WSU Vs. California: Keep An Eye Out For This Red Zone Run
On Monday in Cougar Sports Weekly, I explored WSU's red zone woes and some ideas for improving inside the 10-yard line starting today against California. One idea was to eschew straight ahead runs for wide runs, where the offense could take advantage of the speed of a back such as Rickey Galvin and the agility of linemen such as John Fullington.
Where did I get the idea? From the Cougs themselves, of course. Check out this run from Oregon State:
As I watched the play unfold in front of me, I remember thinking, "Dang, that's a cool looking play!" Galvin stretches out to the right, looking sort of stuck, then all of a sudden he bursts up an alley. It would have been a TD if he hadn't been hip checked by B.J. Guerra.
Then, all of a sudden, it hit me. I've seen this play before.
Yup. It's the Packer Sweep, as made famous by Vince Lombardi. Here's how WSU did it.
First off, here's a quick primer from Lombardi on the blocking assignments:
The Cougs obviously put their own spin on the formation, given that they run everything out of shotgun. But the basic principles are there. WSU sets up in 21 personnel: Two running backs offset on either side of the quarterback, a tight end and two wide receivers. The Andrei Lintz, however, is split wide, while Jared Karstetter is lined up on the edge of the line. Lintz starts the play by motioning in to a wing-back position:
At the snap, guards Guerra and Fullington pull (blue arrows), Karstetter heads down to block a linebacker (long red line), and Lintz targets the defensive end (short red line). The handoff comes across Jeff Tuel's face:
This is where the play's simple elegance really is revealed. Karstetter, easily the team's best blocking receiver, simply has to hold an unsuspecting linebacker. Lintz, meanwhile, only has to seal the defensive end -- who already is looking inside. That leaves lead blockers Fullington, Guerra and Carl Winston to take on two defensive backs and a linebacker. I like that matchup. So does Galvin.
That alley Lombardi was talking about? Watch how it develops:

Guerra is about to take out that middle linebacker to seal the inside. Winston is destroying the corner to seal the outside. And Fullington is about to obliterate a safety. (In high school, we linemen used to call that a "weenie kill.") One interesting thing to note is that this play is almost DOA -- Dan Spitz couldn't hold his down block on the defensive tackle (blue arrow).

Fortunately, Galvin was able to burst past that tackle (blue arrow); he now has a wall in front of him, as Guerra has peeled off his initial block and Fullington has a full head of steam. Faced with the prospect of taking on about 600 pounds of offensive lineman to try and make a tackle, OSU safety Lance Mitchell engages with Fullington but more or less quits on the play by executing one of the better backpedals you'll ever see.
The result is a play that really should have been a touchdown, if not for a little bit of bad luck. As it was, WSU got into the end zone on a Tuel sneak on the next play.
I really like the idea of the Cougars running wide from about the 10-yard line, even though it goes against conventional red zone wisdom. WSU simply can't line up and run the ball down peoples' throats yet, and they have a quick and fast -- but tough -- runner in Galvin. In fact, WSU had success running wide in there against Oregon; although it wasn't a designed wide run, Galvin's TD came off of him bouncing it outside and outrunning a defensive back.
They probably won't run this exact play again, but a variation of it is something to keep an eye on today against the Bears.
By the way, if you're really, really interested in learning about the Packer sweep, you can watch Lombardi himself teaching it on YouTube, parts 1, 2 (which is above) and 3. Yes, it really does take Lombardi 25 minutes to teach this one run.
6 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Thats pretty cool Jeff
nice post
Attractive, Intelligent, Smart A**
by Neil Vincent Roberts on Nov 5, 2011 11:07 AM PDT reply actions
Yea, I never really understood why we never run
on the outside more, especially around the 10. Remember this?
http://www.cougcenter.com/2011/9/5/2406046/wsu-vs-idaho-state-recap-offense-rickey-galvin-touchdown
excellent read Nuss!
One thing I will say about this series is the blocking is crucial due to the fact that they ran it to the short side of the field. This is an aspect of our red zone O that really bothers me. Seems like setting up the hash you want in advance would be savvy regarding play calling. The only problem with the play shown here is the sideline aids the D and not the O. One of the hindrances of the shot gun is that it eliminates the play action aspect in the red zone- allowing vet defenders to ball react and not motion react. Sturdy seems to rely on the hope they they will bite on motion… I think he should design and depend on the fact that they will NOT, that way the offensive sets inside the 20 are better utilized to spread the corners/safeties away from the ball and create the same alternate space in their sets that you have inherently with the shot gun. Also— why not have a smash mouth package ready? Teams have not game planned for the over center by the WSU O in the zone— why not just put a dive package into the sets for this very developmental set of downs?
Price went double tight ends and ran it all day vs. the dawgs many years ago— stunned them and beat them with the new look. I simple additional over cent goal line or 4th or 3rd and short set might create confusion and burn opposition time outs- and/or just get the yard or two needed.
If you can't Go Cougs... don't go.
I was going to make an observation about the short side thing
But I forgot. It’s weird how we do that. We’ve done it on screens too. So strange.
I'm about to start on a 3-hour road trip
meaning the only way I can follow the 1st half is on the radio with Walden. God help me.
by Coug11 on Nov 5, 2011 2:23 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs

by 




















