Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: This Week In GIFs

Jim Walden Wants To Know: 'Why Do I Have To Keep Explaining To The Stupid?'

"THIS IS NOT TINKERBELL."

Well, that was certainly interesting.

Jim Walden went on 950 KJR with Ian Furness and Jason Puckett earlier today, and basically said everyone who even remotely believes Paul Wulff should be fired is an idiot. He also mentions that Captain America is a former QB for the Washington State Cougars, Tinkerbell causes miracles, and that Wulff doesn't need to sell himself to the donors/fan base because there is not a T. Boone Pickens or Phil Knight type booster.

Audio and further analysis after the jump. 

Star-divide

 

Listen to the audio here.

Did you get all of that? Have you taken time to breathe yet? Ok, let's examine some of the gems I wrote down, and then we'll examine it in greater detail after the quotes.

 

"I think Bill Moos and Elson Floyd are both too smart to make a coaching change. And I’m gonna leave it at that."

So, if they did in fact make a coaching change, by this logic, they're stupid? Well, ok then, Jim. Thanks for setting the record straight.

"Let’s take the 2008 season and throw it out."

So ... while I agree that it sucked coming in late, and he didn't really have time to get a recruiting class together, we should just completely ignore 2008? Look, I'm the guy who wrote the "let's take it easy on Wulff because oh my god the 2006 class completely ruined 2008", but even I think pretending like it shouldn't matter is a little irresponsible. Should it weight as much as the other seasons? No, probably not. I think he universally was given a pass for that one season, but to completely disregard it? That's foolish.

"Why do I have to keep explaining to the stupid?"

Because we're stupid, and need to be told things over and over and over. We also drink rum & orange crush, which basically makes decision making nearly impossible.

"All you bloggers out there, do you remember how bad it was?"

YES I EVEN WROTE ABOUT IT. BUT IT WAS IN MY UNDERWEAR, SO IT'S PROBABLY INVALID. CONTINUE, OH WISE ONE.

"Before we let our coach go, write down your list of coaches who you think we’ll get."

First, I'm not sure anyone thinks letting the coach go in the middle of the season is a good idea. So rosterbating (coachsterbating?) about a possible new coach at this point is stupid. However, do you really think, with the new Pac-12 TV money coming in next year, that we wouldn't be able to find a coach who is better than the current staff? Really?

"He won’t be a 1-AA guy, ‘cause we say those guys can’t coach, no matter how many of ‘em. We don’t want any Jim Tressels, ‘cause they got caught cheatin’."

What the hell does Jim Tressel have to do with anything? Not sure anyone thinks all FCS coaches are cheaters. This is just grasping at straws. He then goes on to make a comment about how perhaps it'll be an assistant from West Virginia, and I was completely baffled. I mean, more so than usual. Think about that for a second. Walden said something that made me more confused than he usually makes me.

"He doesn't have to. The Cougar fanbase doesn't give, that's a figment of imagination."

This was in response to a question posed by Furness which asked how much Wulff has to sell himself to the donors/fan base the rest of the season. He then rants for another few minutes on how terrible the WSU alums are and that they never donate money. He calls them the "poorest givers in all of college football" and berates them. Well I don't know about you guys, but hearing that I'm worthless and never give sure makes me want to give!

"Do we have a T. Boone Pickens that you know of? Do we have a guy who runs Nike that you know of?"

Who the hell does, dude? The reason you named those two humungous donors is because Phil Knight (Oregon) and T. Boone Pickens (Oklahoma State) are two of the largest donors in the country. You're really using this as your argument? That we don't have a billionaire donor who is giving the school 50 million dollars? That's your complaint?

"He cleaned up a drug ringed mess."

FROM GUYS THAT WULFF RECRUITED. OH MY GOD I'M SO ANGRY. Jamal Atofau and Andre Barrington were idiots. No one is disputing that. If they were innocent, they're stupid enough to live in a grow house. So Wulff had to get rid of those bad apples? DON'T OVERLOOK THE FACT THAT HE BROUGHT IN THOSE TWO BAD APPLES, YOU CHERRY PICKING BUFFOON.

"I've got proof that we drew 17,000 for the Oregon State game the year we went to the Rose Bowl (1997)."

That's funny, we never played Oregon State in 1997. The first of November, we traveled to Arizona State, where we suffered the first loss of the season. The next week, we hosted Louisiana-Lafayette (and won 77-7). So if your argument is we only had 17k for the Rajun Cajuns the week after a tough road loss? Then ... ok? But I would enjoy seeing this proof of Oregon State. My proof is here. I BET YOUR PROOF IS AN OLD TIMEY ANECDOTE ABOUT WALKING UPHILL BOTH WAYS.

 

Walden, throughout the interview compared Wulff to both Tyrone Willingham and Steve Sarkisian. He claimed that they both had more in the cupboard when they arrived, and that comparing them was not fair.

But ... Jim? You just compared them yourself.

His main talking point was comparing the 2008 Huskies, who went 0-12, to the 2011 Cougars, who are 3-4. His point was, the '08 Huskies (who don't get to throw out their season) lost Jake Locker and went winless. The '11 Cougars, on the other hand, lose Jeff Tuel and still go 3-4. WE IZ SO MUCH BETTERZ.

Nevermind that the Huskies played BYU, Oklahoma, and Notre Dame while the Cougars played Idaho State, UNLV, and San Diego State. I hate the Huskies as much as the next guy, but this is irresponsible. UW has nothing to do with WSU, and comparing the two makes no sense. ESPECIALLY WHEN YOU DAMN US FOR MAKING THE COMPARISON WE'RE NOT MAKING AND YOU ACTUALLY ARE.

Oh my god I hope I am this fun when I get to be 100.

My other favorite part of the interview was when he was comparing the QBs on the roster in 2009. He said "who would you rather have? Lopina, Lobbastael, or Locker?" completely ignoring the fact that Jeff Tuel was actually on the roster. Before this, he mentioned Steve Rogers was the QB in 2008. Steve took time out of his busy schedule from being a frozen superhero to lead the Cougs in '08, and has since gone on to star in his own movie.

Gary Rodgers, on the other hand, got knocked out due to injury. But yeah.

To end the interview, Furness reminded Walden that Tuel is, despite Walden's best efforts to convince us otherwise, not the only player on the roster. Walden responded by mentioning that his injury made the defense, and the other players, emotional. This is the reason for their poor play.

Problem solved, you guys. The defense haz the sadz and stopped trying. Poor Jeff Tuel. If he's not around, the rest of the guys just hang their heads and kick rocks because they're so sad.

 

Basically, I have no idea what the hell Walden was talking about. I've often called him a blowhard and a moron who says things to get attention, but this is taking it one step too far. Dude, go have a glass of prune juice and watch Murder She Wrote. It'll be ok.

Just for transparency, Walden coached at Wazzu for nine seasons. His record was 44-52-4, with three winning seasons. He graduated from Wyoming. I'm usually all for the "Once a Coug, Always a Coug" thing, but ... dude. Go away.

Comment 157 comments  |  4 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

had the joy of listening live

Couldn’t believe how he completely ignored the defense. And he is so far in the bag for whoever the current head coach is, until that guy is gone. Loved the 17k attendance vs OSU in 97 reference too.

by Blackie1829 on Oct 25, 2011 6:25 PM PDT via mobile reply actions  

I listened to the Walden interview early after hearing about it on Twitter

p(.I understand what he was saying, but it doesn’t mean I agree with it. It called us stupid, tight, and supportive. I’ve always liked Jim, he makes me laugh. But right now I’m still processing everything he said and the way he said it, and deciding how I feel about him now. I don’t donate, but am not in a position to do so. I don’t go to as many games as I used to, but I make sure to be supportive when they are in my backyard. If they have an event in Spokane, I go. I figure it’s my duty as a fan to be supportive. I was at the football scrimmage, I was at the basketball game last year, and I’ll be at the basketball games this year. p(. As for the coaching, I have been a Paul Wulf supporter into Saturday night! I saw a team that was not prepared to play, that is a coaches job #1. He was out coached on Saturday, and it wasn’t even close.

