Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Indy 500: 'Greatest Spectacle In Racing' Set For Sunday

WSU Football Recruiting: Robert Barber, DT From American Samoa, Makes It Two In A Row From The Islands

In the past 48 hours, Mike Leach has announced to the world that he is now staking a claim in American Samoa. Along with Destiny Vaeao, the two latest commits both hail from the tiny island in the South Pacific. According to CF.C, this time Robert Barber has pledged his allegiances to the Washington State Cougars. Samoan pipeline!

While I obviously talk about staking claims and pipelines in jest, I love the fact that we're attempting to recruit both Samoa and Hawai'i with more enthusiasm than ever before. And no, two kids does not equal pipeline. Let's just clear that up right now. I'm not saying we won't have one eventually with DL coach Joe Salave'a, but let's all take a deep breath and not count our chickens before they hatch.

Star-divide

This video is very short, and it doesn't really show Barber doing anything off the charts. If Scout is to be believed, he's huge (6'3, 290). I think that might be a little inflated, but I think he has the frame to get that big if he's not there already. He's pretty quick for an interior lineman, so that's a definite plus.

I've seen multiple people say Barber is the perfect NT in our new 3-4, but I'm not sure I agree. Just because the guy is new and huge doesn't necessarily peg him as the next Vince Wilfork. The problem with both Vaeao and Barber is that they're both extremely raw. Vaeao is going to be playing defense full time for the first time in his career, and he'll need to adjust his mindset accordingly. Barber looked all of 250 lbs. in this video, even though it has him listed at 275. Maybe that's because every kid in Samoa is just that big. Maybe that's because they exaggerated his weight. Maybe that's because it's only tape from his junior year. I'm not really sure.

What I can tell you is, when compared to former commit Maurice Bennett, Barber gets blown out of the water in almost every way imaginable. I think that's a silly way to evaluate a player, because not only are they playing against different competition, but they also play in different schemes. However, I simply don't understand blind optimism. Welcoming a new recruit to the Cougar family and hoping he does well is absolutely the right thing to do. I'm on board with this 100%. I'm not ok with posting my evaluation and saying "WOO! LOVE THIS PICK UP! PIPELINE!", though.

Now, before everyone loses their minds and I get destroyed in the comments for being too negative, realize that all I'm going off of right now is that video you see above. It's a two minute and twenty-three second highlight tape. That's it. The kid wasn't offered by any other schools, and before yesterday, Scout and Rivals didn't even have him in their databases. The "well he plays halfway across the world" excuse doesn't fly because Vaeao is from the same city and had eight FBS offers (six of which were BCS schools).

I don't hate Barber, nor do I dislike getting him to commit. He's certainly an interesting prospect, and I'd rather take a chance on a guy like him than a 175 pound LB. I think eventually, Barber can be a solid player for the Cougs. Three or four years down the line, I believe he can contribute in a meaningful way. I'm not sure he'll ever be a starter, but it's important to get guys who are good depth, too. Having backups who push the starters and can step in during injuries is always a great thing. I love the fact that we're putting an emphasis on big guys as well as making sure to recruit the Islands, but I just want to make sure we're all adjusting our expectations.

-----

Want more? Follow us on Twitter and Facebook. Also, check out Recruiting Central

Comment 217 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I hope everyone watches that 60 minutes video on Samoan football players

Link.

These guys don’t even start playing football until High School, in one of the worst looking fields I’ve ever seen. Their equipment looks like it’s from 1970 and at least one of the teams practiced on a field made of lava rocks.

I’m guessing that most of these players have a ways to go before they can contribute, but it seems that they’re likely to work that much harder to improve.

Besides, they have the best hair in all of football.

by klokkins on Jan 29, 2012 10:14 AM PST reply actions  

Sleeper

“Just FYI: Every player who isn’t highly rated isn’t automatically a “sleeper” or a “diamond in the rough”

But being a sleeper doesn’t necessarily mean he’s going to be great. Just means he’s under the radar a bit, possibly with some upside. I think he might have more upside than you indicate. Obviously both Samoans are raw. They only started football prior to high school in the past few years in Samoa. But if they are as big and athletic as some reports indicate, there is potential to coach both up to be more than just helpful depth down the road. I doubt either makes an impact this year. But don’t rule Barber out from being a starter or impact player 4-5 years down the road.

by oscarthecoug on Jan 29, 2012 10:15 AM PST reply actions   1 recs

Well if being sleeper or under-the-radar guy only means "he could be ok"

then why even use the term sleeper? I’d say him being not highly ranked in that scenario is pretty spot on. Wouldn’t everyone not ranked be maybe ok in a couple of years?

by Kyle Rancourt on Jan 29, 2012 1:20 PM PST up reply actions  

not saying it means "he could be ok"

i think it means “he could be be great or good” but he also has a good chance not to get there. basically, higher ceiling than rating might indicate but lower or just as low of a floor. And probably lower chance of reaching that ceiling than the 4 * type guys. That’s the point. From your article, you’d get the impression his upside is solid depth and never a starter. That may happen, but I think the ceiling is higher. Doesn’t mean he’ll get there or close to there. But I’d guess I think he has a better chance to start his senior year than you indicate that you do.

by oscarthecoug on Jan 29, 2012 2:17 PM PST up reply actions  

But that's silly.

Every player, regardless of ranking, could be good or great, but also has a chance of not getting there.

That’s basically saying, “Well, he might suck, but he might be awesome, or he might fall somewhere in the middle. Maybe.”

by Kyle Rancourt on Jan 29, 2012 2:32 PM PST up reply actions  

I guess the question is

What concrete evidence do you have that this guy has that kind of ceiling? That’s what Kyle’s getting at here. Let’s reserve the term for guys who have shown something intriguing.

For example, I thought Rickey Galvin was a “sleeper” two years ago, although I didn’t use that term. He had great elusiveness and acceleration, but the question was whether his size would be a hindrance. In that case, he was a sleeper because other schools were scared off because of his stature. If he could overcome that, he could be a really nice piece.

If someone is going to use the term “sleeper” or “under the radar,” let’s start there.

by Jeff Nusser on Jan 29, 2012 2:49 PM PST up reply actions   2 recs

I hate the term 'sleeper'

it implies all you have to do is wake them up.

Under the radar says exactly what you think it does. The player didn’t get noticed in HS. Could be due to many reasons. But there is one or more reasons why. Does that mean he can’t grow into being a solid or great player? Nope. Does it mean everyone is making a mistake by not noticing him. Nope.

