They were all along the Hawks Nest area and abundant outside the stadium. I really like that emerging tradition and hope it continues.
Regarding the Wulff quote, I don’t like it. In fact, I hate it. Give credit where credit is due, but did OSU really bring anything that was spectacular? They ran it between the tackles and hit hot routes. They didn’t do anything revolutionary. However, I’m not sure I like any of the alternatives. If he goes out there and says “we played like crap, we weren’t prepared at all,” what message does that send to the team? I’m not sure anything he could have said would’ve sounded good to us.
My optimism has been extracted, but like many of you, I hope I’m surprised in the next few weeks. I hope we shock someone. I hope Wulff saves his job. I hope to see my friend and shake his hand. I hope the Pacific is as blue as it has been in my dreams. I hope.
Go Cougs.
by Coug11 on Oct 23, 2011 10:48 PM PDT reply actions 7 recs
How has this comment not been rec'd?
Shawshank reference alone should be worth 10 recs.
I miss *REAL* Four Loko
by B-Lot tailgater on Oct 24, 2011 7:58 AM PDT up reply actions
Indeed
Maybe on Saturdays we should all just watch Shawshank at the same time and live thread it instead of watching the game.
by Mark Sandritter on Oct 24, 2011 11:33 AM PDT up reply actions
Pretty sure Boise State does
At least I saw them in gray when they beat Air Force last week at home. Their font also has that same serif tick thing that’s supposed to make ours ‘unique’.
.

New MWC rules that prohibit BSU to wear blue on the blue turf.
by Brian Floyd on Oct 23, 2011 11:13 PM PDT up reply actions
I agree.
I like the look. We should try the dark gray tops with crimson pants and helmets.
I just wanted to show the air hug
Here’s a better look.

by Brian Floyd on Oct 23, 2011 11:18 PM PDT up reply actions
I like how they managed
to use a gray facemask rather than white. Those white facemasks looked horrible with gray jerseys and dark gray pants.
Plus the crimson helmets didn't match the numbers or lettering
Maybe this is just due to the lighting and the difference between the helmet material and the material used on the numbers, but in any event, it looks horrible.

I think it's funny that we use a flat shiny gray for one helmet
And a metallic shiny crimson for the other …
by Jeff Nusser on Oct 24, 2011 10:27 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
This happens everywhere
Even the helmets at OU don’t match their crimson jerseys. Its because of the difference in material.
I miss *REAL* Four Loko
by B-Lot tailgater on Oct 24, 2011 10:40 AM PDT up reply actions
They have to be closer, though, don't they?
Look at the pic I posted above of Deone … the crimson on the helmets and the jerseys are many, many shades off. The colors being off was evident on the day the uniforms were unveiled at the Davenport. Boise State’s blue helmets and pants look much closer to me, as does the gray on their facemasks with the gray on their jerseys. I understand that the different materials make it more challenging to match colors, but it seems like we’re not even close. We have the same issue with the crimson logo on our home (gray) helmet not being anything close to the crimson on our home jerseys.
True, but
- of teams with some variation of red <<<< # of teams with true gray (not silver)
Don’t abandon crimson, but as far as branding goes, gray is the unique element.
As ugly and humiliating as that game was
it was just one game. I am not voting in this poll because there’s still 5 games to be played. If he loses all 5, of course I think he should go. He goes 3-2, or 4-1, however unlikely, last night will just be a bump in the road.
by tclaus on Oct 23, 2011 11:20 PM PDT via mobile reply actions
I didn't see anything in that game that leads me to believe we can go even 1-4
I hope I’m wrong, I REALLY want to be wrong and see a dramatic turn around. But even two days later now, I feel like it’s at best a 50/50 proposition we don’t lose out by double-digits every week.
by SmartAssCoug on Oct 24, 2011 4:47 PM PDT up reply actions
You know I really feel bad for Coug999
He’s not going to earn any royalties on WulfWagon TM now that everyone has jumped off.
by Mark Sandritter on Oct 23, 2011 11:42 PM PDT reply actions 4 recs
So...
I actually flew in from Las Vegas to Seattle to watch the Cougs play this past weekend. All I can say is how disappointed I am in this team and coaches. I can’t remember how many missed tackles I saw, or how many times I pointed out a WIDE open receiver before Mannion threw the ball. What happened to that effort like in the UCLA or Stanford games on defense? I wasn’t even angry at the game (besides at some calls the refs made); I was just disappointed and apathetic. I was actually LAUGHING with my friends when the bands started dueling. I don’t get how I could go from being outright depressed after the UCLA to being so apathetic after the OSU game. I don’t know; it’s like when you’re in a relationship with someone that went on for far too long that when the relationship was finally over, there no hurt feelings at all.
