Target Distribution And Wide Receiver Rotation In Mike Leach's Offense
This is the first in a series of posts I will be writing breaking down Mike Leach's offense. I'll leave the X's and O's to Brian, Jeff and others, instead I'll be taking a statistical look inside Leach's offense at Texas Tech and how it might relate to WSU. The data used in this series comes from the 88 games of play-by-play I was able to find.
There seems to be a prevailing thought among WSU fans that the Cougars are loaded with wide receivers. It's easy to see why, the previous staff recruited the position heavily and having a star like Marquess Wilson makes the group look stronger than it is. As a result, a lot of fans found it surprising when the new staff immediately targeted a number of wide receiver prospects. However, as we will all quickly learn, when it comes to wide receivers there is depth and then there is Mike Leach depth.
During Leach's last four seasons at Texas Tech, an average of 11.75 wide receivers saw at least one target per season. WSU currently has nine wide receivers on scholarship and that includes Blair Bomber, Rahmel Dockery and Dominique Williams who have yet to play a down of college football. During the 2007 season, 13 Texas Tech wide receivers were targeted with a pass. Including walk-ons, WSU has 13 wide receivers on the current roster. Below you can see how many wide receivers were targeted in Leach's final few seasons at Tech, compared with WSU over the last two seasons.

Now, you may be saying, "That's great, Leach uses a lot of wide receivers in blowouts, so what?" While it is true, Leach subs generously in the late stages of blowouts, he also utilizes a deep wide receiver rotation during tightly contested games.
Going back to the 2007 Texas Tech season, seven different wide receivers were targeted at least 20 times. At the start of fall camp next season, the Cougars will have three wide receivers with 20 or more career targets. Wilson leads the way with 218 career targets followed by Gino Simone with 98 and Bobby Ratliff with 41. The next highest is Kristoff Williams with 16.
In fact, if we look a little deeper at the numbers from 2006-2009 we find that Leach's top seven wide receivers account for nearly 75 percent of total targets.

What does this mean in terms of number of targets? Well, I'm glad you asked. During the 2006-2009 stretch of data, Texas Tech threw an average of 659 times per season. Based on that number, you can see the target breakdown below.
- WR1: 144.5
- WR2: 107.3
- WR3: 81.0
- WR4: 60.5
- WR5: 44.8
- WR6: 28.5
- WR7: 23.5
Compare that to WSU's top seven returning wide receivers ordered by their 2011 yards per target and you start to understand why Leach and his staff are recruiting wide receivers so heavily.
- WR1: Marquess Wilson (11.3 YPT)
- WR2: Bobby Ratliff (8.5)
- WR3: Kristoff Williams (8.4)
- WR4: Gino Simone (7.7)
- WR5: Isiah Myers (5.9)
- WR6: Henry Eaddy (3.5)
- WR7: Bennett Bontemps (3.0)
In an ideal world, my guess is Leach would prefer to have somewhere between 12 and 14 scholarship wide receivers, with walk-ons also factoring in. The three current wide receiver commits would bring the total to 12 and it's possible some of the wide receivers already on scholarship don't fit the Leach mold. Don't be surprised to see Leach sign as many as five wide receivers this signing class just to get the numbers healthy enough to ensure he can run his offense from day one without limitations.
Despite the appearance of depth, no position may have as many question marks heading into next season as wide receiver. Wilson will likely do great things (more on that later in this series), but the coaching staff is still on the search for at least six other key contributors. As I said at the top, there is normal wide receiver depth and then there is Leach wide receiver depth, the Cougs have the former and the staff is currently working on acquiring the latter.
56 comments
|
4 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Holy cow.
So, yeah. I take back everything I said about any WR in this class redshirting. THEY’RE ALL GOING TO PLAY.
by Kyle Rancourt on Jan 10, 2012 11:22 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
My roommate asked me the other day
Why it seemed like Leach was only semi-excited about our WR corp. He thought Leach should be pumped about the WR depth/talent we had. I had no real explanation for him as to why he didn’t seem more excited whenever he was asked. Now I have an answer. Great post, Mark.
Brett Gleason | Twitter | Sports Minds Blog | Never fallen in the sarchasm.
by Brett the 49er on Jan 10, 2012 11:24 AM PST reply actions
No
We never do that
I miss *REAL* Four Loko
by B-Lot tailgater on Jan 10, 2012 3:21 PM PST up reply actions
I think it will take Leach another year or two to get the depth and talent level he wants at the WR position
The blood of "The Five" cries for justice.
wide receivers or all receivers?
Are you calculating just wide receiver positions with a catch or do the number receivers used include running backs out of the backfield, etc?
This is strictly wide receivers.