There is a reason quaint little tags are being placed on headlines. It makes the Koolaid taste better.

Wait, Kyle where is your beef reference?

It is not the size of the gift that demonstrate support…it’s the action of joining.

by woolybugger on Jan 29, 2012 2:56 PM PST up reply actions  

Vegi-Burgers

there what’s for dinner

Attractive, Intelligent, Smart A**

by Neil Vincent Roberts on Jan 29, 2012 3:56 PM PST up reply actions  

They're*

Educate and inform the whole mass of the people... They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty.
Thomas Jefferson

by Skurskicoug on Jan 29, 2012 4:15 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Facepalm

Attractive, Intelligent, Smart A**

by Neil Vincent Roberts on Jan 29, 2012 5:58 PM PST up reply actions  

Samoan side of Tofu declares commitment to WSU

that wasn’t so hard now was it?

It is not the size of the gift that demonstrate support…it’s the action of joining.

by woolybugger on Jan 29, 2012 4:53 PM PST up reply actions  

that tofu

pronounced toe-fu-OO

If you can't Go Cougs... don't go.

by hollyweirdcoug on Jan 29, 2012 8:58 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

I am only half Samoan (my mother)

Weight is a difficult thing to judge. When I weighed 175, people thought I weighed 150. When I weighed 200, people thought I weighed 170. Because of work, I haven’t went to the gym in about a year. I gained about 25 pounds and weigh 240. I have stood next to people who weigh around 200 pounds and people still think that person weighs more.

It is probably our genetics, so I am guessing that his weight is fairly close. I have also read that he has actually lost weight and that is when he started showing more potential. When the S&C coach gets a hold of him and he gets into a great conditioning program for the first time, you may see a better player than you think you are getting.

by Coug1990 on Jan 29, 2012 10:23 AM PST reply actions  

This kid seems like a pretty good grayshirt candidate to me.

Depending on how the rest of this class shakes out. The kid is a project, there’s upside but he’s so far away that it’s hard to make any projections on him and what kind of player he’ll be.

"If you want your dreams to come true, don't sleep in."

by kelly20210 on Jan 29, 2012 10:53 AM PST reply actions  

Not so sure about a grayshirt

Sure, he probably needs a bit more work than some of our other recruits, but he would also benefit from improved facilities and getting to work with Coach Salave’a. I personally think that grayshirts are going to be much more beneficial for guys who still need to develop physically, and I’m not so sure that that is something that Barber needs.

An extra spring in Pullman would be great for him, but is he really going to spend 6 years in Pullman if he ends up being what we’re all hoping he can be?

by MegaCoug on Jan 29, 2012 11:28 AM PST up reply actions  

The player I'm hoping he can be is in the average Pac-12 starter to capable backup range.

You can’t really gauge anything from what we know about him. All we know right now is; roughly how big he is, that the Cougs offered him a scholarship, the position he played in HS, and 2 minutes of him destroying kids, in what looked like glorified back yard football. Based on what we know about him, and all the things we don’t know, I just wouldn’t be all that surprised if he enrolled a semester late. Remember Brandon Rankin? The guy was a monster in JC bigger, stronger, older, more athletic than this guy and he really struggled his first 15 games in the Pac-12. He was way ahead of your average HS lineman recruit and it took him some time to become a semi-productive player. This kid seems well behind the average HS lineman recruit in every way except size.

"If you want your dreams to come true, don't sleep in."

by kelly20210 on Jan 29, 2012 11:53 AM PST up reply actions  

Being from Samoa is a big part of that

They don’t have the same coaching, equipment or resources that kids in the states have. This kid more than likely has all of the natural abilities and desire to be something, but it needs work and training.

He isn’t going to have those resources that will take him to the next level available in Samoa, so it doesn’t make much sense to have him wait there until January. Get him to Pullman ASAP, and get him coached up. That’s what he needs more than anything.

A grayshirt is going to be much more valuable to an undersized kid that needs to put on weight and workout before playing PAC-12 football. We have no shortage of those kids in this class.

by MegaCoug on Jan 29, 2012 12:06 PM PST up reply actions  

Agree to disagree.

To me though this looks like the kid in this class that is furthest from seeing the field right now.

"If you want your dreams to come true, don't sleep in."

by kelly20210 on Jan 29, 2012 1:51 PM PST up reply actions  

"is he really going to spend 6 years in Pullman if he ends up being what we’re all hoping he can be?"

So now we’re debating him not staying in Pullman to exhaust his eligability because his upside is so much that OMG NFL FIRST ROUND!

Awesome. By that logic, I sure hope Feddie Davey stays all four years because I hope he can be Ed Reed.

by Kyle Rancourt on Jan 29, 2012 1:24 PM PST up reply actions  

Kyle your post should include a projected year of draft entry for all these players

I just can’t tell between the 2, 3, and 4 year players. And while you’re at it, do you think Leach is making a mistake going for all these players who are leaving early? It seems like the type of player who redshirts and uses all four years of eleigibility is becoming obsolete

Around these parts, a man could get hurt for wearing purple.

by PullManiac on Jan 29, 2012 1:37 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

That was probably going too far

The point was that for what this kid needs, a grayshirt would be pointless. The point of grayshirting would be to either work on academics, put space between him and someone else already on the roster, or to bulk up. Except for maybe academics, which I haven’t heard anything about from anyone, he doesn’t need any of that.

So why would we have him spend 8 months, living at or near poverty, when he could be at WSU, getting coached and working on his football skills, where he needs the most work.

There are plenty of much more highly rated kids in this class, where my concern is they’re size. We have far too many kids that are built more like Aire Justin than they are a PAC-12 ready football player.

But sure, go ahead and point to the one part of the post where everyone’s excitement over a commit gets the best of my post..

by MegaCoug on Jan 29, 2012 1:37 PM PST up reply actions  

No I actually agree with the greyshirt part.

I’d rather greyshirt a kid like Salmonson or Villarrubia. Let them gain the 30-40 pounds they need to gain, and then they have a redshirt year still available as well. I’d rather just redshirt Barber and Vaeao, get them in a proper conditioning program, and help them learn the intricacies of playing Pac 12 football.

by Kyle Rancourt on Jan 29, 2012 1:42 PM PST up reply actions  

samoan pipeline

I think getting two samoans into the program year one of the leach era will pay dividends down the road.

plus

This guy sounds to me like the textbook definition of an underdog. And who doesn’t love rooting for the underdog?

by gocougs1989 on Jan 29, 2012 11:32 AM PST reply actions  

Ratings

I certainly don’t believe that every player with a low rating is a sleeper, but honestly, this kid wasn’t rated by scout or rivals at all. Neither was Vaeao.