Tackling has been a problem since Wulff showed up
as has the inability of the d-line to get off their blocks.
I miss *REAL* Four Loko
by B-Lot tailgater on Oct 24, 2011 7:59 AM PDT up reply actions
The battle of the bands
was actually pretty entertaining.
I haven't read every comment
But I cannot endorse any opinion which thinks that firing Wulff at the end of the season is the quickest way for this program to become relevant again. The loss was terribly disappointing and seriously makes me doubt the high hopes I once had for this season. However I don’t believe that is any reason to go jumping ship on this coach.
You may disagree, but I still believe in the program Wulff has had to build from the ground up. Most arguments are centered around the notion that a coach is allowed his 3-4 years to recruit his players and install his system before the seat can really begin to get hot. But given the state of the program when he inherited it years ago I don’t think there is a single coach out there that could have turned this thing around any more quickly. Hell, Guerra was quoted as saying players didn’t practice on purpose in order to show up the coach.
Following this thread, I preach patience. Wins or losses be damned, all firing Wulff would accomplish is sedating the fanbase for another 2 years while we haplessly wait for a program to be built. No continuity, 2014 sees some losses, rinse-&-repeat. I want Wulff for another season at minimum. I want him to be able to work will Tuel unperturbed for another season. Only then will we be able to fairly look at Wulff’s process and analyze whether or not he is a D-I caliber coach. Seeing him out the door will only short change us on the year that could have been.
Christ this is a quandary. Just win baby..
Thizz or die.
Things would be so much simpler if we could just win...
especially the games we are supposed to win…
Patience? I've been patient. And patience has morphed into apathy.
It’s looking highly likely that this team will lose all if not all but one of the final five games. Good luck selling Martin Stadium tickets next year to a “patient” Coug fan base with PW as our leader.
Please stop
We know the condition the program was in. It is well documented.
Problem is, Wulff made it worse, and now is showing he is unable to get us out of it. We are being out classed in every facet of the game, and its really not even close.
I had a really bad feeling after the SDSU collapse. I was still hopeful after the UCLA loss, but the complete dismantling at the hands of an AWFUL Oregon State team, should tell us all we really need to know.
I miss *REAL* Four Loko
by B-Lot tailgater on Oct 24, 2011 8:02 AM PDT up reply actions
You don't really think he made the program worse, do you?
I feel like Charlie Brown trying to kick the football. Ugh
I think his tear down is back firing
Don’t disassemble something if you don’t know how to put it back together.
I miss *REAL* Four Loko
by B-Lot tailgater on Oct 24, 2011 11:02 AM PDT up reply actions
I agree with this.
I see Wulff as a really good architect who tried to remodel a house. He drew up a great floorplan, was going to put in a bay window, radiant heated flooring, natural light it was going to be lovely. Then he tore down all the drywall and ripped up all the flooring before he realized he had no idea how to use a nail gun or lay tile.
by Mark Sandritter on Oct 24, 2011 11:43 AM PDT up reply actions
Shoulda hired me.
I know how to lay the pipe.
by Kyle Rancourt on Oct 24, 2011 1:04 PM PDT up reply actions 3 recs
It was suggested earlier that CPW is perhaps only a 2-3 tool guy, rather than a 5 tool guy.
Norm is a 10,000 tool guy.
I don't think you can argue that 2008 and 2009 weren't worse than anything this program has ever endured.
by Jeff Nusser on Oct 24, 2011 11:02 AM PDT up reply actions
Based only on SRS, 2008 and 2009 were by far the worst years in school history.
1. 2009 -14.87
2. 2008 -13.82
3. 1955 -7.19
4. 1969 -6.95
5 1946 -6.76
6. 2011 -6.26
2010 is 13th at -4.19
by Mark Sandritter on Oct 24, 2011 11:40 AM PDT up reply actions
No, I would never argue that
but I don’t think we will return to those depths in the next two years, with our without Wulff. I realize that isn’t a ringing endorsement of the program, but …
I feel like Charlie Brown trying to kick the football. Ugh
Wulff's seat just got hotter.
