APPLE CUP 2011: The Last Stand For Paul Wulff?
Let's get something out of the way right off the bat: None of us knows what Bill Moos is thinking with regards to Paul Wulff's job status as head coach of WSU.
However, it's impossible not to wonder if the outcome of the 2011 Apple Cup will impact that decision.
In a lot of ways, it seems like the Paul Wulff era has been one big long exercise in Murphy's Law: Whatever could go wrong, has gone wrong over the past four years. Players flunking out, scholarship reductions, injuries -- you know the story well. Heck, just when it was "show me" time for the program, he lost the franchise quarterback to a broken collarbone ... after he didn't start the game because he had diarrhea so bad he needed intravenous fluids ... then lost him to acute compartment syndrome in his leg after the quarterback returned.
This, after losing various quarterbacks over the past four years to a broken neck, broken back and blown out knee. You seriously can't make this stuff up.
But Wulff's detractors would argue that much of the depths the program reached were because of Wulff himself, that he hired an inexperienced staff that generally wasn't equipped to meet the challenge of coaching at an FBS program. Wulff's supporters would counter and say that the improvement the past two years is plain, and that's what matters most.
And that's what makes this dilemma so darn difficult. Both sides have excellent points, making Moos' decision a difficult one.
Should today matter? I'm of the opinion that today really should be largely irrelevant, barring some sort of epic embarrassment -- and I really don't see that coming. It also doesn't seem like Moos is the kind of guy to let one game sway him emotionally, and if I were forced to speculate with a gun to my head, I would guess that he's already made his decision.
What do you think? Should today's Apple Cup have any impact on the ultimate decision of whether Paul Wulff stays or is fired?
15 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I vote no, although more information is never a bad thing
But unless we win by 40, this game isn’t going to tell us anything we don’t already know about Paul Wulff.
Writer: CougCenter Twitterer: @Grady_WSU
The one thing you look for is improvement and Wulff has accomplished that during his tenure. I would like to see what he could do with another year or two added to his contract.
UW Dawg Pound - SBN Seattle
Moos has been AD for 23 games now
He should know if he’s seen enough or not. This AC shouldn’t matter. It’s an important game, but why is it more important than any other game on the schedule? If he was going to bring him back, just announce it. Why wait until after the game? Look at Wulff and staff and if you can honestly say he can win 7 or 8 games next year and beyond than keep him. If not, move on.
He's never had too
Was he going fire Bellotti while AD? No, it’s a cop out in my opinion. Has never had to hire a football coach. It’s stupid, he extended June at the start of her season. He couldn’t do that with football?
He didn't extend June, either.
It was a clause in her contract that kicked in. And yes, he went through this with Ernie Kent.
Not in football though
That is my point. You don’t think Wulff has the same clause in hist contract?
I think that if Tuel had not gotten hurt
or if Halliday would have been ready to go at the begining of the year, the Cougs could have won 7 or 8 games this year.
I said yes because.......
I am very much on the fence with a slight lean towards keeping him on. If we were to lay an egg, I might tip the other way. It should not be difficult to get the players up for this game.
It's an interesting question
With only one win against a team that isnt absolutely terrible (although in the midst of an embarassing collapse)—beating an actually decent opponent can only help his case right?
Unless Moos has a bign name coach who is ready to immediately step in
I think that a shake-up would do more harm than good.

by 