They didn’t have scout or rivals profiles because they weren’t evaluated. And while they wouldn’t be 4 or 5 star recruits regardless of if they had been evaluated, that isn’t where their value lies. These guys are exciting commitments because of their potential, not because of what they would be doing this coming fall.

by MegaCoug on Jan 29, 2012 11:35 AM PST reply actions   1 recs

so..

We should just not get excited about “our guys” ? We should not be optimistic about “our guys”?
Isn’t it normal to be looking at the upside potential of “our guys”?

Maybe it is just me but what is it you expect from cougar football fans…to just be negative and minimize, look at the glass as half empty, about every recruit below a certain star level that the recruiting services deem worthy of being ranked?

I understand that the highly rated guys might not pan out, and the lowly ranked or unranked or walk ons can excel. YOU don’t know what someone can and will become, none of us do. Why is it a “problem” for me or others to be optimistic and talk about what could be?

by gocougs1989 on Jan 29, 2012 12:44 PM PST up reply actions  

if your reasoning is to be followed..

let’s not get excited about 3, 4 or hell even 5 star guys. They can and in some cases are wash outs, who don’t live up to the hype. If we are being completely realistic none of “our guys” should be worthy of fans being exciting until they prove themselves on the field in pac 12 games.

I think there is a fundamental difference between overvaluing our guys and being an excited fan to see new recruits committing to our school and being excited about what could/can be. I may have missed the people saying these two or any of our recent verbal commits are going to be the next ALL AMERICAN and program saver….

by gocougs1989 on Jan 29, 2012 1:01 PM PST up reply actions   2 recs

understood

My confusion is due to not understanding the distinction between the two boards. I am more in line with being excited about a new player to the program rather than labeling any verbal commit or recruit as the next ALL EVERYTHING Guy. I was confused as I had not understood who was saying these guys where going to be ALL EVERYTHING.

by gocougs1989 on Jan 29, 2012 3:25 PM PST via iPhone app up reply actions  

To requote Ryan Divish

It’s hat whole “obsession with potential.”

Around these parts, a man could get hurt for wearing purple.

by PullManiac on Jan 29, 2012 1:01 PM PST up reply actions  

agree

But then again the entire star system is based on guessing what a kid is going to do several years down the line.

I think many fans watched 60 minutes therefore the odds are higher anyone from Samoa has a chance of making the NFL. Therefore has a higher chance of making a huge impact in college. No matter what the recruitniks think. Yes there is a difference between a ‘project’ and a more known quantity.

The reality of the situation is we have no idea how any of these kids will turn out. All we can do is hope they win football games. Thinking any one of them will turn the tides is crazy talk.

It is not the size of the gift that demonstrate support…it’s the action of joining.

by woolybugger on Jan 29, 2012 2:35 PM PST up reply actions  

To add to this.....

Scout allows you to go back and look at past recruiting classes and ratings players. Some have lived up to their rating and some haven’t. We have two star starters and three star special teamers on a lot of teams. This recruiting news is great to put some names in our heads, but I am far more interested to see what the depth chart will look like for this coming season.

Around these parts, a man could get hurt for wearing purple.

by PullManiac on Jan 29, 2012 2:43 PM PST up reply actions  

That's not my thinking.

I’m not sold on a few of the guys in this class. But these two recruits from Samoa are different. They have the size, speed and power, however, what they lack is training and coaching.

Neither one of these players was evaluated. Not because they’re some prospect hidden away in California such as a Wendell Taiese, or a kid in Miami like Feddie Davey. They’re all the way in America Samoa. Who on Scout, Rivals or ESPN is in charge of recruiting analysis down there? I’m not 100%, but I don’t believe that there are any.

There is a HUGE difference between a player being evaluated low and not being evaluated at all, but there’s an even greater difference between a kid not being evaluated from America Samoa, and a kid not being evaluated in the States.

These kids are projects, but the potential is most certainly there with their size, speed and power.

by MegaCoug on Jan 29, 2012 1:26 PM PST up reply actions  

This is kind of like being really high on a baseball prospect that is signed to a big bonus

out of the DR or Venezuela. The potential is all certainly there but the point is that he is so far away right now that it’s impossible to project what he will be like once he fills all the holes in his game. Clearly you’re taking the optimistic view that he can reach a very high level because clearly he has potential and upside otherwise why would we offer him? While, Brian and Kyle are playing it on the safe side and pointing out that so many things on and off the field could derail him before he ever really gets going.

"If you want your dreams to come true, don't sleep in."

by kelly20210 on Jan 29, 2012 1:57 PM PST up reply actions  

I watched the highlight tapes too.

I wasn’t super-impressed, but the kid has size and speed. What he does lack is football skills. This is something we would want him to work on with his teammates and coaches.

This class has 8 kids who weigh less than 180, and two more that weigh under 190. They could use a grayshirt much more than Barber, because they could spend that time lifting and preparing for the PAC-12 physically.

When talking about a recruit, you look at the whole spectrum. This kid has the physical gifts to be something special. Much more so than someone like Feddie Davey a 5’8" LB or any of our sub 5’10" receivers. Sure, they’re fast and polished, but unless they hit a major growth spurt, they’re pretty limited on overall potential, and will very much fit the “gimmick” label.

A 6’3" 290LB kid with only a few years of organized football experience in Samoa, is going to have much more potential, because he’s lacking in football knowledge, and football training. He needs more work on what he can learn, not on things he can’t change.

by MegaCoug on Jan 29, 2012 2:21 PM PST up reply actions  

Davey is coming as a safety, not a LB.

Also, really? You’re down on our receivers but high on Barber? “Sure they’ve got speed, great hands, and have been playing football their entire lives and won’t have to learn how to play against great competition, but they’re not 290 pounds, guys. They’re pretty limited.”

by Kyle Rancourt on Jan 29, 2012 2:34 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

That's if Davey is coming at all

According to his facebook (I didn’t look this is coming from a message board) he has offers from Clemson and Illinois that he’s mulling over.

Clemson would make a lot of sense for him since it is so much closer to home and he has a child.

www.twitter.com/nashcoug

by AirRaidCoug on Jan 29, 2012 2:39 PM PST up reply actions  

Well every recruit is coming

until they’re not. Bringing it up is silly because it’s pretty clear no one is a lock until Signing Day.

by Kyle Rancourt on Jan 29, 2012 2:41 PM PST up reply actions  

We have 4 WRs under 5'11" 180LBs in this class alone.