Running backs will be next in the series.
by Mark Sandritter on Jan 10, 2012 11:28 AM PST up reply actions
good analysis
I’m interested to see the inside numbers on how RB’s are used out of the backfield and even in the slot
I don't have anyway of knowing where they lined up pre snap.
But one thing is for sure, RBs will catch a lot more passes than they did in the previous offense.
by Mark Sandritter on Jan 10, 2012 11:31 AM PST up reply actions
Can't wait to see how many passes TEs and FBs caught!
by Kyle Rancourt on Jan 10, 2012 11:40 AM PST via Android app reply actions
May not matter where they are lined up....
…..but really looking forward to seeing Leach put people in positions to attach different parts of the field per their strengths
Awesome job
From 2006 to 2009 WSU threw about 415 times per season so I guess we are expecting an almost 60% increase in pass attempts!
For example...
Kliff Kingsbury averaged a little over 600 attempts per year. His last year, he had games of 70, 65, 60 and 59 (twice) attempts.
by Brian Floyd on Jan 10, 2012 11:56 AM PST up reply actions
In 2007, TT had an amazing 763 pass attempts
http://espn.go.com/college-football/statistics/team/_/stat/passing/sort/passingAttempts/year/2007
Yes, you should follow another Coug-related account on Twitter: @425CougFan
189 of those targets went to Michael Crabtree.
Which is insane.
by Mark Sandritter on Jan 10, 2012 12:20 PM PST up reply actions
Especially when you consider...
Navy had 136 pass attempts on the year and Western Kentucky had 138 pass attempts on the year
by AirRaidCoug on Jan 10, 2012 12:27 PM PST up reply actions
2007 Targets were complete 71.3%
Do we have any WRs now that were able to put up those kind of numbers? We had many, many drops this year.
Wilson was almost 67 percent last season.
I wouldn’t ever expect anyone to go 70 plus. That is fairly absurd. Crabtree didn’t come close to repeating in 2008 when he had a 65 percent catch rate.
by Mark Sandritter on Jan 11, 2012 12:33 AM PST up reply actions
I found your last Target Chart
Yeah, I see we had two WRs who pulled in over 66% of their targets. These same two lead in all the Target categories. If I’m not mistaken they should be our 1 and 2 receivers. This is not a bad thing. You show an estimated 251.8 targets in your “Target Distribution” for the 1 and 2 WRs. If they both continue what they did, and I hope they do, then this is not a bad thing to start with next year.
Keep up the good work. I love your charts..
There were also 18 sacks.
And QBs had 40 rushing attempts overall (including sacks). I’m guessing most of the rushing attempts were called passed.
And 18 sacks on almost 800 passing attempts is damn good.
CougCenter In Reid We Trust, Twitter!
by Craig Powers on Jan 10, 2012 12:34 PM PST up reply actions
called passes*
CougCenter In Reid We Trust, Twitter!
by Craig Powers on Jan 10, 2012 12:34 PM PST up reply actions
Actually we threw 422 times per season Yahoo and ESPN are off...
Going to this ESPN and looking at total attempts and adding 2006-2009 and dividing by four is different than going to yahoo and taking pass attempts per game and multiplying by the amount of games that year and adding and dividing by four
by AirRaidCoug on Jan 10, 2012 12:30 PM PST up reply actions
Any way you can send this article to every WR recruit looking at WSU?
Great read.
by klokkins on Jan 10, 2012 11:54 AM PST via Android app reply actions
I'm sure that's something Leach and his staff are sharing too
But yeah, I’d be excited if I was a WR or QB in this system.
Mark: how do tight ends figure into his offense, if at all?
Very little.
Of the 4,593 pass attempts I logged, 128 went to a TE. That 2.7 percent is only slightly above the 2.2 percent of targets WSU TE’s saw last season.
Sorry Andrew Lintz
by Mark Sandritter on Jan 10, 2012 12:22 PM PST up reply actions
However...
targeting the TE 2.7% of the time with a 40%+ increase in total attempts = more targets for Lintz anyway.
Question
I see the need for more WR’s, but roster spots aren’t a bottomless pool. So where do you see Leach cutting back on depth? Does he have fewer RB’s and TE’s to offset the WR numbers?
I also could see a thought process of bringing in 4 or so WR’s a year and expecting a few of them to switch to defense if they don’t work at WR and we need them at DB, but that might just be me.
I would say fewer TEs, yes.
No more FBs (sorry Byers) as the TE will sort of morph into the H-Back roll, and less RBs.
by Kyle Rancourt on Jan 10, 2012 1:32 PM PST up reply actions
this
But the FB/TE hybrid, (think Jedzilla) was a fairly commone aspect of his teams. They coverage block and release…
If you can't Go Cougs... don't go.
by hollyweirdcoug on Jan 10, 2012 3:01 PM PST up reply actions
Know your role
I miss *REAL* Four Loko
by B-Lot tailgater on Jan 10, 2012 3:46 PM PST up reply actions
Looking back from 2004 to 2008 ...