Go Cougs!

by dslagg on Oct 25, 2011 6:25 PM PDT reply actions  

How do I start new paragraphs?

What did I do wrong? p(. ?

Go Cougs!

by dslagg on Oct 25, 2011 6:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

I guess Coach Waldo

was right when he called me stupid!

Go Cougs!

by dslagg on Oct 25, 2011 11:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

dslagg

“I don’t donate, but I am in a position to do so.”

There’s always the Bulldog Club up at GU!

Welcome to the Sound Pound...

by SoundPound on Oct 26, 2011 12:03 AM PDT up reply actions  

SoundPound my girlfriend can join the Bulldog Club

She just graduated their and works at the university. I guess I’m lucky their, if I want to go to a GU game, I just say honey I need you to go stand in line this week before work.

Go Cougs!

by dslagg on Oct 26, 2011 1:29 AM PDT up reply actions  

REC

REC REC REC

I miss *REAL* Four Loko

by B-Lot tailgater on Oct 25, 2011 8:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

Anyone else read Drew Magary's Fun With Peter King

This reminded me exactly of that. Which means I adored it. Good work sir.

Two in the cake, one in the puddin'! -Kevin Calabro, Twitter: MichaelTheCoug

by Michael The Coug on Oct 25, 2011 6:49 PM PDT reply actions  

I think we need to take a step back...

I don’t agree with what Jim said, but I think his rant just inflamed an already irritated fan base. Cougar football has been abysmal and a running joke for the last 4 plus years, and I think Saturday night’s performance along with his rant was the final straw. I was angry and embarrassed like most of us and ready to fire CPW after Saturday’s game, and just felt hopeless. I think Cougar Nation just needs to take a deep breath and calm down, and just see how this season finishes. We have five games left four out of the five are winnable. With that being said, I think Wulff will not be back next season. I think a change is required. I like Jim and I always have, and have been criticized for supporting him. In this case he is dead wrong, and just because you don’t agree with doesn’t mean you have to crucify him. Yes he’s off his rocker, and eccentric but that’s what makes him entertaining. Coach Walden has done good things for this school (like being and advocate for having the Cougars stop playing in Spokane and play home games in Pullman) and he has said some questionable things. Don’t turn on him because he went off halfcocked, even though he is wrong you have to admire his passion. He’s an avid Cougar supporter; hell! He supports this university more than the one he graduated from. My gripe is that does it matter that he went to Wyoming? That’s not relevant to the argument, I didn’t graduate from WSU; does that make me less of a fan? It doesn’t your background or were you’re from, all it matters is you’re a Coug. My family is a bunch of Cougars, and I was born and raised as Cougar fan. Being a Washington State University fan always meant being a part of an extended family, you have some people in your family you dislike or don’t agree with; It’s just comes with the territory.

I cant define it, I cant tell somebody who isnt a Cougar what its like. Theres something that happens at Washington State;. You quietly and subtly become infected Washington State is a passion. - Coach Jim Walden (1978-1986)

by Cougz4Life509 on Oct 25, 2011 7:20 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

Yeah I guess it sort of seems like I was saying "he's not really a Coug"

I didn’t mean for that to happen. I was just sort of giving his background. To be completely honest, a few years ago, I thought Walden was an alum. The way he talked about the Cougs, I figured this was a life long thing. I didn’t mean to insinuate that he’s less of a Coug because he went to Wyoming and left for Iowa State. I was simply making his information known.

Having said that, I haven’t liked Walden for a while. It’s not like this is the thing that made me dislike Walden.

by Kyle Rancourt on Oct 25, 2011 9:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

Walden made himself into the joke -- Kyle just jumped on board the train.

One question for you: If Kyle’s condescension is simply uncalled for, is Walden’s also?

by Jeff Nusser on Oct 26, 2011 1:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

You know plenty

And yours is a valuable perspective. At the risk of putting words into Kyle’s mouth, I think what he was trying to do is show how Walden undermines everything you just pointed out with the things that he says and how he says them.

For me? I thank him for his service to the university, and now I wish he would please just go away.

by Jeff Nusser on Oct 26, 2011 3:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

And I can even agree with that

… that his current vehemence and ideas are more than not helpul, they’re harmful, divisive, and out of touch. But for many of those who were around in the late ‘70s/early ’80s, things he says now have a deeper context than the current moment, and perhaps there’s more of a tendency to forgive.

by olypencoug on Oct 26, 2011 4:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

THIS.

I whole-heartedly agree. And I wonder if I’m the only Coug who thinks Walden made some valid points.

by 206Coug on Oct 26, 2011 8:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

I've re-read the post more than once and I don't see what you are referring to.

What points did Walden make that were valid? That we don’t give enough? You agree with what he said just because he mentioned that we don’t donate enough money?

by Kyle Rancourt on Oct 26, 2011 10:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

By "THIS" I was referring to olympencoug's comment above

About the condescending remarks toward Walden. And while I realize he completely made up a game from the ’97 season, I do agree with a lot of what he had to say.

You don’t think people compare Wulff and Sark/Willingham? I’ve heard a lot of complaints to the tune of, “Look at what Sark has done since he took over. They fired Willingham, we should fire Wulff and get a coach like Sark.” Walden makes the point that Tyrone was in his fourth season at UW in 2008 and couldn’t win a single game with or without Locker (he had Locker through the first three games, all against ranked opponents). In fact, they lost 7 of their 8 games by 20 points or more without Locker. In his fourth season, Wulff has shown that he can win without his star quarterback. Yes, we beat the likes of ISU, UNLV, and Colorado. Woohoo. But Willingham couldn’t even beat the 2008 WSU Cougars without Locker.

Now, the comparison of Wulff and Sark that Walden made. Wulff inherited Gary “Steve” Rodgers, Kevin Lopina, a HORRENDOUS Marshall Lobbestael (do Wulff and his staff get any credit for helping him develop?) etc. Sark got Jake Locker, Chris Polk, Mason Foster, do I need to go on? Walden is right that it’s unfair to compare their records without looking at the circumstances.

I wish Walden was able to articulate himself better in that interview, but I guess when you’re that fired up and in your 70s it can be tough to keep your composure.

by 206Coug on Oct 27, 2011 2:41 AM PDT up reply actions  

Do not forget the cries about the D-line and O-lines

With them not doing their jobs, two quarterbacks did not even get to show their potential and scores overwhelm the team. We suffered in the end with a two star recruiting year. The only luck was getting a ramdom four star.

by well you win some and lose others on Oct 27, 2011 7:41 AM PDT up reply actions  

Maybe I don't frequent enough places where there are Cougs

But I truly don’t recall anyone comparing the situation Wulff inherited to the situation Sarkisian inherited. Saying Willingham couldn’t win without Locker is a gross overgeneralization, just like it’s a gross overgeneralization to say WSU can’t win without Tuel. If UW had played ISU and UNLV in Willingham’s last year, they’re 2-0, too. It’s silly.

by Jeff Nusser on Oct 27, 2011 7:49 AM PDT up reply actions  

It's not just that Willingham couldn't win without Locker

It’s that he couldn’t stay competitive in a single game without Locker, aside from the Apple Cup. If you’re in your fourth year as HC and losing a single player affects your team’s performance to the tune of 0-12 and nine blowouts, that is not acceptable. I don’t understand how that’s an overgeneralization. Were there noteworthy factors at play, like strength of schedule? Sure. Do I also like to pose questions and answer them myself? You betcha. But I don’t like the idea of a coach getting a free pass just because he had to play some tough games. If you don’t want to be held accountable for losing all your games, don’t schedule half of them against ranked opponents.