What about this says that they’re rare talents? These guys are already pretty close to their ceilings.

With Barber, he has much to learn, and has plenty of room to “sharpen his sword.” He has much greater potential to learn the game of football, learn the techniques, and take advantage of his 4-5 years at WSU.

Obviously not every kid should be a project, we do need the kids ready to come in and play. But when you have as many as 5-6 years to develop a player, I think it’s a good idea to plan on these guys being able to make a much greater impact in years 3-5 than they do in their first 2 years.

Take Gino Simone for example, who has had his best year so far as true freshman in 2009. He was slightly taller at 6’0" and a bigger target for his QBs, but was pretty much undersized, despite being ready to play out of high school. One of his biggest issues has been staying healthy due to his lack of size for PAC-12 play. Unfortunately, as a highly touted recruit, he has been pretty disappointing so far.

by MegaCoug on Jan 29, 2012 3:05 PM PST up reply actions  

Health is not Simone's biggest issue.

Not being as good as most of the other receivers on the roster is.

by Jeff Nusser on Jan 29, 2012 3:15 PM PST up reply actions  

Health isn't all of it, but is certainly part of it.

But I only said it was ONE of his biggest issues, not his only issue. Even then, it’s an issue that is a product of his being a smaller wide receiver. Because of his size, he has had health issues, and he also hasn’t been as good as his teammates who are larger targets, such as Marquess Wilson and Jared Karstetter.

However, my point in bringing up Simone, is that he’s pretty similar to a lot of the receivers we’re bringing in this year. He’s smaller, was supposed to be quicker, with superior route running and catching skills. But he hasn’t developed much since coming to WSU. This is exactly why I am much more excited about the potential of a 6’3" 290lb kid out of Samoa, who has a lot to learn and will redshirt, than I do about guys like Marks, Jackson and Lewis. There isn’t much to build on with those guys.

by MegaCoug on Jan 29, 2012 3:36 PM PST up reply actions  

No no no.

Simone is nowhere near these guys. He ran a what, 4.65 in high school? Lewis alone is running in the low 4.4s. Simone was never ever labeled a burner.

by Kyle Rancourt on Jan 29, 2012 3:37 PM PST up reply actions  

You want to compare it to Rickey Galvin

Getting flattened once every 5-8 carries? He was lightening quick all season, but only had 2 games with more than 12 carries.

How long are these kids going to stay healthy going up against bigger and faster competition than they faced in high school? I guess that must be the reason for bringing in so many of them, isn’t it?

by MegaCoug on Jan 29, 2012 3:43 PM PST up reply actions  

It wasn't the scrum that was flattening him.

He was getting blown up by linebackers and safeties in space from what I recall. This is the same part of the field where we’re going to expect these wide receivers to be playing in.

When these guys are giving up up to 30 pounds on the safeties, it isn’t going to be much different of a result.

Don’t get me wrong, these guys could be very good. But I disagree that any of them have more upside than Barber.

by MegaCoug on Jan 29, 2012 3:55 PM PST up reply actions  

It is, but at the same time it isn't.

The fact is, these kids are going to get hit. Whether it’s going through the middle of the field on a crossing route, or if they’re running in space.

The fact that they’re so small is the issue here. Not so much the position they play. When they get hit by a guy 30 pounds bigger than them, or much more than that, they aren’t going to last as long as a guy who is bigger.

It’s just going to be more likely that they take some shots at inside receiver on crossing routes. I would prefer bigger receivers, and I would have much rather seen these kids recruited to play cornerback.

by MegaCoug on Jan 29, 2012 4:06 PM PST up reply actions  

If you understand the skill set required to play inside receiver for Leach

Then you understand why the players he’s recruiting to play that position are not any bigger than they are.

by Jeff Nusser on Jan 29, 2012 4:09 PM PST up reply actions  

Bigger players can play the position

They don’t have to be 5’8" to 5’11" and 160 to 180 pounds. The skill set has nothing to do with size.

by MegaCoug on Jan 29, 2012 4:14 PM PST up reply actions  

Umm...

Ask yourself who on the opposing D an inside receiver would match up with, and what their speed/quickness profile is likely to be.

Then ask yourself who on the opposing D an outside receiver is likely to match up with, and what their size/height profile is likely to be.

What profiles do you want your IR and OR to be to give you the best leverage?

#CougHarmonyOnTwitter #teamnopants

by TiltingRight on Jan 29, 2012 7:44 PM PST up reply actions  

Galvin was seeking out contact in some sort of effort to prove he was tough

I’m guessing these WRs will be smart enough not to do the same.

And after watching that video of Barber, I’d probably agree with you that he has more upside since he has now set the bar so very, very low. I believe Kyle was incredibly kind in his evaluation.

by Jeff Nusser on Jan 29, 2012 4:03 PM PST up reply actions  

Barber wouldn't be recruited if not for his upside

He’s big, quick, and has a lot to learn. If he didn’t have “potential,” “upside,” or wasn’t in some way “under the radar” due to his playing in Samoa, I don’t see any reason why Leach would have recruited him.

Sorry, but I’m going to go with the fact that Leach and Salave’a have offered him a scholarship over Kyle’s assessment here.

Not saying he’s the next Holati Ngata or anything, but I don’t get why we’re ripping on me or the kid here. All I’ve said, is that this kid could become very good given his size, strength and quickness and that he has a lot he can learn about the game of football.

by MegaCoug on Jan 29, 2012 4:27 PM PST up reply actions  

Kyle's assessment is based on that video.

In that video, he is neither big nor quick. The guy in that video is not a BCS player.

Obviously, it’s safe to assume he’s developed, given what you stated — that he was offered a scholarship. But for goodness sake, if I showed that video to you guys three weeks ago and asked for an honest evaluation, I’m confident it would not have been as glowing as what is being written here.

