2011 WSU DEPTH CHART: Logwone Mitz Looks Leave His Mark
This continues our series of semi-informed WSU football depth chart speculation in which we take a stab at what each position will look like when the Cougars kick off against Idaho State on Sept. 3. You'll note, at times, that it will look a little different than the post-spring practice depth chart -- we're going to incorporate incoming freshmen and also try to guess what's going to play out in August during training camp. Previous: QBs, DBs.
You know how long it's been since WSU has had a running back perform effectively? The 2007 season was the last time the Cougars had a running back -- Dwight Tardy -- meet even the incredibly modest expectations of averaging more than 10 carries and 4.0 yards. The last time a WSU running back truly was a star? Gotta go back to Jerome Harrison in 2005.
Of course, it's impossible to completely separate the performance of the running backs from the performance of the offensive line, and we all know how awful the offensive line has been the last three years. But still -- even with a great offensive line, I don't think anyone was going to mistake Tardy or James Montgomery for The Ghost or Michael Black. (Although, they probably could have passed for Jonathan Smith or Jermaine Green with a serviceable line.)
Which leaves the question: Just what can we expect from these guys this year? The line should be better, but will that be enough to create a passable running game?
Logwone Mitz will lead the way in his senior year, but he's big and bruising and hardly a dynamic feature back. And Paul Wulff has alluded to mental lapses that have cost Mitz playing time over the past two years. Redshirt freshman Rickey Galvin is dynamic, but he's small in stature and coming off a broken wrist sustained on his first carry last year.
Bottom line? There will be a lot of carries to go around to a number of guys. Here's our take on the how the depth chart will look.
| Starter | Backup | Third | Fourth | Fifth |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Logwone Mitz, Sr.* | Rickey Galvin, Fr.* | Carl Winston, Jr. | Arthur Burns, So.* | Leon Brooks, So.* |
Level of certainty: Medium-high. Mitz and Galvin will lead the way, forming a sort of thunder and lightning combination in the WSU backfield. The reality is that they're really starter 1A and 1B, and they're more talented than anyone else on the roster. We only got a brief look at Galvin last year, but he is explosive -- there's a reason why he was slated to get carries as a true freshman. Barring injury, there's very little chance either of those two are overtaken by anyone else on the roster during training camp in August.
Risk of volatility: Medium. Had Bishop Sankey actually signed on the dotted line, he'd be the wild card here and the potential for upheaval in this depth chart as the season went on would be quite high. Alas, he did not, and the top five spots are taken by guys who were on the roster a year ago. That doesn't mean, though, that there's no room for a surprise in here -- something you'd expect to be the case for a unit that has struggled with productivity. Coaches were high on Winston as a freshman, but he wasn't able to break through last year. There's a chance he could wedge his way in here, especially if Mitz struggles with pass protection again. And don't sleep on Burns, whose athleticism is tantalizing. He was moved back to running back last year after a failed experiment at linebacker.
Biggest question: Could Mitz actually emerge as a workhorse? While Mitz, at 6-foot-1 and 230 pounds, doesn't look like your typical feature back, he's surprisingly shifty and does possess more speed than some think -- see Exhibit A. As a big back, Mitz is never going to create something out of nothing; he needs at least a small push and a crease to get those legs churning downhill. If the offensive line is marginally improved, it's possible Mitz takes control of the job to the tune of 15-18 carries a game.
20 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I'm pretty excited to see how they do
It seems to me that Galvin fits the style of O a little better than Mitz, how are Galvins hands out of the back field? Just out of curiosity, what does a feature back look like? :)
To me, a feature back is a guy who can carry the ball 20+ times
A guy who can do a number of things well so you don’t have to take him off the field. I’m unconvinced Mitz can be that guy.
I agree
Mitz has been around long enough we know what to expect out of him. If he has senior maturity, he will be good enough to keep defenses honest against the past. I really don’t envision his ceiling getting much higher than that. If he doesn’t mature, well expect more of the same, blown pass protection, and fumbles.
