Pac-12 Previews: A First Look At The Washington Huskies
In some ways, I'd love to save Washington for last in this series of looks at WSU's fall opponents via the outstanding Bill Connelly at SBNation.com -- after all, whether the team has realistic bowl hopes or not, it's always all about building to the Apple Cup.
But then again, there's also something strangely satisfying about reviewing expectations for Washington so soon because Connelly is going in reverse order of four-year F/+ average rank, and the Huskies are the 11th in his series. I mean, it's been really hard being terrible these last few years, but at least we've been able to ease our pain with a little schadenfreude.
Of course, Husky fans will gleefully point out that they finished 7-6 last season after exacting retribution on Nebraska in the Holiday Bowl, signifying that they have forever left the problems of the last few years behind as they follow their great prophet Steve Sarkisian to the promised land.
Then again, the numbers suggest that this is a team that perhaps just got a little bit fortunate last year -- it's all in how you want to look at it:
It's time for another game of Are You An Optimist Or A Pessimist?
What pessimists see: a team that has risen a bit too quickly in two years and had very little margin for error in terms of reaching a bowl last season. The Huskies were outscored by almost 100 points last year, and they lose both the face of their offense and perhaps their three best defensive play-makers in Aiyewa, Foster and safety Nate Williams. Plus, there are a ton of freshmen, redshirt freshmen and sophomores on the two-deep.
What optimists see: a team whose YPP margin suggests the blowouts were somewhat fluky, a team whose turnover margin was dinged significantly by an unlucky number of fumble recoveries, and a team with downright solid recruiting rankings (those freshmen and sophomores are on the depth chart for a reason -- they're good).
Because the Apple Cup is so far away, and because both teams' rosters are so young, it's tough to project just how this game might shape up come November.
But I think it would be safe to say that the game is going to come down to exactly what it came down to last time, at least when Washington has the ball: Containing Chris Polk (and, to a lesser extent, Jesse Callier). It's reasonable to expect whoever is quarterbacking UW by the time the Apple Cup rolls around -- Keith Price or Nick Montana -- to perform at about the same level as Jake Locker did last year, which was hardly superlative.
Defensive line plays better, linebackers tackle better, defense likely allows a lot fewer points.
As for what this season holds for Washington? You can put me on the pessimist side, at least in the early part of the season. Replacing Locker, Mason Foster and Victor Aiyewa will be no small task, and I think it's probably 2012 before Washington realizes its considerable potential.
31 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The Huskies played four close games last year
and won all four of them. That strikes me as a little fluky.
They beat USC, Cal and WSU because they had the ball last and beat OSU because their TE droped a 2-pt conversion that hit him in the hands.
Yes, coaching and having a senior quarterback helped them quite a bit, but I’d have a hard time saying they go undefeated in close games again this year.
We actually lost a close game too
We lost to BYU in a close game to being the season. We also lost every close game we played in 2009, I think everything kind of evened out last year.
fair enough
UW didn’t get within BYU’s 30 yard line the entire 2nd half of that game. I don’t know if that game was as much close as it was ugly. there wasn’t a single score for the entire final 20 minutes of the game!
UW did not lose every close game in 2009. I seem to remember UW beating USC by a field goal in 2009 when Matt Corp(se) got the start, as well as a miracle interception to beat Arizona.
Pretty sure
we had the ball around their 30 down 6 with a couple minutes left and turned it over on downs. That game was extremely sloppy and painful on both sides. You’re right that we didn’t lose every close game in 2009, but we did lose by a touchdown or less to ND, ASU, and UCLA (we also won a close game against Arizona). You could go back even further and note that we lost all of our close games in 2008 as well, of which there were not many. The close games mostly didn’t go our way in 2009 and did in 2010, probably will continue being about .500 in those close ones.
You’re right that we might not be as good in close games this year (even though I wouldn’t want to be down a score and have to stop Polk in order to win). I would counter that with the fact that hopefully we’ll be enough better that some of those close games will become somewhat comfortable wins.
I'm not taking anything away from UW
I’m just pointing out that UW’s 7-6 team was a few snaps away from being 2-10. And they’re replacing their QB.
UW’s goal this year should be the same as WSU’s: a minor bowl. That being said, I will enjoy watching their Rose Bowl predictions after they beat Eastern.
Mine started after beating Nebraska
Did you know in that Sark once wrestled and killed a bear with nothing more than a loin cloth?
Why was a bear even wearing a loincloth?
Imagine this comment in COUGAR BOLD!
by J.J. FeKl on May 24, 2011 3:59 AM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
that's the other thing i was alluding
(even though I wouldn’t want to be down a score and have to stop Polk in order to win)
UW had the ball last in all of their close games. I don’t know if they can replicate that kind of fortune again.