If you want to say that you trust Leach and Salave’a, I think that’s perfectly reasonable. If you want to say that this video shows that this kid has the potential to be awesome, I’d say you’re not being honest.

by Jeff Nusser on Jan 29, 2012 4:31 PM PST up reply actions  

absolutely.

i like them taking a guy like barber. But I’m far more excited about the group of WRS coming in (and will be even more so if Dozier and/or Lawler are added to the group.

by oscarthecoug on Jan 29, 2012 11:30 PM PST up reply actions  

or the fact is that for Leach's offense to operate effectively,

many receivers are needed. Mark wrote a whole article about it

During Leach’s last four seasons at Texas Tech, an average of 11.75 wide receivers saw at least one target per season.

http://www.cougcenter.com/2012/1/10/2662548/mike-leach-offense-wsu-cougars-wide-receivers-marquess-wilson

by sdcoug09 on Jan 29, 2012 3:49 PM PST up reply actions  

Say what you want and believe what you will

But I think it’s pretty clear at this point that he was simply overvalued by recruiting services thanks to catching passes from Jake Heaps. He was healthy this year. He couldn’t get on the field. Period.

by Jeff Nusser on Jan 29, 2012 3:40 PM PST up reply actions  

Don't forget that Chris Fetters rated him and he had a UW offer

I heard that Fetters is no longer allowed to rate players anymore because he’d boost guys with UW offers.

Simone was a 3-star 72nd best WR on Rivals.

www.twitter.com/nashcoug

by AirRaidCoug on Jan 29, 2012 3:42 PM PST up reply actions  

Heaps got passed up at BYU, too.

Now he’s transferred to Kansas in hopes of more playing time.

by MegaCoug on Jan 29, 2012 3:45 PM PST up reply actions  

I watched a lot of BYU football this season.

Heaps struggled a lot with the tougher part of their schedule early on. He played well towards the end of the season. I felt the transfer had more to do with him not meshing with the coaching staff. Mendenhall is defensive minded and seems to prefer less of a risk taker at QB. We play BYU week 1 next season and you will see what I’m talking about in terms of Nelson.

"If you want your dreams to come true, don't sleep in."

by kelly20210 on Jan 29, 2012 3:57 PM PST up reply actions  

Why are guys that are under 5'11" 180 lbs "pretty close to their ceilings?"

You’re only thinking about the physical aspects. They have plenty to learn still. You can’t just combine a bunch of WRs in to a group like weight and height, there’s still to many other variables like speed and route running that put holes in to your argument.

2 of our WR commits played the majority of their HS snaps at RB. They still have plenty to learn and are nowhere near their ceilings.

www.twitter.com/nashcoug

by AirRaidCoug on Jan 29, 2012 3:22 PM PST up reply actions  

"What about this says that they’re rare talents?"

Their incredible speed? Their ability to make guys who are attempting to tackle them miss? Their ability to score touchdowns?

Playing devil’s advocate, what about a 6’3, 290 pound guys says he’s a rare talent? A lot of football players are big.

by Kyle Rancourt on Jan 29, 2012 3:36 PM PST up reply actions  

re: rare talent

Planet theory:

Of course, this is assuming that Barber is as big and athletic as I believe he is. Not a concrete fact.

but Im very excited about Marks, Jackson , Lewis, and it’d be awesome if Dozier and/or Lawler choose WSU.

by oscarthecoug on Jan 29, 2012 3:45 PM PST up reply actions  

That assumes that big guys can play.

My whole problem with this discussion is that I’m not sure Barber can. Liking his size is fine. But believing he’s some super duper athlete isn’t.

by Kyle Rancourt on Jan 29, 2012 4:28 PM PST up reply actions  

Do we need first hand super duper players to play in the PAC-12 games?

Or do we need a team player who makes the little stuff into big gains?

If My Life Is Great, Why Am I Not Happy?

by well you win some and lose others on Jan 29, 2012 4:36 PM PST up reply actions  

Barber doesn't make the little stuff into big gains

mostly because it’s his job to play defense. If he’s making the little stuff into big gains, we have a problem.

Also, I’d say yes, we need super duper players to play in Pac 12 games.

by Kyle Rancourt on Jan 29, 2012 4:38 PM PST up reply actions  

As for whether guys need to be "super duper"

Realize that playing football in a strong BCS conference is the pinnacle of the sport for a given age group (those who are fewer than three years from graduating high school) in the U.S. (and, for all intents and purposes, the world). There are only six BCS conferences with about 12 teams each, and 85 scholarships on each team, spread out over 4 or 5 class years. To compete and win against peer institutions, your players have to be among the very best in the world. Can there be some guys who aren’t that great, but are far enough out on their development curve to be effective? Yeah. You definitely need to try to use as many of your 85 scholarships as you can on “super duper” players, though.

Yes, you should follow another Coug-related account on Twitter: @425CougFan

by Fractal on Jan 29, 2012 6:02 PM PST up reply actions  

He's not exactly built like Matt Eichelberger

Those Samoan kids are known for their size and strength, and Barber was tossing around many of them close to the same size as him, with what looked to be not a whole lot of effort.

I just think that with a kid with Barber’s size and strength, and limited football experience. He has a lot more upside than a lot of other kids out there. He isn’t starting at quite as high of a base, but there is definitely the room for him to learn.

He’s a kid with power and size, and is being brought in to play a position demanding power and size. If we can teach him to shed some blocks, and harass some quarterbacks, he could be very good.

by MegaCoug on Jan 29, 2012 3:51 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah I'm not sure what video you watched.

But at no point was he tossing anyone around. He sorta lucked into a bunch of tackles.

by Kyle Rancourt on Jan 29, 2012 4:29 PM PST up reply actions  

Matt Eichelberger was a

3 star DT and well thought of in his recruit set.

If you can't Go Cougs... don't go.

by hollyweirdcoug on Jan 29, 2012 9:26 PM PST up reply actions  

Not sure what changed

By the time he saw the field as a senior, he looked like a pear on a couple of toothpicks.

by Jeff Nusser on Jan 29, 2012 9:31 PM PST up reply actions  

sort of why I mentioned ME's 3 stars

it is so often dependent on the work ethic of the kid and the team— that set and the one before it just didn’t hit the weight room or the training table due to Doba’s failed lenient policies for those aspects. The

Not meant as a Doba bashing thread opener, just a sad reality and result of that era’s collapse.

If you can't Go Cougs... don't go.

by hollyweirdcoug on Jan 29, 2012 9:53 PM PST up reply actions  

You so are right

I you wanted to go through Doba classes, there wasn’t a huge difference in rating starts compared to current classses.

Around these parts, a man could get hurt for wearing purple.

by PullManiac on Jan 29, 2012 9:58 PM PST up reply actions  

I don't know if this is a good analogy

but I am sure that many can relate an experience of a “Joe Tallguy” who was either 6’4 or 6’5 in middle school or high school that had poor coordination and was not one of the best 12 players that tried our for the basketball team. Still Joe Tallguy winds up on the squad because the coach wants the height and thinks he can work with it. Coaches love this kind of stuff. It gives them a “project” to work with based on a foundation of needed size and raw ability. I am excited for our new Samoan Cougs. They are lviing the dream to come to the mainland and play big time football and the coaches are lving their dream of developing good football players.

