clock menu more-arrow no yes mobile

Filed under:

O'Bannon vs. NCAA features cameo by WSU, Gonzaga

The rival schools came up in testimony by an NCAA witness regarding competition, but the judge wasn't impressed.


The biggest trial in the history of college athletics is set to come to a close tomorrow, but WSU made a little cameo in the proceedings of O'Bannon vs. the NCAA today when an NCAA witness used Washington State and Gonzaga to try and illustrate a point.

Without getting too deep into the nitty gritty of the trial, which you can read all about here if you've not been keeping up, former UCLA basketball player Ed O'Bannon is suing for the right of college athletes to profit from their name, image and likeness. What exactly that looks like is to be determined (presuming O'Bannon wins, and all signs point that direction), but one obvious model includes universities directly compensating players.

The NCAA, of course, would like you to believe that would significantly shift competitive balance.

The judge, though, wasn't having any of it.

I can see the NCAA's point to some degree; if colleges are allowed to give money to players, major conference schools theoretically have more money to redistribute to the players than small conference schools do. Greater direct compensation could make WSU more attractive than Gonzaga in spite of facilities challenges.

However, I can't help but laugh at the NCAA using WSU and Gonzaga as its examples, given that if it came down to paying players, I remain unconvinced that Gonzaga would actually have less money to spend on labor when you look at the relative investments in the two programs by their schools.

But even if the NCAA is correct, I think Kyle Sherwood speaks for all of us.