Washington did absolutely the right thing by booting Willingham. However, that was a completely different situation than what Moos is facing with Wulff which is why it’s unfair to compare them.

by 206Coug on Oct 27, 2011 9:57 AM PDT up reply actions  

Of course the situations are different.

Nobody around here is saying they’re the same. But I will say there is one glaring similarity: Our defense’s current S&P+ is 109 and Washington’s S&P+ in 2008 was 99th. Remember, that’s an opponent-adjusted measure, and you can’t blame that on the quarterback. Period. It’s a classic red herring argument, and it makes Walden look foolish.

by Jeff Nusser on Oct 27, 2011 10:17 AM PDT up reply actions  

and because I want to keep going....

To my son Homer and his entire family, I leave these: a box of mint-condition 1918 liberty-head silver dollars. You see, back in those days, rich men would ride around in Zeppelins, dropping coins on people, and one day I seen J.D. Rockefeller flying by. So I run of the house with a big washtub and and… hey! Where are you going? Anyway, about my washtub. I’d just used it that morning to wash my turkey, which in those days was known as a walking-bird. We’d always have walking-bird on Thanksgiving, with all the trimmings: cranberries, injun eyes, yams stuffed with gunpowder. Then we’d all watch football, which in those days was called baseball…

by BigWood! on Oct 26, 2011 10:42 AM PDT up reply actions  

Now that's funny

…good stuff right there, yes indeed.

by kaddy on Oct 26, 2011 12:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

To piggyback, Waldo continued...

We wore baseball caps and cheap windbreakers, as was the style at the time.

Aim High - GO COUGS

by 89Coug in FL on Oct 26, 2011 10:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think the coaching staff has their backs against a wall

What would u guys consider a victory (besides the actual W)?
 Lose by no more than 1/2 the spread?
Having the team prepared and ready to show up ALL 4 quarters?

Let’s hope the staff still has a trick up their sleeve…we still have 4 games after Oregon I mean crazier things have happened…

by Kimball10 on Oct 25, 2011 7:33 PM PDT reply actions  

I would consider it a win if we were no longer the biggest joke in west coast football.

How about if, after 4 years, the team wasn’t still underperforming. In 4 years, we have beaten a few awful teams (and lost to some other awful teams).

I’m tired of watching a team and have everyone around me question why I would even bother.

To be honest, I think back on that Oregon State game last year and seriously wonder how the hell that happened. And then I realize that I’m befuddled about our team beating a middle of the road Pac 10 team.

How much more time should we give him?

by displacedcoug on Oct 25, 2011 7:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

I agree

I feel like the wins have to come at some point right?

by Kimball10 on Oct 25, 2011 8:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

root for a good FCS team then

Eastern passed for 500 yards at UW, almost won (even with a -4 TO margin), and now they have won 4 straight. I like the Cougs but EWU is a silver lining to these recent struggles at WSU.

Welcome to the Sound Pound...

by SoundPound on Oct 26, 2011 12:17 AM PDT up reply actions  

I do root for EWU

(as I attended both universities). But I grew up a Coug! EWU was the first of any of the teams I root for to win a championship during my lifetime. Believe me I partied like a rock star, after that championship win!

Go Cougs!

by dslagg on Oct 26, 2011 1:25 AM PDT up reply actions  

Will Moos be stupid if he fires Wulff???

I cannot believe he was that bold in predicting what Moos and Floyd might do. I have a lot of confidence in Moos to make the right decision at the end of the year. For somebody that just left the Paul Wulff camp as of last Saturday, I cannot be all that vehement about him leaving. If Moos thinks he should stay, then I will turst that to be the right decision whether or not it is what I wanted.

by PullManiac on Oct 25, 2011 7:49 PM PDT reply actions  

I can go with this.

If Moos truly believes that Wulff should stay, then I guess I trust him. All I care about are the results, and I do truly like the guy…

by displacedcoug on Oct 25, 2011 7:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

It's not really what he said

(although I disagree with a lot of it, and a lot of it is simply inaccurate) but it’s more about how he said it. Do we need to donate more? Sure. But calling us all idiots and basically saying we don’t get the right to have an opinion is ridiculous.

by Kyle Rancourt on Oct 26, 2011 10:40 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

I can see some people not liking Walden's delivery

Or what he had to say. However, others like myself agree with a lot of what he said and were inspired by his passion.

by 206Coug on Oct 27, 2011 2:12 AM PDT up reply actions  

You still didn't answer my question.

What did you agree with? That he said don’t fire Wulff? That he said we need to donate more? If you think we should keep Wulff, that’s fine. There’s even an argument to be had for that. Walden did a horrific job of arguing for Wulff on the basis of logic and stuck to yelling and “I’M A COACH, I WOULD KNOW HOW HARD IT IS” rhetoric. That’s not an argument. Walden was simply ranting. There was no discussion that took place.

I’m completely fine if people think Walden was right and I was wrong for ripping him, but give me specific examples of which of his points were “valid”, because I pretty much showed the opposite.

by Kyle Rancourt on Oct 27, 2011 11:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

Sure I did, but I can elaborate.

Walden gave a detailed (albeit frantic) explanation about what Wulff really had to work with when he took over, and how fans’ expectations may have exceeded what was actually possible with his resources. Come on guys, Gary Rogers and Kevin Lopina? Although I don’t think you should completely throw out the ‘08 season, you’ve gotta be amazed that we didn’t find ourselves going 0-12 with the state of our program.

I thought he made a good argument for the Seattle game, although I can certainly understand the cons as well.

Like many others I agree with Walden that now is not the time to be calling for Wulff’s head, and I appreciate Moos’ approach of evaluating the season as a whole when it’s over.

He makes a great point about Wulff affecting the players off the field, as in having the fifth best grad rate in the conference. Leaps and bounds in cleaning up that department, which believe it or not, does affect the football aspect of the program as well.

I agree with Walden that Wulff’s future shouldn’t have to come down to money, but rather the direction of the program, especially since financial support from fans has been lacking even during the good times. Also, our athletic department has major funds coming from the new conference media contract whether Wulff keeps his job or not.

I did think Walden placed a little too much weight on losing Tuel. When asked if Walden thought Wulff should have a job if he finishes his fourth season 6-39 — Wulff would actually finish 8-41 without another win, not sure where 6-39 came from — Walden says, “So losing your starting quarterback means nothing to you?” But as it’s been said, losing Jeff Tuel doesn’t excuse that horrendous defensive performance. That said, I have a serious lack of faith in Todd Sturdy and Chris Ball, but I still believe in Paul Wulff.

“There’s been too much work put into this thing to change horses now.”

by 206Coug on Oct 27, 2011 4:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

Ok, I can see that.

But, if you have no faith in the coordinators he hired, how can you have faith in Wulff? He didn’t inherit his staff, he hired them personally. If his coordinators fail, that’s on him.

I’m not sure anyone is advocating letting him go mid-season. Once the season is over, though, I think it’s probably better to part ways. I don’t think anyone mentioned Wulff’s future coming down to money, either.

Finally, are you really patting Wulff on the back for the 5th best graduation rate in a newly formed 12 team conference? Take out Utah (who is tied for 5th with us) and Colorado, and we’re 5th place out of 10 teams. Middle of the pack is something to celebrate? I get that he’s cleaned up the program, and the APR used to be horrible, so it’s commendable that we’re no longer awful, but isn’t that sort of expected? Should we be giving him credit for things like that? I feel like that was part of the job description. That’s like saying, "Well, he’s been a great spokesman for the university." Same thing. That’s part of the job.