Around these parts, a man could get hurt for wearing purple.

by PullManiac on Jan 29, 2012 12:57 PM PST reply actions  

And

While you may not pass the ball to Aron Baynes that much, there is some value that is obtained by having him on the team.

by WazzuCrew11 on Jan 29, 2012 1:03 PM PST up reply actions  

i don't think anyone is claiming

that every single kid is the next big thing or that everyone on the roster is awesome. Maybe i don’t hang around on cougfan.com enough. I hear they are bit too rosy there. But just calling someone a sleeper, even, doesn’t mean they are great or anywhere near a sure thing. It means, they may be under the radar or raw, and definitely risky (especially to rely on very many of your recruits to be like that). But they may have more potential to develop into more than just depth. And potential doesn’t mean they will either. Not all players around 2 stars or unranked are the same. Not the same upside, not the same downside, not the same risk, not the same degree of really knowing what you’re getting.

I know of some Husky fans who were high on Barber before the Cougs were in on him. I think he has more upside than some of the other recruits who are more under the radar. He may not reach it. I think it’s legitimate to think he may develop more in a few years than someone who’s had great coaching for the past 8 years or so and much more development already. I wouldn’t want to build much of a roster this way, but worth a shot, i think especially at DT, a position where there just isn’t usually as much depth as other positions.

by oscarthecoug on Jan 29, 2012 1:07 PM PST reply actions  

I actually agree.

I’m fine with taking a shot on kids like Vaeao and Barber because the entire class isn’t guys just like them. The problem with a lot of Wulff’s guys were just that; they were all “sleepers” or “diamonds in the rough”. It’s fine to label a few guys that way, but you can’t have 25 sleepers. Just doesn’t work that way. I still disagree on how you interpret the term sleeper, because if it simply means they could be something down the road, then there’s no reason to use it. All kids with low rankings coming out of HS could maybe be ok in a few years. That doesn’t mean they’re sleepers. It means they were evaluated properly.

by Kyle Rancourt on Jan 29, 2012 1:35 PM PST up reply actions  

as i said, to me, sleeper means more to do with upside.

And Wulff may have had some (but I agree with you you just can’t rely on a whole class of them). And that’s what Wulff had (at best).

To illustrate, I think Barber is a sleeper. I don’t think Feddie Davey is. I think barber has more athleticism for his size/position and more potential to be a great player. But he’s also more likely to have little value than Davey (in my opinion). He’s more raw and has to develop and he may not. Davey is more limited by size/speed/being a tweener, but he’s been coached well and played for years in Florida. I think you know more what you’re getting and it’s a somewhat limited player who could also be good depth and good special teams player, and has a lower floor than Barber. He can also likely contribute sooner. I think you want a some of both type of player in your class (assuming you can’t just load up on the big ones), but not a lot of either. Obviously to sustain success your going to need the bulk of your class to be at least 3* guys who have both higher upside and are a little more polished.

by oscarthecoug on Jan 29, 2012 2:36 PM PST up reply actions  

Ok, I can get behind this.

I think we’re just arguing semantics at this point anyway, which is probably pointless. I think you’re right when talking about the different kinds of players. A guy like Davey probably has a lower ceiling, but I think he also has a higher floor. He already knows how to play football, and realistically, we’re going to have to teach Barber how.

by Kyle Rancourt on Jan 29, 2012 2:40 PM PST up reply actions  

Now I get it..

I was just on coug fan….I see the optimism and use of the word “pipeline”….both are verboten here I get it…

Back in the mid to late 80’s we landed the “NEXT BIG THING” the OFFENSIVE LINEMAN OF THE YEAR for the STATE OF WASHINGTON…. a 3 or 4 star guy…he ended up being not such a wonderful talent…started a handful of games.

The point is ALL of recruiting is speculative. Nothing wrong with being excited about ALL of “OUR GUYS”… what is the harm in this?

by gocougs1989 on Jan 29, 2012 1:34 PM PST reply actions  

There isn't harm

I understand being excited about commits coming in, I’m just asking for a dose of reality. He’s a project that’s very raw in terms of football skill. A lot of things have to go right for him to hit whatever his potential is — and, really, he hasn’t been playing football for that long; we have no idea what his potential is.

Be excited Coach Salave’a is putting in work in American Samoa. Be excited there’s another future Cougar. Just be careful and measure your expectations accordingly.

by Brian Floyd on Jan 29, 2012 1:37 PM PST up reply actions   2 recs

I agree.

with this..
“Be excited Coach Salave’a is putting in work in American Samoa. Be excited there’s another future Cougar. Just be careful and measure your expectations accordingly.”

by gocougs1989 on Jan 29, 2012 1:39 PM PST up reply actions  

I think this is the reason people are more excited about this kid then maybe they should be

They are excited to see the work Salvae’a is doing in American Samoa and are excited to see what he is able to bring in and get out of them. While I think most have a realistic idea that his kid is going to take time to develop. It is definitely more exciting to see what is going to happen with the “pipeline” that Leached talked about obtaining with Samoan athletes. Everyone is buying into what Leach is selling and this is the first evidence of what he in-visioned happening here.

by WazzuCrew11 on Jan 29, 2012 1:45 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Big Joe and Leach are priming the pump...would not call it a pipeline yet but

a pipeline is built and at first is a small trickle…Samoan’s are very much about family and community, landing two guys from home..will lead to more opportunities in the future. I am excited by the long term picture, getting two guys from Samoa, who can help recruit more future cougs.

by gocougs1989 on Jan 29, 2012 1:54 PM PST up reply actions  

More excited that what?

I’m excited that we picked up a “raw talent” kid from American Samoa rather than an "under the radar guy" from FL/TX/CA. I think there is more "potential" in a guy that already has the size and speed, but needs to work on his D1 game. Hopefully, the coaches will turn him into a productive player down the road. Plus, American Samoa has a good track record of sending guys to play D1 ball. I’m sure a lot of those guys were also "raw talent".

by CougTime on Jan 29, 2012 2:00 PM PST reply actions  

Most males around the world play a different kind of football

Around these parts, a man could get hurt for wearing purple.

by PullManiac on Jan 29, 2012 2:46 PM PST up reply actions  

Football that envolves mostly a foot.