Pretty sure they didn't in the Apple Cup..
I seem to remember a Jeff Tuel interception being the last play of the game..
Attractive, Intelligent, Smart A**
by Neil Vincent Roberts on May 21, 2011 7:56 AM PDT up reply actions
that's not right. They played six close games last year ...
… and the Oregon game was remarkably close in the first half despite Keith Price starting. We did win four of them, but we lost two of them. The stats cited in Connelly’s article suggested that the flukishness may have been how close some of those games that UW won were. WSU is a good example – statistically and physically, it is hard to not argue that UW dominated that game. Mistakes and bad luck equalized that game. Games like that can’t really be considered fluky luck.
The flip side in all of this is that Jake was far more important to the outcomes of these games than his passing stats indicated. His ability to make the right calls, avoid turnovers (he was among the best at that) and to keep drives going with his legs are all aspects that UW won’t have next year.
Damn, my eyeball tastes good.
@chrislandon
I thought that Price could move pretty good.
That was the impression I got from the Oregon game..
Attractive, Intelligent, Smart A**
by Neil Vincent Roberts on May 22, 2011 8:50 AM PDT up reply actions
He can.
I don’t think he’ll be able to run over linebackers like Jake could though.
That's what Chris Polk is for...
I hope Mitzell gets his crap in order. Polk vs. Mitzell could be an interesting match-up in the upcoming years.
Attractive, Intelligent, Smart A**
by Neil Vincent Roberts on May 22, 2011 3:30 PM PDT up reply actions
I'd be beyond shocked if Polk stayed beyond this year
he’d have been a 2nd-3rd rounder this year, and if he can improve his burst, he could be the 2nd or 3rd back taken overall this year.
The Oregon game was not a close game
by B-Lot tailgater on May 23, 2011 1:11 PM PDT up reply actions
It was till mid way through the 4th
If Tuel doesn’t get anxious and throw that pick the Cougs are down by 6 going into the fourth
Attractive, Intelligent, Smart A**
by Neil Vincent Roberts on May 23, 2011 8:21 PM PDT up reply actions
I was referring to the UW/UO game
That Gekko mentioned above.
by B-Lot tailgater on May 24, 2011 7:18 AM PDT up reply actions
Ahhhhh!
My bad
Attractive, Intelligent, Smart A**
by Neil Vincent Roberts on May 25, 2011 6:22 AM PDT up reply actions
I find it interesting
that you say in one paragraph that you expect our first year starting quarterback to be playing at the same level Locker was by the time the Apple Cup roles around, and in the next paragraph include Locker on the list of players who will be tough to replace. Any particular reason for the dual reasoning there?
I would say I’m definitely on the side that it will probably be tough to replace him, but in saying that I would acknowledge that he was a huge reason for our moderate success the last two years. As for the Apple Cup, I don’t expect the game to come down to our quarterback unless WSU proves it can stop Polk and Callier, as you said.
Over the course of the season, Locker will be tough to replace
The Apple Cup comment was merely to say that Locker wasn’t the difference in that game — Polk was. And I don’t expect Price/Montana to be the difference this year, either. Locker was 14-of-22 for 226, 2 TDs and 1 INT. Without Polk’s crazy running, WSU probably wins that game. That’s all I meant.
But over the course of a season? Locker is one case where I really do believe in leadership and intangibles, and that’s a lot to replace. The kid was an icon. It’s tough to replace an icon.
Of course its months away,
but I’m guessing the keys to the apple cup this year will be if WSU can do anything to slow down Polk, and if our secondary does anything to slow down Tuel.
I can see what you mean by Locker not appearing to effect last year’s game too much, but I certainly think we may have lost it without him. If Price had started, I’m sure there would have been 8 in the box for every one of Polk’s runs, probably reducing his effectiveness. Of course Locker’s interception at the end of the half was what let you back into it, but he didn’t make too many other mistakes, and had a TD run called back on one of the weakest holding calls I’ve ever seen.
I guess I just think that a player with his abilities effects the game by forcing the other team to game plan for him, opening up things for his teammates, in this case Chris Polk, who obviously took advantage of the fact that the defense had to consistently be aware of what Locker could do as well.
uw will be amazed
at how much a veteran QB means in a Pac 12 game… Polk is in for a long season of 8 in the box. I like his game a lot, the guy is a stud, but having a QB who was a danger to run mattered a ton. That line has a job to do next year…
If you can't Go Cougs... don't go.
by hollyweirdcoug on May 24, 2011 10:08 PM PDT reply actions

by 