I too am amazed we didn’t go winless in ‘08, but you can’t write off the season while simultaneously giving him credit for the wins.

Basically, I get where you’re coming from on a lot of this, but this simply isn’t what Walden said, at all. It’s what the people who are “agreeing” with him want to hear. He said "Don’t fire Wulff because it’d be stupid to because it’s hard to coach."

by Kyle Rancourt on Oct 27, 2011 5:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

Right on point Kyle

Why he keeps getting a podium to stand on is just amazing.

All you have to do is watch a game on mute and listen to Walden’s commentary and you realize how far from reality he truly is.

by dertingfactor on Oct 25, 2011 8:43 PM PDT reply actions  

His color analyst gig continues because he never says anything negative about the team

His spot on Ian’s show continues because it sparks discussions such as this one. Good for listenership.

by Jeff Nusser on Oct 25, 2011 8:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

Though other than more viewer hits for sites like this...

…we’d all be better off not hearing strongly-opinionated nonsense from someone who has a superiority complex over the rest of the fanbase.

by dertingfactor on Oct 25, 2011 8:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

Now I know how Don James must have felt

For the first time I can empathize with the dawgfather….trying to make sense of the goofy things that inevitably fly from the Mouth of Walden.

by coug79 on Oct 25, 2011 8:46 PM PDT reply actions  

On his whole WSU fans not supporting...

WSU has a rare situation, every home game is basically a road game for the fan base. Best case scenerio Spokane fans only have to drive about 2 hours to get to the game. What other school has to deal with logistics like that?

by bliznair64@gmail.com on Oct 25, 2011 9:12 PM PDT reply actions  

Oregon and Oregon State

It’s not much different than Spokane to Pullman as it is From Portland to both those schools…not to mention Phoenix to Tuscon for UA, and Denver to Boulder for CU

by Cali18 on Oct 26, 2011 2:06 AM PDT up reply actions  

That's what I was thinking.

For whatever reason, its tough getting Spokane people to Pullman. I don’t know why. I love going back to Pullman. There were some years (the better years of course) that I didn’t miss a game.

Go Cougs!

by dslagg on Oct 26, 2011 2:20 AM PDT up reply actions  

The Springfield-Eugene area has over 300,000 people.

I hardly think that compares to Pullman-Moscow.

CougCenter In Reid We Trust, Twitter!

by Craig Powers on Oct 26, 2011 8:11 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

Also,

All those other cities you mentioned are much larger than Spokane.

CougCenter In Reid We Trust, Twitter!

by Craig Powers on Oct 26, 2011 8:12 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

They all also have larger stadiums to fill

I don’t think its an unfair comparison, especially if you throw the Tri-Cities into the mix.

I miss *REAL* Four Loko

by B-Lot tailgater on Oct 26, 2011 8:25 AM PDT up reply actions  

From the City of Spokane website
The City of Spokane is home to some 195,500 residents; there are around 418,000 residents in the metropolitan area.

Not exactly a small town.

I miss *REAL* Four Loko

by B-Lot tailgater on Oct 26, 2011 8:28 AM PDT up reply actions  

I wasn't arguing the point that the stadium should be filled.

I just think it is silly to compare the Spokane Metropolitan area to Phoenix, Denver, and Portland.

CougCenter In Reid We Trust, Twitter!

by Craig Powers on Oct 26, 2011 4:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

Ya, it isn't even close to PHX. PHX 1.5 mill

Denver 600K, but maybe more closer to Portland at 583K. These are city pops alone, not including surrounding areas.

I cook with beer, sometimes I even add it to the food

by SoCalCoug on Oct 26, 2011 5:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

I grew up a farm kid in Central Washington and my family made it to Pullman for at least 1 game a year.

I ran into people I knew at every game. Now that I live in Spokane, I don’t know what the problem is. I wave my flag in front of my house, and others do to! For the bars are pro Gonzaga first, and then WSU or EWU. We even have a bar that caters to Montana fans (never been there). There is only one Sports bar that is decked out in all WSU stuff. I thought the scrimmage was well attended for the first time out, and hope they keep bringing it to town.
As for CDA, it is full of transplants from California, etc (like everywhere else), but I think the locals favor Idaho or Boise State.

Go Cougs!

by dslagg on Oct 26, 2011 5:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

If that's how you want to look at it,

Then you need to throw Bend into the mix. 4 largest cities in Oregon are all within that radius.

"Tonight, we skate with them. Tonight, we stay with them. And we shut them down because we can!" | Herb Brooks

by Coug999 on Oct 26, 2011 8:29 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

Fine, throw Bend into the mix

That has nothing to do with the fact that WSU has a very ample population base to draw from to fill one of the smallest stadiums in a BCS conference.

I miss *REAL* Four Loko

by B-Lot tailgater on Oct 26, 2011 8:31 AM PDT up reply actions  

The apocolypse must be coming, because I agree with B-Lot again

I think the point is fair. Do we know how many alums live in Spokane and the Tri-Cities?

by Jeff Nusser on Oct 26, 2011 8:35 AM PDT up reply actions  

Not even just alums, but fans or potential fans

I know we like to make fun of Husky and Duck fans who never stepped foot in a classroom at UW or UO, but the fact of that matter is those fans are just as important as they equal butts in the seats. They might not be big donors, but they still pay money for a ticket.

I miss *REAL* Four Loko

by B-Lot tailgater on Oct 26, 2011 8:43 AM PDT up reply actions  

The problem is

To this day, no one has figured out how to get these people interested. Well, not enough of them anyways.

I miss *REAL* Four Loko

by B-Lot tailgater on Oct 26, 2011 8:44 AM PDT up reply actions  

I think it's incredibly weird, honestly.

You’ve got Pac-12 football within a reasonable drive, and it elicits a shoulder shrug? I used to drive from Wenatchee to Seattle and back in one day for Seahawks games. It’s really not that big of a deal.

by Jeff Nusser on Oct 26, 2011 8:48 AM PDT up reply actions  

I do too

I’ve never understood it.

I miss *REAL* Four Loko

by B-Lot tailgater on Oct 26, 2011 8:51 AM PDT up reply actions  

i really think that comes down to the lack of success historically

Going to games is more likely to become habit-forming when following a winner over an extended period of time, which we haven’t ever had (I’m talking a run of 15+ quality years). Then, during the down years people are more likely to stick with it if there is still reason to believe things will turn around.

If we had maintained the 01-03 momentum with maybe only one non-bowl year, I think we would be approaching that habit amongst our alums and hangers-on.

by Blackie1829 on Oct 26, 2011 10:25 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

Certainly a huge factor

Oregon attendance was lousy too until the mid 90s.

I miss *REAL* Four Loko

by B-Lot tailgater on Oct 26, 2011 10:26 AM PDT up reply actions  

particularly for non-alum east siders

They have no connection or reason to drive 2-3 hours.

And when less than 30% of our grads are in eastern WA / northern ID, it’s an uphill battle.

by Blackie1829 on Oct 26, 2011 10:38 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

Oregon AND Oregon State had lousy attendence at home games...

They both, at times, played ‘home’ games in PDX in hopes to attract butts in seats. That was the genesis for Autzen stadium. OSU was still playing in PDX into the ’80s.

Fact is, if there’s a good team and excitement surrounding that team, your school can be located just East of a wheat ranch outside of Richland or on top of a volcano in central Oregon…. people will come and do whatever it takes to be part of the show.