And I am man enough to admit I might be wrong in my assessment of his coaching abilities. This team was not ready to play, that was clear early. And it was absolutely frustrating. Any news on Tuel?
That being said we can’t rule out three HORRIBLE calls by the refs on third down that tacked 18 points onto the score board.
Attractive, Intelligent, Smart A**
by Neil Vincent Roberts on Oct 24, 2011 8:54 AM PDT reply actions
I see his point though.
On the off chance we got a stop it was always taken away by a penalty.
"Tonight, we skate with them. Tonight, we stay with them. And we shut them down because we can!" | Herb Brooks
by Coug999 on Oct 24, 2011 10:13 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
I'd argue that stops coming on an "off chance" is much more significant.
by Jeff Nusser on Oct 24, 2011 10:17 AM PDT up reply actions
It most definitely is
but you add in a blown TD call (the line judge’s jaw dropped in surprise when the ref raised his hands indicating a TD), and two blown unnecessary roughness calls killed our already shredded defense…
Attractive, Intelligent, Smart A**
by Neil Vincent Roberts on Oct 24, 2011 10:25 AM PDT up reply actions
calls that* killed our already shredded defense..
man I am still angry about this. Pretty sure I chased a few parents out of the student section on Saturday..
Attractive, Intelligent, Smart A**
by Neil Vincent Roberts on Oct 24, 2011 10:31 AM PDT up reply actions
There was a pretty bad pass interference call down the West sideline too
I believe it was in the third quarter … the ball was about 5 yards out of bounds and was not catchable. That said, I agree with the general premise that all of those penalties were relevant only at the margins.
I'm writing a tirade for my blog right now.
I’ll hit on a few points but the main thing will be how it appeared the penalties hurt the Cougs.
Attractive, Intelligent, Smart A**
by Neil Vincent Roberts on Oct 24, 2011 10:36 AM PDT up reply actions
i counted 14, but i may have missed some
there was a bad late hit call in the 2nd quarter that was on 3rd and 9 that ultimately led to a touchdown.
and there was that reception/fumble/forward progress garbage that should’ve been 4th and 2 but led to a first down.
as far as the forward progress call, i'll admit i don't know the actual rule so i could be wrong
but it seems that if your receiver catches the ball and fumbles it back three yards, he shouldn’t get forward progress.
it either should have been incomplete or a fumble.
Forward progress made no sense.
"Tonight, we skate with them. Tonight, we stay with them. And we shut them down because we can!" | Herb Brooks
by Coug999 on Oct 24, 2011 10:49 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
They ruled that it wasn't a fumble.
CougCenter In Reid We Trust, Twitter!
by Craig Powers on Oct 24, 2011 2:14 PM PDT up reply actions
At least that is what I gathered from the broadcast.
CougCenter In Reid We Trust, Twitter!
by Craig Powers on Oct 24, 2011 2:15 PM PDT up reply actions
Hate to say it, but I knew it...
<Keep Wulff and you will eventually get 6 or 7 wins..but thats as good as it will ever get. I like the guy but it’s pretty obvious he really cant coach in the pac-12. Remember when the cougs “attacked” years ago on both sides of the ball? We are so predictable it’s pathetic-and I see no adjusting during the game-here’s an idea, MIDDLE UNDERNEATH ROUTES TO A TIGHT END OR RB-THE D KNOWS YOU WANT TO GO DEEP TO WILSON AND THEY HAVE SHUT THAT DOWN-DONT BE SO ONE DIMINSONAL…AND BLITZ MORE, SEND A CORNER OR SOMTHING…go cougs
In the interest of accuracy
No passes went to tight ends on Saturday, and only a couple went to running backs. I’d hardly call the offense one-dimensional when they were basically 50-50 run pass. They tried a lot of things.
...

#CougHarmonyonTwitter with your pants off, M*tha F*cker!
by TiltingRight on Oct 24, 2011 2:58 PM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
They blitzed early and often
and Mannion hit hot routes that went for 5+ yards every time, if not more after poor tackling. The problem was not lack of variation, it was lack of execution.
Wulff has to go!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
In Wulff we have a coach, who didn’t have a clue, on what to do in the OSU game. I kinow he wants to win but dosen’t know how. His bad decisions in both the SDU and UCLA games along with this loss, seals his doom.
But less face it . We need a big name coach , who can get the recruits. Leach, in my opinion is our best answer. Get him now. Pay him whatever it takes. It’s time to get off our hands!!!!!!!!!!!