I am much more excited about Galvin’s speed.
Go Cougs!
I'm not talking about what he can do...
You said this
“While Mitz, at 6-foot-1 and 230 pounds, doesn’t look like your typical feature back”
I was refering to this.
???
Ron Dayne, Jerome Bettis, Christian Okoye, Eddie George, Stephan Jackson, Jamal Lewis??? I don’t understand your point of view on this. There are plenty of large RB who are every down backs. They hold up better than little scat backs do. Even Shaun Alexander was 5’ 11’ 225 plus.
Sigh
Look at your list. Only Okoye, George and Jackson are in the size range of Mitz. Dayne, Bettis, Lewis and Alexander are all shorter. The point is that most RBs are under six feet tall, even if they’re heavy. Shorter legs usually equal greater “shiftiness,” if you will. Taller RBs have a tougher time in general. That’s just the way it is, as it’s just harder for a guy that size to possess a lot of agility and speed.
Look around college and pro football. I don’t think you’ll find many every-down running backs that are 6-1, 230. George and Jackson were/are special talents and the exception, rather than the rule.
The offensive line will be better this year
but having an effective passing attack will likely help the run game more. We should be able to pass on most teams and no longer will D’s be able to stack the box against us.
Didn't help last year.
And we were one of the better passing teams in the league for the middle part of the season.
True but...
Didn’t alot of those numbers come at times of games when it didn’t matter anymore? I think the passing attack will help the running game out next year. Especially with the increase of talent at wide out.
Thanks for the Apple Cup clip.
I was expecting the burner Mitz ripped off in the spring game. It was a pleasant surprise to relive happier times.
Go Cougs!
Go Cougs!
When the 2011 class comes....
We have not included most of the 2011 newcomers. This summer the positions will become hotter as players will do their best to get to the field.
by well you win some and lose others on May 31, 2011 9:40 PM PDT reply actions
Any thought on whether Byers being back at FB will help out the RBs?
O-line play is absolutely critical, but after Byers blew out his knee against OSU, the Cougs really didn’t have anybody to play the traditional FB (even if WSU uses that position a bit differently that other teams). I would think that it wouldn’t hurt to have a nice lead blocker in the backfield this year on some occasions*.
And by “some occasions” I don’t mean the Doba/Rosie H-Back that the Cougs used five or six times a game and ran behind the motion EVERY SINGLE TIME. If that wasn’t one of the most predictable plays in college football that year, I don’t know what was.
"A bad day at the track is better than a good day at the office."
And Down The Stretch They Come | @PressThePace
Can't hurt
But someone still has to be able to block up front and to allow a blocker (either the FB or a lineman when the FB picks off a DE) to get to the linebackers, which is where you can spring some things.
Keep an eye on a walk-on that’s coming to WSU in the fall: Drake Watson. Kid played at the HS I teach at, and he’s got the perfect build to be a very good blocking FB. Thick through the trunk and legs. I think the Cougs got a steal.
Good call on the walk-on, Nuss.
Definitely, it’s gotta happen up front. I just think one extra capable blocker in the backfield can’t hurt. At least I hope so.
Looking forward to seeing what some of the kids can do.
Go Cougs.
"A bad day at the track is better than a good day at the office."
And Down The Stretch They Come | @PressThePace
by Matt Gardner on Jun 1, 2011 10:56 PM PDT up reply actions
I'm wondering if they'll use a fullback in a traditional set at all.
I get the feeling they’re going to stick with 10, 20 and 30 personnel out of the shotgun this year - or at least I hope that’s the case. If so, the fullback won’t be a ton of use, unless the staff uses one like they did Marcus Richmond. Throw him to the side of Tuel in 2 and 3-back sets, and either use him as a decoy or a receiving threat out of the backfield. Oh, and short-yardage.

by 