Until the Cougs have a credible program that is at least a threat to knock off the Stanfords and Oregons of the Pacific Conference, they’ll have problems selling seats – whether the game is in Pullman, Spokane or Seattle (unless of course it is Oregon fans driving up to see THEIR team play in Washington State).

by ConfofChamps on Oct 27, 2011 11:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

I also think the stadium improvements will be a factor

The gameday experience is so huge. Even as the Seahawks haven’t been real good the last few years, I still enjoy going to the games. It matters.

by Jeff Nusser on Oct 26, 2011 10:47 AM PDT up reply actions  

There are definitely improvements to be made

to the gameday experience.

We could start a laundry list I am sure.

I miss *REAL* Four Loko

by B-Lot tailgater on Oct 26, 2011 10:55 AM PDT up reply actions  

I think they're doing a good job upgrading this a piece at a time.

It’s not all going to be fixed overnight. I think the goal should be — and is — to have these things in line to take advantage when the program gets good again.

by Jeff Nusser on Oct 26, 2011 10:56 AM PDT up reply actions  

So when do they...

Upgrade 195 and 26? Getting into and out of Pullman is part of the problem. A couple more hotels would help too. This problem is multifaceted.

Aim High - GO COUGS

by 89Coug in FL on Oct 26, 2011 10:35 PM PDT up reply actions  

Bus Travel to Pullman

There are multiple ways WSU has involved the Spokane Market. There is now a bus system that takes people from the WSU Spokane Campus to Pullman and back on Saturday’s. Northern Quest Casino also has packages with WSU that take people to the game. There is Bill Moos’ radio show on Mondays, Coaches Luncheons on Monday afternoons, and viewing parties in the Spokane Coeur d’Alene area for away games. There is no excuse for a fan in the Spokane metro area not to attend a game in Pullman. Its only 1 hr 30 min drive. People wait in traffic longer than that in big cities.

by boomer1544 on Oct 26, 2011 9:34 AM PDT up reply actions  

Another thing to consider with the UO and OSU

when they were bad to mediocre in the 80’s hardly anyone went to their games either. Heck the Oregon AD even drew up plans to put a dome over Autzen

Attractive, Intelligent, Smart A**

by Neil Vincent Roberts on Oct 26, 2011 3:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don't think I'd compare Spokane to any of those cities

In population, or in average income. Guessing on the latter.

by kaddy on Oct 26, 2011 12:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

Spokane Metro: 600K

Portland Metro: 2.3M. Plus Salem is even closer than Portland to both Eugene and Corvallis. IOW Pullman is farther away from a MAJOR population center than any other Pac12 school.

Ducks GOOOOD. Fuskies BAAAAAD.

by BigGreenWreckingMachine on Oct 27, 2011 6:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

THANK YOU FOR THIS ENLIGHTENING NEWS

And for completely missing the point.

I miss *REAL* Four Loko

by B-Lot tailgater on Oct 28, 2011 8:28 AM PDT up reply actions  

Walden/Wulff

y’all who think Wulff should go about half way thru the worst rebuilding since Walden took over are the real idiots

by Willietwo on Oct 25, 2011 9:32 PM PDT reply actions  

Half way?

Four years in is half way? It’s gonna be a rough four more years…

by displacedcoug on Oct 25, 2011 9:46 PM PDT up reply actions   2 recs

Walden is spot on

To begin with, any time you listen to him talk you should understand it should come with a disclaimer: “For entertainment purposes only!” But I think his comments today revealed a deep, and very true frustration with the Cougar fan base.
This was less about Paul Wulff, more about the long history of pathetic fan and donor support. And he is correct. Cougar fans have always complained and moaned, and acted like they’re entitled to a winning program but have done nothing in terms of financial support…or even game day support. Go look at the attendance numbers for the three 10 win season..many in the upper-20-thousand range.
Walden has a deep passion for Cougar football, and his emotions today were partly the result of more than 30 years of pleading for fans to support the program.
His overall coaching record you make fun of was actually one of the better modern day records if you throw out all the coaches who bolted after one or two years…and he brought loyalty, some excellent players and exciting teams to Pullman – resulting in the school’s first bowl bid in 50 years.
I’m willing to cut him more slack. He knows a thing or two about what it takes to get teenagers ready to play each week, as opposed to all the fantastic scribes who clog the internet.

by meancoug on Oct 25, 2011 9:46 PM PDT reply actions   2 recs

So, if I'm in a 30-year marriage with a wife who I've faithfully provided for

That gives me the right to belittle and verbally assault her because I’ve been loyal, taken her on some excellent projects around the house and taken her on some exciting vacations? I can just sort of do and say whatever I want because I’m frustrated and doggone it I’ve earned it?

by Jeff Nusser on Oct 25, 2011 10:12 PM PDT up reply actions   2 recs

Don't forget

You ran out on your marriage for 8 years and spent your time at Iowa State!

Go Cougs!

by dslagg on Oct 25, 2011 11:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

To say "this was less about Paul Wulff" means you didn't actually listen to the interview.

When the topic of donations and money came up, he almost seemed insulted that he had to answer such silly questions. The entire 10 minutes before that, he was ranting about how we don’t know how hard it is to coach and that we shouldn’t be comparing Wulff to Sark.

To say this was less about Paul Wulff is correct. It was about Jim Walden being an asshat per usual.

by Kyle Rancourt on Oct 25, 2011 11:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

Walden has bias...

Whenever he props up Wulff and the staff, I think a lot of casual fans look at that and think “he’s a former coach, he knows what he’s talking about.” The fact is, he has a vested interest in Wulff staying. Wulff and the staff include him in some things, let him give opinions. I don’t know that they use any of that stuff, but by letting him feel involved, he goes out on Saturday’s or whenever there is a mic, and does his Amhad Rashad/Michael Jordan routine.

Doba’s staff didn’t welcome him in the way Wulff does, which is why you never irrational defense of Doba the way you do of Wulff.

by ghostof97Coug on Oct 25, 2011 9:54 PM PDT reply actions  

My response to Jim

This was a stupid interview by Walden in the face of the facts of where the program is and could not be more ill-timed.

I could care less about the U of W and whoever their coach is, and I’ll agree on all points about 2008 and 2009.

I live in 2011 and Coach W spends no time on what’s wrong with where we are are right now. Why is there no progress on
the defense. I fail to see how fans, no matter what they contribute are to be considered stupid for asking, “why is
there so little progress?”

For the salary offered for the position, working hard isn’t what matters, but that’s all we stupid folks should know about.

Berating the support base had merit when Price had the 2003 team. Right now, I’d say it’s a miracle anyone still cares.

And Jim, for the record I have season tickets, am a life time member of the alumni association, and have funded a continuing donation program that provides a substantial sum to WSU.

by TheOriginalCougMan on Oct 25, 2011 10:26 PM PDT reply actions  

I will give him one thing:

You’ve gotta remember that the guy is a former coach, so he probably sees everything that is going on from a different perspective than most (the perspective of a former head coach). Doesn’t give him to right to call out an entire fanbase though.

"Tonight, we skate with them. Tonight, we stay with them. And we shut them down because we can!" | Herb Brooks

by Coug999 on Oct 26, 2011 12:17 AM PDT reply actions   1 recs

This is beyond true

I’ve always found Walden as….an “interesting” addition to radio broadcast. And I have always enjoyed the homer, but knowledgeable, radio guys.
His tirade on Furness’s show does not seem logical

Attractive, Intelligent, Smart A**

by Neil Vincent Roberts on Oct 26, 2011 3:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

Walden has been in Wulff's corner before he was even our coach

I don’t have links or direct quotes, but I remember Walden being very vocal when the search was just starting for Doba’s replacement and he basically said – they don’t need to waste the time searching when the guy for the job is right down the street in Spokane.