The decision to try and block a punt when we had a 10 pt lead and the momentum. We what have got the ball back and most probably scored again. That would have wraped up that game. That was a truly a bad decision, not called for at all. At UCLA we lost the game early by kicking field goals, not having enough confidence in your offense to score. We had UCLA on the ropes.
So, you can pick one risky special teams decision
And about four decisions that any other coach in the country would have made? That’s the basis of your argument?
and since i have to own all the records here
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
by BigWood! on Oct 24, 2011 10:08 AM PDT up reply actions 8 recs
Adding the exclamation point record
And padding his rec’s record at the same time. Impressive.
Streamin' and Threadin' and Shellin
by Shellin on Oct 24, 2011 11:40 AM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
I want to flag this because I loathe exclamation points.
No one knows how to use them properly and it makes me want to punch a small child.
(but I rec’d it anyways, because you’re so clever)
by Kyle Rancourt on Oct 24, 2011 1:08 PM PDT up reply actions
So let me get this straight:
The mod was going to flag to alert a mod about the comment? That just blew my mind.
"Tonight, we skate with them. Tonight, we stay with them. And we shut them down because we can!" | Herb Brooks
by Coug999 on Oct 24, 2011 1:46 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions 3 recs
COUGCENTER INCEPTION
COUGCENTER INCEPTIONCOUGCENTER INCEPTIONCOUGCENTER INCEPTIONCOUGCENTER INCEPTIONCOUGCENTER INCEPTIONCOUGCENTER INCEPTIONCOUGCENTER INCEPTION
by well you win some and lose others on Oct 24, 2011 3:48 PM PDT up reply actions 3 recs
Are you going for the record
of the most double posts?
I miss *REAL* Four Loko
by B-Lot tailgater on Oct 24, 2011 10:11 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
touche
this one was on purpose
touche is the name of my..
..never mind. Forget it
Attractive, Intelligent, Smart A**
by Neil Vincent Roberts on Oct 24, 2011 11:37 AM PDT up reply actions
Long on rant, short on logic argument....

#CougHarmonyonTwitter with your pants off, M*tha F*cker!
by TiltingRight on Oct 24, 2011 3:02 PM PDT up reply actions 3 recs
Nuss - it's been years in the making ...
…but this was one helluva post. I could really sense the emotion and I feel for you. No matter what side of the debate you fall on, great post.
Damn, my eyeball tastes good.
@chrislandon
Nice post Jeff!
I’m sorry you had to write it. I’ve wanted Wulff to succeed. The best thing possible for this university was to see Paul Wulff have great success at WSU, but it’s looking like this just won’t happen unless we want to give him another four years to get us to .500.
I wasn’t expecting 10-win seasons in the first four years, but I was expecting better than 3-31 in conference games and two of those wins were against legendarily bad teams.
I hope when WSU is no longer bowl eligible (if is looking like a pretty long shot at this point), that Moos just cuts Wulff loose and we can hit the reset button on this fiasco.
Anybody read this on wsufootball blog a year ago?
http://www.wsufootballblog.com/2010-articles/november/an-open-letter-to-bill-moos.html
Kinda weird how this is almost true for this season atleast
btw im not saying we should keep wulff
but for those who do maybe this is some hope for you
That is a little bit trippy
And senior Jeff Tuel has followed an injury ridden Junior campaign to emerge as a leading finalist for the Heisman Trophy.
Attractive, Intelligent, Smart A**
by Neil Vincent Roberts on Oct 24, 2011 8:52 PM PDT up reply actions
right?!
If we finish 4-8 like he said, I might start thinking we should actualy keep wulff lol
by korb M coug on Oct 24, 2011 10:57 PM PDT up reply actions
What people felt after the game.

by well you win some and lose others on Oct 24, 2011 3:40 PM PDT reply actions
that looks like the gang of UW fans that were marching towards Palo Alto after last week...
… what happened to the “Get Nick” sign that guy with the hat was carrying?
Damn, my eyeball tastes good.
@chrislandon
Curious
How many of you on this “Stream of Consciousness” have donated more than $10,000 to the athletic program in the last few years? How about $1,000?
Any comment to suggest the program was not dead before Wulff’s arrival must have not been reading about this program for the past three years.
I made the trip to Seattle from So Cal and it was certainly a major disappointment. But I can’t believe how much value is placed on single events and single games. This is a process and Saturday they got an “F” in too many categories to mention.