Well, what do you know?

If My Life Is Great, Why Am I Not Happy?

by well you win some and lose others on Jan 29, 2012 3:01 PM PST up reply actions  

Samoa's entire population is like 180,000.

also, I would like to see where you got this information from.

by Kyle Rancourt on Jan 29, 2012 3:41 PM PST up reply actions  

Well that's flawed.

First it talks about all Pacific Islanders, including Fiji, Tonga, and Hawai’i. Second, it’s just of Samoan decent, not strictly from Samoa.

by Kyle Rancourt on Jan 29, 2012 4:39 PM PST up reply actions  

Not that I believe getting Samoan guys is a bad thing

just that the fact he’s Samoan doesn’t automatically make him a better recruit, which was what your original post seemed to imply.

by Kyle Rancourt on Jan 29, 2012 4:39 PM PST up reply actions  

No I don't think that being Samoan makes him a better recruit

Being the best 2 players out of a population of 55,000 is like being the best 2 players in Lewiston-Clarkston’s Metro. That doesn’t excite me.

I saw that Samoan stat and being a statistician I thought it was interesting. Hell, it’d be interesting if the number was 4 to 5 times higher. I wonder what that ratio is with inner city African Americans and basketball.

www.twitter.com/nashcoug

by AirRaidCoug on Jan 29, 2012 4:59 PM PST up reply actions  

Hope and Reality

I think that this class is full of under the radar sleepers that will be the next best thing. It really doesn’t matter what the definition is in the dictionary. I believe it and my guess is a lot of you guys think it too or else you wouldn’t be trolling these message boards. I sure wouldn’t be here reading the comments to get my hopes down. I have a ton of hope and a pretty good feeling that coach Leach knows what the hell he is doing. Be careful about getting my hopes up? Why? I have nothing to lose by getting my hopes up! In fact getting my hopes will make the next 6 months that much more awesome! I will face "reality" when the season starts. In fact I hope that reality is better than the 7 or 8 wins I am hoping for next year! Just saying… Go Cougs!

Not the original SoCal Coug... just another Coug Fan in SoCal. Go Cougs!

by SoCal Coug on Jan 29, 2012 3:35 PM PST reply actions  

If you laugh at my take on a recruit

then shouldn’t we laugh and dismiss your take on that same player?

I agree that stars are a flawed way to look at players, but it’s the best system we have in place. I never said anything definitively. Because you played with a guy one time who didn’t pan out doesn’t mean this guy will.

by Kyle Rancourt on Jan 29, 2012 4:34 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm pretty sure he was commenting on the banter back and forth not your write up

And I would have to agree with him, that it has become somewhat comical the extreme sides people are taking over this kid and his “potential”. It seems (through these comments) that this kid is somewhere in between a first round NFL pick and someone who will not even make the practice squad come spring.

by WazzuCrew11 on Jan 29, 2012 4:56 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

KR, You miss my point

I am not saying that these recruits will or will not be great players, what I am saying is Leach knows what kind of players he wants and must see something we do not have the resources to evaluate.

by GCoug on Jan 29, 2012 6:25 PM PST up reply actions  

In this case

Yes. Kyle admitted “all I’m going off of right now is that video you see above. It’s a two minute and twenty-three second highlight tape.” As a result of that, nothing substantive was said and animosity was created between fans.

by sooshi on Jan 29, 2012 7:33 PM PST up reply actions  

I don't think Kyle "admitted" anything.

Kyle said “here’s what it looks like with a caveat.” That’s perfectly reasonable – that’s what we do around here. That others decided to go in an odd direction is hardly his fault.

by Jeff Nusser on Jan 29, 2012 7:54 PM PST up reply actions  

Same thing

It is obvious that he knew from before posting this article it would be provocative. Provocative because there wasn’t much to go on and he made definitive statements anyway.

by sooshi on Jan 29, 2012 8:25 PM PST up reply actions  

I don't believe this at all

There really isn’t anything provocative in the article. He just made his opinion based on what he saw and put it in that context. People need to realize that all articles are written with a certain perspective by the individual who writes them up. Kyle writes his reviews in a certain way. I enjoy them and think they are done well and gives you a good baseline of the new recruit. I don’t always agree with what he sees but I can clearly see where he obtained his opinion from. While I do think Kyle is a little more critical of the recruits then most fans, it is his way of keeping it in perspective and not ZOMGing over everyone.

by WazzuCrew11 on Jan 29, 2012 8:44 PM PST up reply actions   2 recs

Here's the instant rec

Around these parts, a man could get hurt for wearing purple.

by PullManiac on Jan 29, 2012 9:19 PM PST up reply actions  

It helps you get rec'd

CougCenter authors are the best!

CougCenter OG since 9/2/2008 | @TheSoCalCoug

by SoCalCoug on Jan 29, 2012 9:19 PM PST up reply actions  

I guess the writers on this site have very thin skin. They can take exception to your post, but how dar

by GCoug on Jan 29, 2012 9:21 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Nope.

It’s more just a matter of understanding we already have an established community here. We know there are going to be some bumps along the way for new people until they get used to how we do things. This isn’t the Seattle Times comment section, you know?

by Jeff Nusser on Jan 29, 2012 9:40 PM PST up reply actions  

Crude and unrefined

This kid is raw and because of his size and mobility, he’s being compared to other Samoan greats without playing a down of college football instead of being looked at like he should be, as a raw player who is going to sit for at least one year, his redshirt, to learn the intricacies of the position and the college game and then provide depth. A year or two of strength and conditioning could be what allows someone like Barber to get some minutes on a defensive line rotation a year or two from now, depending on development.

I watched the 60 Minutes special and it was amazing watching these kids play in ‘70s athletic gear and terrible fields. It was even more amazing to see the total number of players in the NFL and in college in regards to their small population. Obviously the players from Samoa that are coming are raw, but you would have to assume Joe Salava’e has enough connections to note the players who he is reaching out to have the athletic ability and are known well enough for it to be given scholarships based on their potential.

