WSU Vs. Stanford: Happy Statistics And Notes From A Surprising Coug Win
Last night's game between Washington State and Stanford wasn't for those who are a fan of stifling defense, particularly in the first five and last twenty minutes of the game. The Cougars scored on every possession before the under-sixteen media timeout and jumped out to a 15-10 lead. Stanford came out firing in the second half on a quick 13-2 run to build what felt like an insurmountable deficit at the time.
Obviously the deficit was no problem on a night when the Cougs, led by Faisal Aden's 33 points on 21 uses, shred apart a normally excellent Stanford defense for 54 second-half points. In the end, WSU put up 1.27 points per possession for the whole game, second best on the season behind the performance against Santa Clara. The second half was most likely the most efficient Wazzu has been all season, as they scored 1.59 points per possession. That came against a Stanford team that had been giving up 0.90 all season.
Free throws were obviously a huge part of the offensive success, as WSU hit 27 of 29 as a team. The 29 free throw attempts against 48 field goal attempts is good for a 60.4 free throw rate, nearly double what the Cardinal had been allowing. Aden was the biggest reason for that, as he attempted 13 free throws on the night. Coming into the game, he had taken just 27 free throws all season. Stanford was guarding him tightly on the perimeter and repeatedly falling for his pump fake, allowing him to get inside and throw his body around.
Shooting well is something that WSU has been able to all season, and Stanford doesn't rely on tough shooting defense to be effective, so the Cougars 56 eFG% is one of the least surprising numbers to come out of last night. The key was how well the Cougs were able to avoid turnovers and limit second-chance opportunities.
More on that after the jump.
In a game played at 64 possessions, WSU only turned the ball over seven times. Aden didn't turn it over at all. As mentioned in the preview, Stanford has forced a high number of turnovers, but doesn't get many via steals. They force the opposition into making poor decisions. WSU didn't do that and on a night when they were able to shoot so well from the field and get to the line so frequently, keeping possession of the ball allowed for the offense to be super efficient.
This game was certainly not won on the defensive end, as Stanford put up their second-highest efficiency in Pac-12 play. Ken Bone admitted that WSU was fortunate to have some of Stanford's best shooters struggle from the outside. Sophomore Aaron Bright made just 1/8 from three, and he came in shooting 46%.
However, the low shooting percentages may also have been a product of WSU's zone forcing Stanford into playing a way in which they were uncomfortable. On the year, including last night, 34% of the Cardinal's shots have come from three. Yesterday, it was 56%. Their players aren't used to taking that many jumpers, presumably they typically search for better shots and only shoot wide-open threes. Last night, the three was the first option and they struggled (even when the shots were wide-open).
With all those misses, it was vital for WSU to perform better on the defensive glass. The first half was more of the same, as Stanford grabbed 7 of 18 offensive rebounding opportunities, for a 39 OR%, just around their season average. Josh Owens was giving the Cougs plenty of trouble inside, as he pulled down two offensive boards and tipped away others.
The second half saw a change. After getting dominated by Owens for the first 25 minutes, WSU made a conscious effort to deny him the ball and locate him on rebounds. The result was just three field goal attempts and three free throw attempts in the second half, most of which came early. Overall, Stanford grabbed only 6 of 19 offensive boards in the last twenty minutes, dropping them to a 35 OR%, or below their season average. For this Cougar team, holding any opponent to below their season average in offensive rebounding is cause for celebration.
This was an exciting win for the Cougars and their fans. There are parts of the game that were certainly unsustainable, particularly in Aden's ability to hit tough shots with regularity and his high free throw rate. WSU also shouldn't expect a pair of opposing players who combine to shoot around 45% from three to suddenly go 2 for 15 every game. But there were also parts that are encouraging, particularly turnovers. WSU's turnover rate has been trending down since it was a problem early in the season, even as competition has been a little tougher in conference play.
Should we expect the Cougs to come out and play like this all time? Probably not. However, it is good to know that these types of performances can happen and that makes following the team just a little bit more interesting.
26 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Enquist and Shelton
I noticed early that Stanford was not having a problem getting the ball inside and scoring on our zone. I noticed that Bone went to Shelton a lot more down the stretch than Enquist. In fact, Shelton saw 19 minutes last night where he averages around 12 and Enquist saw 12 minutes where he usually averages around 20. Was that a defensive strategy? Shelton didn’t do a lot of rebounding, in fact Charlie still outrebounded him 4 to 1, but it seemed like a lot of the inside baskets went away with Shelton in there.
Around these parts, a man could get hurt for wearing purple.
It is amazing what happens with low turnover rate and a high shooting percentage.
We already have a good shooting percentage. I wish we could just consistently lower the other.
CougCenter OG since 9/2/2008 | @TheSoCalCoug
Sorry guys. I was at this game and I think it was a fluke.
So many things went our way. Especially the turnover situation. There was easily half a dozen times where the Cougars lost control of the ball and should have lost it all together, but they got lucky and somehow recovered.
No argument here.
CougCenter In Reid We Trust, Twitter!
by Craig Powers on Jan 20, 2012 8:21 PM PST up reply actions
I think they made alof of their own luck with hustle and effort
I was there too and that was not my takeaway feeling at all that this game was a fluke. I thought they played with a lot of heart and minimized their mistakes.
Around these parts, a man could get hurt for wearing purple.
I don't think this game was repeatable.
Will Faisal hit all those ridiculous shots over and over again in another game" Maybe, but probably not. There were plenty of time when WSU lost the dribble and had were fortunate enough to have it bounce right into the hands of their own. There were so many times in that game where I held my breath only to breathe a sigh of relief as a Coug grabbed a loose ball. If the ball bounces slightly differently, it could be going the other way.