I am not a big fan of playing a home game in Seattle but understand the need for the money. We did not have the student support and we certainly had a lot of fans who simply are unwilling to make the trip to Pullman.
Use Stanford as a measuring stick…..I think we played a much better game than the Huskies against what might be the best team in the country.
Did someone expect Wulff to blast his players or coaches with the news media? Anyone know what he said privately to his team or coaches?
Last visit to this site for awhile…….it is not what happens that is as important as how we respond to it and our choice of attitude is one of the greatest of all human freedoms and to think this might influence you……well wrong again.
If you visit CougCenter often, you should realize that most of the people here understand that it is a process,
but processes have an end. For most fans, the end of the was this season and this game suggested that we are going to be disappointed. At some point, the process must produce, and Oregon State was a prime opportunity to prove something.
You say that “it is not what happens that is as important as how we respond to it.” Fans will hopefully show a certain level of loyalty and perseverance, but to say that what happens is not important is contrary to everything sports, history, and (quite frankly) the real world teaches us. Results matter, and this week’s result was beyond awful.
Then this team must have an extra large and special measure of persistence and focus at this point
I don’t mean to be totally dismissive, but to come in here and suggest that we’ve ignored the process or haven’t been patient is a bit insulting.
by Jeff Nusser on Oct 24, 2011 8:18 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
You do mean to be dismissive and you did. Your analysis and articles have been both supportive, perceptive and insightful. Given the level of analysis and support you know as well as anyone the path and have outlined it well. The fact that the OSU game was completely unexpected and unacceptable is a fact. How this team deals with it is as important as anything we will see or observe in terms of what the course and direction of the staff should be. The intent is not insult anyone…..and by the way there is a cost to dismiss Wulff and the athletic department will have to foot the bill……so those calling for his ouster may need to be a bit more familiar with the economic elements of this decision.
I said I didn't mean to be TOTALLY dismissive :-)
And I find this comment to be completely on point. It’s why I stopped short in my post of calling for him to be fired. I said the team is going to need to show something serious over the final five games, and they still have the opportunity to do so. I was merely saying they lost the margin for error. They are now forced to show something pretty significant. I think we’re on the same page.
As for the cost … well, it’s a sunk cost. And if you don’t fire him, you have to extend him, soooo … I guess I just don’t find the economic argument very compelling with just one year left on his contract at $650,000.
And lastly, I’m on a mission to get this thread to 300 comments. LET’S DO THIS.
I can raise my hand to your first question.
Can you?
by Blackie1829 on Oct 24, 2011 7:03 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
I'd argue people who want Wulff gone have a hell of a lot more data points than you do
And this comes from someone who has pushed every positive data point for the past year and a half.
I have data that will blow your mind....

by well you win some and lose others on Oct 24, 2011 8:43 PM PDT up reply actions 3 recs
Pirates are inversely proportional to temperature?!
This… Explaines… EVERYTHING!
I hate to be the math major here
But I would argue that this is directly proportional.
Streamin' and Threadin' and Shellin
I hate to be the really bad math major here
But I would argue that one should look at the axes labels before making comments.
Streamin' and Threadin' and Shellin
...
#CougHarmonyonTwitter with your pants off, M*tha F*cker!
by TiltingRight on Oct 25, 2011 8:23 AM PDT up reply actions 3 recs
So Stanford counts
but OS doesn’t?
I miss *REAL* Four Loko
by B-Lot tailgater on Oct 25, 2011 7:41 AM PDT up reply actions
I think Moos, Wulff, and the team captains need a private talk.
Cause something is just not working.
by well you win some and lose others on Oct 24, 2011 10:39 PM PDT up reply actions
Not correlated….the point is the the cost of a firing is real. The athletic department will have to foot the bill and it will be part of the analysis and evaluation. The fact that we have facilities that are not on par with other Pac 12 schools does impact recruiting and many other issues. WSU has lots of fans and passionate ones. WSU has a much smaller base of quality donors and this does impact the moves being made. Being a real supporter is more that wearing hat, t-shirt or waving a flag. This team has potential and is still very young. They had a game that was more than forgettable and disappointing. The point of donations was not specific to this game but to the overall picture of WSU athletics.
Welcome to CougCenter.
Please use the Subject Line for all future posts. Please and thank you.
by Kyle Rancourt on Oct 25, 2011 6:12 PM PDT up reply actions

by 
