Leach recruited 19 receivers. That averages out to 3.75 a year. In 2003, it shows that he didn’t recruit a single one which is hard to believe. Got this info off of the Tech Rivals page.
If I remember right, his goal is to recruit a complete team every year. There are 22 position available and he wants 22 recruits to fill those positions.
Just wait until you do the QB stats …
BTW, one of the reasons his QB’s can just step in and play is very interesting. His number one and two QB’s have equal number of reps in each practice: 200.
by Arizona Raider on Jan 10, 2012 12:48 PM PST reply actions
Great Article
My question is where do the scholarships come from for this increased receiver depth? With the limit of 85 we have to be taking a hit somewhere else, is that exclusively felt at TE and RB, or will there be fewer guys on D or the OL?
He recruits one RB a year and a TE once every two or three years
and the TE functions as a stand up inside receiver. Very rarely will the TE be in a three point stance.
by Arizona Raider on Jan 10, 2012 12:57 PM PST up reply actions
I believe he also probably looks at preferred walk-ons at the WR position.
CougCenter OG since 9/2/2008 | @TheSoCalCoug
Would you believe it if I told you we currently have less commits than before Wulff was fired?
Ok, so it’s actually the same amount (18), but I was shocked looking at this the other day. I felt like we had to have somewhere approaching 30 commits. A lot of kids de-committed, and I feel like once Signing Day rolls around, we’ll probably see a player or two transfer. Also, walk-ons walk-ons walk-ons walk-ons walk-ons walk-ons
by Kyle Rancourt on Jan 10, 2012 1:35 PM PST up reply actions
I wonder if the transfer announcements will just slowly come in or if there will be a bunch at one time
I think the last couple of years Leach had 3 TEs on his roster, don’t know how many of them were on scholarship
interestingly the team rank
has plummetted from mid 50’s to the high 60’s nationally on Scout—w/ nary a yelp from the fanbase. Even with an eye patch on Coug fans are trusting some blind faith in Cap’n Leach…
(sorry Kyle I onow you hate the priate thing)
If you can't Go Cougs... don't go.
by hollyweirdcoug on Jan 10, 2012 3:05 PM PST up reply actions
I think people haven't cared because the Cougs are now on the radar of players that weren't even thinking about WSU before.
Players with more stars.
CougCenter In Reid We Trust, Twitter!
by Craig Powers on Jan 10, 2012 3:09 PM PST up reply actions
And the players Leach is getting/offering have more impressive offer sheets.
It automatically makes them seem like better players even if they aren’t.
by Mark Sandritter on Jan 10, 2012 3:12 PM PST up reply actions
Scout's rankings are aggregate, if I remember right
So I think the dropping is more about them getting passed, which is natural when you’ve only got 18 or 20 scholarships to give, you’ve already got your commits, and other schools are now starting to pile theirs up.
Anyone that can can catch a ball get ready to do it
over and over and over and over…..get the point?and Leach seems to be the master mind to find players that never knew they could fit into an offense like he runs.Even what you have in place right now.JMO
I love seeing the recruits who talk about Leach
Alex Jackson has committed because of Leach. Gabriel Marks is visiting soon and he’s a 4 star as well as 4 star Kenny Lawler who is now considering the Cougars because of Leach.
It’s nice to see recruits wanting to come to WSU because of a coach. It’s been a long time since we’ve been able to say a couple of 4 stars around here are going to be Cougs. And because of Leach these aren’t character/not qualifying problems, these are good players who can go anywhere and want Leach. I love it!
What wide receivers don't fit Leach's mold?
Question about “The three current wide receiver commits would bring the total to 12 and it’s possible some of the wide receivers already on scholarship don’t fit the Leach mold.”
Is there really a WR that doesn’t fit Leach’s mold somehow? I mean besides academics or work ethic. With running 4 WRs consistently, isn’t there a few different molds that ML has for the position (e.g. an inside receiver mold vs. an outside receiver mold)? And WR seems to be that position where most coaches want a variety anyway (i.e. a big guy like Karstetter for the red zone, a speedy guy like Wilson for space, etc).
by Something Snazzy on Jan 10, 2012 4:43 PM PST reply actions
No coach wants someone who can't catch
by Something Snazzy on Jan 10, 2012 5:06 PM PST up reply actions
As much as I appreciate the slam (and trust me, I do)
Lose the rec for not having link open in new window.
by klokkins on Jan 10, 2012 5:39 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
I always right click, open in new window.
#CougHarmonyOnTwitter #teamnopants
by TiltingRight on Jan 10, 2012 11:31 PM PST up reply actions

by 

