Saying that WSU worked harder in this game to get those loose balls implies that in other games where they lost them as turnovers implies that they didn’t work very hard in those. I’ve watched most games this year and don’t think that is true.
CougCenter In Reid We Trust, Twitter!
by Craig Powers on Jan 20, 2012 8:46 PM PST up reply actions
Just to add.
As I said in this post, there are some things that can be repeated, but others that can’t be expected to happen every game.
CougCenter In Reid We Trust, Twitter!
by Craig Powers on Jan 20, 2012 8:48 PM PST up reply actions
Thanks for the chance to clarify
I hate to say “hustle and effort” because, as you state, it’s like I’m implying “not like all the other games.” But I was there in the gym and maybe I don’t have the right word to describe it, but that was a team that was tired of getting their asses kicked and they played in a way not to make it happen again. Come on, coaches applaud their teams effort and hustle after individual games all the time. So are they saying they can’t get them to hustle or put forth effort in other games when they say that?
And as far as repeating performances, I don’t know. I think they can play with a Stanford team that beat OSU by 2 points or Utah by 4 at home. Do I think WSU can be Stanford more times than not? No. But if we had a few best of 7s with them, I think we would always come away with 1 and sometimes 2 wins.
Around these parts, a man could get hurt for wearing purple.
I'm pretty happy that last night was the one or two out of seven!
CougCenter In Reid We Trust, Twitter!
by Craig Powers on Jan 20, 2012 9:11 PM PST up reply actions
Well, you know, a game 7 wouldn't be necessary, so it would be out of 5 or 6
Around these parts, a man could get hurt for wearing purple.
Sure, they can bring it for a game
But as you rightly point out in your second paragraph, that’s not the argument here. The question is whether this is sustainable and repeatable. There’s a lot of evidence to suggest that it’s not. Perhaps that’s wrong — teams have pulled 180s in the past. But probability suggests that’s unlikely. That’s all we’re saying.
Repeatable and sustainable are not exactly the same thing
Repeatable, yes. College basketball is a sport of any given night. That was my objection, because this started off with the idea the game was a “fluke” meaning unrepeatable. I think they will repeat this type of performance a few more times this year (especially at home).
As far as sustainable, a whole other animal, I agree it is not sustainable. especially with this team on the road. We are playing better over the last two games, but we have far from made a 180.
From here on out, I think we go 3-3 at home and 1-5 on the road. At least 2 of those wins will be “repeats of last night” because we played well with extra intensity.
Around these parts, a man could get hurt for wearing purple.
Agreed that it is repeatableish.
Do I think Faisal will go 10-17 and 13-13 from the line again? Absolutely not.
Do I think WSU will beat another team technically weren’t supposed to beat again at some point this season, while taking good care of the basketball and shooting well? Yes I do.
CougCenter In Reid We Trust, Twitter!
by Craig Powers on Jan 20, 2012 10:16 PM PST up reply actions
The Aden thing made it "unique"
But I guarantee that is not the end of him trying driving/slashing to the basket. Get ready to watch that again all day tomorrow. There will be an attempt to repeat it.
Around these parts, a man could get hurt for wearing purple.
He has been driving and slashing all year.
I saw little difference to how he played compared to the rest of the season. The shots just fell and Stanford was playing aggressively.
CougCenter In Reid We Trust, Twitter!
by Craig Powers on Jan 20, 2012 10:40 PM PST up reply actions
He said that he hasn't done it as often as he ought during the postgame
I agree he had shots falling, but he had similar shooting game vs. New Mexico (10-16 3-6 3pt), which is actually better than last night.. I think the real difference last night was his ability to drive get to the line. I would like to compare his shot chart across last night to other games. I’ll bet the pattern would look quite different in terms of where shots were taken. It looks like he is usually 30-40% behind the arc and takes several hots just inside of it….at least this year on average.
BTW Do you know where you can get individual and team shot charts online?
Around these parts, a man could get hurt for wearing purple.
Nobody tracks those with any reliability.
About the best you can do is “3-pointer,” “jumper” and “layup” from the play-by-play.
by Jeff Nusser on Jan 20, 2012 11:32 PM PST up reply actions
I saw a little difference
I feel like Aden did not attempt his patented reverse-layup miss like previous games. While he was still off balance on a few of his layups I think that he went up stronger to the rim in the game which helped draw some more fouls. I expected him to try and do a reverse layup on the layup to tie the game in the second half and was completely shocked when he didn’t.
damnit
I guess i missed that. I would assume that he missed it then?
by WazzuCrew11 on Jan 21, 2012 11:24 AM PST up reply actions
That's a fair point I can get behind
To that end, I’m much more interested in sustainable things. :-)
by Jeff Nusser on Jan 20, 2012 11:31 PM PST up reply actions
So about Faisal hitting all those ridiculous shots again
Attractive, Intelligent, Smart A**
by Neil Vincent Roberts on Jan 21, 2012 10:47 PM PST up reply actions
Because that totally seems sustainable!
by Kyle Rancourt on Jan 22, 2012 1:38 PM PST up reply actions
I had to go to the emergency room.
I had 19 heart attacks and 4 heart burns.
If My Life Is Great, Why Am I Not Happy?
by well you win some and lose others on Jan 22, 2012 4:15 PM PST up reply actions
I'd like to think you're right,
but to me the phrase “played with a lot of heart” screams fluke.
"Tonight, we skate with them. Tonight, we stay with them. And we shut them down because we can!" | Herb Brooks
by Coug999 on Jan 20, 2012 8:54 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
See my post above
Especially the point about coaches acknowledging variations in their team’s effort. So next time you hear Bone or any other coach say, “We really played with heart tonight.” after a win, you have to say that he meant it was a fluke.
Around these parts, a man could get hurt for wearing purple.

by 