For all we know, Salava’e could be on to something and Barber and Destiny Vaeao are players with a ton of natural athletic ability who are crude and unrefined, but with some solid coaching could become more than just depth and become solid players.

by jeremyb91 on Jan 29, 2012 4:56 PM PST reply actions  

One of the problems I have with the Cougar Fanbase in general:

We have an unsatiable desire for big linemen on either side of the ball. In some forums I’m seeing people call for two or three more linemen even though we already have so many committed, and for every new lineman commit, it is soon followed by comments talking about how great they’re going to be, and how much we “need” this and this allows many to overlook the flaws. It’s like we see someone with a big body and immediately think “THIS WILL SURELY SOLVE ALL OUR PROBLEMS!”

by msgp501st on Jan 29, 2012 5:37 PM PST via mobile reply actions  

It's insane to me that everyone wants more big men

WSU signed a class of lineman — seriously, it was like all linemen — last year. Now, the defense is shifting to a three-man front and an even more spread look on offense. Sooooo…..

by Brian Floyd on Jan 29, 2012 7:44 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm kinda curious what you mean about the spread offense

when talking about the size of the linemen and not wanting more of them. Are you saying we should see smaller more athletic guys rather then big less agile guys? I don’t really know what the typical size lineman Leach used at TT was.

by WazzuCrew11 on Jan 29, 2012 8:12 PM PST up reply actions  

Sure, it'll cut into the TEs because there will be none

RBs? Maybe, maybe not. Leach used two-back sets at TTU quite a bit, so there’s that. He’ll also need different types of running backs.

The point is that the rallying cry has been “WHERES THE DAMN BEEF?” when in reality, there’s been a whole lot of lineman coming through recently. On the defensive side, hybrids and linebackers will cut into where the linemen were. On the offensive side, sure, you still need the same number of linemen, but as you can see he needs a whole lot more skill players than he has right now.

The conventional wisdom is that games are won up-front, and that’s fine and true. Except the systems being employed here are a bit different. It’s less about knocking the defense out on offense and more about playing in space with skill guys. On defense, the linebackers will have a much bigger role, with the linemen more there to fill space.

by Brian Floyd on Jan 29, 2012 8:48 PM PST up reply actions  

He's perfect for it

He’s an outside linebacker already, basically, so he’ll slot right in. If you’re looking for what those hybrid guys look like, Mayes is your example. Not big enough to be a lineman, great rush moves, understands leverage and can come off the edge.

by Brian Floyd on Jan 29, 2012 8:52 PM PST up reply actions  

I can't wait

He showed some flashes last year that make me think he can be a special player.

by Couginthepink on Jan 29, 2012 8:55 PM PST via Android app up reply actions  

I don't think most people saw it

But in practice it was easy to see how developed his technique is. He has a great understanding of pad level and leverage, and uses them to his advantage. He’s also got an excellent repertoire of rush moves and would regularly burn the first-team line with them.

by Brian Floyd on Jan 29, 2012 8:57 PM PST up reply actions  

Right, I completely agree on the Defensive side

and all the changes that are going to be made and not needing as much beef on the line. I was just confused about how you saw the spreed offense related to not needing more big offensive lineman.

by WazzuCrew11 on Jan 29, 2012 8:59 PM PST up reply actions  

Posted a fanpost about this...
The point is that the rallying cry has been "WHERES THE DAMN BEEF?" when in reality, there’s been a whole lot of lineman coming through recently.

www.twitter.com/nashcoug

by AirRaidCoug on Jan 29, 2012 9:19 PM PST up reply actions  

You can always glance at

past Texas Tech recruiting classes to maybe try to find a pattern of what Leach likes to pick up. Due to homework constraints, I don’t have time to do the numbers, but I can see that there is always a good sized handful of linemen in each class

Around these parts, a man could get hurt for wearing purple.

by PullManiac on Jan 29, 2012 8:23 PM PST up reply actions  

Who knew a recruiting post could stir up so many comments.

Kyle Rancourt – CougCenter’s Most Polarizing Author

CougCenter OG since 9/2/2008 | @TheSoCalCoug

by SoCalCoug on Jan 29, 2012 9:23 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

Boom!

CougCenter OG since 9/2/2008 | @TheSoCalCoug

by SoCalCoug on Jan 29, 2012 9:27 PM PST up reply actions  

It could be worse

Cal had over 300 comments waiting for a kid to commit today only to have him go to Oregon, but they were just happy he didn’t go to UW. We are being overly Optimistic about our guys and they are being overly negative, “They are DOOOMED” yet look who has the more talented recruits. Kinda funny if you ask me.

by WazzuCrew11 on Jan 29, 2012 9:29 PM PST up reply actions  

Gotta say, this one is my favorite.

"Tonight, we skate with them. Tonight, we stay with them. And we shut them down because we can!" | Herb Brooks

by Coug999 on Jan 29, 2012 9:43 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

I loved

How many times he changed into different Oregon stuff on that episode.

by WazzuCrew11 on Jan 29, 2012 9:44 PM PST up reply actions  

..... and that makes him one of the most interesting

subject author for Cougcenter.

If My Life Is Great, Why Am I Not Happy?

by well you win some and lose others on Jan 29, 2012 11:49 PM PST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to CougCenter, a website dedicated to WSU football, basketball and other athletics.

Community Guidelines

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Brianheadshot_small
Where Did You Come From And How Did You Get Here?

Recent FanPosts

Rainbow-caught-on-moffitt-wooly-bugger1_small
Its Memorial Day weekend and I’ve already skipped ahead to Labor Day.
Brianheadshot_small
OT: Teaching Football Signals
Small
Per Cougfan.. Walden is out
Worldtraveler_small
OTFP: Greatest Player You've Ever Seen?
Cougar_01t_small
Bone-in or Bone-out?
Small
Vote for ESPN College Game Day to come to Pullman!
Jeff_mug_h2_small
Live In Spokane? Possess A DVD Recorder? Or Even A VCR? I Need Your Help
Small
OTFP: Best/Worst Trophy
Small
Just noticed this about The Crimson and Grey Game

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

A UW "Swagga Suit" - yes, it's a real thing.

Recent FanShots

1931 Rose Bowl Highlight Reel
1916 Rose Bowl Highlight "reel"
Pac-12 Blog talks to DC Mike Breske
Bill Moos interview - pirates of the palouse.
Interview with Drew Bledsoe
Klay Thompson 6th In ROY voting
Tell us: Between Mike Leach and Craig James, who gets your vote?
Wulff lands job with 49ers
New 'Friday Night Lights' Movie: Leaked* Script Reveals Mike Leach Storyline

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Go Cougs


Attractive, intelligent managing editors

Jeff_mug_h2_small Jeff Nusser

62817_716885768283_27206155_40333453_7664553_n_small Grady Clapp

Arizona_small Craig Powers

Brianheadshot_small Brian Floyd

Header_small Mark Sandritter

Attractive, intelligent editors

Worldtraveler_small Kyle Rancourt