Similar to how most of us are when we are strongly supportive of an idea – Walden is just hanging on, hoping he doesn’t have to admit that he was wrong in his assessment of Wulff. If/when Wulff is let go at the end of the season, he’ll throw out the “we weren’t patient enough with Wulff.” When the new coach does well, that will be Wulff’s framework, if the new coach struggles – it’s an “I told you so” coming our way. It’s a good position Walden is putting himself in, only mistake was taking shots at the fanbase.

"I used to play sports. Then I realized you can buy trophies. Now I'm good at everything." - Demetri Martin.

by LeaveItToWeaver on Oct 26, 2011 1:13 AM PDT reply actions  

The only problem with this line of thinking

is his pride shouldn’t matter. I don’t want to position myself to look like a genius if the next guy wins or fails. I just want us to not suck.

by Kyle Rancourt on Oct 26, 2011 1:16 AM PDT up reply actions   2 recs

What Jim Means...

I’ll tell you exactly what Jim was trying to say. first off he said if you don’t donate or go to any games then you don’t have a right to have an opinion about the coaching. 2nd he believes that the recruiting and coaching are progressing at the pace it should be. 3rd, if you want a new coach who do you think you are going to get? NO top name guy is coming here so throw the idea that RichRod, Belloti Leach would even think of stepping in Pullman. big names get big jobs making $3-$4 million a year. Floyd flat out said a football coach can’t make more then him and got a $50k raise after Wulff was hired, plus remember, Floyd is an idiot that has admitted he knows nothing about football. So what are you going to do? Get a small college guy that has HC experience, an assistant that has no experience? the moral of the story is if you change the guy now you’ll have 3-4 more years of shit, so wait one more year and decide. Look at the team, mostly Freshman and Sophomores starting…. if they get 5-7 this year that is a good jump, next year 8-4 or better….. Patience! stay the plan…… and stop flapping your lips when you don’t support the team and in most cases no very little about building a program…..

by Wulff fan on Oct 26, 2011 9:58 AM PDT reply actions  

Link to the Floyd quote?

Either one of them?

And do you realize how few coaches, especially ones who have been fired from their most recent job, make 3-4 million a year?

I miss *REAL* Four Loko

by B-Lot tailgater on Oct 26, 2011 10:14 AM PDT up reply actions  

Uh, I think we all were pretty clear on what he was saying, and what he meant.

We just happen to disagree with every last shred of it, to say nothing of the belittling manner in which he said it.

The only reason I’m letting your comment stand — even though it violates our community guidelines by failing to provide evidence to back up your assertions (specifically with Floyd) — is so that everyone who’s actually taken the time to be a part of this community before spouting off incoherently can respond appropriately.

by Jeff Nusser on Oct 26, 2011 10:54 AM PDT up reply actions  

IF

IF, IF, IF they get to 5-7. Do you really think that is going to happen?

in most cases no know very little about building a program…..

Please. This is your first comment. You don’t know the group of people that have been a part of this community for years, and you really don’t no know what we know.

by spencer peaty on Oct 26, 2011 10:57 AM PDT up reply actions   2 recs

it's interesting that history doesn't support your view on Floyd...

If you read this article you will see the highest paid salary in Missouri was head coach Gary Pinkel, while Floyd was down the list making nearly 1 million less than his own football coach. I’ve never heard President Floyd make any reference to how much or little WSU’s football coach should be getting paid. I’d be interested in a link for that.

http://www.columbiabusinesstimes.com/235/2006/12/30/mu%E2%80%99s-biggest-salaries/

You will also see in this bio below that President Floyd was offered football scholarships out of high school but chose to take an academic scholarship to UNC instead. While he has never been a head coach of a college team, I think it’s safe to say he is a football fan and understands the game. Him hanging out in the student section during games might in-directly point to this as well.

http://www.answers.com/topic/elson-s-floyd

All that being said, I’m failing to understand why you are targeting Floyd so much with your comments, rather than Moos who is the actual A.D. who would be making the decision?

One thing you were correct about – Leach not stepping foot in Pullman. It appears he might prefer just attending WSU sponsored events in Spokane instead?…

http://www.wsucougars.com/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/020811aaa.html

"I used to play sports. Then I realized you can buy trophies. Now I'm good at everything." - Demetri Martin.

by LeaveItToWeaver on Oct 27, 2011 1:11 AM PDT up reply actions  

have you been around for any other WSU Pres?

He is the first Pres that I can remember caring about football. The first Pres I’ve seen at games. The first Pres I’ve seen at tailgates.

He ‘gets’ football \ sports and what they mean to WSU

by woolybugger on Oct 27, 2011 7:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don't think we should be comparing our program to UW!

(Somehow I got it in my head that Bill Moose said that. I have nothing to support he said that.) I don’t think we should! We are WSU, they are UW! 2 extremely different programs with 2 different situations. We are WSU period. We have disadvantages and even some advantages, no excuses! Comparing the situations at the two schools is going back to talking about (Big Brother) UW, I know we were told not to do that. Yet Walden was comparing the 2 programs on a loud rant. I don’t want comparisons, I want results! I don’t know if Walden-O is an employee of the athletic program or the radio stations, but he is a representative of the school. Maybe Wulf will pull things together by the end of this season. I don’t know what that means, but hopefully I will know it when I see it. Sorry that’s my rant! Yes me have already made progress this season, but the last 2 weeks I have felt like we took a step back.

Go Cougs!

by dslagg on Oct 26, 2011 11:12 AM PDT reply actions  

I was gonna say

I think that’s a trumpet and not a trombone, but I don’t care. You made a rusty trombone reference, and I love you for it. Rec’d alllllll day.

by Kyle Rancourt on Oct 26, 2011 2:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

Forget the trumpet/trombone.

What he needs is Stewie following behind him playing the tuba.

(Sorry, I don’t have a gif handy. A little help?)

Aim High - GO COUGS

by 89Coug in FL on Oct 26, 2011 10:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

Here you go.

"Tonight, we skate with them. Tonight, we stay with them. And we shut them down because we can!" | Herb Brooks

by Coug999 on Oct 26, 2011 11:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

Big Jim

Shot his mouth off again on one of Spokane’s local radio stations again today. I missed the show, but from what I’m seeing online, it was the same rant.

Go Cougs!

by dslagg on Oct 26, 2011 7:14 PM PDT reply actions  

Walden

I’ve never liked Jim Walden as a color guy, his rambling, stammering, thank-you-captain-obvious analysis really doesn’t add anything to Bob Robertson’s broadcast. Actually, it takes away from it. He’s such a tremendous homer – and whiner – that it’s tough to listen to. Why someone is giving him a microphone outside of that couple hours on a few Saturdays a year is beyond me, unless they’re just trying to let him show what a buffoon he is…and of course, he’s obliging.

He didn’t make a single point in his rambling interview that really provides a legitimate reason to keep a coach who is 8-36, and who is still getting blown out in his 4th year. Nothing to counter the fact that SMU after the death penalty and Marshall after the plane crash both managed better records than WSU has under Wulff. All he’s doing is trying to defend his pal, who he recruited in the 80’s and isn’t ready to let go of. And in that effort, he’s willing to ridicule and alienate the fans, who are the ones he really needs to get behind him if he’s going to have any chance of saving his pal.

Walden provides proof yet again that you should really slow down and think before you open your mouth. We didn’t play Oregon State – at all – in 1997 or 1998, and our lowest attendance in 97 was the Labor Day game against UCLA. That’s the only time we were below 31K that season. As for the Steve Rogers reference, I sort of understand the confusion, because Walden is pretty much a cartoon character himself. Something like Sylvester the cat, I think. And just as relevant.

by 95coug on Oct 27, 2011 8:36 AM PDT reply actions   1 recs

Hey everyone! I found a picture of Walden's son.

Father like son.

"Clear Eyes, Full Hearts, Can't Lose"

by SoCalCoug on Oct 27, 2011 4:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

Okay Walden

I think you have called out Cougs enough and your points are not valid anymore. This fanbase has been more patient with the program, more than any other legitimate BCS fanbase. Including this season our record for the past 4 years is 8-36 and 3 of those wins are this year against horrible teams.

I know we had APR problems and coaching issues that got us to this point, but who’s fault is that really? Not the fanbase. We are not the one’s who chose these coaches or monitored the players. If this was a business (and not a public school) it would be out of business because of bad management decisions. If this was my company the boss would have seen the writing on the wall that things were going in the wrong direction and corrected them before it got out of hand. There is no excuse for the APR scores and problems.

This also does not fall completely on the coach, it is also on the athletic department and upper management. Why should a fanbase increase it’s giving to a product that hasn’t proven it can win again? We need a new football facility and new stadium, we need money, blah blah blah, yada, yada, yada. That is all I keep hearing. I get the suites will be bring in money and such, but quit making excuses.

I know this is how Moos built it at Oregon and he got their fanbase excited, but they also had a decent program and a good coach when he came in. Belotti was the HC there from 1995 to 2008. Since 1995 Oregon football has only had one losing season and in that 2004 season they went 5-6. Freakin’ 5-6, we dream about that. During Moos’s tenure at Oregon they only had one losing season. In 1995 when Moos came in at Oregon they went 9-3 and went to the Cotton Bowl. Sounds like an easier job to step into.

I don’t know if Moos can build it the same at WSU as he did at UO especially if football team goes 2-11 in his first year. I am sure Boise St. and TCU’s budgets are not much larger than ours (if not smaller) and they put winning products on the field.

We are also in a recession and people are just trying to house and feed their family. It is easy to say these things when you (Walden) have a lot of money, probably don’t have many expenses since you are basically retired and live in a cheap area. He needs to pull his head out and realize unemployment is at the highest it has been in years.

I keep hearing we need facilities and all this mumbo-jumbo. I feel like we are being told the reason we are not winning is because of the fanbase, donors, that we don’t have money and we don’t have the facilities and all these constant excuses. How about put your money (with the Pac12 media deal) into a huge big name coach that will bring in players, which will bring in money, which will bring in national exposure, which will bring winning? Granted nice facilities will help get players, but a coach that is good and wins is going to get the players here. Especially if he can get players to the NFL. Winning trumps everything. USC has had crappy facilities for years. I rather go to a crappy stadium and watch a good team than go to a nice stadium and watch crappy team. You can shine up a turd all you want, but it will still be a turd.

A good example is the Mariners. The only reason the Mariners are still in Seattle is because they put a good product on the field in 1995. They won the hearts of Seattle when they made that playoff run in a crappy dome with crappy facilities. People didn’t come to the Kingdome because it was nice they came because the Mariners were winning. Guess what winning did? It energized a fanbase to want to donate (even tax paying dollars which is hard in Seattle, just ask the Sonics) to build a new stadium.

Walden’s rants are not going to do a thing for WSU. The only thing that will energize the fan base is winning. Moos had that with Oregon when he started, which help improve the stadium and facilities. We can build all facilities and suites we want, but without winning you won’t reach your goal.

Put money into making winning programs (i.e.-coaches), then everything else will come. Does a company that wants to grow hire crappy salesman? No. Put your money into good salesman and have a mediocre office, then upgrade the office later. Don’t hire crappy salesman that can’t get business and put all your money into the office, plus things get outdated quickly. People can be enamored with nice things all they want, but people like people, not structures. Structures get old, good coaches can make a program last.

I cook with beer, sometimes I even add it to the food

by SoCalCoug on Oct 27, 2011 12:14 PM PDT reply actions  

Walden has put his money where his mouth is

and as a guy who has had some direct contact over a lot of years with the fund raising aspects of WSU athletics… MOST Coug fans don’t. Fans might not like to hear;
_ _ _ _
(via brand X-)
When the discussion led to talk about fundraising, Walden spared nothing.

“The Cougar fan base doesn’t give, Ian, that’s a figment of the imagination (that WSU fans make donations) … The Cougar fan base is all cluck and no checks.”

He called them the “poorest givers” in major-college football, and added, "Notoriously, in my years at Washington State, there’s been a hell of a lot more crabbin’ and not nearly enough givin’."
_ _ __

But whether they want to hear it or not— this is not untrue. We are so far dead last in donations it isn’t even funny. So while fans may be complaining about being called out by Walden, and I don’t agree with everything he said by any means… nor the way he said some of it. But, it does warrant some analysis beyond calling the guy an ass*** in a supposedly moderated forum where classless comments like that are suppose to be limited- yet in this case are made by a staffer no less. Walden does have a VESTED interested in the program:
_ _ _
via Brand X-
Walden himself has been a generous donor to WSU. A year ago he contributed $100,000 to the WSU Student-Athlete Excellence Fund and offered as much as another $100,000 on top of that if fans and former athletes hit certain donation levels for the fund. Perhaps not surprisingly, the "extra" amount that Walden had to pay came in at $58,000 rather than the $100,000 he was hoping for.
_
_ _
I fail to see how the fan frustration with Wulff (or other WSU coaches, mostly Bone) and the frequently uninformed views therein, which are roundly and justifiably scolded in this fine site, are different than Walden’s frustration with the fan base. The guy feels that the fans are out of line who want Wulff’s head. He says so regularly. He is one of us in that regard, a fan with an opinion. But he was a coach, none of us were a coach for WSU. His perspective is a unique one, in that he has seen it from inside and out, and his ‘shoot from the hip’ attitude has here to fore been his calling card. It endeared the fans to Walden when he was coach and flummoxed the stoic Husky man James more often than not. It was a classic example of “us vs. them” and Coug fans loved it and loved Jim for it when he beat the purple in some legendary Coug games and brought a bowl to WSU for the first time in 44 years. Whether we agree with his opinion of ‘us’ as fans today doesn’t alter those facts. When the premise is that this guy who has coached at the school in some of it’s greatest wins, announced for the school in some of it’s greatest wins, and suffered with the fanbase in the seasons that were less than stellar— and then in the worst seasons anyone can remember offered a match to donars to bring up support and funding- is just an “old ***hat” that should shut his mouth and just go away because he was critical of the fanbase, well, that renders the article somewhat moot. I would ask how many of the fans on here “clucking” as Walden put it- have actually given to the program. Those numbers are telling.
_ _ __
In fiscal year 2011, annual giving to WSU’s athletics scholarship fund totaled just less than $2.5 million, records show. Mind you, this isn’t total athletics fundraising, just the part (albeit a major part) that is focused on funding scholarships.

Looking at the rest of the Pac-10 for FY 2011, that number by WSU not only ranks dead last, but dead last by a ton. The next-lowest on the list is Arizona State, which raised $5.4 million in FY11 to pay for its scholarships.
_ _ __

I would ask whether a guy with credentials like his is allowed the same leeway to simply root for and criticize, when he knows the actual difficulties involved with the inner workings far better than anyone on this site.

This rip of Walden is beneath the standards of this fine site- IMO- and the fact that the reason he is getting ripped is for voicing an opinion about ‘us’ the fans, rather than bitching about the team of the current coach, is mildly hypocritical at it’s essence. Walden could have, and should have handled this in a classier fashion… but a knee jerk classless response from this site, equally as low brow, is no better.

If you can't Go Cougs... don't go.

by hollyweirdcoug on Oct 28, 2011 2:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

Important difference: Walden is an employee of the university, and we are not

Beyond the fact that we’re the ones who actually pay his checks, I’d argue that it’s just incredibly inappropriate for him to say the things he’s been saying.

Let me ask you this: Do you think what he said is going to make someone more or less likely to give to the athletic department?

Nobody is arguing that he’s wrong about many of the things he said. The issue is how he said it and what it doesn’t accomplish. If Walden truly cared about the university, he’d be avoiding these sorts of rants that make him look guilty of self-serving cronyism. But I suspect the university is not his top priority here, which brings us back to the original problem.

by Jeff Nusser on Oct 28, 2011 3:06 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

If he really cared about the university?

Seriously? $100,000 and years of devotion is a good bit of caring, as is the additional $58 K he matched by folks who actually gave to the ’make Jim pay" fund.

There is no important difference; Walden reacted in a classless fashion and so did Kyle. The churlish name calling and sophomoric rant were beneath the usual solid standards of this site… obviously just my opinion.

If you can't Go Cougs... don't go.

by hollyweirdcoug on Oct 28, 2011 10:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hollyweirdcoug we have been on here a while

and I highly respect your opinion, but your reply to my post seems more geared to this whole thread ,not me.

In regards to what you said, I don’t care how much someone donates, it doesn’t give someone any extra right to call someone else out. I don’t ask fellow Cougs if they donate, if they are a Coug fan they are a Coug fan. Is there some kind of hierarchy system of who can call out who based out how much money they donate? That is B.S. On this site we are about not calling out people’s passion for the Cougs and what Jim did is along the same lines. I get what he is trying to do, but a man at his age should use his wisdom for better judgement. What he did is not going to make people want to donate more. He is not in everyone’s financial books, so he doesn’t know. That is bush league. If I am making the kind of money he does at his age I could easily donate that. We are in the top 5 worst financial times in America, which is masked by credit and other factors and he is calling people tight wads. Hmmmm…..lets see put food on the plate for my family or donate to the Cougs. That is an easy answer, I will feed my family. Many people have lost jobs, are taking furlow days or had health insurance cut. So in other words he should think (about sensitive issues) before he says them. He does not get a pass because of who he is. He does not get a pass.

I love coach Wulff, but what happened against OSU got me thinking. We keep blaming money and facilities for our loses. What would happen if we didn’t put money into facilities and we used that money and the Pac12 media money to try and bring in a coach like Urban Meyer, Mike Leach or someone with a name. Players pick between schools because of coaches not facilities. All the places that have nice facilities were already winning or had coaches that brought a winning tradition that translated to facilities. Oregon has been winning for a while, and now the facilities are just an added bonus in recruiting. Do you think that if we have a nice stadium and facilities and are losing games that players will pick WSU over a school that is winning, putting players in the NFL but has mediocre facilities?

I agree the fanbase needs to donate more, but it is process that doesn’t happen overnight (especially when we keep losing) and after a loss like that Walden didn’t need to say those things. There has been a lot of knee-jerk reactions by a lot of people after that game. Sometimes it is better just to keep your mouth shut. He could have done it in much better way, but for Walden it is probably better to stay quite.

I love Wulff and I hope he succeeds the rest of the season, but in reality it might be a big name coach that will invigorate this fanbase, not facilities that take a while to build and then might bring in recruits 3-4 years from now.

Clear eyes, Full Hearts, Can't Lose

by SoCalCoug on Oct 29, 2011 7:11 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

I pretty much said the same

thing about Walden. He should have handled it better. But the fact that he shoots from the hip is, and has been his forte for a very long time. In this case it didn’t serve him wellat all. However, the fact that the ‘newer’ generation of Cougs don’t understand the indelible mark Walden made on the program, as evidenced by Kyle’s ever so weak final perfunctory lines that basically say; "oh and by the way he did do some good stuff before’, is indicative of the lack of understanding of where the guy is coming from at all.

I didn’t personally call out anyone’s allegiance— Walden was dismissed in the very immature Kyle rant- and then Nuss used the wording “if Walden really cared about the university” which, given the circumstance of his almost absurd WSU loyalty and the generosity and effort of his ‘make Jim pay’ contributions was a ridiculous comment as well. The guy obviously cares so much that he embarrassed himself in the defense ofthe school.

My point is this juevenile hogwash of an article; written about Walden calling out the fan base, does more to emphasize the former Coug head coach’s point that the Coug fan base is more cluck than checks (paraphrased of course) than it does to diminish Walden’s poor handling of the situation. A poor taste response to someone behaving in poor taste does little else than create more of a sour taste. It is a case of two wrongs not making anyone look right. The article is in bad taste- below the usual standards of this fine site.

If you can't Go Cougs... don't go.

by hollyweirdcoug on Nov 1, 2011 3:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

Basically though,

you’re saying it was par for the course for Walden, and he’s a Coug, so we should let it slide. But me? Oh I’m immature and my rant was below the belt, especially when the other authors on this site are above petty things like that.

A tad hypocritical, no? If you choose to forgive Walden, then by your logic, you must also choose to forgive me for my immature rant (not sure how or why it was immature, but I digress).

I’m not really upset, because listening to Jim today on the radio just made me laugh at how out of touch (and simply incorrect) he is about a lot of things. I won’t write another post though, because it’s a waste of everyone’s time.

by Kyle Rancourt on Nov 1, 2011 6:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

nice straw man but no

that isn’t what I said. I said, quite clearly, that Walden’s comments were improper in my opinion, and that your churlish rant in response to it were no less improper. I read your stuff, and I suspect you even know this was a bit beneath your own and this site’s standards… but again, that is straitly my opinion.

You are a Coug- he is a Coug- we come in all shapes, sizes and ages- he has done much for the school, you have yet to do so, but still may… but none of that excuses the classless banter by you or him. That is what I am saying.

If you can't Go Cougs... don't go.

by hollyweirdcoug on Nov 2, 2011 8:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to CougCenter, a website dedicated to WSU football, basketball and other athletics.

Community Guidelines

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Brianheadshot_small
Where Did You Come From And How Did You Get Here?

Recent FanPosts

Rainbow-caught-on-moffitt-wooly-bugger1_small
Its Memorial Day weekend and I’ve already skipped ahead to Labor Day.
Brianheadshot_small
OT: Teaching Football Signals
Small
Per Cougfan.. Walden is out
Worldtraveler_small
OTFP: Greatest Player You've Ever Seen?
Cougar_01t_small
Bone-in or Bone-out?
Small
Vote for ESPN College Game Day to come to Pullman!
Jeff_mug_h2_small
Live In Spokane? Possess A DVD Recorder? Or Even A VCR? I Need Your Help
Small
OTFP: Best/Worst Trophy
Small
Just noticed this about The Crimson and Grey Game

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

A UW "Swagga Suit" - yes, it's a real thing.

Recent FanShots

1916 Rose Bowl Highlight "reel"
Pac-12 Blog talks to DC Mike Breske
Bill Moos interview - pirates of the palouse.
Interview with Drew Bledsoe
Klay Thompson 6th In ROY voting
Tell us: Between Mike Leach and Craig James, who gets your vote?
Wulff lands job with 49ers
New 'Friday Night Lights' Movie: Leaked* Script Reveals Mike Leach Storyline
What if Larry Scott Never Came and Tom Hansen was Still in Charge?

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Go Cougs


Attractive, intelligent managing editors

Jeff_mug_h2_small Jeff Nusser

62817_716885768283_27206155_40333453_7664553_n_small Grady Clapp

Arizona_small Craig Powers

Brianheadshot_small Brian Floyd

Header_small Mark Sandritter

Attractive, intelligent editors

Worldtraveler_small Kyle Rancourt